Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
20
Riya Halder, MBBS*, Bobby Paul, MD (PSM), DCH**, Ankush Banerjee, MBBS, M.D.***, Ranjan Das, MD
(PSM)**, Trina Sengupta, MBBS*
*MD Community Medicine, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, **Department of Preventive and Social Medicine,
All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, ***All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Functional Status of the Elderly and their
Rehabilitation Needs: A Mixed-Method Study in
a Slum of Kolkata, West Bengal
ABSTRACT
Objective: A comprehensive understanding of the requirements of elderly is necessary to preserve their “functional
capacity”, an important indicator of their health status. is study aimed to assess the functional status of the elderly
and their rehabilitation needs.
Materials and Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted from November 2021 to June 2022 at a health centre
in Chetla, West Bengal, India. Quantitative data, collected from 172 elderly persons using a pretested questionnaire,
were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Qualitative data, collected via focus group discussions, were analyzed
thematically.
Results: Overall, 11.62% and 66.86% participants were functionally dependent in one or more activities of daily
living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), respectively. Signicant association of age ≥70 years
(AOR = 4.06, 95% CI= 1.13-14.63), male gender (AOR= 5.21, 95% CI= 1.57-17.28) and assistive device use (AOR=
6.92, 95% CI= 1.85-25.83) was found with ADL limitations. Increasing age (AOR= 1.29, 95% CI= 1.13-1.50), female
gender (AOR= 13.97, 95%CI= 3.61-54.00), residence in joint family (AOR= 3.95, 95%CI=1.47-10.61), without
spouse (AOR= 3.59, 95% CI= 1.12-11.44) and daily intake of multiple medications (AOR= 4.99, 95%CI= 1.45-
17.13) were factors signicantly associated with IADL limitations. Major identied needs of the elderly were related
to development of peer support groups, transportation systems and delivery of services from the health system.
Conclusion: Rehabilitative services like providing assistive devices to the needy, developing elderly support groups,
undertaking household visits for bedridden and those with restricted mobility, and building supportive environments
within families and communities should be ensured.
Keywords: Activities of daily living; elderly; functional status; instrumental activities of daily living; rehabilitation
(Siriraj Med J 2023; 75: 20-28)
Corresponding author: Trina Sengupta
E-mail: ghoto1995@gmail.com
Received 22 September 2022 Revised 27 October 2022 Accepted 4 December 2022
ORCID ID:http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-8159
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.4
All material is licensed under terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
license unless otherwise stated.
INTRODUCTION
e unprecedented increase in human longevity
in the 20
th
century has led to a global rise in the elderly
population. India is soon destined to become home to the
second-largest number of elderly persons in the world.
e Census data has demonstrated a steady increase in
the proportion of older people from 7.7% of the total
population in 2001 to 10.1% in 2021, which is estimated
to reach 300.96 million by 2051.
1
Over the past decade, ‘Healthy aging’ has emerged
as an important concept concerning health issues of the
elderly. It has been dened as “not only the mere absence
Halder et al.
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
21
Original Article
SMJ
of a disease but the process which enables older people to
continue to do the things that are important to them”.
2
Data provided by the United Nations has shown that
more than 46% of the global elderly population (≥60
years of age) live with disabilities.
3
Disabilities are the
negative aspects of the interaction between the individual
and the environment, i.e., decits, limitations in the
activity and restrictions in his/her social participation.
4
us, maintenance of functional capacity becomes an
important indicator of health status in the elderly.
5
Activities of daily living (ADL) are considered as those
activities that are essential for an independent life while
instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are more
complex tasks that involve decision making and greater
interaction with the environment.
6
Studies conducted
previously across dierent countries have assessed the
functional capacity of the elderly and have demonstrated
varying prevalence of limitations in activities of daily living
(ADL) ranging from 17.3% to 34.6% while limitations
in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) ranged
from 35.75% to 59.3%.
7-10
Although laudable eorts have
been made by the researchers for assessing the functional
status, the issue of social and healthcare needs of the
elderly required for healthy ageing has been largely
overlooked. erefore, a comprehensive understanding
of the requirements of our elderly population is needed
to preserve their functional capacity and promote healthy
aging so that they can continue to make their positive
contributions towards the society. With this backdrop,
this mixed method study was undertaken to assess the
functional status of the elderly residing in an urban slum
in West Bengal and to explore their unmet needs from
the health system for rehabilitation
MATERIALS AND METHODS
is cross-sectional study with convergent parallel
mixed method design (QUAN+QUAL) was conducted
from November 2021 to June 2022 among the elderly
persons (age≥60 years) attending the non-communicable
disease (NCD) clinic at Urban Health Unit and Training
Centre, Chetla, Kolkata, West Bengal. Participants who
did not give written informed consent were excluded
from the study.
Sampling
For the quantitative strand of the study, considering
the prevalence of ADL disability and IADL disability
among the study population to be 53.6%
11
and 48%
9
respectively and relative error of 20% with a condence
level of 95%, the sample size was calculated separately
using the standard Cochran’s formula.
12
It came to be
84 and 105 respectively. Taking into account the larger
value, that is 105, the nal sample size was estimated by
adding a design eect of 1.5 and 10% non-response rate
allowance which came to be 172.
Data collection was performed on 1 day per week.
So, for estimated sample size of 172, it took approximately
12 weeks for data collection. Study participants were
selected by systematic random sampling technique
for the quantitative strand. Approximately 30 elderly
persons attended the NCD clinic per day. Study piloting
revealed that only 15 patients could be interviewed per
day. erefore, taking sampling interval of 30/15= 2, every
2
nd
patient attending the NCD clinic was interviewed.
Separate days were taken to conduct Focus group
discussions (FGDs) for collecting data for the qualitative
strand of our study. Data was collected till the point of
data saturation which was reached aer conduction of
2 FGDs. Each FGD constituted 6 members who were
recruited purposively from the patients visiting the NCD
clinic.
Study Tools and Parameters Used
Medical records were checked and face-to-face
interview technique was performed using pre-tested,
pre-designed structured questionnaire to collect data
for the quantitative strand of our study. Pretesting was
done on 15 elderly patients diagnosed with NCDs in a
dierent setting who were not included in the study.
Reliability of the scales used within the questionnaire
was checked with Cronbach’s alpha along with inter-item
correlation. Face & construct validity of the scales used
was checked by public health experts. e questionnaire
consisted of the following domains:
(a) Independent variables
i. Socio-demographic variables: age, religion, caste, gender,
marital status, living arrangement, education, employment
status, nancial status, socioeconomic status, availability
of medical insurance
ii. Physical health status: body mass index (BMI), pain
on visual analog scale (VAS), number of chronic diseases
(from medical records), number of daily medicine intake
(from medical records)
iii. Environmental characteristics: presence of assistive
technology (handrails, grab bars, hearing aid, glasses, walker
wheelchair etc.), home modications (widened doors,
lowered cabinets) and material adjustments (removing
throw rugs, rearranging furniture etc.)
iv. Multidimensional scale of perceived social support
(MSPSS): It was assessed via a 12-item tool for measuring
perceptions of support from 3 sources: family, friends,
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
22
and signicant others. [Cronbach’s alpha= 0.87].
13
A
mean score of 1-2.9 meant low support, 3-5 indicated
moderate support and 5.1-7 indicated high support.
v. Geriatric depression scale 15 (GDS 15) consisted of
a 15-item preliminary screening tool for depression in
elderly [Cronbach’s alpha= 0.71].
14
Scores of 0-4 were
considered normal, 5-8 indicated mild depression; 9-11
as moderate depression; and 12-15 indicated severe
depression.
(b) Dependent variable
i. Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living
(ADL): It assessed the client’s ability to independently
perform six activities of daily living i.e bathing, dressing,
toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding.
15
Participants
were given 1 point if they required no assistance in
performing their daily activities and 0 point if they
required help, personal assistance or total care for the
same. (Cronbach’s alpha=0.79). Study participants were
categorized into two groups according to their summary
scores:
1. Independent (score of 6, needed no assistance
in any of the activities)
2. Dependent (score 0-5, assistance needed in some
or the other activity)
ii. Lawton- Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Scale (IADL): It measured the client’s ability to perform
independent living skills, measured across 8 domains.
16
Women were scored on all 8 areas of function; whereas,
for men, the areas of food preparation, housekeeping,
laundering were excluded [Cronbach’s alpha= 0.82].
Participants were given 1 point if they required no
assistance in performing the activities and 0 point if
they required help, personal assistance or total care for
the same. Study participants were categorized into two
groups according to their summary scores:
For females: 1. Independent (score of 8, needed no
assistance in any of the activities)
2. Dependent (score of 0-7, assistance
needed in some or the other activity)
For males: 1. Independent (score of 5, needs no
assistance in any of the activities)
2. Dependent (score 0-4, assistance needed in some
or the other activity)
For the qualitative part of the study, two FGDs were
conducted among the study participants to nd out their
expectations from the health system with respect to their
healthcare needs, using a predesigned FGD guide, audio
recorder and eld notes.
Data analysis
Quantitative data was analysed using Microso
Excel 2016 and Statistical Package for Social Sciences
soware (version 16). Descriptive statistics were shown
by frequency table, mean, median and interquartile range.
Aer excluding multicollinearity (variance ination
factor>10), factors were analyzed by test of signicance
(p-value< 0.05) at 95% condence interval via univariate
regression model. All the biologically plausible signicant
factors in the respective univariate analysis where then
included in the nal multivariable model.
For qualitative data, thematic analysis approach
was undertaken. e recorded statements from the FGD
were rst transcribed in verbatim format and translated
back to English language. Simultaneously, eld notes
were reviewed. Appropriate codes were then generated
from the transcripts. Similar codes were put together
to generate subthemes followed by the generation of
appropriate themes.
Ethical approval
Permission was taken from Institutional Ethics
Committee of All India institute of Hygiene and Public
Health, Kolkata. All the ethical principles as per Declaration
of Helsinki were strictly adhered to. Informed written
consent was taken from each participant before data
collection. Condentiality was maintained throughout
the process.
RESULTS
Among the 172 study participants, 118 were females
and 54 were males with a median age of 62.50 years
(IQR =61.00- 67.75). Majority of the male participants
were married (81.5%) whereas only 36.4% females were
married. Around 30.8% of the participants had two
children. 47.1% of elderly were living with ‘spouse and
other members’. Almost 55.2% of the participants had
no formal education and considered themselves to be
nancially dependent on their family members. Around
one-fourth (25.6%) of the study participants were formally
retired. More than half (60.5%) of the study participants
belonged to class V of B.G Prasad’s socioeconomic scale.
e median per capita income was Rs 1,000/-. More than
half of the participants (52.3%) were covered under
state government nanced medical insurance schemes
like ‘Swasthya Sathi’.
With regard to their health status, as many as 56.9%
of individuals suered from multiple chronic diseases
and 55.8% were taking multiple medicines daily. Around
44.8% individuals reported to be suering from moderate
pain on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
On the part of environmental modications, only 0.6%
and 5.8% of participants had special equipment attached
to their home structure and did material adjustments
Halder et al.
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
23
Original Article
SMJ
respectively, for unhindered movement. Assistive devices
were used by 24.4% of the elderly. None of the participants
had the interior of their homes modied as per their
necessity of old age.
Almost 65.7% of the elderly received moderate
social support (friends, family and signicant other
combined) with median score of 4(IQR= 3.44-5.04).
Majority (82.6%) of study participants were suering
from some or other form of depression with a median
score of 6(IQR= 5-9) as measured by GDS 15.
Functional Status of the elderly:
e respondents reported at least one problem with
IADL (66.86 %) more frequently than with ADL (11.62
%). Among the female participants 7.6% and among
males 20.4% were dependent in one or more ADL while
80.5% of females and 37% of males were found to be one
or more IADL (Fig 1 & 2).
e most frequent problem in ADL was related to
transferring (6.4%) followed by continence (4.7%) and
toileting (4.7%). e most frequent problem associated
with IADL was food preparation (61.9%) among the
females and shopping in males (52.3%).
Factors associated with functional limitations among
the study participants
Signicant factors associated with functional limitations
in ADL were age of ≥70 years {Adjusted odds ratio (AOR)
= 4.06, 95% CI= 1.13-14.63}, male gender (AOR= 5.21,
95% CI= 1.57-17.28) and use of assistive devices (AOR=
6.92, 95% CI= 1.85-25.83) (Table 1).
With respect to IADL limitations, increasing age
(AOR= 1.29, 95% CI= 1.13-1.50), female gender (AOR=
13.97, 95% CI= 3.61-54.00), participants residing in
joint family (AOR= 3.95, 95% CI= 1.47-10.61) without
spouse (AOR= 3.59, 95% CI= 1.12-11.44) and taking
multiple medicines daily (AOR= 4.99, 95% CI= 1.45-17.13)
were the factors that came to be statistically signicant
(Table 2).
e models examining the inuences of factors on
ADL and IADL explained 16.6%-32.3% and 39.7%-55.1%
of the variance respectively.
4( 4.1%)
5 (25.0%)
75 (76.5%)
20 (100.0%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
<70 yrs ≥70 yrs
Number of females
Age groups
Dependent in ≥1 ADL Dependent in ≥1 IADL
5 (11.9%)
6 (50.0%)
10 (23.8%) 10 (83.3%)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
<70 yrs ≥70 yrs
Number of males
Age groups
Dependent in ≥1 ADL Dependent in ≥1 IADL
Fig 1. Multiple bar diagram showing
functional status of female participants
across age groups (n=118).
Fig 2. Multiple bar diagram showing
functional status of male participants across
age groups (n=54).
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
24
TABLE 1. Factors associated with functional limitation in ADL among study participants: Univariate and
Multivariable logistic regression analysis (n=172).
Parameters Total number Dependent in Unadjusted OR Adjusted OR
(n) ≥1ADL(%) (95%CI) (95%CI)
Age
<70 yrs 140 9(6.4) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
≥70 yrs 32 11(34.4) 7.62(2.82-20.60) 4.06(1.13-14.63)
Gender
Female 118 9(7.6) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Male 54 11(20.4) 3.09(1.19-8.00) 5.21(1.57-17.28)
Number of chronic diseases
<2 74 4(5.4) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
≥2 98 16(16.3) 3.41(1.09-10.68) 0.57(0.09-3.61)
Number of medicines taking daily
<2 76 4(5.3) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
≥2 96 16(16.7) 3.60(1.15-11.26) 3.04(0.52-17.83)
Use of assistive devices (hearing aid, wheelchair, walker etc)
Absent 130 8(6.2) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Present 42 12(28.6) 6.10(2.29-16.24) 6.92(1.85-25.83)
Material adjustments at residence (removing through rugs, rearranging furniture, adjusted lighting etc.)
Absent 162 16(9.9) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Present 10 4(40.0) 6.08(1.55-23.85) 0.81(0.12-5.35)
Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic=0.669, Cox and Snell’s R
2
=0.166, and Nagelkerke’s R
2
=0.323.
Qualitative exploration of the unmet needs of the
elderly from the health system for rehabilitation
e FGDs revealed three major themes: (I) need to
cater to service issues (II) need to cater to transportation
issues (III) need for development of peer support group.
Under the rst theme the major sub themes identied
were ‘Homebased services’, ‘Supplies and logistics’, ‘Social
protection schemes’ and ‘Other health services’.
Under the ‘Homebased services’ subtheme, the
need for domiciliary visits at least once every month
by trained healthcare workers for routine health check-
ups was identied. In this context P4 (60 years, female)
reiterated:
“If it was possible that once or twice in a month
the health workers come and visit us in our house and
do a checkup of our sugar, pressure it would have been
very very helpful.”
e major ‘Supplies and logistics’ need identied
was ensuring the availability of medicines and assistive
devices such as glasses, hearing aids etc. from the health
centre, better if free of cost. P3 (61 years, female) said
in this regard:
“Sometimes they ask us to buy medicines from
outside but we cannot buy them due to our economic
constraint. So, we miss the dose for that month.”
Under the ‘Social protection schemes’, the need
for old age pension, increase in pension amount, and
health insurance schemes were identied. P2 (62 years,
female) said in this respect:
“I get old age pension of ₹1,000 per month. But
you tell me, in these days does ₹1,000 have any value?”
e study participants also highlighted the need
for provision of ‘Other health services’ such as dental
facility, ophthalmology, psychiatry, otorhinolaryngology
and investigations such as thyroid prole from the PHC.
P1 (64 years, male) & P2 said in this regard:
“I hear less in one ear. If facility for ear check-up
was present over here I would go for the same.”
Halder et al.
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
25
Original Article
SMJ
TABLE 2. Factors associated with functional limitation in IADL among study participants: Univariate and
Multivariable logistic regression analysis (n=172).
Parameters Total number Dependent in Unadjusted OR Adjusted OR
(n) ≥1IADL(%) (95%CI) (95%CI)
Age(↑)* 1.14(1.05-1.24) 1.29(1.13-1.50)
Gender
Female 118 95(80.5) 7.20(3.43-14.36) 13.97(3.61-54.00)
Male 54 20(37.0) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Type of family
Joint 99 78(78.8) 3.61(1.85-7.03) 3.95(1.47-10.61)
Nuclear 73 37(50.7) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Marital Status
No spouse 83 70(84.3) 5.26(2.55-10.85) 3.59(1.12-11.44)
Married 89 45(50.6) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Education
No formal education 95 70(73.7) 2.06(1.07-3.96) 0.79(0.28-2.17)
Educated (any form) 73 42(57.5) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Socioeconomic status †
Class V 104 83(79.8) 4.44(2.26-8.73) 0.87(0.31-2.41)
Class IV & below 68 32(47.1) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Pain
Severe pain 27 24(88.9) 4.74(1.36-16.51) 5.56(0.93-33.18)
Less than severe pain 145 91(62.8) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Number of chronic diseases
≥2 98 73(74.5) 2.22(1.16-4.24) 0.60(0.16-2.23)
<2 74 42(56.8) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Number of medicines taking daily
≥2 96 75(78.1) 3.21(1.66-6.22) 4.99(1.45-17.13)
<2 76 40(52.6) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Multidimensional scale of perceived social support
Lower support 131 96(73.3) 3.17(1.53-6.56) 0.71(0.23-2.11)
High support 41 19(46.3) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic=0.095, Cox and Snell’s R
2
=0.397, and Nagelkerke’s R
2
=0.551.
*Continuous variables, OR=odds ratio, CI=condence interval
† According to Revised B.G Prasad Scale for January 2021 based on labour bureau statistics of November 2020
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
26
“I have pain in my gums and teeth but no dental
facility is available here”.
Under the second theme, the distant location of
tertiary care hospitals, poor access to accessible, comfortable
and reliable transport services were reported to cause
hindrance to patients’ journey to hospitals for specialized
care. Notable verbatim by P7 (61 years, female) in this
aspect is:
“Sometimes we are said to go to specialized hospitals
since all the treatment is not available here. But our old
age and restricted mobility prevent us from going there
and getting better treatment”
e third theme highlighted the ‘need for development
of peer support groups’. e elderly valued peer support
as an important source of happiness, information and
companionship as stated by P8 (65 years, male):
“It feels good to talk among your friends and relieve
your mental burden. You can hear their side of their
stories as well as you can express your concerns.”
DISCUSSION
e study ndings revealed the overall prevalence
of ADL and IADL limitations among the elderly to be
11.62% and 66.86% respectively, which is comparable to
the ndings from other studies. A study done in Nepal
by Chalise et al.
18
showed around 30% & 52% elderly
aged 65 yrs and older were having functional limitation
on at least one ADL and IADL respectively. In a study
done in India by Patel et al. 22% & 48% of the older
adults reported some form of ADL and IADL disability
respectively.
9
Increasing age showed signicant association with
functional limitations, both ADL and IADL in elderly
proving that it can be the most important risk factor for
the deterioration of the functional state in the elderly.
e current study showed that males were more
dependent in ADL than females which is in contrast
to other studies that showed female gender to be more
predisposed to functional limitations in ADL.
7,19,20
is
may be attributed to the fact that there were more older
male participants (22.2%) compared to females (6.9%)
in this study.
With respect to IADL limitations and gender dierences,
this study is in line with ndings from other studies that
showed that female elderly are signicantly more dependent
in one or more IADL.
7,19,20
is can be explained by the
fact that in an Indian society, which is predominantly
male dominated, women are traditionally bound to do
household work whereas their male counterparts do work
outside and are mainly responsible to handle nances.
Participants residing in joint family reported to have
more dependency in IADL in our study. is nding
substantiates the fact that those who live with others
have the opportunity to depend on them for shopping,
food preparation, housekeeping etc., than those who
live alone.
Signicant association between functional limitation
of IADL and absence of spouse can be explained by the
fact that loss of signicant other in the extreme of age
has a huge emotional impact on the surviving elderly to
the extent that it can lead to depression. Many previous
studies have also found a positive correlation between
depression and worsened mobility in elderly.
21,22
As disability and mobility problems increase with
age, use of assistive devices such as canes, crutches, and
walkers, increase a patient’s base of support, improves
balance, increased activity and independence, proving that
signicant association between functional dependency
in ADL and assistive device use among the elderly may
exist, as found in our study.
Signicant association between dependency in IADL
and intake of multiple medicines has been found in our
study which can be ascribed to the fact that advancing age
brings increased number of comorbidities and thereby
increasing number of daily medicines intake.
e ndings from the qualitative part of our study
also substantiates our quantitative ndings (Table 3).
Subjective needs assessment is required for addressing
the complexity of needs of dependent older people. Due
to limitations in mobility and economic constraints, older
people cannot access health facilities located far away
from home or buy medicines from outside. ere is a
paramount need for provision of various rehabilitative
and healthcare services like home visits, ensuring all-
time supply of medicines and logistics, service delivery
nearer to homes, easy availability and accessibility of
social protection schemes and development of peer
support groups.
CONCLUSION
is study revealed that emotional health is as
important as physical health of the elderly. With advancing
age there is not only an increasing limitation in the
functional capacity of the elderly but also an increasing
requirement of meaningful relationships and experiences.
Declining agility and unsteadiness may result in falls
and devastating injuries among the aged population.
Similarly feeling of loneliness, isolation and lack of self-
worth may result in depression among elderly. Health
care administrators and policy makers should take into
note the physical and emotional needs of the elderly
while implementing strategies for their rehabilitation.
Halder et al.
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
27
Original Article
SMJ
TABLE 3. Joint Display of health care needs of elderly with respect to their functional status.
Themes Subthemes Qualitativeresults(Codes) Quantitativeresults
Service issues Need for home domiciliary visits by health 11.62% & 66.86% elderly are
based services workers for health check up dependent in ADL & IADL
respectively, hindering their regular
visit to health centre.
15.7% participants reported severe
body pain
Need for supplies ensure availability of 56.9% and 55.8% participants
and logistics medicines, insulin supply, respectively, were having ≥2
supply of hearing aids, chronic diseases and taking ≥2
glasses, cane medications daily.
24.4% elderly required assistive
devices in their daily activities.
Need for Social provision of government More than half of the study
Protection health insurance scheme, participants (55.2%) were nancially
Schemes (SPS) increment in amount of old age dependent and belonged
pension schemes, nancial to lower socio-economic group
dependence on children (60.5%).
47.7% were not covered by any
medical insurance.
Other services dental facility, psychiatry, 17.4% elderly had visual
Eye and ENT doctors, impairment, 6.4% had impaired
thyroid prole test hearing, 1.2% had dental problems,
1.2% had thyroid disorder.
Transportation inconvenient and distant 11.6% were found to be dependent
issues location of tertiary care hospitals on ‘mode of transportation’ item of
providing specialized care and Lawton Brody IADL Scale.
treatment
Peer support isolation & neglect of family, 82.6% suffered from some form of
groups loss of spouse, feeling of burden depression in GDS 15 scale
on children, no one to share 8.7% participants reported to have
emotional feelings low social support in MSPSS scale.
Tailor-made interventions are the need of the hour for
holistically addressing the rehabilitative needs- both
physical and emotional, of our elderly. Availability of
various services such as mental health clinics, dental
clinics, ophthalmology and otorhinolaryngology services
etc, provision of assistive devices to the needy, developing
elderly support groups, undertaking household visits for
bedridden elderly, counseling about improved care-seeking,
and increasing supportive environment in families and
community should be ensured at the primary care level.
Limitations
is study was done in an outpatient clinic and
hence elderly who are bedridden, too sick to attend OPD
could not be interviewed. While most of the responses
were recall-based, bias might be possible.
Conict of interest : Nil
Funding: Nil
Volume 75, No.1: 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
28
REFERENCES
1. Training Manual on Elderly Care for Medical Ocer at Ayushman
Bharat – Health and Wellness Centres. Ministry of Health
& Family Welfare. Government of India. Available from:
https://nhsrcindia.org/
2. Ageing and health [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 15]. Available
from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/
ageing-and-health
3. Ageing and disability | United Nations Enable [Internet]. [cited
2022 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/
desa/disabilities/disability-and-ageing.html
4. International Classication of Functioning, Disability and
Health (ICF) [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 15]. Available from: https://
www.who.int/standards/classications/international-classication-
of-functioning-disability-and-health
5. Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C,
Beck JC. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-
living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci
Med [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2022 Jan 15];48(4):445-69. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10075171/
6. Judge JO, Schechtman K, Cress E. e relationship between
physical performance measures and independence in instrumental
activities of daily living. e FICSIT Group. Frailty and Injury:
Cooperative Studies of Intervention Trials. J Am Geriatr Soc
[Internet]. 1996 [cited 2022 Jan 15];44(11):1332-41. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8909349/
7. Millán-Calenti JC, Tubío J, Pita-Fernández S, González-Abraldes I,
Lorenzo T, Fernández-Arruty T, et al. Prevalence of functional
disability in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental
activities of daily living (IADL) and associated factors, as
predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Gerontol Geriatr.
2010;50(3):306-10.
8. Ćwirlej-Sozańska A, Wiśniowska-Szurlej A, Wilmowska-
Pietruszyńska A, Sozański B. Determinants of ADL and IADL
disability in older adults in southeastern Poland. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1319-4
9. Patel R. Prevalence and Determinants of Activity of Daily Living
and Instrumental Activity of Daily Living Among Elderly
in India. 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 24]; Available from: https://
doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-523499/v1
10. Burman J, Sembiah S, Dasgupta A, Paul B, Pawar N, Roy A.
Assessment of Poor Functional Status and its Predictors among
the Elderly in a Rural Area of West Bengal. J Midlife Health
[Internet]. 2019 Jul 1 [cited 2021 Jun 6];10(3):123-30. Available
from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31579173
11. Keshari P, Shankar H.Prevalence and spectrum of functional
disability of urban elderly subjects: A community-based study
from Central India. J Fam Community Med 2017;24:86-
90. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
PMC5426108/pdf/JFCM-24-86.pdf
12. Saha I, Paul B. Essentials of Biostatistics & Research Methodology.
3
rd
ed. Kolkata: Academic Publishers, 2020.p.86-114.
13. Zimet G. Multidimensional scale of perceived social support
(MSPSS)-scale items and scoring information. Johns Hopkins
Univ Press [Internet]. 2016;(December):50-52. Available from:
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bsltests/2977
14. Courses O. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Short Form.
Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1):5-6.
15. Wallace M. Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily
Living (ADL) [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 3]. Available from:
www.ConsultGeriRN.org.
16. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-
maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist
[Internet]. 1969 [cited 2022 Jan 16];9(3):179-86. Available
from: /record/2011-21299-001
17. Majhi MM, Bhatnagar N. Updated B. G Prasad’s classication
for the year 2021: consideration for new base year 2016. J Family
Med Prim Care. 2021[cited 2022 Apr 17];10(11):4318-9. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35136812/
18. Chalise HN, Khanal B. Functional Disability on Instrumental/
Activities of Daily Livings Among Rural Older People in Nepal.
J Karnali Acad Heal Sci [Internet]. 2020;3(3):1-6. Available
from: http://jkahs.org.np/jkahs/index.php/jkahs/article/view/338
19. Nagarkar A, Kashikar Y. Predictors of functional disability
with focus on activities of daily living: A community based
follow-up study in older adults in India. Arch Gerontol Geriatr
[Internet]. 2017 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Jan 22];69:151-5. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27936458/
20. Veerapu N, A. PB, P. S, G. A. Functional dependence among
elderly people in a rural community of Andhra Pradesh, South
India. Int J Community Med Public Heal [Internet]. 2016 Dec
28 [cited 2022 Jan 22];3(7):1835-40. Available from: https://
www.ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/view/319
21. Hung Y-C, Chen Y-H, Lee M-C, Yeh C-J. Eect of Spousal
Loss on Depression in Older Adults: Impacts of Time Passing,
Living Arrangement, and Spouse’s Health Status before Death.
Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 Dec 10 [cited
2022 Jan 22];18(24):13032. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34948641/
22. Das A. Spousal loss and health in late life: moving beyond
emotional trauma. J Aging Health [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited
2022 Jan 22];25(2):221-42. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23271727/
Halder et al.