Chutiporn Banyong, M.N.S.*, Wallada Chanruangvanich, D.N.S.**, Orapan Thosingha, D.N.S.**, Varut Lohsiriwat, M.D., Ph.D.***
*Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, **Department of Surgery, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand, ***Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included patients who underwent elective major gastrointestinal surgery in a super tertiary hospital in Thailand. The data were collected using a uniform case record form including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. PPOI was defined using criteria of Vather et al. (2013). Predictive factors for PPOI were determined by multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 123 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 59.8 ± 12.7 years. The most common indication for surgery was gastrointestinal malignancy (96 patients, 78%), followed by an open approach (75 patients, 61%) and a combined general and epidural anesthesia (58 patients, 47%). Approximately 30% of patients had a history of smoking. Preoperative anxiety and depression were equally found in nine patients (7%). Twenty-seven patients (22%) experienced PPOI. The significant predictive factors of PPOI were having preoperative anxiety (OR = 6.26, 95% CI = 1.22–44.41, p = 0.046) and being unable to ambulate on postoperative day 1 (OR = 3.26, 95% CI =
1.25–8.50, p = 0.015).
Postoperative ileus (POI), or the temporary dysfunction of bowel motility, is one the most common complications following surgeries involving the gastrointestinal tract. It seems to be an inevitable event since the development of POI is induced in response to the surgery.1,2 Normally, POI is expected to resolve 2-3 days after surgery as a mechanism of bowel recovery.3 Therefore, POI that
lasts longer than this period is usually considered to be a pathological abnormality, or prolonged POI (PPOI). A wide variety of cutoff times and criteria have been used by studies to determine PPOI; however, 8-32% of patients suffer from PPOI following surgery.4–13
PPOI is known to burden both patients and the health care system. Numerous studies have reported that patients with PPOI are prone to develop postoperative
Corresponding author: Wallada Chanruangvanich E-mail: wallada.cha@mahidol.ac.th
All material is licensed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license unless otherwise stated.
complications4,9,13 that can lead to negative outcomes such as a prolonged length of stay9–11, increased reoperation rate and readmission rate6,9,11,14, and increased mortality rate.15 In terms of the health care system, PPOI increases the use of medical resources as well as the economic burden of the treatment.13
The literature has shown that several methods can reduce the incidence of PPOI such as laparoscopic surgery,7,9 chewing gum,16,17 coffee consumption,18 postoperative administration of mosapride19, and early enteral feeding.20,21 However, some interventions are not applicable in the clinical setting due to several limitations such as patients’ condition and health care providers’ competency. Moreover, although interventions are applied, the incidence of PPOI remains.
Several factors are associated with the development of PPOI such as age,6,7 body mass index (BMI),5,6,22 smoking status,4,6 time to first ambulation,12 previous abdominal surgery,5 and operative time.6 These factors have been shown to predict PPOI, mostly in retrospective studies of colorectal surgery patients, but conflicting results have been found. Therefore, the factors predicting PPOI in major gastrointestinal surgery remain unclear. In this study, the investigators selected factors based on their potential effect on gastrointestinal motility reported in the literature, including age, BMI, smoking status, preoperative anxiety and depression, and time to first ambulation.
In the literature, advanced age is known to increase the risk, severity, and duration of PPOI due to an imbalance between proinflammatory processes and pro- and anti- inflammatory mechanisms in older adults.23 In obese patients, it is more difficult to manipulate the fatty tissue surrounding the internal organs, thus resulting in more tissue inflammation and a higher rate of PPOI.24 Smoking might cause delayed bowel motility as a consequence of nicotine consumption.25 Anxiety and depression can release catecholamine, which affects the sympathetic innervation of the gastrointestinal tract, thus inhibiting bowel motility.26,27 Lastly, delayed ambulation might cause a lack of stretch stimulation to the gastrointestinal tract, which is a key factor to enhance intestinal smooth muscle motility and a lack of stimulation to parasympathetic innervation activity, thus decreasing intestinal smooth muscle motility.28
Therefore, the purpose of the study was to prospectively determine whether age, BMI, smoking status, time to first ambulation, and preoperative anxiety and depression predict PPOI in major gastrointestinal surgery in Thailand. In particular, the knowledge of such risk factors is crucial, as they could be used to screen patients with a high
probability of PPOI, monitor them closely, and manage them suitably to prevent the development of PPOI.
The sample size was calculated based on a previous study of intraabdominal surgery in which the rate of PPOI was 32.4%.13 With a power of test of 80% and a significance level of 5% (two-sided test), a sufficient sample size was 123 patients.
Population and samples
The study was conducted in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) scheduled for major gastrointestinal surgery in the Faculty of Medicine at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand from February to September 2020. The inclusion criteria were 1) having elective major gastrointestinal surgery;
2) having good consciousness (Glasgow Coma Score ≥ 13); 3) having a Mini-cog score ≥ 3 (patients aged ≥ 60 years); 4) having the ability to walk (with or without assistance); and 5) having the ability to communicate in the Thai language. Patients were excluded from the study if they underwent major gastrointestinal surgery due to trauma or laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Moreover, they were withdrawn from the study if they needed a postoperative ventilator or were discharged before postoperative day 4 and were unable to be contacted by phone.
Instruments
Patient record form: The data were collected by interviewing patients and from patients’ files. They were divided into three parts. Part 1 (demographic and preoperative data) included sex, age, height, weight, BMI, diagnosis, comorbidity, history of previous abdominal surgery, history of smoking, and method of bowel preparation. Part 2 (intra-operative data) included surgical approach, procedure, anesthetic technique, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Part 3 (postoperative data) included opioid used, time to first enteral feeding, time to first flatus and stool, time to first ambulation, nasogastric tube insertion, complications, reoperation, and length of postoperative stay.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) Thai version.29 The questionnaire was a self-reported survey comprising 14 items (seven items on the anxiety subscale and seven items on the depression subscale). It was interpreted from its scoring system (0–21 points) as non-case (0–7), doubtful case (8–10), and confirmed case (11–21). The questionnaire was translated into the Thai language and tested with patients with cancer.29 Both subscales presented good internal consistency, with
Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.8551 for the anxiety subscale and 0.8259 for the depression subscale. The questionnaire was used to identify preoperative anxiety and depression in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.30 Before the study, the questionnaire was tested with 30 patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery; the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.82 (unpublished data).
The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) Thai version.31 The FTND was a self-reported questionnaire comprising six items. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 10. A score of 0–4 was considered as very low to low nicotine dependence, 5 as moderate nicotine dependence, and 6–10 as high to very high nicotine dependence. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the Thai version of the FTND was 0.83 and the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.52.31
Prolonged postoperative ileus: The development of PPOI was determined based on the definition of PPOI by Vather et al.,32 which included five criteria; 1) nausea or vomiting, 2) the lack of tolerance to an oral diet within 24 hours, 3) the absence of flatus in 24 hours, 4) abdominal distension, and 5) radiologic results of ileus. PPOI was determined if at least two of the criteria were met on the fourth day after surgery. Radiologic evidence of ileus was assessed using the hospital database and the result was confirmed by a physician.
Data collection
Patients who met the inclusion criteria were approached preoperatively on an individual basis and informed about the details of the study together with the right to withdraw at any time. They were ensured that participation in this study would not affect the care and treatment they received. Once patients agreed to participate in the study, they were asked to provide written consent. The data were obtained through questionnaires, interviews, and patients’ files. On the first day of admission, patients were asked to complete the HADS questionnaire (15-20 minutes). Patients who had a history of smoking were also asked to complete the FTND questionnaire (5-10 minutes).
The investigators revisited patients on postoperative day 4 between 9 and 10 a.m. to assess whether they had experienced PPOI. However, during the data collection period, if patients needed a ventilator, they were withdrawn from the study. If patients were discharged before postoperative day 4, the investigators called them on postoperative day 4 to assess the development of PPOI.
This prospective observational study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (Si 838/2019).
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed by SPSS version 25 and descriptive statistics were generated. The relationships among the variables were analyzed using a Chi-square test. The powers of the predictive factors were analyzed using binary logistic regression. A p-value of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
During the study period, 132 patients initially met the inclusion criteria. However, nine patients were later excluded from the study: four because their operation was canceled, three because a prolonged postoperative ventilator was used, and two were lost in follow-up. As a result, 123 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 59.8 ± 12.7 years and 52% men. The most common indication for surgery was gastrointestinal malignancy (96 patients, 78%), followed by an open approach (75 patients, 61%) and a combined general and epidural anesthesia (58 patients, 47%). Nearly half (46%) had a history of previous abdominal surgery. The details of patients’ demographics and operative characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Approximately 30% of patients had a history of smoking and one-third of them had high to very high nicotine dependence (FTND score 6–10) (Table 2). The same proportion of patients had anxiety and depression preoperatively (7.3% and 7.3%, respectively) (Table 3). After the operation, around 50% of patients had their first oral feeding on postoperative day 1, first flatus on postoperative day 1, and first stool on postoperative day 2. Up to one-third got out of bed on postoperative day 2. Complications except PPOI were found in 9.8% of patients. Only 1.6% of patients required reoperation.
The median postoperative length of stay was five days (IQR 5-7).
As detailed in Table 4, PPOI was observed in 22% of patients undergoing elective major gastrointestinal surgery. In the PPOI group, most patients could not tolerate an oral diet within the first 24 hours (77.8%), had abdominal distension (70.4%), and had nausea/ vomiting (66.7%). Only a few patients had an absence of flatus/stool over 24 hours on postoperative day 4 (26%). In particular, PPOI was confirmed by X-ray in 63% of patients with PPOI.
Univariate analysis revealed that having preoperative anxiety (p = 0.025) and starting ambulation on or after postoperative day 2 (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with PPOI (Figs 1 & 2). According to the multivariate analysis, the significant predictive factors of PPOI were having preoperative anxiety (OR = 6.26,
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics and the development of prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) (n = 123).
Characteristics Sex | Overall n (%) | PPOI No (n = 96) | Yes (n = 27) |
Male | 64 (52%) | 52 (81.3%) | 12 (18.7%) |
Female | 59 (48%) | 44 (74.6%) | 15 (23.4%) |
Age (years) Early adulthood (22-40) | 14 (11.4%) | 11 (78.6%) | 3 (21.4%) |
Middle adulthood (41-60) | 44 (35.8%) | 32 (72.7%) | 12 (27.3%) |
Old age (> 60) | 65 (52.8%) | 53 (81.5%) | 12 (18.5%) |
Mean ± SD (years) | 59.8±12.7 | 60.1±12.1 | 58.9±14.7 |
BMI (kg/m2) < 18.5 | 13 (10.6%) | 10 (76.9%) | 3 (23.1%) |
18.5–22.9 | 53 (43.1%) | 38 (71.7%) | 15 (28.3%) |
23–27.5 | 35 (28.5%) | 30 (85.7%) | 5 (14.3%) |
> 27.5 | 22 (17.9%) | 18 (81.8%) | 4 (18.2%) |
Mean ± SD (kg/m2) | 24.34±6.90 | 24.62±6.82 | 23.40±7.04 |
Diagnosis Diseases of the liver | 25 (20.3%) | 24 (96%) | 1 (4%) |
Diseases of the pancreas | 13 (10.6%) | 5 (38.5%) | 8 (61.5%) |
Diseases of the biliary tract and gall bladder | 21 (17.1%) | 14 (66.7%) | 7 (33.3%) |
Diseases of the stomach and small intestine | 7 (5.7%) | 4 (57.1%) | 3 (42.9%) |
Diseases of the large intestine | 46 (37.4%) | 40 (87%) | 6 (13%) |
Morbid obesity | 9 (7.3%) | 8 (88.9%) | 1 (11.1%) |
Other | 2 (1.6%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) |
Pathology Non-cancer | 27 (22%) | 22 (81.5%) | 5 (18.5%) |
Cancer | 96 (78%) | 74 (77.1%) | 22 (22.9%) |
Comorbidity | |||
No | 33 (26.8%) | 22 (66.7%) | 11 (33.3%) |
Yes | 90 (73.2%) | 74 (82.2%) | 16 (17.8%) |
Type of comorbidity (n = 90) Diabetes mellitus | 27 (30%) | 26 (96.3%) | 1 (3.7%) |
Hypertension | 55 (61%) | 42 (76.4%) | 13 (23.6%) |
Dyslipidemia | 39 (43.3%) | 30 (76.9%) | 9 (23.1%) |
Coronary artery disease | 8 (8.9%) | 8 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Kidney disease | 6 (6.7%) | 5 (83.3%) | 1 (16.7%) |
COPD | 2 (2.2%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Other | 34 (37.8%) | 26 (76.5%) | 8 (23.5%) |
Previous abdominal surgery No | 66 (53.7%) | 54 (81.8%) | 12 (18.2%) |
Yes | 57 (46.3%) | 42 (73.7%) | 15 (26.3%) |
Smoking status | |||
Never | 84 (68.3%) | 65 (77.4%) | 19 (22.6%) |
Current smoker | 12 (9.8%) | 11 (91.7%) | 1 (8.3%) |
Ex-smoker | 27 (22%) | 20 (74.1%) | 7 (25.9%) |
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics and the development of prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) (n = 123). (Continue)
No | 77 (62.6%) | 58 (75.3%) | 19 (24.7%) |
Yes | 46 (37.4%) | 38 (82.6%) | 8 (17.4%) |
Type of bowel preparation (n = 46) | |||
Osmotic agent | 37 (80.4%) | 30 (81.1%) | 7 (18.9%) |
Combination of osmotic agent and stimulant laxative | 9 (19.6%) | 8 (88.9%) | 1 (11.1%) |
Surgical approach Open | 75 (61%) | 57 (76%) | 18 (24%) |
Laparoscopy | 32 (26%) | 31 (96.9%) | 1 (3.1%) |
Robot-assisted | 16 (13%) | 8 (50%) | 8 (50%) |
Procedure | |||
HPB surgery | 45 (36.6%) | 38 (84.5%) | 7 (15.5%) |
Upper GI surgery | 15 (12.2%) | 12 (80%) | 3 (20%) |
Colorectal surgery | 48 (39%) | 42 (87.5%) | 6 (12.5%) |
Whipple’s operation | 15 (12.2%) | 4 (26.7%) | 11 (73.3%) |
Anesthesia General anesthesia | 65 (52.8%) | 54 (83.1%) | 11 (16.9%) |
General anesthesia with epidural anesthesia | 58 (47.2%) | 42 (72.4%) | 16 (27.6%) |
Operative time (minutes) | |||
60-120 | 2 (1.6%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
121-180 | 14 (11.4%) | 13 (92.9%) | 1 (7.1%) |
181-240 | 32 (26%) | 31 (96.9%) | 1 (3.1%) |
241-300 | 27 (22%) | 24 (88.9%) | 3 (11.1%) |
> 300 | 48 (39%) | 26 (54.2%) | 22 (45.8%) |
Mean±SD (minutes) | 317±148 | 274±113 | 467±159 |
Estimated blood loss (ml) ≤ 500 | 85 (69.1%) | 74 (87.1%) | 11 (12.9%) |
> 500 | 38 (30.9%) | 22 (57.9%) | 16 (42.1%) |
Median (IQR) | 300 (50–650) | 200 (31–500) | 550 (300–890) |
Postoperative opioid used No | 9 (7.3%) | 9 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Yes | 114 (92.7%) | 87 (76.3%) | 27 (23.7%) |
Time to the first oral feeding Day 0 | 46 (37.4%) | 40 (87%) | 6 (13%) |
Day 1 | 67 (54.5%) | 50 (74.6%) | 17 (25.4%) |
Day 2 | 6 (4.9%) | 5 (83.3%) | 1 (16.7%) |
Day 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
≥ Day 4 | 4 (3.3%) | 1 (25%) | 3 (75%) |
Time to the first flatus | |||
Day 1 | 43 (35%) | 39 (90.7%) | 4 (9.3%) |
Day 2 | 60 (48.8%) | 49 (81.7%) | 11 (18.3%) |
Day 3 | 16 (13%) | 8 (50%) | 8 (50%) |
≥ Day 4 | 4 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) |
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics and the development of prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) (n = 123). (Continue)
Characteristics Time to the first stool | Overall n (%) | No (n = 96) | PPOI Yes (n = 27) |
Day 1 | 17 (13.8%) | 15 (88.2%) | 2 (11.8%) |
Day 2 | 44 (35.8%) | 38 (86.4%) | 6 (13.6%) |
Day 3 | 34 (27.6%) | 27 (79.4%) | 7 (20.6%) |
≥ Day 4 | 28 (22.8%) | 16 (57.1%) | 12 (42.9%) |
Time to the first ambulation | |||
Day 1 | 84 (69.3%) | 72 (85.7%) | 12 (14.3%) |
≥ Day 2 | 39 (31.7%) | 24 (61.5%) | 15 (38.5%) |
Mean±SD (days) | 1.5±0.9 | 1.3±0.5 | 2.1±1.4 |
Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion | |||
No NGT insertion | 95 (77.2%) | 80 (84.3%) | 15 (15.8%) |
NGT removed by protocol | 17 (13.8%) | 11 (64.7%) | 6 (35.3%) |
Delayed NGT removal | 9 (7.3%) | 4 (44.5%) | 5 (55.5%) |
NGT reinsertion | 2 (1.6%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) |
Complications | |||
No | 111 (90.2%) | 94 (84.7%) | 17 (15.3%) |
Yes | 12 (9.8%) | 2 (16.7%) | 10 (83.3%) |
Type of complication (n = 12) | |||
Intraabdominal collection | 4 (33.3%) | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) |
Surgical site infection | 4 (33.3%) | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Pancreatic fistula | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) |
Anastomosis leakage | 2 (16.7%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Cholangitis | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Chyle leak | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Incisional hernia | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) |
Efferent loop syndrome | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) |
Septic shock | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) |
Hospital acquired pneumonia | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) |
Reoperation | |||
No | 121 (98.4%) | 96 (79.3%) | 25 (20.7%) |
Yes | 2 (1.6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) |
Postoperative length of stay (days) | |||
2 | 2 (1.6%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
3 | 20 (16.3%) | 20 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
4 | 39 (31.7%) | 37 (94.9%) | 2 (5.1%) |
5 | 21 (17.1%) | 21 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
≥ 6 | 41 (33.3%) | 16 (39%) | 25 (61%) |
Median (IQR) | 5 (4–7) | 4 (4–5) | 11 (7–22) |
Mean ± SD (days) | 6.5±5.9 | 4.5±1.6 | 13.6±9.5 |
TABLE 2. Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and development of prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) (n = 39).
FTND score | n (%) | PPOI No (n = 31) Yes (n = 8) | |
Very low to low nicotine dependence (0–4) | 25 (64.1%) | 20 (80%) | 5 (20%) |
Moderate nicotine dependence (5) | 2 (5.1%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
High to very high nicotine dependence (6–10) | 12 (30.8%) | 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) |
Mean ± SD | 1.24±2.27 | 1.32±2.31 | 0.93±2.13 |
TABLE 3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and development of prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) (n = 123).
HADS score | n (%) | PPOI No (n = 96) Yes (n = 27) | |
Anxiety score | |||
0-7 (Non-case) | 91 (74%) | 75 (82.4%) | 16 (17.6%) |
8-10 (Doubtful case) | 23 (18.7%) | 17 (73.9%) | 6 (26.1%) |
11-21 (Confirmed case) | 9 (7.3%) | 4 (44.4%) | 5 (55.6%) |
Mean ± SD | 5.83±2.94 | 5.67±2.84 | 6.41±3.27 |
Depression score | |||
0-7 (Non-case) | 90 (73.2%) | 71 (78.9%) | 19 (21.1%) |
8-10 (Doubtful case) | 24 (19.5%) | 18 (75%) | 6 (25%) |
11-21 (Confirmed case) | 9 (7.3%) | 7 (77.8%) | 2 (22.2%) |
Mean ± SD | 6.16±2.49 | 6.16±2.50 | 6.19±2.50 |
TABLE 4. Development of prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) (n = 123).
Development of PPOI | n | (%) |
Development of PPOI | ||
No (0-1) | 96 | 78 |
Yes (2-5) Diagnosis criteria for PPOI* (n = 27) | 27 | 22 |
Nausea/vomiting | 18 | 66.7 |
Lack of tolerance to an oral diet over 24 h | 21 | 77.8 |
Absence of flatus/stool over 24 h | 7 | 26 |
Abdominal distension | 19 | 70.4 |
Radiologic results | 17 | 63 |
Fig 1. Association between preoperative anxiety and prolonged postoperative ileus.
Fig 2. Association between time to first ambulation and prolonged postoperative ileus.
95% CI = 1.218–44.411, p = 0.046) and ambulation on or after postoperative day 2 (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.254–8.501, p = 0.015) (Table 5).
This study demonstrated that 22% of patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery developed PPOI based on the criteria recommended by Vather et al.,32 which have been validated and widely used to determine PPOI in several international studies. This study also found that preoperative anxiety and delayed postoperative ambulation were two significant predictors of PPOI. Interestingly, both preoperative anxiety and depression were investigated as psychological distress using HADS in this study, but only anxiety was a significant predictor of PPOI. Several recent studies have addressed the problem of clinical anxiety in elective surgery.30,34–36
Preoperative anxiety in surgical patients develops for several reasons such as fear of complications, postoperative pain, disability, and death.34,36 The association between psychological distress and changes in gastrointestinal function has been established in many studies.37,38 It is known to alter autonomic innervation, specifically stimulated sympathetic innervation, which relaxes the smooth muscle, thus decreasing bowel motility. Another reason might be the release of catecholamine, which is triggered by psychological distress and causes altered mucosal blood flow.26,27
Our findings of anxiety (not depression) as a PPOI predictor were consistent with the study by Paine et al.,39 who examined the relationship between anxiety and depression as well as 24-hour catecholamines in patients with untreated high blood pressure and highlighted that only anxiety is associated with sympathetic innervation
TABLE 5. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) following major gastrointestinal surgery.
Factors | Crude OR (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P-value |
Age Early adulthoodref | ||||
Middle adulthood | 1.38 (0.33–5.80) | 0.664 | 0.83 (0.15–4.52) | 0.832 |
Old age | 0.83 (0.20–3.44) | 0.798 | 0.64 (0.13–3.26) | 0.595 |
BMI (kg/m2) < 18.5ref | ||||
18.5-22.9 | 1.32 (0.32–5.45) | 0.705 | 1.19 (0.23–6.11) | 0.838 |
23-27.5 | 0.56 (0.11–2.75) | 0.472 | 0.57 (0.09–3.55) | 0.543 |
> 27.5 | 0.74 (0.14–3.99) | 0.727 | 0.73 (0.10–5.39) | 0.754 |
HADS Anxiety subscale 0-7ref | ||||
8-10 | 1.65 (0.56–4.85) | 0.359 | 1.62 (0.48–5.43) | 0.439 |
11-21 Depression subscale 0-7ref | 5.86 (1.42–24.27) | 0.025* | 6.26 (1.22–44.41) | 0.046* |
8-10 | 1.25 (0.43–3.57) | 0.683 | 0.82 (0.24–2.84) | 0.759 |
11-21 | 1.07 (0.21–5.57) | 0.938 | 0.44 (0.048–3.99) | 0.465 |
FTND score 0-4ref | ||||
5 | 0.43 (0.15–3.84) | 0.989 | 0.91 (0.02–4.56) | 0.899 |
6-10 | 0.94 (0.24–3.66) | 0.933 | 0.95 (0.21–4.25) | 0.942 |
First ambulation POD 1ref | ||||
≥ POD 2 | 3.75 (1.54–9.12) | 0.004* | 3.26 (1.25–8.50) | 0.015* |
*Statistically significant (p-value < 0.05)
Abbreviations: CI; Confidence interval, OR; Odds ratio, BMI; Body mass index, HADS; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, FTND; Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence, POD; Postoperative day
activation. Therefore, anxiety and depression might affect the gastrointestinal tract through a different mechanism. Another study of 162 surgical patients also confirmed a correlation between preoperative anxiety and delayed gastrointestinal recovery.40
The present study also demonstrated that delayed ambulation was significantly associated with PPOI, which concurred with a population-based study in New Zealand in which delayed ambulation was found to
influence PPOI following elective colorectal surgery.12 Meanwhile, early ambulation has been shown to enhance patients’ overall recovery, including facilitating bowel motility.41 Morisawa et al.28 also found that the bowel sound of critically ill patients is significantly increased after passive exercise. They explained that ambulation can induce gastrointestinal motility by stretching the gastrointestinal tract and stimulating its parasympathetic innervation activity. Moreover, Kumar et al.42 found that
bowel cleansing is more adequate in patients without ambulation difficulty. Interestingly, as no definition of early ambulation was specified, the results of the study suggested that early ambulation (i.e., postoperative day 1) is recommended, especially to reduce the development of PPOI following major gastrointestinal surgery.
Age was not identified as a significant predictor of PPOI in this study. This concurred with prior studies of colorectal surgery.5,8,9,12,14,22 BMI was also unable to predict PPOI in this study, again consistent with previous studies.4,7-9,12,14 Lastly, smoking status was not significantly associated with PPOI in this study, in line with the findings of previous research.5,9,12
Although this was a prospective study, some limitations need to be addressed. First, all types of major gastrointestinal surgery were included given that the extent of surgery may vary depending on the nature of the disease (benign versus malignancy) and organ involvement. Second, due to the relatively small number of smokers, the power of smoking could not be determined in this study. Lastly, although PPOI was defined by the international definition proposed by Vather et al.,32 PPOI may manifest beyond the period of study or after discharge. An extended period of study could provide additional information for calculating the risk factors for the delayed presentation of PPOI.
PPOI occurred in 22% of patients following major gastrointestinal surgery. Preoperative anxiety and delayed postoperative ambulation were significant predictors of PPOI. Therefore, it is reasonable that preoperative anxiety should be assessed and treated (if present) under a multidisciplinary team approach. Early ambulation on the first day after the operation is also encouraged alongside effective nursing care and pain control.
As the first author, I am indebted to my advisors for their invaluable guidance throughout this study. I would also like to express my sincere thanks to the nursing staff and participants at this tertiary hospital who kindly supported me in every aspect.
Abbreviations
POI; Postoperative Ileus
PPOI; Prolonged Postoperative Ileus BMI; Body Mass Index
HADS; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale FTND; The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence
Venara A, Neunlist M, Slim K, Barbieux J, Colas PA, Hamy A, et al. Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention. J Visc Surg 2016;153(6):439-46.
Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, LoboDN.Postoperativeileus:Recentdevelopmentsinpathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2015;34(3): 367-76.
Holte K, Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 2000;87(11):1480-93.
Sugawara K, Kawaguchi Y, Nomura Y, Suka Y, Kawasaki K, Uemura Y, et al. Perioperative Factors predicting prolonged postoperative ileus after Major abdominal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22(3):508-15.
Rybakov EG, Shelygin YA, Khomyakov EA, Zarodniuk IV. Risk factors for postoperative ileus after colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 2017.
Murphy MM, Tevis SE, Kennedy GD. Independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus development. J Surg Res 2016;201(2):279-85.
Hain E, Maggiori L, Mongin C, Prost AlDJ, Panis Y. Risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an analysis of 428 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2018;32(1): 337-44.
Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Lambrecht M, Fieuws S, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Boeckxstaens G, et al. Preoperative risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32(6):883-90.
Courtot L, Le Roy B, Memeo R, Voron T, de Angelis N, Tabchouri N, et al. Risk factors for postoperative ileus following elective laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective multicentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018;33(10):1373-82.
Alhashemi M, Fiore JF, Jr., Safa N, Al Mahroos M, Mata J, Pecorelli N, et al. Incidence and predictors of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery in the context of an enhanced recovery pathway. Surg Endosc 2019;33(7):2313- 22.
Rees J, Bobridge K, Cash C, Lyons-Wall P, Allan R, Coombes J. Delayed postoperative diet is associated with a greater incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus and longer stay in hospital for patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Nutr Diet 2018; 75(1):24-9.
Vather R, Josephson R, Jaung R, Robertson J, Bissett I. Development of a risk stratification system for the occurrence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a prospective risk factor analysis. Surgery 2015;157(4):764-73.
Huang DD, Zhuang CL, Wang SL, Pang WY, Lou N, Zhou CJ, et al. Prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(51):e2242.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hwang GS, Hanna MH, Phelan M, Carmichael JC, Mills S, et al. Risk factors for prolonged ileus following colon surgery. Surg Endosc 2016;30(2):603-9.
Tevis SE, Carchman EH, Foley EF, Harms BA, Heise CP, Kennedy GD. Postoperative Ileus--More than Just Prolonged Length of Stay? J Gastrointest Surg : official journal of the society for surgery of the alimentary tract 2015;19(9):1684-90.
Kalyanwat A, Jakhar M, Jain S. Postoperative ileus: a study on the role of chewing gum to reduce its duration. Saudi Surg J 2018;6(3):85-8.
Duangchan C, Toskulkao T, Danaidutsadeekul S, Iramaneerat
C. Effect of gum chewing on bowel motility in patients with colorectal cancer after open colectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Siriraj Med J 2016;68:135-41.
Dulskas A, Klimovskij M, Vitkauskiene M, Samalavicius NE. Effect of coffee on the length of postoperative ileus after elective laparoscopic left-sided colectomy: a randomized, prospective single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58(11):1064-9.
Lohsiriwat V. Mosapride Reduces Prolonged Postoperative Ileus after Open Colorectal Surgery in the Setting of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS): A Matched Case-Control Study. Siriraj Med J 2019;71:181-8.
Nematihonar B, Salimi S, Noorian V, Samsami M. Early versus delayed (Traditional) postoperative oral feeding in patients undergoing colorectal anastomosis. Adv Biomed Res 2018;7(1):30-.
Manakijsirisuthi W. Early Postoperative Feeding After Gastroduodenal Operation : A 72 Cases Report. Siriraj Med J 2002;54(7):387-93.
Juárez-Parra MA, Carmona-Cantú J, González-Cano JR, Arana- Garza S, Trevino-Frutos RJ. Risk factors associated with prolonged postoperative ileus after elective colon resection. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2015;80(4):260-6.
Moore BA, Albers KM, Davis BM, Grandis JR, Tögel S, Bauer AJ. Altered inflammatory gene expression underlies increased susceptibility to murine postoperative ileus with advancing age. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007;292(6): G1650-9.
Svatek RS, Fisher MB, Williams MB, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Grossman HB, et al. Age and body mass index are independent risk factors for the development of postoperative paralytic ileus after radical cystectomy. Urology 2010;76(6):1419-24.
Kadota K, Takeshima F, Inoue K, Takamori K, Yoshioka S, Nakayama S, et al. Effects of smoking cessation on gastric emptying in smokers. J clin gastroenterol 2010;44(4):e71-5.
Emmanuel AV, Mason HJ, Kamm MA. Relationship between psychological state and level of activity of extrinsic gut innervation in patients with a functional gut disorder. Gut 2001;49(2):209- 13.
Paravati S, Rosani A, Warrington SJ. Physiology, catecholamines. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright© 2020, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2020.
Morisawa T, Takahashi T, Nishi S. The effect of a physiotherapy intervention on intestinal motility. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27(1): 165-8.
Nilchaikovit T, Lortrakul M, Phisansuthideth U. Development of Thai version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in
cancer patients. J Psychiatr Assoc Thailand. 1996;41(1):18-30.
Rattanamongkol C, Sindhu S, Toskulkao T, Iramaneerat C. Factors Related to the severity of postoperative complications in patients with primary gastrointestinal (Stomach, Liver, Bile Duct, Colon, and Rectum) cancer. TJNC 2016;31(3):97-109.
Klinsophon T, Janwantanakul P, Thaveeratitham P. Reliability of the Thai version of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). J Med Assoc Thai 2017;100(10):1130.
Vather R, Trivedi S, Bissett I. Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey. J Gastrointest Surg : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2013;17(5):962-72.
Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Boeckxstaens G, D’Hoore A. Incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2016;18(1):O1-9.
Abate SM, Chekol YA, Basu B. Global prevalence and determinants of preoperative anxiety among surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2020;25:6-16.
Liu CH, Stevens C, Wong SHM, Yasui M, Chen JA. The prevalence and predictors of mental health diagnoses and suicide among U.S. college students: implications for addressing disparities in service use. Depress Anxiety 2019;36(1):8-17.
Williams H, Jajja MR, Baer W, Balch GC, Maithel SK, Patel AD, et al. Perioperative anxiety and depression in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for benign or malignant disease. J Surg Oncol 2019;120(3):389-96.
Manabe N, Tanaka T, Hata J, Kusunoki H, Haruma K. Pathophysiology underlying irritable bowel syndrome--from the viewpoint of dysfunction of autonomic nervous system activity. J Smooth Muscle Res = Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai kikanshi 2009;45(1):15-23.
Mach T. The brain-gut axis in irritable bowel syndrome--clinical aspects. Med Sci Monit 2004;10(6):Ra125-31.
Paine NJ, Watkins LL, Blumenthal JA, Kuhn CM, Sherwood
A. Association of depressive and anxiety symptoms with 24-hour urinary catecholamines in individuals with untreated high blood pressure. Psychosom Med 2015;77(2):136-44.
Arı M, Yılmaz E. Impact of pre-operative anxiety on post- operative constipation. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2016;26:39-46.
Stethen TW, Ghazi YA, Heidel RE, Daley BJ, Barnes L, Patterson D, et al. Walking to recovery: the effects of missed ambulation events on postsurgical recovery after bowel resection. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018;9(5):953-61.
Kumar A, Lin L, Bernheim O, Bagiella E, Jandorf L, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Effect of functional status on the quality of bowel preparation in elderly patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Gut Liver 2016;10(4):569-73.