Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
232
Regarding the pressure ratio cuto value of 0.62,
which is quite low compared with other reports
2,9
, this
gure was selected as a reassuring cuto, not the revision
one. As the specicity of the test suggested, some patients
whose measurement exceeded these criteria eventually
fell into the insignicant residual outow stenosis at the
sonographic follow-up. is implies that even if both
proposed criteria are met, the surgeon should logically
identify the culprit location and consider the possibility of
further resection without scarifying the pulmonary valve
integrity before commencing the second pump run. e
reason behind this is possibly due to the heterogeneous
nature of postoperative Fallot’s outow tract restriction
(i.e., xed or dynamic)
10
, which, unfortunately, might
need intraoperative echocardiography to dierentiate.
3
Unsurprisingly, the patients who needed the pulmonary
valve ring enlarged performed worse than those with an
intact pulmonary valve ring in terms of the pulmonary
valve integrity and in-hospital care duration (Table 2).
In contrast to a previous report
8
, our study demonstrated
better in-hospital outcomes among the patients with
signicant residual outow tract obstruction (shorter
ICU and hospital stay). is result could probably be
attributed to the eect of the transannular approach and
the resultant pulmonary insuciency rather than the
gradient itself (the transannular patching requirement
of the patients with insignificant residual stenosis
was almost triple that of the signicant counterpart,
Table 3).
It is to be noted that our study had limitations due
to its retrospective nature and short period of follow-up.
Also, changes in the outow tract gradient over time
were monitored only in selected patients. Furthermore,
as we did not have a patient with critical residual outow
tract obstruction in our series, the diagnostic cuto of
such a condition was, therefore, unattainable. Longer-
term follow-up of such a ‘signicant’ patient is needed
to elucidate the clinical signicance of such ndings.
CONCLUSION
In the setting without intraoperative transesophageal
echocardiography, the direct measurement of right
ventricular pressure can predict the adequacy of outow
tract reconstruction during the repair of tetralogy patients.
Adding an absolute pressure criterion of 49 mmHg to
the pressure ratio could prevent unnecessary surgical
revision and protect pulmonary valve integrity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Sasima
Tongsai from the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, who
performed the statistical analysis for this study.
Funding statement: is research received no specic
grant from any funding agency.
Conict of interest statement: None declared.
REFERENCES
1. Neill CA, Clark EB. Tetralogy of Fallot. e rst 300 years.
Tex Heart Inst J 1994;21: 272-9.
2. Boni L, Garcia E, Galletti L, Perez A, Herrera D, Romos V, et al.
Current strategies in tetralogy of Fallot repair: pulmonary valve
sparing and evolution of right ventricle/le ventricle pressures
ratio. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:885-9; discussion 889-
890. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.016.
3. Borodinova O, Mykychak Y, Yemets I. Transesophageal
Echocardiographic Predictor of Signicant Right Ventricular
Outow Tract Obstruction Aer Tetralogy of Fallot Repair.
Semin orac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;32:282-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.
semtcvs.2019.09.011.
4. Ferraz Cavalcanti PE, Sa MP, Santos CA, Esmeraldo IM, de
Escobar R, de Menezes AM, et al. Pulmonary valve replacement
aer operative repair of tetralogy of Fallot: meta-analysis and
meta-regression of 3,118 patients from 48 studies. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2013;62:2227-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.107.
5. Geva T. Indications and timing of pulmonary valve replacement
aer tetralogy of Fallot repair. Semin orac Cardiovasc Surg
Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2006;11-22. DOI: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2006.
02.009.
6. Egbe AC, Vallabhajosyula S, Connolly HM. Trends and outcomes
of pulmonary valve replacement in tetralogy of Fallot. Int J
Cardiol 2020;299:136-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.063.
7. Gellis L, Banka P, Marshall A, Emani S, Porras D. Transcatheter
balloon dilation for recurrent right ventricular outow tract
obstruction following valve-sparing repair of tetralogy of
Fallot. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:692-700. DOI:
10.1002/ccd.25930.
8. Chittithavorn V, Rergkliang C, Chetpaophan A, Vasinanukorn P,
Sopontammarak S, Promphan W. Predicted outcome aer
repair of tetralogy of Fallot by postoperative pressure ratio
between right and le ventricle. J Med Assoc ai 2006;89:
43-50.
9. Naito Y, Fujita T, Manabe H, Kawashima Y. e criteria for
reconstruction of right ventricular outow tract in total correction
of tetralogy of Fallot. J orac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;80:574-81.
10. Kaushal SK, Radhakrishanan S, Dagar KS, Lyer PU, Girotra S,
Shrivastava S, et al. Signicant intraoperative right ventricular
outow gradients aer repair for tetralogy of Fallot: to revise or
not to revise? Ann orac Surg 1999;68:1705-12; discussion
1712-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01069-3.
Nitayavardhanam et al.