Optimal PEEP guided by Esophageal pressure in ARDS: Myth or Reality?

Authors

  • เพชร วัชรสินธุ์ แผนกโรคทางระบบทางเดินหายใจและเวชบำบัดวิกฤต กองอายุรกรรม รพ.พระมงกุฎเกล้า

References

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 327 - 336.

Beitler RJ, Sarge T, Banner-Goodspeed VM, et al. Effect of titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with an esophageal pressure-guided strategy vs an empirical high PEEP-FiO2 strategy on death and days free from mechanical ventilation among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321: 846 - 857.

Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, et al. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2095 - 2104.

Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice guideline: mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1253 - 1263.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

How to Cite

1.
วัชรสินธุ์ เ. Optimal PEEP guided by Esophageal pressure in ARDS: Myth or Reality?. Clin Crit Care [Internet]. 2019 Jun. 24 [cited 2024 Jun. 17];27(1):19-22. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ccc/article/view/250292

Issue

Section

TSCCM Journal Watch