Siriraj Medical Journal
E-ISSN 2228-8082
The world-leading biomedical science of Thailand
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
E-mail: sijournal92@gmail.com
SMJ
Volume 74, Number 4, April 2022
By Voramon Teranasthiarphan, et al.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE
MONTHLY
Indexed by
THAILAND SECTION
1954
Siriraj Medical Journal
SMJ
Volume 74, Number 4, April 2022
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
211 Long Term Outcomes and Durability of Bioprosthetic Valve for Valve Replacement at
Siriraj Hospital
Wanchai Wongkornrat, et al.
217 The Reliability of the Thai Version of the Toddlers’ Temperament Questionnaire
Pat Rojmahamongkol, et al.
225 Predictive Value of Right Ventricular Pressure Measurement for Residual Pulmonary
Stenosis in Tetralogy Repair
Prompak Nitayavardhanam, et al.
233 The Efficacy of Inside-Out Transversus Abdominis Plane Block vs Local Infiltration before
Wound Closure in Pain Management after Kidney Transplantation: A Double-blind,
Randomized Trial
Chatporn Boonyapalanant, et al.
239 The Analgesic Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on the
Opposite Side for Phantom Limb Pain
Janravee Vathakul, et al.
245 Propensity Score Matched Study of Triweekly vs. Weekly Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Concurrent with Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
Kullathorn Thephamongkhol, et al.
256 Validation of Several Formulas to Differentiate Thalassemia from Iron Deficiency Anemia
and Proposal of a Thalassemia–Iron Deficiency Discrimination (TID) Predictive Score
Nisachon Khorwanichakij, et al.
REVIEW ARTICLE
266 The Evolution of Associating Liver Partition with Portal Vein Ligation for Staged
Hepatectomy
Voramon Teranasthiarphan, et al.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
142 Factors Influencing the Quality of Life and Nutritional Status of 0-2 Years Old Children
Somsiri Rungamornrat, et al.
152 Increasing Dialysate Flow Rate Over 500 ml/min for Reused High-Flux Dialyzers
do not Increase Delivered Dialysis dose: A Prospective Randomized Cross Over Study
Wiparat Srisuwan, et al.
161 Survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Unexpected N2 After Complete
Resection: Should Aggressive Invasive Mediastinal Staging be Encouraged?
Suparauk Geanphun, et al.
169 Incidence and Risk Factors of Neonatal Sepsis in Preterm Premature Rupture of
Membranes Before 34 Weeks of Gestation
Thitiporn Sirivunnabood, et al.
178 Incidence of Adverse Perioperative Airway Complications in Obese Non-Pregnant
and Pregnant Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia
Natwara Asanathong, et al.
185 Burnout among Mental Health Professionals in a Tertiary University Hospital
Nichada Khanngern, et al.
193 Attitudes Toward Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Among Schizophrenia Patients in
Southern Thailand: A Multihospital-Based Cross-Sectional Survey
Jarurin Pitanupong, et al.
REVIEW ARTICLE
202 Kidney Health for All: Bridging the gGap in Kidney Health Education and Literacy
Robyn G. Langham, et al.
SIRIRAJ MEDICAL JOURNAL
First Editor: Ouay Ketusinh Emeritus Editors: Somchai Bovornkitti, Adulya Viriyavejakul, Sommai Toongsuwan,
Nanta Maranetra, Niphon Poungvarin, Prasit Watanapa, Vithya Vathanophas, Pipop Jirapinyo, Sanya Sukpanichnant,
Somboon Kunathikom
Executive Editor: Prasit Watanapa Editorial Director: Manee Rattanachaiyanont
Managing Editor: Gulapar Srisawasdi, Chenchit Chayachinda
Editor-in-Chief: awatchai Akaraviputh
Associate Editor: Varut Lohsiriwat, Prapat Wanitpongpan Online Editor: Puttinun Patpituck
SIRIRAJ MEDICAL JOURNAL is published bimonthly, 6 issues a year (Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct and Nov-Dec)
and distributed by the end of the last month of that issue.
SIRIRAJ MEDICAL JOURNAL is listed as a journal following the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (URM)
by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since 9 July 2010 [http://www.icmje.org/journals.html].
Philip Board (Australian National University, Australia)
Richard J. Deckelbaum (Columbia University, USA)
Yozo Miyake (Aichi Medical University, Japan)
Yik Ying Teo (National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Harland Winter (Massachusetts General Hospital, USA)
Philip A. Brunell (State University of New York At Bualo, USA)
Noritaka Isogai (Kinki University, Japan)
Yuji Murata (Aizenbashi Hospital, Japan)
Keiichi Akita (Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Japan)
Shuji Shimizu (Kyushu University Hospital, Japan)
David S. Sheps (University of Florida, USA)
Robin CN Williamson (Royal Postgraduate Medical School, UK)
Tai-Soon Yong (Yonsei University, Korea)
Anusak Yiengpruksawan (e Valley Robotic Institute, USA)
Stanlay James Rogers (University of California, San Francisco, USA)
Kyoichi Takaori (Kyoto University Hospital, Japan)
Tomohisa Uchida (Oita University, Japan)
Yoshiki Hirooka (Nagoya University Hospital, Japan)
Hidemi Goto (Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan)
Kazuo Hara (Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Japan)
Shomei Ryozawa (Saitama Medical University, Japan)
Christopher Khor (Singapore General Hospital, Singapore)
Yasushi Sano (Director of Gastrointestinal Center, Japan)
Mitsuhiro Kida (Kitasato University & Hospital, Japan)
Seigo Kitano (Oita University, Japan)
Ichizo Nishino (National Institute of Neuroscience NCNP, Japan)
Masakazu Yamamoto (Tokyo Womens Medical University, Japan)
Dong-Wan Seo (University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea)
George S. Baillie (University of Glasgow, UK)
G. Allen Finley (Delhousie University, Canada)
Sara Schwanke Khilji (Oregon Health & Science University, USA)
Matthew S. Dunne (Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Health, Switzerland) 
Marianne Hokland (University of Aarhus, Denmark)
Marcela Hermoso Ramello (University of Chile, Chile)
Ciro Isidoro (University of Novara, Italy)
Moses Rodriguez (Mayo Clinic, USA)
Robert W. Mann (University of Hawaii, USA)
Wikrom Karnsakul (Johns Hopkins Childrens Center, USA)
Frans Laurens Moll (University Medical Center Ultrecht, Netherlands)
James P. Dolan (Oregon Health & Science University, USA)
John Hunter (Oregon Health & Science University, USA)
Nima Rezaei (Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran)
Dennis J. Janisse (Subsidiary of DJO Global, USA)
Folker Meyer (Argonne National Laboratory, USA)
David Wayne Ussery (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA)
Intawat Nookaew (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA)
Victor Manuel Charoenrook de la Fuente 
(Centro de Oalmologia Barraquer, Spain)
Karl omas Moritz
(Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden)
Nam H. CHO (University School of Medicine and Hospital, Korea)
www.smj.si.mahidol.ac.th
Statistician: Saowalak Hunnangkul (Mahidol University, ailand)
Medical Illustrator: Chananya Hokierti (Nopparat Rajathanee Hospital, ailand)
Online Assistant: Surang Promsorn, Wilailuck Amornmontien, Hatairat Ruangsuwan Editorial Oce Secretary: Amornrat Sangkaew
International Editorial Board
Editorial Board
Watchara Kasinrerk (Chiang Mai University, ailand)
Rungroj Krittayaphong (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Wiroon Laupattrakasem (Khon Kaen University, ailand)
Anuwat Pongkunakorn (Lampang Hospital, ailand)
Nopporn Sittisombut (Chiang Mai University, ailand)
Vasant Sumethkul (Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Yuen Tanniradorm (Chulalongkorn University, ailand)
Saranatra Waikakul (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Pa-thai Yenchitsomanus (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Surapol Issaragrisil (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University,ailand)
Jaturat Kanpittaya (Khon Kaen University, ailand)
Suneerat Kongsayreepong (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Pornchai O-Charoenrat (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Nopphol Pausawasdi (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Supakorn Rojananin (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Jarupim Soongswang (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Suttipong Wacharasindhu (Chulalongkorn University, ailand)
Prapon Wilairat (Mahidol University, ailand)
Pornprom Muangman (Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Ampaiwan Chuansumrit
(Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Sayomporn Sirinavin
(Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul
(Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ailand)
SMJ
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
211
Original Article
SMJ
Wanchai Wongkornrat, M.D., Kornkan Mahasawas, M.D., Punnarerk Thongcharoen, M.D., Thaworn
Subtaweesin, M.D.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, ailand.
Long Term Outcomes and Durability of Bioprosthetic
Valve for Valve Replacement at Siriraj Hospital
ABSTRACT
Objective: Bioprosthesis has been used in cardiac valve replacement for a long time. However, structural valve
deterioration is still a major cause of failure. ere are several risk factors for valve deterioration. is study evaluates
the risk factors of valve deterioration in the long term (10 years) at Siriraj Hospital.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 249 patients who underwent mitral
or aortic valve replacement between January 2006 and December 2012 using various tissue valves, comprising
Carpentier–Edwards porcine, Carpentier–Edwards Perimount bovine pericardial, Carpentier–Edwards Perimount
Magna bovine pericardial, and St Jude Trifecta bovine pericardial types. e information from each patient was
entered into a database at the time of the operation and followed up regularly, with a mean follow-up of 10 years.
Results: Aer 10 years follow-up time, the incidence of valve deterioration events were 1.2% and 8.43% in the rst
ve and ten years, respectively. e overall death rate during follow-up was 2.41%. ere were three statistically
signicant risk factors (p < 0.05) of valve deterioration: gender (female) (p = 0.042), age ≤ 60 years old (p = 0.010)
and St Jude Trifecta bovine pericardial valve (p = 0.004).
Conclusion: In the surgical populations who underwent valve replacement at Siriraj Hospital with tissue valves,
we found an acceptable long-term durability of the tissue valve. e risk factors of valve deterioration were female
gender, age ≤ 60 years old, and St Jude Trifecta bovine pericardial valve.
Keywords: Tissue valve; bioprosthesis valve; structural valve deterioration (Siriraj Med J 2022; 74: 211-216)
Corresponding author: aworn Subtaweesin
E-mail: subtaweesin@gmail.com
Received 3 November 2021 Revised 30 December 2021 Accepted 8 January 2022
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-6171
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.26
All material is licensed under terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
license unless otherwise stated.
INTRODUCTION
ere are two types of prosthetic heart valves: the
mechanical heart valve and the bioprosthetic tissue
valve. The mechanical valve is recommended for
young patients because of its durability, but the patient
is required to take anticoagulants for life to prevent
thromboembolism events; whereas the tissue valve is less
durable than the mechanical valve, but the patient is not
required to take anticoagulants for life; thus leading to a
lower risk of bleeding events associated with the use of
anticoagulants.
In 1966, Dr. Alain Carpentier invented the stented
porcine valve and used glutaraldehyde solution as the
chemical preservative for porcine valves by creating collagen
cross-links. is preservation protected the denaturation
of tissue leaets and made the tissue immunologically
inactive.
1
Since 1980s, tissue valves have been improved
through the use of low-pressure xation to maintain a
normal leaet morphology. Anti-calcication and anti-
mineralization treatment methodologies were developed
to obtain longer durable leaets.
2
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
212
Porcine and pericardial tissue valves have been
used for cardiac valve replacement surgery for 20 years
at Siriraj Hospital. However, it is known that these may
suer structural valve deterioration over time, which is
the major cause of tissue valve failure worldwide. Data
collected from 1970 to 2000 revealed that 30% - 40%
of tissue valves at the mitral or aortic position require
replacement within 15 years following implantation
because of structural valve deterioration.
3
ere are several
risk factors for structural valve deterioration, such as a
younger patient, renal insuciency, hyperparathyroidism,
hypertension, tissue valve at the mitral position, and an
older generation of tissue valve.
Calcication is accelerated in younger patients,
renal insuciency, or hyperparathyroidism patients.
Systemic hypertension damages tissue valves at the mitral
and aortic positions due to the increased systolic and
diastolic closing pressure. Older generations of tissue
valves are less durable than the newer generation of
tissue valves. Pericardial valves are more durable than
porcine valves.
4,5
e primary objective of this study was durability of
tissue valve and secondary objective was the risk factors
of long-term (10-year) structural valve deterioration in
patients at Siriraj Hospital, which are essential to have
a better understanding of in order to support selection
of the proper tissue valve types for patients in terms of
the position and timing of tissue valve replacement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
is research was approved by the Ethical Committee
on Research Involving Human Subjects, Faculty of Medicine
Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University on March 24, 2021.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records
of 249 patients who underwent mitral or aortic valve
replacement since January 2006 to December 2012 using
the Carpentier–Edwards porcine (porcine) (24 cases),
Carpentier–Edwards Perimount bovine pericardial (PM)
(165 cases), Carpentier–Edwards Perimount Magna
bovine pericardial (PM magna) (57 cases), and St Jude
Trifecta bovine pericardial (trifecta) (3 cases) tissue
valves types and who survived the operation. e types
of tissue valve were selected by the individual surgeon’s
preference and the valves available at that time. e case
of structural valve deterioration was dened by clinical
presentation, echocardiographic nding results and
reoperation event.
Statistical analysis
e baseline demographic continuous data were
presented as number or percentage, mean and standard
deviation were carried out as normal distribution.
Categorical data was presented as percentage or ratio/
In inferential statistic, 95%CI was used. In case of time
to deterioration in univariate analysis, deterioration was
obtained from Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank
test for compared each group. For multivariate analysis
using Cox (Proportional Hazards) regression analysis
was performed aer adjusted controlling confounding
factors with p-value < 0.2 from univariate analysis using
backward elimination for variable selection. e statistical
signicance was accepted if the p-value was < 0.05.
Table 1 summarizes the preoperative clinical
characteristics of all the patients. The male gender
represented 48.2% of cases and the female gender 51.8%.
e mean age was 69.2 years old (range 15–98 years old),
with 203 patients (81.5%) being more than 60 years old.
Overall, 148 patients underwent aortic valve replacement
(AVR) (59.4%), 84 patients underwent mitral valve
replacement (MVR) (33.7%), and 17 patients underwent
double valve replacement (DVR) (6.8%).
Also, 79 patients (31.7%) with signicant coronary
artery disease who received preoperative angiography
underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass gra
surgery were included in this study. e data obtained
from all the patients were entered into a database at
the time of the operation and then those patients were
followed up regularly.
TABLE 1. Preoperative clinical characteristics.
Variables (n=249) Number (%) or Mean ± SD
Gender; Male 120 (48.2%)
Female 129 (51.8%)
Age (years) 69.2 ± 11.4
≤60years 46(18.5%)
>60years 203(81.5%)
Follow-up time (years) 10.0 (4.0-15.0)
Diagnosis
Regurgitation 153(61.4%)
Stenosis 79(31.7%)
Mixed 17(6.8%)
Operation
AVR 148 (59.4%)
MVR 84(33.7%)
DVR 17(6.8%)
Type of tissue valve
PM 165(66.3%)
PMmagna 57(22.9%)
Porcine 24(9.6%)
Trifecta 3(1.2%)
Concomitant CABG 79(31.7%)
Wongkornrat et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
213
Original Article
SMJ
RESULTS
Aer 10 years (range 4-15 years) follow-up time,
the incident of structural valve deterioration events was
1.2% (95%CI: 0.25-3.47) and 8.43% (95%CI: 5.27-12.56)
in the rst ve and ten years, respectively (Fig 1). e
overall death rate during follow-up was 2.41% (95%CI:
0.97-5.66). A summary of the incidence of structural
valve deterioration is shown in Table 2.
According to Table 3, there were three statistically
signicant risk factors (p < 0.05) of structural valve
deterioration, i.e., female gender, age ≤ 60 years old,
and St Jude Trifecta bovine pericardial valve. e risk
of structural valve deterioration was 2.75 times (95%Cl:
1.04 to 7.28 times) higher signicant (p = 0.042) in
females compared to males, and the risk of structural
valve deterioration is 3.33 times (95%Cl: 1.34 to 8.29
times) more signicant (p = 0.010) in the adult group
(age ≤ 60 years old) compared with the elderly group
(age > 60 years old). e St Jude Trifecta valve was also
found to be a signicant risk factor of structural valve
deterioration (p = 0.004)
DISCUSSION
The expanding use of tissue valves for valve
replacement has been supported by evidence of their
long term durability and freedom from structural valve
deterioration. In this present study at Siriraj Hospital,
we followed 249 cases of tissue valve replacement in
the aortic and mitral valve positions. During the early
years of our experience, the main reasons for using a
tissue valve were patients having a contraindication
to taking anticoagulants, elderly patients, and women
of reproductive age. Nowadays, patient preference has
become one of the most important factors for choosing the
proper valve. In our series, the freedom from structural
valve deterioration at 10 years was 91.57% (Fig 1). ere
were three statistically signicant risk factors (p < 0.05)
of structural valve deterioration identied in our study:
female gender, age ≤ 60 years old and St Jude Trifecta
bovine pericardial valve (Table 3, Fig 2, Fig 3).
Fig 1. Freedom from structural valve deterioration for all tissue valves.
TABLE 2. Incidence of structural valve deterioration.
Variables (n=249) Number of Deterioration Incident of Deterioration (95%CI)
Deterioration
at5years 3 1.20%(0.25-3.47)
at10years 21 8.43%(5.27-12.56)
Died during follow-up 6 2.41%(0.97-5.66)
e risk of structural valve deterioration in the
mitral position has been considered to be higher than in
the aortic position because the systolic closing pressure
at the mitral position is higher than the diastolic closing
pressure at the aortic position. In an Edinburgh study
6
,
aer 15 year tissue valve follow-up, a reoperation rate of
29% due to structural valve deterioration was observed
in the AVR group and 44% in the MVR group. In our
series, aer 10 year tissue valve follow-up, we found
a rate of structural valve deterioration of 6.8% in the
AVR group and 10.7% in the MVR group. However,
the statistical dierence was insignicant (p = 0.183).
Regarding gender, as far as we know there has been no
report about the eects of gender associated with structural
valve deterioration aer tissue valve replacement, but we
found a structural valve deterioration rate of 11.6% in
females and 5.0% in males. e risk of structural valve
deterioration was 2.75 times (95%Cl: 1.04-7.28) more
signicant (p = 0.042) in female compared to male. e
suggested reason behind this result might be the use of a
smaller valve in female patients, which carries a higher
risk of structural valve deterioration.
4
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
214
TABLE 3. Risk factors of structural valve deterioration.
Variable Number (%) or Mean ± SD Log-rank Multivariate Cox
Non- Deterioration test Adjusted HR regression
deterioration (n=21) (p-value) (95%Cl) (p-value)
(n=228)
Gender
Male(n=120) 114(95.0) 6(5.0) 0.069 1
Female(n=129) 114(88.4) 15(11.6) 2.75(1.04-7.28) 0.042*
Age (year) 69.8±10.7 63.05±15.7 
Adultgroup;age≤60year(n=46) 38(82.6) 8(17.4) 0.021 3.33(1.34-8.29) 0.010*
Elderlygroup;age>60year(n=203) 190(93.6) 13(6.4) 1
Diagnosis
Regurgitation(n=153) 137(89.5) 16(10.5) 0.930
Stenosis(n=79) 75(94.9) 4(5.1)
Mixed(n=17) 16(94.1) 1(5.9) 
Operation
AVR(n=148) 138(93.2) 10(6.8) 0.183
MVR(n=84) 75(89.3) 9(10.7)
DVR(n=17) 15(88.2) 2(11.8)
Type
PM(n=165) 153(92.7) 12(7.3) 0.052 1
PMmagna(n=57) 53(93.0) 4(7.0) 1.53(0.47-5.00) 0.479
Porcine(n=24) 20(83.3) 4(16.7) 2.22(0.70-7.01) 0.173
Trifecta(n=3) 2(66.7) 1(33.3) 23.71(2.69-209.09) 0.004*
CABG
yes(n=79) 75(94.9) 4(5.1) 0.176
no(n=170) 153(90.0) 17(10.0)
Fig 2. Freedom from structural valve deterioration for male and female patients.
Wongkornrat et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
215
Original Article
SMJ
Fig 3. Freedom from structural valve deterioration for adult and elderly patients.
Elderly patients have been shown to be the most
powerful determinants of tissue valve longevity.
7
Rizzoli
et al.
3
reported the actual freedom from structural valve
deterioration in patients younger than 65 years old was
less than that seen in older patients (84.5% vs. 95%).
Similarly, we found the rate of structural valve deterioration
was 17.4% in the adult group (age ≤ 60 years old) and
6.4% in the elderly group (age > 60 years old). e risk
of structural valve deterioration was 3.33 times (95%Cl:
1.34-8.29) more signicant (p = 0.010) in the adult group
(age ≤ 60 years old) compared to the elderly group (age
> 60 years old).
e newer generations of tissue valves are more
durable than older generations of tissue valves. Likewise,
pericardial valves are more durable than porcine valves.
5
Bourguignon et al.
8,9
reported the long-term outcomes
of patients tted with a Carpentier–Edwards Perimount
valve in the aortic or mitral position. ey found that
the expected valve durability was 19.7 years in the aortic
position and 14.2 years in the mitral position.
In our series, aer 10 year tissue valve follow-up,
we found structural valve deterioration in 7.3% of cases
in the Perimount group, 7.0% in the Perimount Magna
group, 16.7% in the porcine group, and 33.3% in the
Trifecta group. However, the statistical dierence was
insignicant for the Carpentier–Edwards porcine compared
to the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bovine pericardial
type (p = 0.173, 95%Cl: 0.70-7.01). Conversely, the St
Jude Trifecta bovine pericardial type was found to be a
signicant risk factor of structural valve deterioration
(p = 0.004, 95%Cl: 2.69-209.09), but it should be noted
that the total number of cases in the Trifecta group was
very small (n = 3) compared to in the other groups. So,
we cloud not conclude that they were more likely to
deteriorate than other types.
When reoperation is required, reoperative AVR or
MVR can be done safely. e recent mortality outcomes
were 5%-7% in reoperative AVR or reoperative MVR.
10,11
Besides, in the future, valve in valve transcatheter aortic
valve replacement (TAVR) and transcatheter mitral
valve replacement (TMVR) may be the second optional
treatments for patients who develop structural tissue
valve deterioration. In our series, there were 7 cases who
underwent reoperative AVR or reoperative MVR without
mortality and 2 cases who underwent TAVR without
mortality, while 12 structural valve deterioration cases
were still waiting for their denitive treatment soon.
CONCLUSION
In surgical populations that underwent valve
replacement at Siriraj Hospital with tissue valves, we
found an acceptable long-term durability of the new tissue
valve. e risk factors of structural valve deterioration
were the female gender and age ≤ 60 years. e freedom
from reoperation was not signicantly dierent in terms
of the valve position. However, we need to further re-
evaluate the data in the next 5-10 years to obtain longer
term results.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Miss Nachasa Khongchu of
Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj
Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ailand for
her professional statistical analysis.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
216
REFERENCES
1. Carpentier A, Lemaigre G, Robert L, Carpentier S, Dubost C.
Biological factors affecting long-term results of valvular
heterogras. J orac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;58(4):467-83.
2. Russo M, Taramasso M, Guidotti A, Pozzoli A, Segesser L,
Nietlispach F, et al. e evolution of surgical valves. Cardiovascular
Medicine. 2017;20(12):285-92.
3. Rizzoli G, Bottio T, iene G, Toscano G, Casarotto D. Long-
term durability of the Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis. J
orac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(1):66-74.
4. O’Gara PT. Chapter 23: Prosthetic Heart Valves. In: Catherine
Otto RB, Catherine Otto, Robert Bonow, editor. Valvular
Heart Disease: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease.
3rd ed: Elsevier; 2009. p. 383-98.
5. Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Durability
of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2004;44(2):384-8.
6. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian
C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years aer valve replacement
with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: nal report of the
Veterans Aairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(4):
1152-8.
7. Poirer NC, Pelletier LC, Pellerin M, Carrier M. 15-year experience
with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann
orac Surg. 1998;66(6 Suppl):S57-61.
8. Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Candol P, Mirza A,
Loardi C, May MA, et al. Very long-term outcomes of the
Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve in aortic position. Ann
orac Surg. 2015;99(3):831-7.
9. Bourguignon T, Espitalier F, Pantaleon C, Vermes E, El-Arid
JM, Loardi C, et al. Bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement
in patients aged 65 years or younger: long-term outcomes
with the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(2):302-9.
10. Chan V, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry P, Masters R, Mesana
TG, et al. Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical
prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement. J orac
Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):146-51.
11. Potter DD, Sundt TM, 3rd, Zehr KJ, Dearani JA, Daly RC,
Mullany CJ, et al. Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for
failed mitral valve prostheses. Ann orac Surg. 2004;78(1):
67-72; discussion 67-72.
Wongkornrat et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
217
Original Article
SMJ
Pat Rojmahamongkol, M.D., Supaluk Tangvalelerd, M.D.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, ailand.
The Reliability of the Thai Version of the Toddlers’
Temperament Questionnaire
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the reliability of the Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (ECBQ)-very short form, ai
version; and to investigate ai toddlers’ temperaments
Materials and Methods: e English version of the very short form ECBQ was translated into ai language. e
primary caregivers of 360 healthy, 18-36 months old children, were asked to ll the questionnaire from the period
of April, 2018 to June, 2019. e scores were calculated to determine the child’s temperament. e reliability of
the very short form ECBQ- ai version was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha coecient for internal consistency and
Intraclass correlation coecient (ICC) for inter-rater reliability, two-week and six-month test-retest reliability.
Results: e Cronbach’s alpha coecients were 0.627-0.692, which indicated questionable internal consistency,
but almost reach those of the original ECBQ. e inter-rater ICCs were 0.463-0.670, which were comparable to
those in the original English version. e two-week ICCs were 0.602-0.750, which indicated moderate reliability,
whereas the six-month ICCs decreased to 0.459-0.602. However, these values almost reached those of the original
English version. Most toddlers were reported to have a surgency temperament. Boys signicantly had more surgency
temperament and had higher mean surgency scores, whereas girls exhibited a more eortful-control temperament.
Conclusion: e very short-form ECBQ, ai version can be implemented in assessing ai toddlers’ temperament.
e majority of ai toddlers in this study demonstrated surgency temperament. Boys tended to be more surgency,
while girls tended to be more eortful control.
Keywords: temperament, ECBQ questionnaire, ai toddlers (Siriraj Med J 2022; 74: 217-224)
Corresponding author: Pat Rojmahamongkol
E-mail: patojung@yahoo.com
Received 14 January 2022 Revised 24 January 2022 Accepted 25 January 2022
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-0026
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.27
INTRODUCTION
Temperament is dened as an inborn dierence
in reactivity and self-regulation when a child interacts
with his or her environment. Reactivity is the child’s
reaction to changes in the environment. Self-regulation
is a process to modulate one’s reactivity. Although one’s
temperament persists throughout life, heredity, maturation,
and experiences inuence it over time
1
, for example,
parental discipline and responses to a child’s behavior
can aect the child’s expressions and habits. e most
popular temperament concept among pediatricians
has been omas and Chess’s approach, which was
introduced in 1977.
2
is concept has included nine
dimensions of temperament, which were activity level,
rhythmicity or regularity of physical functions, approach
to or withdrawal from a new situation, adaptability, one’s
sensory threshold to external stimuli, intensity of reactions,
quality of mood, distractibility, and attention span or
persistent focus on tasks. Children are categorized from
the nine dimensions into three groups, which are easy,
dicult, and slow-to-warm up ones. e “easy child” is
easy to raise and care for, exhibits regular sleep, waking
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
218
and feeding times, good moods, and high adaptability.
e “dicult child” has characteristics that are opposite
to those in the rst category. e “slow-to-warm-up
child” demonstrates initial withdrawal from new stimuli
and needs more time to adapt to those new situations,
though eventually he or she can adjust to such stimuli.
Some behavioral problems have been claimed to be
associated with temperament. e child who has a very
high activity level and is very distractible might mimic
the one with attention decit/ hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD). Toddlers with autism exhibited more sensitivity
to stimuli and have more negative moods, compared to
their typically developing peers.
3
Moreover, the child’s
temperament may have bidirectional interactions with
the parents’ responses and psychopathology. Parents
of negative-mood and low-impulse-control children
tended to report a history of anxiety.
4
One study found
that the authoritative parenting style - when parents were
always sensitive to the child’s needs and give him or her
freedom to make decisions in general situations while
limiting the child’s decision-making in more serious
ones, especially potentially dangerous activities - was
correlated with more patience and less irritability among
their children.
5
is highlights the fact that a successful
management strategy for behavioral problems based on
temperamental origin should harmonize with the child’s
temperament. us, a correct interpretation of the child’s
temperament helps pediatricians and other medical
personnel to assist parents in better understanding their
children’s characteristics and to guide parents in dealing
with his or her problems.
Although omas and Chess’s temperament concept
is clinically practical for the evaluation of children’s
behavior and in terms of offering recommendation
to parents, however, the Toddler Temperament Scale
questionnaire developed by Fullard et al, in 1984
6
to
measure the nine dimensions of temperament contains
97 question items which is not clinically practical for ai
context. Most of ai-version questionnaires developed
for time-constraint clinical use consists of 15-40 question
items.
7-9
ere is also the concept of temperament developed
by Rothbart in 1981. Rothbart’s temperament is dened
as biologically-rooted individual dierences in reactivity
and self-regulation in one’s emotional, activational,
and attentional processes.
1
In their eort to measure
children’s temperaments, Putnam et al.
10
formulated 18
scales of temperamental components based on Rothbart’s
temperamental concept, which are shown in the appendix.
e children were classied into three groups: “surgency,”
which refers to the ones with a high activity level and
positive anticipation regarding new activities; “negative
aectivity,” referring to children who display fear and
frustration; and “eortful control,” which applies to those
with high impulse control and attentiveness to tasks. is
approach led to the development of the Early Childhood
Behavior Questionnaire (ECBQ),
10
which was designed
to assess temperament in children from 18-36 months
old. e psychometric properties have demonstrated
good internal consistency and reliability.
7
ere are three
versions of the ECBQ - the standard ECBQ (consisting
of 201 items), the short-form ECBQ (107 items), and
the very short-form ECBQ (36 items).
11
e ECBQ has been widely used in English and in
more than 18 languages, such as Chinese, Japanese, and
French. e very short-form version has been widely
implemented in English and ten non-English-speaking
countries.
11
To the best of our knowledge, there is no temperament
questionnaire for ai toddlers. As a result, research on
temperament in the ai population has been very limited.
e aim of this study was to translate the original English
very short form of ECBQ into ai and to evaluate the
reliability of the ai version. We also aimed to study ai
toddlers’ temperament by using this form. e English
version of the very short-form ECBQ was selected for
this research study because the number of the question
items is feasible for implementation in busy clinical
settings in ailand.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
e details of the original questionnaire
The very short version of the Early Childhood
Behavior Questionnaire (ECBQ) is used to evaluate
the temperament of 18-36-month-old children. e
questionnaire includes 36 items regarding children’s
behaviors, which are specic to each temperament type.
ere are 12 items for surgency, 12 for eortful control, and
another 12 for negative aectivity. Parents or caregivers
give a Likert scale score regarding the frequency of their
child’s behaviors. e scores range from 1 (never) to 7
(always), and “Does not apply” (if the question is not
relevant to the child). e mean score of each temperament
type is calculated, and the highest mean scores dene
the child’s temperament type. If there is more than one
equally highest mean score, the child is classied as
more than one - i.e. a mixed-temperament type. Internal
consistency was evaluated by using Cronbach’s alpha
coecient. e internal consistency of negative aectivity,
surgency, and eortful-control temperament were 0.70,
0.72, 0.72, respectively. e longitudinal stability over
six months was 0.65.
12
Rojmahamongkol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
219
Original Article
SMJ
e translation process
e ai version of the very short-form ECBQ
was translated with the permission of the pioneer of
the original English version. e content validity was
measured by three ai developmental and behavioral
pediatricians. e acceptable content validity index was
0.67. Each item’s content validity was initially ranged
from 0.33 to 0.67. e items which had low content
validity were retranslated. Aer substantial agreement
from those three specialists, reected by a content validity
index of 1, the translation back into English was done to
conrm that the ai version adhered with the original
English version.
Population and procedure
is cross-sectional, questionnaire-based research
included caregivers of 18-to-36-month-old children
who attended the well child clinic and daycare at Siriraj
Hospital, or who were in pre-kindergarten and daycare
in Bangkok and the surrounding metropolitan area. e
recruitment period was from April, 2018 to June, 2019.
e exclusion criteria were those whose children had a
diagnosis of developmental delay or chronic diseases.
Caregivers who could not read ai were also excluded.
is study was approved by the Human Research Protection
Unit, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol
University.
Aer signing an informed consent, 360 caregivers
were asked to ll out the 20-minute ai very short-form
ECBQ. Of these, 20 were randomized for two-week (short-
term) test-retest reliability; another 20 were allocated for
six-month (long term) test-retest reliability. Eighty-three
pairs of primary and secondary caregivers were recruited
for inter-rater reliability testing. e number of the
participants in each group randomized for test-retest and
inter-rater reliabilities were based on the reliabilities from
the original English version (0.6 and 0.31, respectively),
estimated type I error of 0.05, and the power of 80%. e
scores obtained from the questionnaire were calculated
so as to interpret the children’s temperament. At the end
of the study, all caregivers received the information about
their child’s temperament, as well as the developmental
and behavioral pediatrician’s guidance in child-rearing
practices specic to each child’s temperament.
Statistical analysis
e data were prepared and analyzed using PASW
Statistics 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive
statistics were used to describe the participants’ characteristics.
Number and percentage were used to describe qualitative
data, while mean and standard deviation (SD) were used
to describe normally distributed quantitative data. A
median (25
th
, 75
th
percentile) was used to report non-
normally distributed data. e Chi-Square test was used
to evaluate statistical signicance.
Cronbach’s alpha coecient was used to evaluate the
internal consistency of the questionnaire. e coecient,
which was < 0.5, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, and > 0.7, was dened
as unacceptable, poor, questionable, and good internal
consistency, respectively.
13,14
Test-retest reliability was
interpreted by using the intraclass correlation coecient
(ICC). Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the two-
way random-eects model, while intra-rater reliability
was evaluated by using the two-way mixed-eects model.
In this study, an ICC which was < 0.5, 0.5-0.75, and
0.75-0.9 was classied as of poor, moderate, and good
reliability, consecutively.
15
RESULTS
e demographic data are shown in Table 1. Of the
360 caregivers, 323 (89.7%) answered the questionnaire
regarding the child’s gender. e majority of these caregivers
were mothers. e short-term (two weeks) test-retest
reliability was performed involving 20 fathers or mothers
of the children, which included nine (45%) boys and 11
(55%) girls. Long-term (six months) test-retest reliability
was performed involving 20 participants whose children
were 11 (55%) boys and nine (45%) girls. Sixteen out
of 20 caregivers, who were randomized for long- term
test-retest reliability, were fathers or mothers. Another 4
out of 20 were other family members. Of the 83 pairs of
primary and secondary caregivers recruited for inter-rater
reliability, 46 (55.4%) were the caregivers of boys, and
37 (45.6%) were the caregivers of girls. All the children
were ai and lived in Bangkok and the surrounding
metropolitan area. e mean age (SD) was 27.9 (6.2)
months old.
Table 2 demonstrates Cronbach’s alpha coecient
for each temperament and the range of Cronbach’s
alpha coecient when one item was deleted. e overall
Cronbach’s alpha coecients were 0.682, 0.627, and
0.692 for surgency, negative aectivity, and eortful-
control temperament, respectively. e maximum of
the coecient when one item was deleted was 0.707.
Regarding the inter-rater reliability, the ICCs were
0.638, 0.670, and 0.463 for surgency, negative aectivity,
and eortful-control temperament, respectively. e
ICCs for short-term intra-rater reliability were 0.614,
0.750, and 0.602 for surgency, negative aectivity, and
eortful-control temperament, respectively. For long-
term one, the ICCs decreased to 0.602, 0.459, and 0.476,
respectively. (Table 3)
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
220
TABLE 1. Demographic data of the children and the caregivers
TABLE 2. Cronbach’s alpha coecient for each temperament.
Characteristics Number (%)
Child’sgender
Boy 174(53.9)
Girl 149(46.1)
Missingdata 37
Child’sAge(N=357)
18-23months 98(27.5)
24-30months 110(30.8)
31-36months 149(41.7)
Missingdata 3
Caregivers
Parents 346(96.1)
Grandparents 12(3.3)
Others 2(0.5)
Caregivers’maritalStatus
Single 32(8.9)
Married 317(88.1)
Divorced 11(3.1)
Caregivers’education
UnderBachelordegree 42(11.7)
Bachelordegree 194(53.9)
AboveBachelordegree 124(34.4)
Family’smonthlyincome
≤30,000Bahts 111(31.7)
30,001-50,000Bahts 107(30.6)
50,001-100,000Bahts 82(23.4)
≥100,001Bahts 50(14.3)
Missing 10
Temperament Cronbach’salphacoefcient Cronbach’salphacoefcient
when item is deleted
Surgency 0.682 0.645to0.692
NegativeAffectivity 0.627 0.576to0.636
EffortfulControl 0.692 0.649to0.707
Rojmahamongkol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
221
Original Article
SMJ
TABLE 3. Inter-rater reliability, short-term and long-term intra-rater reliabilities.
Temperament ICC
a
(95% CI) ICC
b
(95% CI) ICC
c
(95% CI)
Surgency 0.638(0.495-0.747) 0.614(0.228-0.832) 0.602(0.244-0.819)
NegativeAffectivity 0.670(0.536-0.772) 0.750(0.461-0.896) 0.459(0.021-0.746)
EffortfulControl 0.463(0.280-0.614) 0.602(0.231-0.824) 0.476(0.040-0.756)
ICC: Intraclass correlation coecient
a
Intraclass correlation coecient between primary and secondary caregivers
b
Intraclass correlation coecient, two weeks apart (short-term)
c
Intraclass correlation coecient, six months apart (long-term)
e temperament classications of 360 ai children
in this study were 205 (56.9%) for surgency, 135 (37.5%)
for eortful control, and 3 (0.8%) for negative aectivity.
ere were 16 (4.4%) children whose caregivers rated
their temperaments as surgency and eortful control
equally; one (0.3%) child was classied as manifesting
surgency and negative aectivity. Boys signicantly had
more surgency temperament and a higher mean surgency
scores than girls. Girls exhibited more eortful-control
than boys. ere was no statistical signicance of gender
dierence in terms of negative aectivity and mixed
temperament. (Table 4)
TABLE 4. Descriptive statistics for the scale scores of each temperament in boys and girls.
Temperament Boys Girls p-value
Surgency
N(%) 107(61.5) 72(48.3) 0.019*
Meanscores±SD 5.36±0.62 5.16±0.69 0.008*
NegativeAffectivity
N(%) 0 3(2) 0.097
Meanscores±SD 2.86±0.67 3.00±0.73 0.056
EffortfulControl
N(%) 57(32.8) 68(45.6) 0.022*
Meanscores±SD 5.11±0.65 5.09±0.68 0.740
Surgency-EffortfulControlequally
N(%) 10(5.7) 5(3.4) 0.428
Meanscores±SD N/A N/A N/A
Surgency-NegativeAffectivityequally
N(%) 0 1(0.3) 0.461
Meanscores±SD N/A N/A N/A
p-value < 0.05 is considered statistically signicant
* p-value < 0.05
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
222
DISCUSSION
is is the rst study in ailand that has used the
translated very short form of Early Childhood Behavior
Questionnaire (ECBQ), which is the clinically practical
evaluative tool for assessing ai toddlers’ temperament.
is study is also the rst preliminary report on ai
toddlers’ temperament. e majority of ai toddlers in
this study demonstrated surgency temperament. Boys
exhibited more surgency, while girls manifested more
eortful control.
The very short form of ECBQ, Thai version demonstrated
an internal consistency coecient at 0.682 for surgency
temperament, 0.627 for negative-aectivity temperament,
and 0.692 for eortful-control temperament. Although these
coecients suggested questionable internal consistency,
they were slightly lower than those of the original English
version (0.72 for surgency, 0.7 for negative aectivity,
and 0.72 for eortful control).
12
e maximum of the
Cronbach’s alpha coecient of the ai version of the
questionnaire, when any item was deleted, was 0.707,
which was slightly higher than the overall Cronbach’s alpha
coecient. is suggests that no item disproportionately
aected the overall internal consistency (i.e. No specic
item should be removed from the ai version of the
very short-form ECBQ). A recent study translating the
very short-form ECBQ into Czech, which recruited 709
children ages 18-36 months, also revealed an internal
consistency by Cronbach’s alpha coecients of 0.65, 0.70,
and 0.71 for surgency, negative aectivity, and eortful
control, consecutively. However, there was no report
regarding the inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities.
16
e intraclass correlation coecients exhibited
moderate to good short-term intra-rater reliability
(0.614, 0.602, and 0.750 for surgency, eortful control,
and negative aectivity, respectively). In contrast, the
long-term one had poor to moderate reliability (0.602
for surgency, 0.476 for eortful control, and 0.459 for
negative-aectivity temperament). We postulated that the
decline in the reliability might be due to chronological
fading. However, the long-term ICCs almost reached
those of the original English version, which was ranged
from 0.55-0.83.
12
e inter-rater reliability was classied
as being of poor to moderate reliability - i.e. 0.463,
0.638, and 0.670 for eortful control, surgency, and
negative aectivity, respectively, which were slightly
more favorable than in the original English version,
which reported an overall inter-rater reliability of 0.31
(0.32, 0.24, and 0.36 for eortful control, surgency, and
negative aectivity, respectively).
12
All of the properties
demonstrated that very short-form ECBQ, ai version can
be fruitfully used in research on temperament among ai
children.
Our study found that the majority of our participants
were reported as having a surgency temperament. Although
no previous studies reported the most common temperament
type in their populations, there has been plentiful evidence
that culture aects temperament. American children
get higher scores for surgency and lower scores for
negative aectivity than Japanese children.
17
One possible
explanation is that self-reliance, autonomy, and creativity
are highly valued and promoted in the Western cultures,
whereas such characteristics tend not to be in the Asian
ones. However, the American children got higher scores
for negative aectivity,
18
and tended to demonstrate
more eortful control than Chilean and Italian toddlers,
respectively.
19
erefore, how ai children’s temperament
diers from that of children’s from other regions should
be the subject of future research. Our ndings regarding
gender dierences are comparable to those of previous
international studies.
16,20
Possible explanations involve
how boys and girls are raised to behave dierently.
ere were some limitations to this study. e data
collection about parental temperament scoring did not
be specied that the parent was a father or a mother.
This lack of information hindered the comparisons
between fathers’ and mothers’ perspectives that may
lead to low inter-rater reliability, especially regarding
eortful-control temperament. Although our sample
size was adequate for evaluating the reliability of the
questionnaire, it was obviously too low to represent all
ai toddlers. Future research should be done using a
considerably larger sample size and should include the
participants from every region of ailand.
CONCLUSION
e very short form Early Childhood Behavior
Questionnaire, ai version demonstrated acceptable
internal consistency and reliability. e majority of the
ai toddlers revealed a surgency temperament. Boys
exhibited more surgency, while girls manifested more
eortful control.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
e authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Samuel
P. Putnam for giving us permission to translate the
Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire, very short
form into ai, and to Dr. Sasima Tongsai and Ms.
Kanokwan Sommai from the Division of Research,
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
for help with the statistical analysis.
Conict of interest declaration
e authors declare no conicts of interest relating
to any aspect of this study.
Rojmahamongkol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
223
Original Article
SMJ
Funding disclosure
ere was no funding for this study.
APPENDIX
The ECBQ assesses the following 18 scales of
temperament:
Activity Level/Energy: Level (rate and intensity) of gross
motoractivity, including rate and extent of locomotion
Attentional Focusing: Sustained duration of orienting
on an object ofattention; resisting distraction
Attentional Shiing: e ability to transfer attentional
focus fromone activity/task to another
Cuddliness: A child’s expression of enjoyment in and
moldingof the body to being held by a caregiver
Discomfort: Amount of negative aect related to sensory
qualitiesof stimulation, including intensity, rate, or
complexity oflight, sound, texture.
Fear: Negative aect,including unease, worry, or nervousness
related to anticipated pain or distress and/or potentially
threatening situations;being startled by sudden events
Frustration: Negative aect related to interruption of
ongoingtasks or goal blocking
High-intensity Pleasure: Pleasure or enjoyment related
to situations involving high stimulus intensity, rate,
complexity, novelty and incongruity
Impulsivity: Speed of response initiation
Inhibitory Control: e capacity to stop, moderate,or
refrain from a behavior under instruction
Low-intensity Pleasure: Pleasure or enjoyment related
to situations involving low stimulus intensity, rate,
complexity,novelty and incongruity
Motor Activation: Repetitive small-motor movements;
dgeting
Perceptual Sensitivity: Detection of slight, low-intensity
stimuli from the external environment
Positive Anticipation: Excitement about expected
pleasurableactivities
Sadness: Tearfulness or lowered mood related to exposure
to personal suering, disappointment, object loss, loss
of approval,or response to other’s suering
Shyness: Slow or inhibited approach and/or discomfort
in social situations involving novelty or uncertainty
Sociability: Seeking and taking pleasure in interactions
with others
Soothability: Rate of recovery from peak distress,
excitement, or general arousal
Children’s temperament divided into three factors:
Surgency/Extraversion is characterized by high
positive loadings for Activity Level, High-Intensity
Pleasure, and the Impulsivity scale and strong negative
loadings on the Shyness scales.
Negative Affectivity is characterized by high
positive loadings for Anger/Frustration, Sadness, Fear,
and Discomfort and negative loading for the Soothability
scales.
Eortful Control is characterized by high positive
loadings for Inhibitory Control, Attention Control, and
the Perceptual Sensitivity scales.
REFERENCES
1. Rothbart MK, Derryberry D. Development of individual
dierences in temperament. In: M.E. Lamb ALB, editors.
Advances in developmental psychology. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associations; 1981. p. 33-86.
2. Chess S, omas A. Temperamental individuality from childhood
to adolescence. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1977;16(2):218-
26.
3. Macari SL, Koller J, Campbell DJ, Chawarska K. Temperamental
markers in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. J Child
Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(7):819-28.
4. Kryski KR, Olino TM, Dyson MW, Durbin CE, Klein DN, Hayden
EP. Associations between observed temperament in preschoolers
and parent psychopathology. Personal Ment Health. 2018;12(2):
131-44.
5. Lee EH, Zhou Q, Eisenberg N, Wang Y. Bidirectional relations
between temperament and parenting styles in Chinese children.
Int J Behav Dev. 2012;37(1):57-67.
6. Fullard W, McDevitt SC, Carey WB. Assessing temperament in
one- to three-year-old children. J Pediatr Psychol. 1984;9(2):205-
17.
7. Laohaprasitiporn P, Monteerarat Y, Jaderojananont W,
Limthongthang R, Vathana T. Validity, reliability and
responsiveness of the ai version of patient-related wrist
evaluation. Siriraj Med J. 2021;73(4):275-81.
8. Janha P, Punyapas S, Ratta-apha W. Parent stress-coping
skills and resilience among parents of children with specic
learning disorders. Siriraj Med J. 2021;73(1):38-45.
9. Pinkaew B, Assansen P, Michel O, Talek K, Phonmanee T,
Kerdnoppakhun J. Impact assessment of smell and taste disorders
on quality of life in ais using the SF-36 health survey (ai
version). Siriraj Med J. 2019;71(2):102-9.
10. Putnam SP, Gartstein MA, Rothbart MK. Measurement of
ne-grained aspects of toddler temperament: the early childhood
behavior questionnaire. Infant Behav Dev. 2006;29(3):386-401.
11. Mary Rothbart’s temperament questionnaires. The Early
Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (ECBQ) [Internet]. [cited
2020 Nov 30]. Available from: https://research.bowdoin.edu/
rothbart-temperament-questionnaires/instrument-descriptions/
the-early-childhood-behavior-questionnaire/.
12. Putnam SP, Jacobs J, Gartstein MA, Rothbart MK. Development
and assessment of short and very short forms of the Early
Childhood Behavior Questionnaire. Poster presented at:
International Conference on Infant Studies; 2010 Mar; Baltimore,
MD.
13. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-5.
14. Glen S. Cronbach’s alpha: simple denition, use and interpretation.
[Internet]; 2021 [cited 2020 30 Nov]. Availble from: https://
www.statisticshowto.com/cronbachs-alpha-spss/
15. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
224
correlation coecients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med.
2016;15(2):155-63.
16. Petra P, Potmesil M. e Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire
Very Short Form (ECBQ VSF) and its adaptation to the population
of the Czech Republic. Psychiatr Psychol Klin. 2019;19:281-7.
17. Slobodskaya HR, Gartstein MA, Nakagawa A, Putnam SP.
Early temperament in Japan, the United States, and Russia: do
cross-cultural dierences decrease with age? J Cross Cult
Psychol. 2012;44(3):438-60.
18. Farkas C, Vallotton C. Dierences in infant temperament
between Chile and the US. Infant Behav Dev. 2016;44:208-18.
19. Cozzi P, Putnam SP, Menesini E, Gartstein MA, Aureli T,
Calussi P, et al. Studying cross-cultural dierences in temperament
in toddlerhood: United States of America (U.S.) and Italy.
Infant Behav Dev. 2013;36(3):480-3.
20. Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS, Goldsmith HH, Van Hulle CA.
Gender dierences in temperament: a meta-analysis. Psychol
Bull. 2006;132(1):33-72.
Rojmahamongkol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
225
Original Article
SMJ
Prompak Nitayavardhanam M.D., Teerapong Tocharoenchok M.D.
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, ailand.
Predictive Value of Right Ventricular Pressure
Measurement for Residual Pulmonary Stenosis in
Tetralogy Repair
ABSTRACT
Objective: e long-term outcome of tetralogy of Fallot repair depends on an adequate relief of right ventricular
outow tract obstruction and preservation of the pulmonary valve function. Since intraoperative transesophageal
echocardiography is not routinely performed in small patients, we postulated that the post-bypass right ventricular
pressure measured intraoperatively could predict residual pulmonary stenosis when evaluated by transthoracic
echocardiography.
Materials and Methods: Of the 187 patients who underwent tetralogy repair between 2012 and 2019 at Siriraj
Hospital, ailand, 95 with right ventricular pressure measurements and pre-discharge echocardiography were
included in the study. eir intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. e tolerable
pressure cuto was determined.
Results: e median patient age was 3.9 years old (interquartile range 2.75–6). Fiy-three patients (54.6%) required
the use of the transannular patch. Ten patients (10.3%) had signicant residual pulmonary stenosis with a mean
right ventricular systolic pressure of 64.0±10.6 mmHg compared with 48.7±14.4 mmHg for the other patients.
ere was an association between the pressure gure and the degree of residual pulmonary stenosis (rho=0.391,
p=0.01). A systolic pressure above 49 mmHg predicted pulmonary stenosis with a likelihood ratio of 2.18 (1.94-
2.80, 95%CI). e likelihood rose to 2.93 (2.44-4.01, 95%CI) if the pressure resulted in a right to le ventricular
pressure ratio above 0.62. e patients whose gures did not exceed 49 mmHg experienced no signicant residual
obstruction, regardless of the pressure ratio.
Conclusion: Intraoperative measurement of the right ventricular pressure can predict residual pulmonary stenosis
aer tetralogy repair with a reassuring cuto of 49 mmHg.
Keywords: Tetralogy of Fallot repair; right ventricular pressure; residual pulmonary stenosis; intraoperative
assessment (Siriraj Med J 2022; 74: 225-232)
Corresponding author: Teerapong Tocharoenchok
E-mail: Teerapong.toc@mahidol.ac.th
Received 26 November 2021 Revised 21 December 2021 Accepted 22 December 2021
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9983-3915
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.28
INTRODUCTION
Tetralogy of Fallot is the most common cyanotic
congenital heart disease worldwide. e rst corrective
surgery was performed in the 1950s and the treatment
has been evolving ever since.
1
e current strategies
involve adequate relief of right ventricular outow tract
obstruction and optimal preservation of the right ventricular
and pulmonary valve function, guided predominantly
by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.
2,3
Residual pulmonary stenosis or regurgitation aer
the repair is not infrequent and, to some extent, it can
lead to progressive right ventricular dysfunction requiring
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
226
subsequent reoperation to prevent sudden cardiac death.
4-6
In the light of a paradigm shi from complete relief of the
right ventricular outow tract obstruction to preserving
the pulmonary valve and infundibulum during tetralogy
repair, the adequacy of resection has gained elevated
importance as some reports have revealed a high incidence
of residual right ventricular outow tract obstruction
following valve-sparing surgery. even during short-term
follow-up.
7
Intraoperative echocardiography is not routinely
performed in small children at many institutes, including
at our institute, and instead, many surgeons measure the
right ventricular pressure intraoperatively to predict the
degree of residual pulmonary stenosis and to identify
whether the problematic outow justies immediate
revision.
8
Unfortunately, the maximum tolerable pressure
is arbitrary and depends on the individual threshold of
acceptance. Besides, the le to the right systolic ventricular
pressure ratio alone is subject to errors as it depends on
the systemic vascular resistance, which may vary across
patients in response to the cardiopulmonary bypass.
We postulate that, in the absence of intraoperative
echocardiography, the right ventricular systolic pressure can
predict residual right ventricular outow tract obstruction.
Further, in this study, we tried to identify the pressure
criteria for outow tract revision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
Between 2012 to 2019, 187 consecutive tetralogy
of Fallot patients underwent total correction at Siriraj
Hospital, ailand. Aer exclusion of the patients without
documented post-bypass right ventricular systolic
pressure measurements and pre-discharge transthoracic
echocardiography, 95 patients were included in the study
analysis. e decision to measure the ventricular pressure
primarily depended on the surgeon’s routine. Table 1
shows the baseline characteristic and operative variables
of the study population. e preoperative pulmonary
valve z-value and McGoon ratio were obtained from
the cardiac catheterization measurements. e clinical
outcomes between the 95 included patients were similar
to those of the rest patients (who were excluded because of
no documented intraoperative right ventricular pressure
measurement) concerning signicant residual pulmonary
stenosis and in-hospital care duration (the results not
shown).
e study was approved by Siriraj Institutional
Review Board (COA no. Si 003/2020). e patient consent
is waived as it contained minimal risk to the subject.
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics.
Variables Study patients
(n=95)
Age,y mean±SD 6.0±6.7
median[IQR] 3.9[2.75–6]
Weight,kg mean±SD 15.7±8.7
median[IQR] 13[10.5–17.8]
PreoperativePVz-score -2.14±1.52
McGoonratio 2.21±0.47
Bypasstime,min 165.5±58.7
Cross-clampingtime,min 121.2±39.2
Transannularpatch,n(%) 52(54.7)
DirectRVSP,mmHg 50.3±14.8
DirectPrv/Plvratio 0.60±0.18
PostOpTTERVOTPPG,mmHg 25.2±14.3
missing,n(%) 15(15.8)
PostOpTTEPSgrade,n(%)
none 16(16.8)
mild 69(72.6)
moderate 10(10.5)
severe 0
SignicantresidualPS,n(%) 10(10.5)
ICUstay,d mean±SD 3.2±6.6
median[IQR] 2[1,3]
Hospitalstay,d mean±SD 9.8±7.4
median[IQR] 8[7–11]
Abbreviations: ICU; intensive care unit, Plv; le ventricular pressure,
Prv; right ventricular pressure, PostOp; postoperative, PPG; peak
pressure gradient, PS; pulmonary stenosis, PV; pulmonary valve,
RVOT; right ventricular outow tract, RVSP; right ventricular systolic
pressure, TTE; transthoracic echocardiography.
Surgical technique and right ventricular pressure
measurement
All repairs were conducted through median
sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass under mild
systemic hypothermia. Intermittent, antegrade cold blood
cardioplegia was given for myocardial protection. e
surgical approach was transatrial and transpulmonary
and/or transventricular in all the patients depending
on the degree of infundibular hypoplasia and on the
anatomy of the ventricular septal defect. The right
Nitayavardhanam et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
227
Original Article
SMJ
ventricular outow was managed with either annular-
preserving repair or standard transannular patch repair
with monocusp creation using a 0.1 mm-thick expanded
polytetrauoroethylene membrane according to the
intraoperative annular measurement. e patch size was
tailored for a normal pulmonary valve size for the age
and height of the patient. Aer the patients had come
o the bypass, all the transducers were calibrated, and
the right ventricular pressure was obtained by direct
puncture to the right ventricular free wall using a 25
mm-long, 22-gauge needle connected to the pressure
transducer system. e le ventricular pressure was
simultaneously estimated by the peripheral arterial line
and an arterial outlet pressure monitoring device.
Postoperative course and transthoracic echocardiography
In the intensive care unit, the hemodynamic support
and ventilator management were adjusted according
to the clinical progress by the attending physicians.
Postoperative echocardiography was performed by pediatric
cardiologists before hospital discharge or otherwise as
clinically indicated. e pressure gradient across the
right ventricular outow tract, degree of pulmonary
stenosis, and regurgitation were noted.
Denitions
e degree of residual pulmonary stenosis was
estimated using transthoracic echocardiography by a
combination of the morphologic appearance, and the
measured peak velocity and peak pressure gradient across
the pulmonary valve.
Mild: peak velocity < 3 m/s, peak gradient < 36
mmHg
Moderate: peak velocity = 3–4 m/s, peak gradient
= 36–64 mmHg
Severe: peak velocity > 4 m/s, peak gradient >
64 mmHg
Signicant residual pulmonary stenosis is dened
as a moderate or greater degree of pulmonary stenosis.
Statistical analysis
Based on the expected correlation coecient of 0.3,
a minimum sample size of 85 was required to estimate
Spearman’s rank correlation with a power of 0.8 and a
signicance level of 0.05. Descriptive statistics were used
to present the baseline characteristics of the patients.
Continuous variables were presented as the mean with the
standard deviation or the median with the interquartile
range. e dierences were evaluated using the Student’s
t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical
variables were presented as number and percentage, and
dierences were evaluated using the chi-square test or
Fischer’s exact test, as appropriate. A p-value < 0.05 was
set as the threshold for statistical signicance. Receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated
to determine the optimal cuto values for the variables
in the prediction of signicant residual outow tract
obstruction. All the data were analyzed using the SPSS
soware version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM Company, Chicago,
Illinois, USA).
RESULTS
No operative mortality was observed. e pre-
discharge transthoracic echocardiography was performed
at the median post-operative day 5 (interquartile range
1-6). e mean intraoperative right ventricular systolic
pressure aer the repair was 50.3±14.8 mmHg (range
17–83 mmHg). e mean intraoperative right to le
systolic ventricular pressure ratio was 0.60±0.18 (range
0.21–1.08). Concerning the degrees of postoperative
tricuspid regurgitation, only 5 patients experienced
moderate tricuspid regurgitation while the rest had
no or mild regurgitation. Table 2 shows comparisons
between the two surgical approaches: the transannular
and non-transannular techniques. e transannular
patch repair group was associated with less residual
outow obstruction, more pulmonary regurgitation,
and a longer ICU stay and hospital stay.
Ten patients (10.5%) were documented to have
significant residual right ventricular outflow tract
obstruction with a higher systolic right ventricular
pressure and pressure ratio. None of them underwent
surgical revision at the index admission. Comparisons
between the patients with and without signicant residual
pulmonary stenosis are shown in Table 3. e patients
with residual subpulmonary obstruction required less
transannular patching and subsequently a shorter in-
hospital care duration. e characteristics of the patients
with signicant residual pulmonary stenosis are shown
in Table 4.
rough Spearman’s rank correlation analysis, we
found a correlation between the systolic right ventricular
pressure and the degree of postoperative residual pulmonary
stenosis (rho = 0.391; p = 0.01). e right to le systolic
ventricular pressure ratio was also correlated with the
degree of postoperative residual pulmonary stenosis
(rho = 0.369; p = 0.01). rough ROC curve analysis,
we analyzed each intraoperative pressure parameter and
the combination of both to identify the diagnostic cuto
for signicant residual pulmonary stenosis identied
by pre-discharge transthoracic echocardiography. e
results are depicted in Fig 1. A systolic right ventricular
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
228
TABLE 2. Comparison of two outow reconstruction techniques among the study patients.
Variables Transannular approach Transatrial/Pulmonary P-value
(n=52) (n=43)
Age,y mean±SD 5.1±4.9 7.1±8.3 0.15
median[IQR] 3.4[2.8–6.2] 4.8[2.8–6.0] 0.43
Weight,kg mean±SD 14.5±6.9 17.1±10.5 0.16
median[IQR] 12.2[10.4–16.3] 14[10.5–18.5] 0.27
PreoperativePVz-score -2.82±1.47 -1.30±1.14 <0.001
McGoonratio 2.21±0.47 2.27±0.59 0.58
Bypasstime,min 176.1±68.5 148.7±40.1 0.022
Cross-clamping,min 129.5±42.3 108.4±32 0.007
DirectRVSP,mmHg 52±15 48.5±14.7 0.26
DirectPrv/Plvratio 0.62±0.19 0.58±0.18 0.26
PostOpTTEPSgrade,n(%)   0.46
none 8(15.4) 7(16.3)
mild 41(76.9) 27(62.8)
moderate 2(3.8) 8(18.6)
severe 0 0
SignicantresidualPS,n(%) 2(3.8) 8(18.6) 0.039
PostOpTTEPRgrade,n(%)   <0.001
none 0 7(16.3)
mild 4(7.7) 10(23.3)
moderate 20(38.5) 21(48.8)
severe 27(51.9) 4(9.3)
PostOpTTERVOTPPG,mmHg 24.4±13.9 25.6±13.5 0.72
missing,n(%) 9(17.3) 7(16.3)
ISatICUarrival mean±SD 11.3±12.7 8.2±6.2 0.15
median[IQR] 7.5[5–15] 7[4–13] 0.38
ICUstay,d mean±SD 4.3±8.8 2±1.5 0.09
median[IQR] 2.5[1–4] 1[1–2] 0.006
Hospitalstay,d mean±SD 11.5±10 8.1±2.7 0.032
median[IQR] 10[7–11.8] 8[6–10] 0.007
Abbreviations: ICU; intensive care unit, IS; inotropic score, Plv; le ventricular pressure, Prv; right ventricular pressure, PostOp; postoperative,
PPG; peak pressure gradient, PR; pulmonary regurgitation, PS; pulmonary stenosis, PV; pulmonary valve, RVOT; right ventricular outow
tract, RVSP; right ventricular systolic pressure, TTE; transthoracic echocardiography.
Nitayavardhanam et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
229
Original Article
SMJ
TABLE 3. Comparison of two outow reconstruction techniques among the study patients.
Variables Patients with Patients without P-value
signicantresidualPS signicantresidualPS
(n=10) (n=85)
Age,y mean±SD 3.8±2.0 6.3±7.0 0.019
median[IQR] 3.3[2.3–5.3] 4.3[2.8–6.3] 0.31
Weight,kg mean±SD 14.2±5.0 15.9±9.1 0.39
median[IQR] 13.3[10–17.6] 13[10.6–17.8] 0.85
PreoperativePVz-score -1.59±0.74 -2.21±1.58 0.22
McGoonratio 2.58±0.57 2.17±0.44 0.05
Bypasstime,min 144±24.9 168±61 0.028
Cross-clampingtime,min 109.6±29.5 122.6±40.1 0.23
Transannularpatch,n(%) 2(20) 49(57.6) 0.039
DirectRVSP,mmHg 64±10.6 48.7±14.5 0.001
DirectPrv/Plvratio 0.76±0.13 0.58±0.18 0.002
PostOpTTERVOTPPG,mmHg 46.7±10.2 21.8±10.9 <0.001
missing,n(%) 0 14(16.5)
ISatICUarrival mean±SD 8.6±6.9 9.9±10.7 0.60
median[IQR] 7[4–11.3] 6.8[4.4–15] 0.89
ICUstay,d mean±SD 1.7±1.9 3.5±6.9 0.07
median[IQR] 1[1–1.3] 2[1–3] 0.018
Hospitalstay,d mean±SD 7.7±1.8 9.3±3.6 0.042
median[IQR] 7[6.8–8.5] 8[7–11] 0.27
Abbreviations: ICU; intensive care unit, IS; inotropic score, Plv; le ventricular pressure, Prv; right ventricular pressure, PostOp; postoperative,
PPG; peak pressure gradient, PS; pulmonary stenosis, PV; pulmonary valve, RVOT; right ventricular outow tract, RVSP; right ventricular
systolic pressure, TTE; transthoracic echocardiography.
pressure above 49 mmHg predicted postoperative
residual pulmonary stenosis with a likelihood ratio of
2.18 (95%CI 1.94–2.80). A systolic right to le ventricular
pressure ratio above 0.62 predicted postoperative residual
pulmonary stenosis with a likelihood ratio of 2.57 (95%CI
2.21–3.42). e combination of both pressure criteria
raised the likelihood of residual outow obstruction to
2.93 (95%CI 2.44–4.01). Fig 2 shows the outow tract
decision owchart according to our results. None of the
study patients whose ventricular pressure did not meet
both criteria experienced signicant residual outow
obstruction.
DISCUSSION
We found an association between right ventricular
systolic pressure and the degree of pulmonary stenosis.
As a predictor for residual right ventricular outow tract
obstruction, the absolute gure of the intraoperative
pressure performed comparably to the pressure ratio
(an almost identical area under the ROC curve). When
we combined both parameters, the predictive value from
the likelihood ratio increased considerably. Apart from
the pressure ratio, this information implies how high the
right ventricular pressure is also matters, especially when
the right to le systolic pressure ratio approaches the
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
230
TABLE 4. Characteristics of the patients with signicant residual pulmonary stenosis.
Patient Gender Preoperative McGoon Technique RVSP, Prv/lv PostOp TTE IS at ICU ICU stay, Hospital
PV z-score ratio mmHg ratio RVOT PPG, arrival day stay, day
mmHg
1 M -2.06 2.73 Subannular, valvulotomy 52 0.66 39 4 1 6
2 F -1.5 2.3 Subannular, valvulotomy 50 0.63 49 15 2 6
3 M -1.18 3.5 Supravalve, valvulotomy 69 0.69 47 11.7 8 12
4 F -2.6 3 Transannular, monocusp 67 0.76 55 20 4 10
5 M -1.9 2.5 Supravalve, valvulotomy 64 0.75 42 7 1 8
6 M -1.63 1.5 Sub/supravalve patch, 50 0.70 38 5 1 8
valvulotomy
7 M -2.4 2 Supravalve, valvulotomy 81 0.70 55 10 1 7
8 F -1.79 3.12 Transannular, monocusp 75 0.90 66 7.5 1 7
9 M -0.4 2.53 Supravalve, valvulotomy 70 1.08 41 5 1 8
10 M -0.4 2.6 Transatrial 62 0.73 44 10 1 7
Abbreviations: ICU; intensive care unit, IS; inotropic score, Plv; le ventricular pressure, Prv; right ventricular pressure, PostOp; postoperative, PPG; peak pressure gradient, PV; pulmonary valve, RVOT;
right ventricular outow tract, RVSP; right ventricular systolic pressure, TTE; transthoracic
Echocardiography.
Nitayavardhanam et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
231
Original Article
SMJ
Fig 2. Outow tract assessment decision owchart
Abbreviations: Prv/lv; right ventricular to le ventricular systolic pressure ratio, PS; pulmonary stenosis, RV; right ventricle, RVSP; right
ventricular systolic pressure.
Fig 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the predictors of right ventricular outow tract obstruction. (A) Right ventricular
systolic pressure (RVSP). (B) Right to le ventricular pressure ratio (Prv/Plv ratio).
Abbreviations: AUC; area under the curve, Sn; sensitivity, Sp; specicity.
published revision criteria. Although in the majority of
the cases both the pressure and pressure ratio went in the
same direction and magnitude, in some patients with a
relatively low systolic blood pressure initially o the pump,
use of the pressure ratio alone tended to overestimate
the residual outow obstruction. Only one of the sixteen
patients (specically, patient #9) with an initial systolic
blood pressure below 70 mmHg experienced signicant
residual pulmonary stenosis despite a mean pressure ratio
of 0.75±0.29 in the group with hypotension. Adding the
absolute right ventricular pressure to the consideration
could prevent unnecessary intervention in this context.
To the best of our knowledge, this piece of information
has not been reported before in the literature.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
232
Regarding the pressure ratio cuto value of 0.62,
which is quite low compared with other reports
2,9
, this
gure was selected as a reassuring cuto, not the revision
one. As the specicity of the test suggested, some patients
whose measurement exceeded these criteria eventually
fell into the insignicant residual outow stenosis at the
sonographic follow-up. is implies that even if both
proposed criteria are met, the surgeon should logically
identify the culprit location and consider the possibility of
further resection without scarifying the pulmonary valve
integrity before commencing the second pump run. e
reason behind this is possibly due to the heterogeneous
nature of postoperative Fallot’s outow tract restriction
(i.e., xed or dynamic)
10
, which, unfortunately, might
need intraoperative echocardiography to dierentiate.
3
Unsurprisingly, the patients who needed the pulmonary
valve ring enlarged performed worse than those with an
intact pulmonary valve ring in terms of the pulmonary
valve integrity and in-hospital care duration (Table 2).
In contrast to a previous report
8
, our study demonstrated
better in-hospital outcomes among the patients with
signicant residual outow tract obstruction (shorter
ICU and hospital stay). is result could probably be
attributed to the eect of the transannular approach and
the resultant pulmonary insuciency rather than the
gradient itself (the transannular patching requirement
of the patients with insignificant residual stenosis
was almost triple that of the signicant counterpart,
Table 3).
It is to be noted that our study had limitations due
to its retrospective nature and short period of follow-up.
Also, changes in the outow tract gradient over time
were monitored only in selected patients. Furthermore,
as we did not have a patient with critical residual outow
tract obstruction in our series, the diagnostic cuto of
such a condition was, therefore, unattainable. Longer-
term follow-up of such a ‘signicant’ patient is needed
to elucidate the clinical signicance of such ndings.
CONCLUSION
In the setting without intraoperative transesophageal
echocardiography, the direct measurement of right
ventricular pressure can predict the adequacy of outow
tract reconstruction during the repair of tetralogy patients.
Adding an absolute pressure criterion of 49 mmHg to
the pressure ratio could prevent unnecessary surgical
revision and protect pulmonary valve integrity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Sasima
Tongsai from the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, who
performed the statistical analysis for this study.
Funding statement: is research received no specic
grant from any funding agency.
Conict of interest statement: None declared.
REFERENCES
1. Neill CA, Clark EB. Tetralogy of Fallot. e rst 300 years.
Tex Heart Inst J 1994;21: 272-9.
2. Boni L, Garcia E, Galletti L, Perez A, Herrera D, Romos V, et al.
Current strategies in tetralogy of Fallot repair: pulmonary valve
sparing and evolution of right ventricle/le ventricle pressures
ratio. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:885-9; discussion 889-
890. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.016.
3. Borodinova O, Mykychak Y, Yemets I. Transesophageal
Echocardiographic Predictor of Signicant Right Ventricular
Outow Tract Obstruction Aer Tetralogy of Fallot Repair.
Semin orac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;32:282-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.
semtcvs.2019.09.011.
4. Ferraz Cavalcanti PE, Sa MP, Santos CA, Esmeraldo IM, de
Escobar R, de Menezes AM, et al. Pulmonary valve replacement
aer operative repair of tetralogy of Fallot: meta-analysis and
meta-regression of 3,118 patients from 48 studies. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2013;62:2227-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.107.
5. Geva T. Indications and timing of pulmonary valve replacement
aer tetralogy of Fallot repair. Semin orac Cardiovasc Surg
Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2006;11-22. DOI: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2006.
02.009.
6. Egbe AC, Vallabhajosyula S, Connolly HM. Trends and outcomes
of pulmonary valve replacement in tetralogy of Fallot. Int J
Cardiol 2020;299:136-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.063.
7. Gellis L, Banka P, Marshall A, Emani S, Porras D. Transcatheter
balloon dilation for recurrent right ventricular outow tract
obstruction following valve-sparing repair of tetralogy of
Fallot. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:692-700. DOI:
10.1002/ccd.25930.
8. Chittithavorn V, Rergkliang C, Chetpaophan A, Vasinanukorn P,
Sopontammarak S, Promphan W. Predicted outcome aer
repair of tetralogy of Fallot by postoperative pressure ratio
between right and le ventricle. J Med Assoc ai 2006;89:
43-50.
9. Naito Y, Fujita T, Manabe H, Kawashima Y. e criteria for
reconstruction of right ventricular outow tract in total correction
of tetralogy of Fallot. J orac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;80:574-81.
10. Kaushal SK, Radhakrishanan S, Dagar KS, Lyer PU, Girotra S,
Shrivastava S, et al. Signicant intraoperative right ventricular
outow gradients aer repair for tetralogy of Fallot: to revise or
not to revise? Ann orac Surg 1999;68:1705-12; discussion
1712-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01069-3.
Nitayavardhanam et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
233
Original Article
SMJ
Chatporn Boonyapalanant, M.D.**, Varat Woranisarakul, M.D.*, Siros Jitpraphai, M.D.*, Ekkarin Chotikawanich,
M.D.*, Tawatchai Taweemonkongsap, M.D.*, Hari Bahadur KC, M.D.***, itipat Hansomwong, M.D.*
*Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ailand, **Division of Urology,
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, ailand,
***Department of Surgery, Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal.
The Efcacy of Inside-Out Transversus Abdominis
Plane Block vs Local Inltration before Wound
Closure in Pain Management after Kidney
Transplantation: A Double-blind, Randomized Trial
ABSTRACT
Objective: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a form of multimodal pain management in open abdominal
surgery. Among patients who undergo kidney transplantation, their choice of painkillers is limited. is study
aims to determine the ecacy of TAP block vs local inltration in pain management aer kidney transplantation.
Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, 46 patients with end-stage
kidney disease who had undergone kidney transplantation were randomly divided into two groups: a local anesthetic
inltration (LA) group receiving 0.25% Bupivacaine 20 ml around the surgical wound before wound closure and a
TAP block group receiving 0.25% Bupivacaine 20 ml by the inside-out technique. eir postoperative pain scores
and morphine consumption were recorded at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours.
Results: ere was no statistically signicant dierence in the baseline characteristics between the groups. e
postoperative pain score at two hours in the TAP block group was signicantly lower than in the LA group
(P value = 0.037), but without other dierences in their pain scores aer two hours. ere was no statistical dierence
in the morphine consumption between the two groups. e total morphine consumption in the TAP block group
was less than in the LA group, but this was not statistically signicant. No patients suered from complications of
the TAP block.
Conclusion: Transversus abdominis plane block can reduce postoperative pain at two hours aer kidney transplantation,
without signicant complications.
Keywords: Transversus abdominis plane block; kidney transplantation; pain management; postoperative pain
(Siriraj Med J 2022; 74: 233-238)
Corresponding author: itipat Hansomwong
E-mail: thitipat.han@mahidol.ac.th
Received 7 September 2021 Revised 1 February 2022 Accepted 17 February 2022
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-8243-7876
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.29
Abbreviations
TAP Transversus abdominis plane
NRS Numerical rating scale
BMI Body mass index
LA Local anesthesia
QL Quadratus lumborum
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
234
INTRODUCTION
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice
in patients with end-stage kidney disease. A kidney
transplant is a major operation requiring a classical
incision at the lower abdomen, extending from laterally
to the pubic symphysis to the anterior superior iliac crest
called Gibson incision. Many patients require a painkiller
aer the operation, and postoperative pain control is
crucial to improving one’s surgical outcome. Multimodal
analgesia aims to decrease opioid consumption and its side
eects. Especially among patients who undergo kidney
transplantation, their choice of painkiller is limited, due
to any such drugs’ interaction with immunosuppressive
drugs and nephrotoxicity.
1
Local anesthesia inltration
around the incision is one of the traditional methods of
local pain control. Two decades ago, transversus abdominis
plane (TAP) block was introduced as a new technique to
reduce postoperative pain. is was originally reported by
Ra in 2001.
2
TAP block is a regional anesthesia, targeting
sensory nerves running between the internal oblique
muscle and the transversus abdominis muscle layer, these
nerves receiving signal from anterior abdominal wall
between level of T9 and T12 via a blinded technique or
ultrasound guidance.
3,4
A TAP block can be performed
by a surgeon or anesthesiologist using the outside-in
technique aer the induction of anesthesia or through
the inside-out technique before the wound is closed. A
TAP block has been used to control postoperative pain
involving many kinds of abdominal surgery. e results
from many trials have produced variable outcomes, some
showing no signicant dierence in post-operative pain
management, while others have resulted in signicant pain
scores and/or opioid consumption.
5-11
According to meta-
analyses, the TAP block seems to benet postoperative
pain control in kidney transplantation patients.
12
Until
now, there has been no report comparing traditional,
local anesthetic inltration with the TAP block by the
inside-out technique in kidney transplantation patients.
is study aims to determine the ecacy of the TAP
block vs local inltration in pain management aer
kidney transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This prospective, randomized, double-blinded
clinical trial was approved by the Ethics Committee
of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol
University, ailand, protocol number 826/2019(IRB4).
Aer informed consent, 46 patients with end-stage kidney
disease who had undergone kidney transplantation from
both living-donor and cadaveric kidney transplant at
Siriraj Hospital were recruited. Patients were excluded
if they had a history of painkiller allergy, if they could
not dene a pain score in the numerical rating scale
(NRS), were suspected of having a painkiller addiction
or an abnormal coagulopathy, or had incomplete data.
Patients’ demographic data (sex, age, BMI, and
previous abdominal surgery); intraoperative data (operative
time and length of wound); and postoperative data
covering 48 hours (pain score and opioid usage) were
collected. Patients were randomly divided into two groups:
a local anesthetic inltration (LA) group and a TAP
block group. e group allocations were concealed in
opaque envelops which were randomly picked up and
opened just before each wound was closed. Aer standard
monitoring, all patients received general anesthesia. e
kidney transplantation was then done routinely. In the
LA group, patients received 0.25% Bupivacaine 20 ml
around the surgical wound before the wound was closed.
In the TAP block group, the TAP block was performed
by a surgeon with the ultrasound- guided inside-out
technique. A curvilinear ultrasound probe was placed
just lateral to the quadratus lumborum muscle above
the iliac crest as high as possible via a standard Gibson
incision. Aer the layer between the internal oblique
muscle and the transversus abdominis muscle was found,
0.25% Bupivacaine 20 ml was injected into the space
via needle 25-gauge 1.5 inch with the appearance of a
Goose egg sign before the wound was closed (Fig 1). All
patients were received postoperative care and pain control
at postanesthesia care unit following Siriraj protocol
13
including Acetaminophen 500 mg 1 tab per oral every
6 hours for 3 days. Aer the operation, patients were
assessed on a pain score with a numerical rating scale
Fig 1. TAP block procedure
0.25% Bupivacaine 20 ml was injected
into the space between the internal oblique
muscle and the transversus abdominis
muscle via needle 25-gauge 1.5 inch
with ultrasound guided.
Boonyapalanant et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
235
Original Article
SMJ
(NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain) at 2, 6, 12,
18, 24, and 48 hours. If the pain score was more than
3 or analgesics were required, 1 mg of morphine was
intravenously administered, and then the pain score was
rechecked aer ve minutes. e amount of morphine
consumption was recorded. All pain scores and morphine
consumption were recorded by investigators who were
blinded to the group allocations.
e goal was to compare the pain score and morphine
consumption aer the TAP block and LA technique.
e sample size was calculated from previous study on
TAP-block ecacy.
9-11
Statistical analysis was conducted
using SPSS version 21 soware. Demographic data and
intraoperative data were present as mean ± SD. In a
normal distribution of data, the Student’s t-test and
Pearson’s chi-square were used to compare the results
between the two groups. e postoperative pain scores
and morphine consumption were present as a median
with IQR, and compared between the groups by using
the Mann-Whitney U test. A P value less than 0.05 was
determined as having statistical signicance.
RESULTS
From January, 2020 to November, 2020, 46 patients
were enrolled in this study and were randomized into
two groups, with 23 people in each group. One patient
in the TAP block group was excluded due to the need for
reoperation within 24 hours because of bleeding from
tissue around the kidney gra (Fig 2). 62.2% of the study
population was male, and the mean age was 46.7 years
old (range: 26 – 62). e mean body mass index was
21.39 kg/m
2
(range: 15.6 – 27.9). 28.9% of the patients
had previous abdominal surgery. e mean operative
time was 177 minutes (range: 110 – 360) and the mean
length of the wound was 16.6 centimeters (range: 12 –
23). ere was no statistically signicant dierence in
the baseline characteristics between the groups, as is
indicated in Table 1.
The pain scores (NRS) were compared in two
groups, (as seen in Fig 3), at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours
postoperatively. e median and IQR of pain scores at
2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours in LA group are 3 (3-4),
2 (1-3), 2 (0-3), 1 (0-2), 0 (0-1) and 0 (0) respectively.
Fig 2. Patients ow chart.
TABLE 1. Comparison of two outow reconstruction techniques among the study patients.
LA group TAP block group P value
Sex 0.848
Male 60.9% 63.6%
Female 39.1% 36.4%
Age(years) 48.4±9.7 44.9±10.2 0.247
Bodymassindex 21.8±3.1 20.9±2.8 0.339
Previousabdominalsurgery 30.4% 27.3% 0.815
Operativetime(minute) 181.8±50.1 172.5±36.9 0.484
Lengthofwound(cm) 16.5±2.2 16.7±2.3 0.771
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
236
e median and IQR of pain scores at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24,
and 48 hours in TAP block group are 2 (2-3), 2 (1-2),
2 (1-2), 0 (0-1), 0 (0-0.25) and 0 (0). e postoperative
pain score at two hours in the LA group was higher than
in the TAP block group (P value = 0.037), though there
were no other dierences in the pain scores aer two
hours and throughout a 48-hour period.
ere was no statistical dierence in morphine
consumption between the groups, in terms of total usage,
and any recorded time point, as shown in Fig 4. e
median total morphine consumption in the LA group
was 2 mg (IQR 1-4); in the TAP block group, it was 1 mg
(IQR 1-3), with a p value of 0.105. No patients suered
from complications of the TAP block.
DISCUSSION
e most eective options for postoperative pain
control aer kidney transplantation are not always easily
determined, due to the many limitations arising from
patients’ status. In post-kidney transplant patients, many
kinds of painkillers have a risk of causing nephrotoxicity
and can alter renal clearance. An epidural block is an option
for postoperative pain control in abdominal surgery, but
there is risk of epidural hematoma formation in kidney
transplantation patients because of platelet dysfunction.
14
Regional nerve block has become a promising choice for
postoperative pain control in kidney transplant patients.
Regional nerve block or TAP block is target on specic
sensory nerve but local anesthesia can be variable due to
Fig 3. Postoperative pain score (NRS) at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (median with IQR).
Fig 4. Morphine consumption at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (median with IQR).
Boonyapalanant et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
237
Original Article
SMJ
operator dependent and variations of anatomy.
3
From
a meta-analysis
15
, we see that a TAP block can reduce
total opioid consumption (morphine consumption to
6 mg per day) as well as a patient’s pain score within 24
hours aer the operation. Our study shows that the pain
scores two hours aer the operation in the TAP block
group were lower than in the LA group, but, again, there
was no signicant dierence between the groups aer
that. Our LA group were given 0.25% Bupivacaine 20 ml
around the surgical wound, which can also reduce the
postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption.
Even though our study had local pain control in the LA
group, the results still reveal that the TAP block was better
than the LA, as regards post-operative pain control aer
kidney transplantation. TAP block is recommended
if ultrasound is available and patients do not have an
abnormal coagulopathy.
Concerning the duration of pain control aer the
TAP block, our meta-analysis
15
showed that 0.375%,
0.5% and 0.75% Ropivacaine TAP block reduced the
pain score at two hours aer surgery, but only 0.75%
Ropivacaine was eective 12 to 24 hours aer surgery.
We used 0.25% Bupivacaine 20 ml for the TAP block.
Onset of action of 0.25% Bupivacaine is about 19 ± 41
seconds and duration of action is about 7.02 ± 1.46 hours
aer injection.
16
is may be one of the reasons why there
were signicantly reduced pain scores only at two hours
aer the operation. In some studies, specialists added
drug regimens to the TAP block in order to prolong
the pain-control eect. Yang et al.
17
have shown that
the addition of dexmedetomidine can provide a more
eective analgesic eect for the TAP block. Systematic
review and meta-analysis from Choi et al.
18
have indicated
that adding dexamethasone to the local nerve block can
prolong the eect of nerve block more than by just doing
a local nerve block alone.
In a meta-analysis
14
, some of researchers used the
blinded technique of the TAP block, but many used the
ultrasound-guided approach. e ecacy of the latter has
been shown to be superior. Today, the ultrasound-guided
technique is considered the gold standard for the TAP
block.
4
Regarding the other technique of TAP block in our
study, we used the ultrasound-guided method with the
inside-out technique. e typical outside-in TAP block
technique may cause visceral organ damage, even if the
procedure is ultrasound-guided.
19,20
e inside-out technique
can reduce the possibility of visceral organ damage due
to performers’ visualization while performing the TAP
block. Additionally, the TAP block, which is performed
by a surgeon intra-operatively, requires less time than
the conventional TAP block by an anesthesiologist, and
there is with no dierence in the postoperative pain-
control outcomes.
21
ere is an important question involving the timing
of the administration of the TAP block. In our study, the
TAP block was applied before the wound was closed,
though some performers do this before starting to operate.
Dahl et al.
22
have demonstrated that postoperative pain
scores were not signicantly dierent between the pre- and
post-incisional nerve block. Another technique that may
help in pain management for kidney transplant patients
is the quadratus lumborum (QL) block 2. According to
Kolacz et al.
23
, this kind of block can reduce fentanyl
consumption within 24 hours aer kidney transplantation,
without a dierence in the pain score, compared to the
TAP block. Given the inside-out technique used in our
study, we may also perform a QL block via a kidney-
transplantation incision.
ere were a number of limitations in this study.
First, we could not assess the patients’ sensory-distribution
level because the TAP block was performed before the
wound was closed and while patients were still under
general anesthesia. Secondly, our inside-out technique is
dierent from original TAP technique. e double pop
sensation described in original technique cannot be felt
during needle passage, so ultrasound guided is necessary
to determine the depth of the needle. e third limitation
is no use of intravenous patient control analgesia to
access accurate dose of morphine requirement. Lastly,
our sample size was too small to broadly assess the safety
of the TAP block technique. Further studies are required
to compare the safety of the inside-out method with the
outside-in technique of the TAP block, and to determine
the optimum dose or volume to use for the TAP block.
CONCLUSION
e transversus abdominis plane block can reduce
postoperative pain aer kidney transplantation, without
signicant complications. We conclude that the TAP block
can be used as a part of multimodal pain management
for post-kidney transplantation patients.
Conicts of interest statement: e authors declare
that there are no nancial or other conicts of interest
involved in this project.
REFERENCES
1. Baker M, Perazella MA. NSAIDs in CKD: Are ey Safe? Am
J Kidney Dis. 2020; 76(4):546-57.
2. Ra AN. Abdominal eld block: A new approach via the
lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(10):1024-26.
3. Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, Yang SF, Chang CC, Yao
HY, et al. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: An Updated Review
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
238
of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8284363.
4. Hopkin PM. Ultrasound guidance as a gold standard in regional
anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98(3):299-301.
5. Shin HJ, Kim ST, Yim KH, Lee HS, Sim JH, Shin YD. Preemptive
analgesic ecacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis
plane block in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery via
a transverse lower abdominal skin incision. Korean J Anesthesiol.
2011;61(5):413-8.
6. Gharaei H, Imani F, Almasi F, Solimani M. e Eect of
Ultrasound-guided TAPB on Pain Management aer Total
Abdominal Hysterectomy. Korean J Pain. 2013;26(4):374-8.
7. Chang H, Rimel BJ, Li AJ, Cass I, Karlan BY, Walsh C. Ultrasound
guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block utilization
in multimodal pain management aer open gynecologic surgery.
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018;26:75-77.
8. Brady RR, Ventham NT, Roberts DM, Graham C, Daniel T.
Open transversus abdominis plane block and analgesic requirements
in patients following right hemicolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg
Engl. 2012;94(5):327-30.
9. Srivastava U, Verma S, Singh TK, Gupta A, Saxsena A, Jagar KD,
et al. Ecacy of trans abdominis plane block for post cesarean
delivery analgesia: A double-blind, randomized trial. Saudi J
Anaesth. 2015;9(3):298-302.
10. Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laey JG. e
transversus abdominis plane block provides eective postoperative
analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.
Anesth Analg. 2008;107(6):2056-60.
11. Azawi NH, Mosholt KS, Fode M. Unilateral ultrasound-guided
transversus abdominis plane block aer nephrectomy; postoperative
pain and use of opioids. Nephrourol Mon. 2016;8(2):e35356.
12. Singh PM, Borle A, Makkar JK, Trisha A, Sinha A. Evaluation of
transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients -
A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(2):261-71.
13. Sanansilp V. Pain Control System in Siriraj Hospital Postanesthesia
Care Unit (PACU). Siriraj Med J. 2014;66(4):82-90.
14. Basta M, Sloan P. Epidural hematoma following epidural
catheter placement in a patient with chronic renal failure.Can
J Anaesth.1999;46:271-4.
15. Sun N, Wang S, Ma P, Liu S, Shao A, Xiong L.Postoperative
Analgesia by a Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Using
Dierent Concentrations of Ropivacaine for Abdominal Surgery:
A Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(9):853-63.
16. Collins JB, Song J, Mahabir RC. Onset and duration of intradermal
mixtures of bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine. Can
J Plast Surg. 2013;21(1):51-53.
17. Yang P, Luo Y, Lin L, Zhang H, Liu Y, Li Y. e ecacy of
transversus abdominis plane block with or without dexmedetomidine
for postoperative analgesia in renal transplantation. A randomized
controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2020;79:196-201.
18. Choi S, Rodseth R, McCartney CJ. Eects of dexamethasone as a
local anaesthetic adjuvant for brachial plexus block: a systematic
review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth.
2014;112(3):427-39.
19. Farooq M, Carey M. A case of liver trauma with a blunt regional
anesthesia needle while performing transversus abdominis
plane block.Reg Anesth Pain Med.2008;33(3):274-5.
20. Lancaster P, Chadwick M. Liver trauma secondary to ultrasound-
guided transversus abdominis plane block.Br J Anaesth.2010;
104(4):509-10.
21. Narasimhulu DM, Scharfman L, Minko H, George B, Homel
P, Tyagaraj K. A randomized trial comparing surgeon-
administered intraoperative transversus abdominis plane
block with anesthesiologist-administered transcutaneous block.
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018;35:26-32.
22. Dahl JB, Møiniche S. Pre-emptive analgesia. Br Med Bull.
2004;71:13-27.
23. Kolacz M, Mieszkowski M, Janiak M, Zagorski K, Byszewska
B, Weryk-Dysko M, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block
versus quadratus lumborum block type 2 for analgesia in renal
transplantation: A randomised trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;
37(9):773-89.
Boonyapalanant et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
239
Original Article
SMJ
Janravee Vathakul, BNS*, Nanticha Kessava, M.D.*, Julaporn Pooliam, M.Sc.**, Madonna Damayanthie Datu,
M.D.***, anawut Jitsinthunun, M.D.*, Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon, M.D.*
*Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ailand, **Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Oce
for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ailand, ***Department of Anesthesiolgy, Dr.
Wahidin Sudirohusodo-Hasanuddin University General Hospital, Makassar-Indonesia.
The Analgesic Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical
Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on the Opposite Side for
Phantom Limb Pain
ABSTRACT
Objective: To observe the eects of TENS on the contralateral limb and PLP reduction.
Materials and Methods: is was a single center retrospective study of 20 amputee participants with phantom limb
pain. e inclusion criteria were participants aged above 18, average pain of at least 4/10 on the numerical rating
scale (NRS), duration of pain longer than one week and treatment with TENS on the opposite side. We recorded
pain intensity before and aer TENS application, response time to treatment, satisfaction, and adverse eects.
Results: Of the 20 amputee participants, all patients suered from PLP and three also suered from residual limb
pain. e average pain score before use of TENS was 4.85/10 and aer was 1.15/10. e mean pain intensity score
was reduced by 3.7/10 (95% CI 2.95-4.45/10) or 76.28% (95% condence interval 63.61-89.47%). e average overall
satisfaction was 81.65%, and no adverse eects from application of TENS was reported.
Conclusion: e study shows that the application of TENS on the opposite side is a safe and eective treatment
method for intractable pain from PLP.
Keywords: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; amputee; phantom limb pain; contralateral; neuromodulation;
neuropathic pain (Siriraj Med J 2022; 74: 239-244)
Corresponding author: Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon
E-mail: nantthasorn@gmail.com
Received 8 October 2021 Revised 20 February 2022 Accepted 21 February 2022
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5946-7962
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.30
INTRODUCTION
Up to 80% of amputees experience pain sensation
to a limb aer amputation (phantom limb pain: PLP)
and/or pain at the stump (residual limb pain; RLP) that
negatively impacts their quality of life.
1-5
Although chronic
PLP is common, evidence evaluating the ecacy of
treatments remains scarce, and there is still no consensus
for a standard treatment in standard guidelines.
5,6
e
most common treatments are pharmacological. However,
strong evidence supporting the short and long-term
ecacy of pharmacological treatments for PLP is still
lacking.
6,7
In an eort to identify additional eective treatment
options for PLP, clinicians and investigators have examined
a variety of non-pharmacological treatments such as
application of mirror visual feedback
8,9
and transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
10-13
, especially for the
patients who had limited success from pharmacological
treatment. TENS delivers pulsed electrical currents across
the intact surface of the skin to stimulate the peripheral
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
240
nerves and spinal cord, resulting in segmental and extra-
segmental analgesia.
14
Research indicates that the application
of TENS at the site of residual limb pain or projected
site of phantom pain is associated with decreases in pain
intensity, both at rest and during movement.
10
However,
residual limb application of TENS can be challenging in
certain situations because it may aggravate discomfort
in patients with pre-existing pain or cause skin irritation
that reduces stump integrity in recent amputees.
Contralateral TENS, by inhibiting the contralateral
segmental in the dorsal horn from another side
14
, potentially
alleviates PLP and can address the problems associated
with the stump. A number of reports and small case
series have reported successful outcomes of contralateral
TENS for PLP
11-13
, and we already apply this treatment
in our daily practice. As there is no data collection of
large series for such treatment, we conducted this study
to examine the eects in the ai population.
We hypothesized that patients with PLP who received
TENS on the contralateral limb would report signicant
pain reduction aer treatment. e primary objective
of this study was to observe the eects of TENS on the
contralateral limb and PLP reduction. e secondary
objectives included observing for adverse eects, satisfaction,
and the duration of contralateral TENS treatment for
PLP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this retrospective observational study, in order to
compare the analgesic eect before and aer treatment, we
performed sample size calculations with the aim to detect
a 30% reduction in pain scores aer treatment, which is
a meaningful change. Using data from a pilot study, the
mean pain score of patient suering from phantom limb
pain in our center was 5.2/10 (SD=2). By using PASW
Statistics version 18 (Chicago, IL, USA), a sample size
of 16 patients was enough to detect a dierence, with an
alpha error of 0.05 and power of 90%. As the estimate of
incomplete data was 20%, the nal number of patients
needed for this study was adjusted to 20 patients.
Aer approval by the Mahidol University-IRB, the
research team identied the medical records of patients
who suered from phantom limb pain at the Siriraj
Pain Clinic and received contralateral TENS treatment
for pain relief at Siriraj Hospital from January 1, 2018
to December 31, 2018. e research team collected the
following data points:
1. General demographic and medical history, including
age, sex, and cause of amputation
2. Pain history, including pain diagnosis, past
medications and previous treatment(s) for PLP, and
pain-related interference assessed by a validated ai
version of a brief pain inventory questionnaire
15
3. NRS before and aer treatment
4. Side eects and patient satisfaction of treatment
In routine practice, we oer the treatment to adult
patients who have moderate to severe pain (average pain
intensity from numeric rating scale more than 3 out of
10) despite appropriate pharmacological treatment (the
patients had taken at least two analgesics). TENS was not
oered in contraindicated conditions such as pregnancy,
epilepsy, active malignancy, deep vein thrombosis, frail
or damaged skin or to patients with cardiac pacemakers
or implantable cardioverter debrillators.
We used commercially available TENS units in our
daily practice (Fig 1) due to their low cost and ease of use.
First, we applied TENS’ electrodes on the contralateral
limb, mimicking the pain area on the opposite side.
As the commercial TENS units were obtained from a
variety of brands and did not have measurable parameter
settings (frequency, pulse width, amplitude), we used
clinical response as our end point. We turned on the
stimulation and increased the intensity until the patient
felt pain-free paresthesia.
We recorded an initial pain score, then applied the
stimulation for at least 30 minutes and recorded their
subsequent pain score. If the patient did not report
any change, the session was extended to 45 minutes or
60 minutes. At the end of the session, we assessed the
patient satisfaction scale (0-100) and the presence of
any adverse eects. ere was no long-term follow-up
aer the session.
Fig 1. Commercially available TENS unit.
Vathakul et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
241
Original Article
SMJ
TABLE 1. Patient’s demographic data. PLP (phantom
limb pain), RLP (residual limb pain).
TABLE 2. Medication used for treatment of phantom limb pain.
Demographic data (n=20)
Sex
Male 10(50%)
Female 10(50%)
Age:mean(SD)years 57.1(15.63)
Pain
PLP 20(100%)
PLP+RLP 3(15%)
Levelofamputation
Transhumeral 5(25%)
Transfemoral 9(45%)
Transtibial 6(30%)
Cause
Vascular 8(40%)
Trauma 5(25%)
Tumor 7(35%)
Medication Number of patients (Percentage) Dose range (mg/day)
Gabapentin 20(100%) 600-3000
Tricyclicantidepressants(amitriptyline,nortriptyline) 15(75%) 10-25
Weakopioids(tramadol,codeine) 11(55%) Tramadol50-400mg/day
Strongopioids(morphine) 1(5%) 20mg/day
RESULTS
We collected data from a total of 21 patients who
received treatment. However, one patient was excluded
because of amputation on both legs. ere is no exclusion
due to unreliable reporting of pain score because of
psychological or physical morbidities. Finally, the data
of 20 patients were included in this analysis. All patients
had been suering from PLP, and three of them also
suered from residual limb pain (RLP). e demographic
data of all patients is shown in Table 1. e average pain
score was 4.85 out of 10 despite the use of at least two
analgesics such as gabapentin, tricyclic antidepressant,
or opioids (Table 2). e pain-related interferences were
evaluated by a brief pain inventory questionnaire.
15
e
average total score of pain-related interference (impact of
pain on general activity, mood, work, relationships, sleep,
and enjoyment of life) was 16.35 out of 60. e average
time elapsed since amputation before this treatment was
1.9 years.
Pain intensity
Pain intensity was rated by the average numeric rating
pain score (NRS). e average NRS before application of
TENS was 4.85/10 ±1.18, and it decreased to 1.15/10±1.38
aer the treatment. e dierence in average pain intensity
was 3.7±1.59 with a p-value of <0.001 for the paired
T-test (95% condence interval was 2.95-4.45). e NRS
ranged from 3-8 out of 10 before application of TENS
and decreased to 0-5 post-treatment.
Nineteen out of 20 patients reported clinically
signicant pain relief (pain score decreased by more than
30%). e mean percentage of pain reduction was 76.54
± 6.18% (95% condence interval was 63.61-89.47%).
e individual responses to treatment are shown in
Fig 2. Only one patient who had PLP aer a right elbow
amputation due to recurrent brosarcoma (number 12)
did not respond to treatment. is patient also did not
respond well to other treatments, including gabapentin
and tricyclic antidepressants.
Duration of treatment
In this study, we applied TENS on the contralateral
limb until the pain score decreased or for 60 minutes, if
pain did not improve. Sixteen participants responded
to treatment in the rst 30 minutes, and another three
responded aer it was extended to 45 minutes. Only one
participant (patient 12) reported no signicant change
in NRS aer 60 minutes. e median time required for
TENS to decrease pain was 30 minutes. e cumulative
number of responders over time is shown in Fig 3.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
242
Fig 2. Individual response to contralateral TENS stimulation.
Fig 3. Cumulative number of patient reporting pain relief over time.
Adverse eect and satisfaction
e application of transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulation on the contralateral side was tolerated by
all participants without any adverse events during the
session. Participants reported no difficulty in using
TENS and titrating the amplitude. e average overall
satisfaction was 81.65% (0-100% and 0% for patient 12).
DISCUSSION
is study aimed to determine if the application of
TENS on the opposite limb could reduce pain intensity
in patients suering from PLP. Our ndings suggest a
signicant reduction of NRS immediately aer treatment.
Additionally, the treatment led to high satisfaction rates
and no report of adverse events.
Following amputation, up to 80% of patients reported
pain, either in the part that was amputated (phantom
pain) or at the site of amputation (residual limb pain), or
both.
1-4
is pain can aect their quality of life and prevent
proper rehabilitation and prosthetic usage. PLP is poorly
understood and one of the most dicult type of pain to
treat.
16
e underlying pathophysiology of PLP is unclear,
although it is generally accepted that nociceptive and
neuropathic processes are involved and that neuropathic
changes include reorganization and adaptation within the
peripheral and central nervous systems.
17
Additionally,
evidence evaluating the ecacy of treatments for chronic
PLP remains scarce.
6
Currently, multimodal treatment
strategies are used, including pharmacological treatments
(gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and opioids),
pain intervention (sympathetic blocks, sympathectomies),
mirror box therapy, and TENS.
17
However, there is no
strong evidence that supports the long-term ecacy of
each treatment for PLP.
17,18
TENS delivers pulsed electric currents across the
intact surface of the skin to stimulate peripheral nerves
and the spinal cord, resulting in segmental and extra-
segmental analgesia.
14
Additionally, physiological and
clinical research suggest that TENS inhibits second-order
nociceptive neurons, may increase blood ow, reduces
muscle spasms, and selectively activates large diameter
aerent bers, which reduces nociceptor cell activity and
sensitization in the central nervous system,
17,19,20
all of
which are potential analgesic mechanisms for phantom
pain and/or residual limb pain. Mulvey et al, indicates that
TENS application at the site of residual limb pain or on
the site of phantom pain is associated with decreases in
Vathakul et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
243
Original Article
SMJ
pain intensity, both at rest and with movement (frequency
100 hertz, pulse width 80 microseconds and the current
increased until the patient achieved strong non-painful
sensations).
10
However, residual limb application of
TENS can be challenging in certain situations because
this stimulation may aggravate pain in patients with
preexisting pain or allodynia. e application of TENS
on the residual limb can also cause skin irritation that
reduces stump integrity in recent amputees.
Contralateral TENS can address problems associated
with residual limb TENS. Moreover, a number of case
reports and small case series have reported successful
outcomes of contralateral TENS for PLP/ RLP and
phantom limb sensation.
11-13
Additionally, Carabelli
13
described a better response when TENS was applied
to the contralateral limb compared to residual limb
stimulation. e benecial eects may be the result of
stimulation on contralateral segmental inhibition in the
dorsal horn.
14
e case series of contralateral TENS were done
by Kawumara (10 cases), Katz (2 cases), and Carabelli
(3 cases).
11-13
e settings of TENS applications in these
studies varied from frequency 4-80 hertz, pulse width
90-225 microseconds and range of amplitude 50-80
MA depending on patients’ tolerance. Compared to
these previous studies, we use commercially available
machines without standard settings, but adjusted the
treatment by clinical response. Nevertheless, the results
from our larger series still conrmed that contralateral
TENS application successfully reduced pain signicantly
in 95% of patients. e NRS pain score decreased by an
average of 3.7/10 (from 4.85 to 1.15/10) or 76.28%. Since
almost all patients in this study experienced moderate
to severe pain despite the use of at least two analgesics
and suered a negative impact on their quality of life, the
population in this study were considered patients with
dicult to treat or intractable PLP. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the largest application of contralateral
TENS for intractable PLP. Moreover, the treatment is
associated with a high satisfaction rate as no adverse
events were reported and the method is inexpensive and
easy to use. is data demonstrates that TENS is one of
the logical options for treatment of phantom limb pain.
An additional interesting nding was the duration of
treatment in this study. Many studies of the application
of TENS for phantom limb pain treatment do not have an
exact duration to reduce pain.
17,18
Our study showed that
80% of patients responded aer 30 minutes of treatment
and 95% responded aer 45 minutes, with no additional
response aer 45 minutes. e data suggests that the
duration for application of TENS on the contralateral
limb for treating phantom limb pain should be at least
30 minutes, which can be extended to 45 minutes. For
treatments longer than 45 minutes, there is probably no
additional benet.
ere were several limitations to this study. First, the
design was an observational study and not a randomized
control trial, so it is possible that factors such as the placebo
eect or natural regression may have an eect. Second,
as we used commercially available TENS machines,
there was no standard treatment protocol. However,
commercially available machines were more practical
in clinical practice due to low cost and accessibility by
the patients. Although this research suggests short term
analgesic eect of the application of TENS in contralateral
limb for PLP, a randomized control trial is needed to
conrm this nding. Finally, as we only collected short
term data immediately aer treatment in this study,
long-term follow up regarding duration of the treatment
and its impact on quality of life and medication use aer
treatment is needed. Nevertheless, this study provides
useful information such as the eect of treatment on a
sample size and duration of application of treatment
for protocol design for a future prospective randomized
study.
CONCLUSION
is cohort study shows that the application of
TENS in the contralateral limb can lead to meaningful
reduction of pain in patients suering from dicult
to treat phantom limb pain. is treatment has a high
success rate and is associated with high satisfaction rates
and no reported adverse events. e suggested duration
of treatment is at least 30 minutes and may be extended
up to 45 minutes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Ms. Nattaya Bunwatsana
for assistance with document preparation for the IRB
approval process. e authors have no conict of interest
to declare.
REFERENCES
1. Ephraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ, Dillingham TR,
Pezzin LE. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain
in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil. 2005;86(10):1910-9.
2. Kern U, Busch V, Rockland M, Kohl M, Birklein F. Prevalence
and risk factors of phantom limb pain and phantom limb sensations
in Germany. A nationwide eld survey. Schmerz. 2009;23(5):479-
88.
3. Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Elzinga A, van der
Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
244
limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. 2000;87(1):
33-41.
4. Richardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, Horgan M. Incidence of
phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 months
aer major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral
vascular disease. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(4):353-8.
5. Kaur A, Guan Y. Phantom limb pain: A literature review. Chin
J Traumatol. 2018;21(6):366-8.
6. Edwards DS, Mayhew ER, Rice AS. “Doomed to go in company
with miserable pain”: surgical recognition and treatment of
amputation-related pain on the Western Front during World
War 1. Lancet. 2014;384(9955):1715-9.
7. Alviar MJ, Hale T, Dungca M. Pharmacologic interventions
for treating phantom limb pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2016;10:CD006380.
8. Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. e use of visual feedback,
in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function.
Brain. 2009;132(Pt 7):1693-710.
9. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Stewart M.
Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Science.
1992;258(5085):1159-60.
10. Mulvey MR, Radford HE, Fawkner HJ, Hirst L, Neumann V,
Johnson MI. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
for phantom pain and stump pain in adult amputees. Pain
Pract. 2013;13(4):289-96.
11. Kawamura H IK, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto H, Ishida K,
Kawakami T, Tani T, et al. e transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulation applied to contralateral limbs for the phantom
limb pain. J Phys er Sci. 1997;9:71-76.
12. Katz J, France C, Melzack R. An association between phantom
limb sensations and stump skin conductance during transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied to the contralateral
leg: a case study. Pain. 1989;36(3):367-77.
13. Carabelli RA, Kellerman WC. Phantom limb pain: Relief
by application of TENS to contralateral extremity. Arch Phy
Med Rehabil. 1985;66:466-7.
14. Fitzgerald M. e contralateral input to the dorsal horn of the
spinal cord in the decerebrate spinal rat. Brain Res. 1982;236(2):
275-87.
15. Chaudakshetrin P. Validation of the ai Version of Brief Pain
Inventory (BPI-T) in cancer patients. J Med Assoc ai. 2009;
92(1):34-40.
16. Subedi B, Grossberg GT. Phantom limb pain: mechanisms
and treatment approaches. Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011:864605.
17. Johnson MI, Mulvey MR, Bagnall AM. Transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for phantom pain and
stump pain following amputation in adults.Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2015;8(8):CD007264.
18. Bennett MI, Hughes N, Johnson MI. Methodological quality
in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve
stimulation for pain: low delity may explain negative ndings.
Pain. 2011;152(6):1226-32.
19. Avdić D, Buljina A. TENS u tretmanu misićnog spazma [TENS
in the treatment of muscle spasm].Med Arh. 2000;54(1):
49-51.
20. Bowornkitiwong T, Seevokom W, Tawatchot P, Paisan T,
Sirichotpapa S, Nanthanangkul S, et al. Short-term Eect of
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Pain
in Patients with Bone Metastasis: An Uncontrolled Pretest-
Posttest Study. Siriraj Med J 2020;72(6):470-5.
Vathakul et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
245
Original Article
SMJ
Kullathorn ephamongkhol, M.D., M.Sc.*, Arb-aroon Lertkhachonsuk, M.D., MMEd.**, Chomporn Sitathanee,
M.D.***, Petch Alisanant, M.D.****, Napapat Amornwichet, M.D., Ph.D.****, Chonlakiet Khorprasert, M.D.****,
Jidapa Bridhikitti M.D.*****, Pornpim Korpraphong, M.D.******, Kobkun Muangsomboon, M.D.******,
Sith
Phongkitkarun, M.D.*******, Saowanee Srirattanapong, M.D.*******, Duangkamon Prapruttam, M.D.*******,
aworn Dendumrongsup, M.D.********, Kewalee Sasiwimonphan, M.D.*********,
Chamnan Tanprasertkul, M.D.,
Ph.D.**********,***********, Mantana Dhanachai, M.D., MS.c.***,
Jayanton Patumanond, M.D., Dr.Sc.************,
Jiraporn Setakornnukul, M.D.*
*Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, ailand, **Gynecological
Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, ailand,
***Division of Radiation and Oncology, Department of Diagnostic and erapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
10400, Bangkok, ailand, ****Division of erapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty
of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, ailand, *****Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine,
Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, ailand. ******Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology,
Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, ailand, *******Diagnostic Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and
erapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University 10400, Bangkok, ailand, ********Abdominal Imaging Section,
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, ailand, *********Division
of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
10330, ailand, **********Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ammasat University, Pathum ani 12120,
ailand, ***********Center of Excellence in Applied Epidemiology, ammasat University, Pathum ani 12120, ailand, ************Center for Clinical
Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, ailand.
Propensity Score Matched Study of Tri-Weekly vs.
Weekly Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Concurrent
with Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally
Advanced Cervical Cancer
Corresponding author: Jiraporn Setakornnukul
E-mail: jiraporn.set@mahidol.ac.th
Received 23 December 2021 Revised 13 February 2022 Accepted 21 February 2022
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-0377
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.31
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare tumor control and toxicity between tri-weekly chemotherapy and weekly platinum-based
chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer using the propensity score matching method.
Materials and Methods: DESIGN: Retrospective cohort with propensity score matched population. SETTING: Four
university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 781 advanced local cervical cancer patients. INTERVENTION: tri-weekly
platinum-based chemoradiotherapy versus weekly chemoradiotherapy OUTCOMES: Overall survival (OS), local
recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS),
and toxicity, including hematological and renal toxicity.
Results: Overall median follow-up time was 59.5 months. Aer the propensity score matching process was completed,
326 patients were analyzed (163 in each group). e ve-year OS was 66% and 64% (p 0.630); ve-year LRFS was
85% and 81% (p 0.209); ve-year RRFS was 89% and 94% (p 0.307); and ve-year DMFS was 75% and 79% (p 0.420)
in the tri-weekly and weekly groups, respectively. e patients in the tri-weekly and the weekly group had grade 2
-3 neutropenia (10.5% vs 2.5%). e other toxicities appeared to be similar in both groups in terms of white blood
count, platelet and creatinine.
Conclusion: ere was a potential small benet of local control (4%) and overall survival (2%) with the tri-weekly
regimen but we could not demonstrate statistical signicance. However, this came at the price of an increase of
7% to 8% in grade 2-3 neutropenia.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; chemotherapy; radiotherapy; weekly regimen; tri-weekly regimen (Siriraj Med J 2022;
74: 245-255)
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
246
INTRODUCTION
A 1999 US National Cancer Institute announcement
dened concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with
radiotherapy as the standard of care for women with
locally advanced cervical cancer due to approximately
10% added survival benet aer ve years without a
signicant increase in late toxicities.
1
is was based on
the results of ve randomized controlled trials.
2-4,5,6
Despite this, the frequency of the platinum-based
regimen remains heterogeneous and routine chemotherapy
is dierent among hospitals. For example, some hospitals
administer weekly chemotherapy sessions whereas
others give tri-weekly chemotherapy. To compare these
treatment methods, many randomized controlled have
been carried out.
7-14
Interestingly, most of the evidence
remains conicting in terms of both tumor control and
toxicity. For example, a randomized controlled trial from
the University of Ulsan, Korea in 2008
13
showed that
the weekly regimen not only improved compliance but
was comparable with the tri-weekly regimen in response
and survival rate. On the other hand, a collaborative
randomized controlled trial by the Korea Institute of
Radiological and Medical Sciences, Dongnam Institute of
Radiological and Medical Sciences and National Cancer
Institute, Korea
12
showed that the tri-weekly regimen
was 20% more eective in terms of overall survival and
had less grade 3-4 neutropenia than the weekly regimen.
Moreover, evidence from meta-analyses looking at
the same question is also conicting. Zhu J et al,
15
carried
out a meta-analysis based on six randomized controlled
trials and two retrospective studies. It showed that the
tri-weekly regimen was superior to the weekly regimen
only in local recurrence but not overall survival. e
same results were reported in a recent meta-analysis
16
based on eight randomized controlled trials. Meanwhile,
a meta-analysis was also carried out by Petrelli et
al,
17
based on four randomized controlled trials and
four retrospective studies. Its results showed that the
platinum-based combined therapy should be the preferred
treatment over weekly regimen due to benets in overall
survival.
As a result, there are dierent policies for the weekly
and tri-weekly regimen. e routine regimen at the Radiation
Oncology Division at Siriraj Hospital is weekly cisplatin
(40 mg/m
2
) or carboplatin (AUC2), but some hospitals
have a routine tri-weekly regimen of cisplatin (75-100
mg/m
2
) (or carboplatin AUC5) with or without 5FU. We
are still waiting for high-quality evidence, notably results
of the Tri-weekly Cisplatin Based Chemoradiation in
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (TACO) trial (Clinical
Trials. gov Identier: NCT01561586). In the meantime,
we still require evidence for solving this issue. Hence,
we collected data from a multicenter in ailand where
locally advanced cervical cancer patients underwent
concurrent chemoradiotherapy. is could help provide
a suitable answer to a controversial issue with the help
of advanced statistical analysis, such as propensity score
matching that can simulate pseudo randomization by
matching pre-treatment variable factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We used retrospective cohort data from a multicenter
in ailand (Siriraj Hospital (SI), Ramathibodi Hospital
(RA), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (CU) and
Songklanagarind Hospital (PSU). We recruited patients
with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or
adenosquamous carcinoma of locally advanced cervical
cancer who were denitively treated with concurrent
chemoradiotherapy between Jan 2007 to Dec 2015. For
staging purposes, all patients underwent a CT scan with
contrast media of the whole abdomen, chest X-ray and
cystoscopy. Diagnostic radiologists in each hospital
newly reviewed the lymphadenopathy status according
to the pelvic lymphatic pathway.
18,19
Depending on the
policy of each hospital, a weekly or tri-weekly regimen of
cisplatin or carboplatin concurrently with radiotherapy
was given to the patient. Generally, 46-50 Gy of external
beam radiotherapy and 4 fractions of each 6.5 to 7.0 Gy
high dose rate brachytherapy were routinely prescribed.
For chemotherapy, usually, the clinical policy of SI, CU
and PSU is to give cisplatin weekly whereas RA gives
cisplatin tri-weekly. Additionally, Siriraj Hospital may
also adhere to the weekly carboplatin regimen as it is the
preference of some radiation oncologists regardless of
the patient’s performance status. e main outcome of
this study was overall survival. e secondary outcomes
were local-recurrence free survival, regional-recurrence
free survival and distant metastasis-free survival, which
were dened as rst day of radiotherapy to the date of
rst failure at cervical area, regional pelvic or paraaortic
lymph node and visceral distant metastases or lymph
node metastases above the diaphragm respectively.
Hematological toxicity (hemoglobin, white blood cell
count, neutrophil count and platelet) and renal toxicity in
the maximum grade of each patient were also reported.
Sample size
A randomized controlled trial from Korea
12
showed
that the tri-weekly regimen was more eective in overall
survival. is study reported a hazard ratio of 0.375.
When using this hazard ratio, 0.05 type I error and
80% statistical power, the sample size contained only 38
Thephamongkhol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
247
Original Article
SMJ
patients in each arm. However, we planned to include
more patients as per our data availability.
Statistical analysis
In order to eliminate the selection bias of weekly
or tri-weekly chemotherapy regimen, we performed a
propensity score-matching analysis. is method is based
on balancing baseline characteristics of patients to simulate
randomization. eoretically, the best propensity score
came from factors that clinicians unfairly selected in the
weekly or tri-weekly regimen, such as patient or tumor
characteristics before treatment, especially pelvic or
para-aortic lymph nodes. In this study, we used the new
2018 FIGO stage, which included pelvic and para-aortic
lymphadenopathy status, histology, tumor grade, tumor
size, age, initial hemoglobin and hydronephrosis status.
For this purpose, we used MatchIt package version 3.02
in R soware version 4.05. Logistic regression with the
factors above was used to predict the linearized propensity
score. We then used this score in the MatchIt function
with the nearest method with varying caliper distances.
We further proved whether this procedure worked by
comparing baseline characteristics before and aer the
propensity score-matched procedure.
Aer we got the matched population, we also explored
whether the factors aer the start of the treatment were
well-balanced, especially the chemotherapy regimen
(cisplatin or carboplatin). We aimed to control this
additional confounder in non-parametric analysis. For
time-to-event analysis, we used the Kaplan Meier method
and log-rank test to determine the hypothesis. Non-
parametric analysis was performed to show a dierence
with 95% condence interval. For toxicity comparison,
we used the Fisher exact test to test the hypothesis.
Institutional Review Board Statement: e study was
conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration
of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review
Board of Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol
University (Si 312/2016).
RESULTS
e patient characteristics before and aer the
propensity score matching process is shown in Table 1.
Missing data were in only histopathological grade,
which was available 80%. Before the matching process,
a total of 781 patients (618 in the weekly group and 163
patients in the tri-weekly group) were compared. e
patients in the tri-weekly group seemed to have a better
prognosis in terms of 2018 FIGO stage. For example, less
pelvic lymph node metastases (stage IIIc1, 20.2%) were
observed in the tri-weekly group, compared with the
weekly group (stage IIIc1, 34.3%). Aer the propensity
score matching process was completed (163 patients
in the weekly group and 163 patients in the tri-weekly
group), there was a similar prognosis, especially in terms
of FIGO staging. e pelvic lymph node metastases were
only 20.2% in both the weekly and tri-weekly groups.
Also, the proportion of histology was very similar in
terms of adenocarcinoma (22.1% in the weekly group
and 22.7% in the tri-weekly group). Furthermore, age,
tumor type, tumor size, tumor grade, initial hemoglobin
and also any side eects of hydronephrosis were better
balanced in both groups (Table 1). Despite the balance
in these prognostic factors, the chemotherapy regimens
(cisplatin or carboplatin) were dierent in both groups.
Cisplatin was given to half of the patients (56%) in the
weekly group, but almost all the (96%) patients in the tri-
weekly group. is dierence was then further adjusted
in a statistical analysis.
e overall median follow-up time was 59.5 months.
e follow-up rate for disease recurrence status and
for death status was 87% and 100% respectively. For
tumor control outcome, the tri-weekly group showed
an unadjusted non-statistically small benet in overall
survival (Fig 1A). is small benet was only 2%-3% as
per the follow-up time (Supplementary Fig S1). Aer
chemotherapy regimen (cisplatin or carboplatin) adjustment,
this small dierence disappeared and the survival curve
seemed to cross each other (Fig 1B). Interestingly, the
tri-weekly group showed better local recurrence-free
survival (Fig 2A). is dierence was about 6%-7% in
the rst two years of follow-up and about 3%-4% in the
third to h year (Supplementary Fig S2). Unfortunately,
with our limited sample size, a statistical dierence could
not be detected. Again, aer chemotherapy regimen
adjustment, this dierence disappeared (Fig 2B). For
regional recurrence-free survival (Fig 3A) and distant
metastasis-free survival (Fig 4A), the dierence between
the weekly group and tri-weekly group was small and
not consistent with the follow-up time (Fig 3B and Fig
4B). Also, the adjustment of chemotherapy regimen
(Supplementary Fig S3 and Fig S4) showed no signicant
change from unadjusted analysis.
Toxicity outcome was available for 96% of study
population. For grade 2 or greater toxicity (Table 2),
the patients in the tri-weekly group had more absolute
neutrophil count toxicity (10.5%), when compared
to patients in the weekly group (2.5%). On the other
hand, patients in the tri-weekly group seemed to have
less hemoglobin toxicity (29.4%) when compared to
patients in the weekly group (33.8%). ese results are
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
248
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics before and aer propensity score matching.
Before Propensity score Matching After Propensity score Matching
Patient Characteristics Weekly Tri-weekly
p-value
Weekly Tri-weekly
p-value
n=618 n=163 n=163 n=163
Age 53.8(11.7) 54.1(10.6) 0.80 54.7(11.7) 54.1(10.6) 0.59
Stage:I-II 132(21.4%) 51(31.3%) 0.004 51(31.3%) 51(31.3%) 0.92
IIIa-b 180(29.1%) 55(33.7%)  53(32.5%) 55(33.7%)
IIIc1 212(34.3%) 33(20.2%)  33(20.2%) 33(20.2%)
IIIc2 82(13.3%) 20(12.3%)  24(14.7%) 20(12.3%)
IVa 12(1.9%) 4(2.5%)  2(1.2%) 4(2.5%)
Type:Exophytictype 428(69.3%) 129(79.1%) 0.015 120(73.6%) 129(79.1%) 0.30
Ulcerativetype 190(30.7%) 34(20.9%)  43(26.4%) 34(20.9%)
Tumorsize 4.43(1.54) 4.15(1.37) 0.036 4.21(1.41) 4.15(1.37) 0.72
Histology:SCC 475(76.9%) 121(74.2%) 0.50 122(74.8%) 121(74.2%) 1.00
Adenocarcinoma 117(18.9%) 37(22.7%)  36(22.1%) 37(22.7%)
Adenosquamouscarcinoma (4.2%) 5(3.1%)  5(3.1%) 5(3.1%)
Differentiation:Well 119(19.3%) 37(22.7%) <0.001 38(23.3%) 37(22.7%) 0.96
Moderate 227(36.7%) 30(18.4%)  30(18.4%) 30(18.4%)
Poorly 153(24.8%) 61(37.4%)  64(39.3%) 61(37.4%)
Unknown 119(19.3%) 35(21.5%)  31(19.0%) 35(21.5%)
InitialHb 11.5(1.8) 11.6(1.6) 0.38 11.5(1.9) 11.6(1.6) 0.76
Hydronephrosis:No 550(89.0%) 143(87.7%) 0.68 143(87.7%) 143(87.7%) 1.00
Yes 68(11.0%) 20(12.3%)  20(12.3%) 20(12.3%)
approximately the same when we categorized to cisplatin
and carboplatin (Supplementary Table S1). e other
toxicities appeared to be very similar in both groups in
terms of white blood count, platelet and creatinine. e
compliance towards chemotherapy in both groups was
very good (79.14% in ve cycles or more in the weekly
group and 89.6% in two cycles or more in the tri-weekly
group).
DISCUSSION
e standard treatment for locally advanced cervical
cancer is concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy
and radiotherapy.
1
e frequency of the chemotherapy
regimen is either weekly or tri-weekly administration
according to clinical practice guideline of some institution
in ailand.
20
e weekly regimen is easy to manage in
terms of no requirements for patient admission and
possibly fewer side eects, however, there is still the
concern that the weekly regimen might not be enough
in terms of tumor control. erefore, any additional
evidence may potentially provide a benet in routine
management of chemotherapy in this setting.
Our results show that the tri-weekly group
experienced 8% more neutrophil count grade 2 or greater
toxicity than the weekly group. is eect led to no
signicant reduction in compliance. Interestingly, our
results also showed a potential 6%-7% benet in local
control and possibly a small benet (2%-3%) in overall
Thephamongkhol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
249
Original Article
SMJ
Fig 1. Kaplan-Meier survival estimate comparison between weekly and tri-weekly chemotherapy, unadjusted curve (le) and adjusted by
chemotherapy regimen (carboplatin or cisplatin) (right).
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
250
Supplementary Fig S1. Absolute dierence of overall survival with 95% condence interval.
Absolute difference
3-yrOS 0.03%(-0.7%to1.2%)
5-yrOS 0.03%(-0.8%to1.3%)
Absolute difference
3-yrOS 0.04%(-0.04%to0.12%)
5-yrOS 0.04%(-0.04%to0.13%)
Absolute difference
3-yrOS -0.01%(-0.06%to0.05%)
5-yrOS -0.04%(-0.11%to0.03%)
Supplementary Fig S2. Absolute dierence of local recurrence-free survival with 95% condence interval.
Supplementary Fig S3. Absolute dierence of regional recurrence-free survival with 95% condence interval.
Thephamongkhol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
251
Original Article
SMJ
Supplementary Fig S4. Absolute dierence of distant metastasis-free survival with 95% condence interval.
Absolute difference
3-yrOS -0.01%(-0.11%to0.08%)
5-yrOS -0.03%(-0.13%to0.08%)
TABLE 2. Toxicity and compliance between weekly and triweekly chemotherapy.
Weekly Tri-weekly p-value
n=163 n=163
Compliance
Noofcycle 1 2(1%) 14(9%) Notapplicable
2 8(5%) 132(81%)
3 2(1%) 14(9%)
4 20 (12%) -
5 91 (56%) -
6 38(23%) -
7 1(1%) -
Missingdata 1(1%) 3(1%)
Toxicity
Hemoglobin 0 44(27.0%) 25(15.3%) 0.011
1 60(36.8%) 81(49.7%)
2 51(31.3%) 40(24.5%)
3 4(2.5%) 8(4.9%)
Missingdata 4(2.5%) 9(5.5%)
Whitebloodcell 0 51(31.3%) 45(27.6%) 0.43
1 77(47.2%) 73(44.8%)
2 28(17.2%) 29(17.8%)
3 3(1.8%) 7(4.3%)
Missingdata 4(2.5%) 9(5.5%)
ANC 0 123(75.5%) 102(62.6%) 0.009
1 32(19.6%) 35(21.5%)
2 4(2.5%) 12(7.4%)
3 0 5(3.1%)
Missingdata 4(2.5%) 9(5.5%)
Platelet 0 109(66.9%) 145(89.0%) <0.001
1 50(30.7%) 14(8.6%)
2 1 (0.6%) 1 (0.6%)
3 0 0
Missingdata 3(1.8%) 3(1.8%)
Creatinine 0 139(85.3%) 141(86.5%) 0.80
1 19(11.7%) 14(8.6%)
2 1 (0.6%) 2 (1.2%)
3 0(0.0%) 1(0.6%)
Missingdata 4(2.5%) 5(3.1%)
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
252
SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE S1. Toxicity and compliance between weekly and triweekly cisplatin and carboplatin.
Cisplatin Carboplatin
Weekly Tri-weekly Weekly Tri-weekly
n=92 n=157 P value n=71 n=6 p-value
Compliance
Noofcycle 1 0(0%) 13(8%) NA 2(3%) 1(17%) NA
2 3(3%) 128(82%) 5(7%) 4(67%)
3 2(2%) 13(8%) 0(0%) 1(17%)
4 11(12%) - 9(13%) -
5 49(53%) - 42(59%) -
6 26(28%) - 12(17%) -
7 0(0%) - 1(1%) -
Missingdata 1(1%) 3(2%) 0(0%) 0(0%)
Toxicity
Hemoglobin 0 28(30%) 24(15%) 0.003 16(23%) 1(17%) 0.553
1 30(33%) 78(50%) 30(42%) 3(50%)
2 31(34%) 39(25%) 20(28%) 1(17%)
3 1(1%) 8(5%) 3(4%) 0(0%)
Missingdata 2(2%) 8(5%) 2(3%) 1(17%)
WBC 0 22(24%) 44(28%) 0.417 29(41%) 1(17%) 0.085
1 43(47%) 71(45%) 34(48%) 2(33%)
2 23(25%) 27(17%) 5(7%) 2(33%)
3 2(2%) 7(4%) 1(1%) 0(0%)
Missingdata 2(2%) 8(5%) 2(3%) 1(17%)
ANC 0 66(72%) 99(63%) 0.285 57(80%) 3(50%) 0.025
1 20(22%) 34(22%) 12(17%) 1(17%)
2 4(4%) 11(7%) 0(0%) 1(17%)
3 0(0%) 5(3%) 0(0%) 0(0%)
Missingdata 2(2%) 8(5%) 2(3%) 1(17%)
Platelet 0 61(66%) 141(90%) <0.001 48(68%) 4(67%) 1.000
1 29(32%) 12(8%) 21(30%) 2(33%)
2 1(1%) 1(1%) 0(0%) 0(0%)
3 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%)
Missingdata 1(1%) 3(2%) 2(3%) 0(0%)
Creatinine 0 81(88%) 137(87%) 0.842 58(82%) 4(67%) 0.413
1 9(10%) 12(8%) 10(14%) 2(33%)
2 1(1%) 2(1%) 0(0%) 0(0%)
3 0(0%) 1(1%) 0(0%) 0(0%)
Missingdata 1(1%) 5(3%) 3(4%) 0(0%)
Thephamongkhol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
253
Original Article
SMJ
survival. ese results could lead to potential benets in
individual clinical judgment, especially in the context
of a university hospital in ailand while we wait for
stronger evidence.
Nowadays, strong evidence to clearly support
weekly or tri-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy
with radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer
is limited. Two famous randomized controlled trials
from Korea provide conicting results and dierent
points (Table 3). e rst study from Korea
13
showed a
comparable tumor control eect and more compliance
with weekly chemotherapy. e reasons behind this
could be that the tri-weekly combined chemotherapy
regimen with cisplatin and 5FU has poor compliance
due to 15% grade 4 hematological toxicity, compared
with only 2% in the weekly group. erefore, the weekly
group in this study might display a similar eect because
of inadequate chemotherapy in the tri-weekly group due
to toxicity. On the other hand, the second randomized
controlled trial from Korea
12
showed that the tri-weekly
regimen was 20% more eective in terms of overall
survival and had less grade 3-4 neutropenia than the
weekly regimen. Less toxicity can be explained by the fact
that the regimen in this study was only cisplatin without
5FU. Interestingly, even with planned randomization,
the baseline characteristics in this second study were not
well-balanced. e patients in the weekly chemotherapy
group had much poorer prognosis. For example, the
patients in the weekly group had an advanced stage of
disease (stage III and stage IVA 45.1%), compared with
TABLE 3. Comparison of two Korean randomized controlled trials and this study.
Study Kim et al
13
(RCT) Ryu et al
12
(RCT) Our study (PS matched)
Weekly Tri-weekly Weekly Tri-weekly Weekly Tri-weekly
(Cis) (Cis+5FU) (Cis) (Cis) (Cis, carbo) (Cis, carbo)
(n=77) (n=78) (n=51) (n=53) (n=163) (n=163)
Patient StageII StageII StageII StageII StageI-II StageI-II
characteristics =58(75%) =52(67%) =28(55%) =34(64%) =51(31.3%) =51(31.3%)
StageIII-Iva StageIII-Iva StageIII-Iva StageIII-Iva StageIII-Iva StageIII-Iva
=19(25%) =26(33%) =23(45%) =19(36%) =112(68.7%) =112(68.7%)
PelvicLN+ PelvicLN+ PelvicLN+ PelvicLN+ PelvicLN+ PelvicLN+
=31(40%) =32(41%) =29(57%) =27(51%) =33(20%) =33(20%)
PAN+ PAN+ PAN+ PAN+
=7(14%) =5(9%) =24(15%) =20(12%)
Chemotherapy >80% >80% >=5cycles >=2cycles >=5cycles >=2cycles
compliance planned planned =98% =94% =80% =90%
dose dose
=64(83%) =47(60%)  
Hematological Grade3-4 Grade3-4 Neutropenia Neutropenia Neutropenia Neutropenia
toxicity =19(25%) =32(41%)
Grade4 Grade4 Grade3-4 Grade3-4 Grade3-4 Grade3-4
=2(3%) =15(19%) =20(39%) =12(23%) =0(0%) =5(3%)
Thrombocytopenia Thrombocytopenia Thrombocytopenia Thrombocytopenia
Grade3-4 Grade3-4 Grade3-4 Grade3-4
=4(8%) =3(6%) =0(0%) =0(0%)
Overall survival 4year:67% 4year:70% 5year:67% 5year:89% 5year:64% 5year:66%
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
254
the tri-weekly group (stage III and stage IVA 35.9%).
Moreover, positive pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes
were more frequent in the weekly group (70.6%) than
in patients in the tri-weekly group (61.3%). is also
could be a reason why the weekly group had poorer
tumor control.
Our study had some strengths. First, it included real-
world data from a multi-centered study from university
hospitals in ailand, meaning it was more generalized
than a single-institute study. Second, we used advanced
statistical analysis to match patients who showed well-
balanced baseline characteristics. ird, this study had
adequately long-term follow-up time. However, there
were several limitations of this study as well. First, our
data came from the two-dimensional brachytherapy
era. Nowadays, many hospitals use three-dimensional
brachytherapy, which likely leads to more local control
of the primary site. erefore, the benet of tri-weekly
chemotherapy might be less than that seen in this study.
Also, our sample size was not large enough to detect any
actual dierence.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the tri-weekly chemotherapy regimen
showed a non-statistically potential benet over the
weekly regimen in terms of local control and overall
survival but with more neutrophil toxicity. Further
evidence with adequate sample size could validate this
result. In the meantime, individual judgment using this
data can be discussed with patients.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Lalita Chunkoh as the main patient-data collector
at SI, RA and CU Hospitals; Ladathip Suwan as the
patient-data collector and supervisor of data collection
at RA Hospital; Buntipa Netsawang as the supervisor of
patient-data collection at CU Hospital; Siriporn Wong as
an additional patient-data collector at CU Hospital; Dr.
Poompis Pattaranutaporn as the supervisor of laboratory
data collection at RA Hospital.
Conict of interest: None to declare
REFERENCES
1. Concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer. Clinical
announcement, [press release]. Washington, D.C., February
22 1999.
2. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, Muderspach LI, Chafe WE,
Suggs CL, 3
rd
, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy
compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky
stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1154-
61.
3. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G,
Maiman MA, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy
and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl
J Med. 1999;340(15):1144-53.
4. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens
RE, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy
compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk
cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1137-43.
5. Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, Malfetano JH, Hannigan
EV, Fowler WC, Jr., et al. Randomized comparison of uorouracil
plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation
therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative
para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and
Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(5):1339-
48.
6. Peters WA, 3
rd
, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ,
Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation
therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as
adjuvant therapy aer radical surgery in high-risk early-stage
cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606-13.
7. Mittal S, Chauhan A, Kaur P, Verma YP. Comparing Weekly
versus ree Weekly Schedules of Cisplatinum Concomitant
with Radical Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Carcinoma
Uterine Cervix. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale). 2017;7(1).
8. Panda N, Bag S, Samantaray S. Randomised Clinical Trial of
Weekly vs. Triweekly Cisplatin Based Chemotherapy Concurrent
with Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced
Cervical Cancer. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017;5(4):4.
9. Sharma K, Kumar P, Singh DP. Weekly verses tri-weekly
concurrent cisplatin with radiotherapy in the treatment of
cervical cancer: a study comparing ecacy and toxicity. SRMS
Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;1(2):66-72.
10. Preety J, Fareed K, Amit A. Comparative study of weekly versus
three weekly cisplatin in advanced cases of carcinoma cervix
alone with radiotherapy. Journal of Evolution of Medical
and Dental Science. 2015;4(88):8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14260/
jemds/2015/2177
11. Nagy VM, Ordeanu C, Coza O, Alin CR, Traila A, Todor N.
Randomized phase 3 trial comparing 2 cisplatin dose schedules
in 326 patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical
carcinoma: long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;
22(9):1538-44.
12. Ryu SY, Lee WM, Kim K, Park SI, Kim BJ, Kim MH, et al.
Randomized clinical trial of weekly vs. triweekly cisplatin-based
chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment
of locally advanced cervical cancer. International journal of
radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2011;81(4):e577-81.
13. Kim YS, Shin SS, Nam JH, Kim YT, Kim YM, Kim JH, et al.
Prospective randomized comparison of monthly uorouracil and
cisplatin versus weekly cisplatin concurrent with pelvic radiotherapy
and high-dose rate brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical
cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108(1):195-200.
14. Rose PG, Ali S, Watkins E, igpen JT, Deppe G, Clarke-Pearson
DL, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing
concurrent single agent cisplatin, cisplatin-based combination
chemotherapy, or hydroxyurea during pelvic irradiation for
locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology
Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(19):2804-10.
15. Zhu J, Ji S, Hu Q, Chen Q, Liu Z, Wu J, et al. Concurrent
Thephamongkhol et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
255
Original Article
SMJ
weekly single cisplatin vs triweekly cisplatin alone with radiotherapy
for treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a meta-
analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:1975-85.
16. Zhu J, Zhang Z, Bian D, Chen Q, Hu Q, Ji S, et al. Weekly
versus triweekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy
in the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma: An
updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(1):e18663.
17. Petrelli F, De Stefani A, Raspagliesi F, Lorusso D, Barni S.
Radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin-based doublet or weekly
cisplatin for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(1):166-71.
18. Paño B, Sebastià C, Ripoll E, Paredes P, Salvador R, Buñesch
L, et al. Pathways of lymphatic spread in gynecologic malignancies.
Radiographics. 2015;35(3):916-45.
19. Mao Y, Hedgire S, Prapruttam D, Harisinghani M. Imaging
of Pelvic Lymph Nodes. Current Radiology Reports. 2014;2(11):70.
20. Ieumwananonthachai N, Pataranutraporn P, Chasilpa Y,
Sangruchi S, Verasan V, Suntornpong N, et al. Results of
Cervical Cancer Patients Treated According to Clinical Practice
Guidelines in Siriraj Hospital. Siriraj Med J. 2003;55(12):695-
703.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
256
Nisachon Khorwanichakij, M.D.*, Smith Kungwankiattichai, M.D.**, Weerapat Owattanapanich, M.D.**
*Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Chaophraya Yommarat Hospital, Suphanburi 72000, ailand, **Division of Hematology,
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, ailand.
Validation of Several Formulas to Differentiate
Thalassemia from Iron Deciency Anemia and
Proposal of a Thalassemia–Iron Deciency
Discrimination (TID) Predictive Score
ABSTRACT
Objective: is study aimed to validate the sensitivity analysis of all the available formulas for their ability to
dierentiate between IDA and thalassemia and propose a novel formula to improve the sensitivity of all thalassemia
subtypes screening.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a 5-year, single-center, Cohort study on 227 microcytic anemia patients
diagnosed between June 2015 and September 2020 at Chaophraya Yommarat Hospital, Suphanburi, ailand to
validate the sensitivity of all the available formulas and invent the novel predictive score.
Results: Approximately three-quarters of our cases were all subtypes of thalassemia diseases while 26.9% were IDA.
e sensitivity of almost all the previous formulas for thalassemia prediction ranged between 13.9%-44.0%, while
the specicity varied between 0%–98.4%. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of the formulas that had favorable sensitivity
was quite low. Here, a novel thalassemia–iron deciency discrimination (TID) predictive score is proposed, which
demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.4% the specicity of 78.7%, the positive predictive value of 92.0 %, the negative
predictive value of 75.0%, and the accuracy of 87.2%.
Conclusion: e proposed TID predictive score is a novel uncomplicated formulation which oers high sensitivity
for all thalassemia subtypes prediction.
Keywords: Iron deciency anemia; microcytic anemia; predictive score; thalassemia (Siriraj Med J 2022; 74: 256-265)
Corresponding author: Weerapat Owattanapanich
E-mail: weerapato36733@gmail.com
Received 27 January 2022 Revised 18 February 2022 Accepted 23 February 2022
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1262-2005
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.32
INTRODUCTION
According to the World Health Organization, iron
deciency anemia (IDA) is the major cause of nutritional
anemia worldwide.
1
e incidence of IDA in ai women
of reproductive age was reported to be 28.7%, 30.2%, and
31.8%, in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively.
1
Another
study reported an anemia rate of 21% in educated young
ai women, with the two most prevalent causes among
those cases being thalassemia (28%) and IDA (21%).
2
Patients with IDA and thalassemia may both
present with microcytic anemia (defined as a mean
corpuscular volume (MCV) < 80 fL), which should be
further investigated to distinguish between these two
entities due to their dierent treatment approaches.
Iron supplementation and the correction of occult blood
loss remain the standard treatments for IDA. On the
other hand, certain types of thalassemia diseases, such
as hemoglobin (Hb) E/β-thalassemia and homozygous
Khorwanichakij et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
257
Original Article
SMJ
β-thalassemia, require regular blood transfusion and iron
chelation to prevent iron deposition in various organs,
which could lead to multiple organ dysfunction, i.e.,
liver cirrhosis, endocrinopathies, and heart failure.
3
Detailed evaluation to conrm IDA involves an
iron study test, consisting of measuring the levels of
serum ferritin, serum iron, total iron-binding capacity
(TIBC), and transferrin saturation (TSAT). If the serum
ferritin value is ≤30 ng/mL or the TSAT value is <16%,
IDA diagnosis can be conrmed with high sensitivity
and high specicity.
4
Meanwhile, Hb typing is employed
for the diagnosis of thalassemia.
5
However, in developing
countries, some primary hospitals have limited resources
to manage iron studies and Hb typing test. As a result, to
make a diagnosis, blood samples have to be transferred
to a comprehensive laboratory center, which can be a
time-consuming process. As such, other available tools
to initially discriminate these conditions could be of
value. For thalassemia diagnosis, a range of associated
factors can be assessed to develop a thalassemia predictive
score.
According to the extensive literature review we
performed, several formulas exist for thalassemia prediction
among microcytic anemic patients, including the Red
Blood Cell Count (RBC), Red Cell Distribution Width
(RDW), Red Cell Distribution Width Index (RDWI),
Green and King formula, Srivastava formula, Mentzer
formula, Ehsani formula, Ricerca formula, England
and Fraser formula, Sirdah formula, and Shine and Lal
formula.
6-14
e reported sensitivity and specicity of these
formulas range from 40% to 100%.
6-18
Another formula,
the 11T score is an interesting formula that combines
11 other formulas to calculate its score, providing a
higher discrimination ability.
15-18
In a previous study that
attempted to validate this score among a ai population,
the 11T score showed a sensitivity of 82.1% and specicity
of 91.7% for thalassemia prediction. However, it should
be noted that only β-thalassemia subtype was included
in previous studies. In addition, IDA in those trials was
diagnosed when serum ferritin was <10 ng/mL.
18
In the present study, we aimed to validate the sensitivity
assessment of all the available formulas for their ability to
dierentiate between IDA and all thalassemia subtypes.
In addition, we propose a novel formula to improve
the sensitivity of thalassemia screening. In addition,
to increase the diagnostic sensitivity in our study, the
diagnosis of IDA could be established when ferritin was
<30 ng/mL and TSAT was <16%.
4
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design and population
We conducted a 5-year, retrospective, single-
center, cohort study on microcytic anemia patients
diagnosed between June 1, 2015, and September 30,
2020, at Chaophraya Yommarat Hospital, Suphanburi,
ailand. e inclusion criteria were: (1) patients aged
15 years old or older, and (2) patients with microcytic
anemia. (3) patients who had the result of iron study
in the IDA group and Hb typing and/or PCR in the
thalassemia group. e exclusion criteria were patients
receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or receiving
iron supplementation before blood testing. We categorized
patients into 2 groups by dierent timeframes; a group
for internal validation using patients during June 2015
- August 2017 and a group for calculation score using
patients during September 2017 - September 2020.
e study was approved for registration in the ai
Clinical Trial Registry with the identication number
TCTR20210725003.
Instrument and evaluation parameters
All blood samples were collected by using 3-ml
dipotassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes
(K
2
EDTA) for a complete blood count (CBC) test and
analyzed within 2 hours aer taking the samples by
Mindray BC-6200 automated blood counter (Mindray
Bio‐Medical Electronics Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China).
is device used impedance technology to count and
size RBC and platelet (PLT) together with cyanotic-free
colorimetric method for Hb. MCV and % RDW were
calculated based on the RBC histogram. In addition, mean
corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and mean corpuscular
hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was also calculated
from RBC, Hb, and hematocrit parameters. e patient’s
demographic data and initial laboratory results were collected.
Patients with microcytic anemia were classied into two
groups: the IDA group and the thalassemia group. In the
thalassemia group, three included thalassemia disease
subtypes were as follows: α-thalassemia, β–thalassemia
disease, and α- combined β-thalassemia disease.
Study size consideration
At least 200 microcytic anemia cases were required
to validate the formulas and develop a novel predictive
score. Furthermore, 150 patients (40 patients with IDA and
110 patients with thalassemia) were separately assigned
for an internal validation of this score.
Handing of continuous predictors
e proposed predictive score was developed followed
by the predictive model study Risk of Bias Assessment
Tool (PROBAST). Four red blood cell parameters were
incorporated for this predictive score calculation including
MCH, RDW, RBC and PLT.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
258
Terminology
Anemia is dened by a hemoglobin (Hb) level <
13/dL in males or Hb < 12 g/dL in females.
19
Anemia
with small red blood cells (MCV < 80 fL) is termed
microcytic anemia.
4
A diagnosis of IDA is established if
a patient has microcytic anemia with serum ferritin < 30
ng/mL and transferrin saturation < 16%.
4
e 11T score
is a summary score from 11 formulas, comprising RBC
(×10
12
/L), RDW, RDWI (RDW × MCV/RBC), Green
and King formula (MCV2 × RDW/Hb × 100), Srivastava
formula (MCH/RBC), Mentzer formula (MCV/RBC),
Ehsani formula [MCV - (10 × RBC)], Ricerca formula
(RDW/RBC), England and Fraser formula [MCV - RBC
- (5 × Hb) - 3.4], Sirdah formula [MCV - RBC - (3 ×
Hb)], and Shine and Lal formula (MCV2 × MCH/100).
18
Statistical analysis
PASW Statistics for Windows, version 18.0 (SPSS
Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was applied for the data analyses.
e patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were
summarized descriptively by causes of microcytic anemia.
Continuous variables were reported as the mean±standard
deviation for normally distributed continuous variables,
and the median with interquartile ranges (Q1, Q3) for
nonnormally distributed continuous variables. Categorical
variables were reported as the frequency and percentage
and were compared using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square
test. Continuous variables were compared using the
Student’s t-test or Mann–Whiney U test. e univariate
and multivariate predictors of thalassemia were estimated
using Cox proportional hazards analysis (backward
stepwise method) and presented as an odds ratio (OR)
and 95% condence interval (CI). e receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve for the cuto score and for
thalassemia diagnosis was presented as the area under the
curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specicity, positive
predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value
(NPV). For all the tests performed, a two-tailed p-value
< 0.05 was considered to be statistically signicant. e
calibration belt model was used for model calibration.
e model was attended by the Hosmer –Lemeshow χ
2
goodness-of-t test.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
is study was approved by the Ethics Committee for
Research in Human Subjects at Chaophraya Yommarat
Hospital, Suphanburi, ailand. All procedures followed
were in accordance with the ethical standards of the
responsible committee on human experimentation and
with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Informed consent was waived due to a retrospective
study.
RESULTS
Baseline patient characteristics
In total, 227 microcytic anemic patients were included
in this study. Approximately three-quarters (73.1%)
were diagnosed with thalassemia disease, including
Hb E/β-thalassemia, homozygous β-thalassemia, Hb
H disease, Hb H/CS disease, AE Bart’s disease, and EF
Bart’s disease, whereas 61 patients (26.9%) were IDA.
In the thalassemic group, the mean patient age
was 42.1±20.5 years old. e mean Hb and MCV were
8±1.7 g/dL and 61.7±9.2 fL, respectively. e median
PLT count was 308,000/µL (range, 189,000-413,000/
µL). Among the IDA group, the mean patient age was
57.6±18.3 years old. e mean Hb was 6.1±1.7g/dL and
the mean MCV was 62.9±8.3 fL. e median PLT count
and serum ferritin were 384,000/µL (range, 263,000-
478,000/µL) and 16.7 ng/mL (range, 4-22.2 ng/mL),
respectively. Several factors were signicantly dierent
between the thalassemic and the IDA groups, such as age,
body mass index, Hb level, MCH, MCHC, red blood cell
distribution width (RDW), red blood cell counts, PLT
count, and iron proles. Table 1 displays the baseline
patient features and initial laboratory results of the
thalassemic and IDA patients.
Validation of the previous formulas predicting thalassemia
We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, PPV,
NPV, and accuracy of each previous formula to predict
thalassemia, including RBC, % RDW, RDWI, Green and
King, Srivastava, Mentzer, Ehsani, Ricerca, England,
and Fraser, Shine and Lal, and 11T score, by using the
included patient’s data in this study. e sensitivity of
almost all the formulas ranged between 13.9% - 44%.
Only the RDW and Shine and Lal formulas yielded
high sensitivity (97.6%), but with low specicity results,
with gures of 0% and 3.3%, respectively. e specicity
of each formula varied between 0%-98.4%. e high
specicity of above 90% was found with several formulas,
including RDWI, Green and King, England and Fraser,
Sirdah, and 11T score; unfortunately, the sensitivity of
these formulas was quite low. e PPV of almost all the
formulas provided high results, which were above 90%.
In contrast, the NPV of all the formulas was as low as
approximately 30% (range, 0%-36.3%). e accuracy
of each formula varied between 36.1%-72.3%. Table 2
demonstrates the sensitivity, specicity, PPV, NPV, and
accuracy of each formula for predicting thalassemia.
Subgroup analysis of the formulas for predicting each
type of thalassemia
We performed a subgroup analysis of each thalassemia
subtype, including β-thalassemia disease, α-thalassemia
Khorwanichakij et al.
Original Article
SMJ
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
259
TABLE 1. Baseline patient features and initial laboratory results of the thalassemic and iron deciency anemia patients.
Parameters Total Thalassemia β-thalassemia α-thalassemia α-thalassemia Irondeciency P-valueformultiplecomparisons
(N=227) (All) (1)(N=89) (2)(N=62) combinedwith anemia(0)
(N=166) (39.2%) (27.3%) β-thalassemia (N=61)
(73.1%)  (3)(N=15) (26.9%) 1vs.0 2vs.0 3vs.0 Allvs.0
(6.6%)
Age(mean±SD) 46.3±21 42.1±20.5 42.8±20.4 41.5±21.5 40.9±17.1 57.6±18.3 <0.001 <0.001 0.002 <0.001
(years)
Sex(Male) 74(32.6%) 54(32.5%) 33(37.1%) 18(29%) 3(20%) 20(32.8%) 0.589 0.652 0.531 0.971
BMI 21.4±4.1 20.8±3.6 20.8±3.9 20.3±3.1 22.5±3.3 23.2±4.9 0.001 <0.001 0.602 0.001
Hemoglobintyping 181 (79.7%) 166(100%) 89(100%) 62(100%) 15(100%) 15(24.6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
PCRfor 14(6.2%) 14(8.4%) 4(4.5%) 3(4.8%) 7(46.7%) 0(0%) 0.146 0.244 <0.001 0.024
α-thalassemia
Comorbidities 77(33.9%) 44(26.5%) 26(29.2%) 15(24.2%) 3(20%) 33(54.1%) 0.002 0.001 0.018 <0.001
Hypertension 34(15%) 16(9.6%) 12(13.5%) 3(4.8%) 1(6.7%) 18(29.5%) 0.016 <0.001 0.097 <0.001
Diabetes 22(9.7%) 12(7.2%) 10(11.2%) 1(1.6%) 1(6.7%) 10(16.4%) 0.361 0.004 0.682 0.039
Dyslipidemia 15(6.6%) 6(3.6%) 5(5.6%) 0(0%) 1(6.7%) 9(14.8%) 0.059 0.001 0.676 0.005
CAD 11(4.8%) 10(6%) 4(4.5%) 5(8.1%) 1(6.7%) 1(1.6%) 0.649 2.07 0.358 0.296
CKD 11(4.8%) 9(5.4%) 8(9%) 1(1.6%) 0(0%) 2(3.3%) 0.202 0.619 1.00 0.732
Liver disease 8(3.5%) 7(4.2%) 5(5.6%) 1(1.6%) 1(6.7%) 1(1.6%) 0.402 1.00 0.358 0.686
Arthritis 7(3.1%) 6(3.6%) 4(4.5%) 2(3.2%) 0(0%) 1(1.6%) 0.649 1.00 1.00 0.678
Others 19(8.4%) 7(4.2%) 2(2.2%) 5(8.1%) 0(0%) 12(19.7%) <0.001 0.062 0.109 <0.001
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
260
TABLE 1. Baseline patient features and initial laboratory results of the thalassemic and iron deciency anemia patients. (Continue)
Parameters Total Thalassemia β-thalassemia α-thalassemia α-thalassemia Irondeciency P-valueformultiplecomparisons
(N=227) (All) (1)(N=89) (2)(N=62) combinedwith anemia(0)
(N=166) (39.2%) (27.3%) β-thalassemia (N=61)
(73.1%)  (3)(N=15) (26.9%) 1vs.0 2vs.0 3vs.0 Allvs.0
(6.6%)
Laboratory
CBC
Mean±SD
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 7.5±1.9 8±1.7 7.9±1.9 8±1.5 8.5±1.7 6.1±1.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Hematocrit (%) 25±14.3 26.4±16.2 26.2±21.7 26.9±4.4 25.9±6.3 21.2±5 0.082 <0.001 0.003 0.015
MCV (fL) 62±8.9 61.7±9.2 61.3±8.9 63.7±9.5 56.1±7.3 62.9±8.3 0.286 0.605 0.005 0.404
MCH (pg) 18.8±3 19.2±2.8 19.9±3 18.6±2.2 17.3±2.4 17.7±3.3 <0.001 0.066 0.674 0.001
MCHC (g/dl) 31.3±14.7 32.5±17 32.3±2.5 33.2±27.8 30.9±2.5 28.0±2.2 <0.001 0.148 <0.001 0.042
RDW (%) 23.6±5.4 24.7±5.7 24.5±6.3 25.2±5 23.8±4.7 20.4±3 <0.001 <0.001 0.016 <0.001
RBC (x10
12
/L) 4±1 4.2±1 4±1 4.3±0.9 4.9±0.9 3.4±0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Median±IQR
WBC (cells/µL) 7,410 7,595 7,860 6,900 7,750 6,320 0.009 0.495 0.096 0.031
Platelet(/µL) 316,000 308,000 307,000 298,000 353,000 384,000 0.015 0.006 0.759 0.006
(224,000- (189,000- (172,000- (202,000- (298,000- (263,000-
436,000) 413,000) 409,000) 401,000) 470,000) 478,000)
Ironstudy
Median±IQR
serum ferritin 249 590 882.5 383.6 548 16.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
(ng/ml) (8.96-859) (259-1,427) (323-2387.5) (184-759) (268.7-1499) (4-22.2)
serum iron (µg/dl) 17 69 66 70.5 79 12 <0.001 <0.001 0.004 <0.001
(11-51) (44-104) (41-104) (47.0-89) (49.0-105) (10-15)
Transferrin 4.9 27.5 26.3 32.9 36 3.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
saturation (%) (3.2-24.2) (19.1-44) (16.6-46.8) (23-44) (23-38.6) (2.5-4.6)
Mean±SD
TIBC (µg/dl) 322.7±90.2 250.6±80.3 258.1±96.8 241.9±57.7 235.7±31.8 371.3±58.6 <0.001 <0.001 0.027 <0.001
Abbreviations: MCV = Mean corpuscular volume, MCH = Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC = Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, RDW = Red blood cell
distribution width, RBC = Red blood cell, WBC = White blood cell, TIBC = Total iron binding capacity (µg/dL), TSAT = Transferin saturation (%).
Khorwanichakij et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
261
Original Article
SMJ
TABLE 2. Sensitivity, specicity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of each formula
to predict thalassemia.
Formula Cutoff Thalassemia Iron Sensitivity Specicity PPV NPV Accuracy
n(%) deciency (95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI)
anemia
n (%)
RBC(x10
12
/L) ≥5 36(97.3) 1(2.7) 21.7% 98.4% 97.3% 31.6% 42.3%
<5 130(68.4) 60(31.6) (15.7-28.7) (91.2-100) (85.8-99.9) (25-38.7) (35.9-48.7)
RDW(%) ≥14 162(72.6) 61(27.4) 97.6% 0% 72.6% 0% 71.4%
<14 4(100) 0(0) (93.9-99.3) (0-5.9) (66.3-78.4) (0-60.2) (65.48-77.25)
RDWI[6] <220 23(92) 2(8) 13.9% 96.7% 92% 29.2% 36.1%
≥220 143(70.8) 59(29.2) (9-20.1) (88.7-99.6) (74-99) (23-36) (29.9-42.4)
GreenandKing[7] <72 27(96.4) 1(3.6) 16.3% 98.4% 96.4% 30.2% 38.3%
≥72 139(69.8) 60(30.2) (11-22.8) (91.2-100) (81.7-99.9) (23.9-37) (32-44.7)
Srivastava[8] <3.8 56(84.8) 10(15.2) 33.7% 83.6% 84.8% 31.7% 47.1%
≥3.8 110(68.3) 51(31.7) (26.6-41.5) (71.9-91.8) (73.9-92.5) (24.6-39.5) (40.6-53.6)
Mentzer[9] <13 65(90.3) 7(9.7) 39.2% 88.5% 90.3% 34.8% 52.4%
≥13 101(65.2) 54(34.8) (31.7-47) (77.8-95.3) (81-96) (27.4-42.9) (45.9-58.9)
Ehsani[10] <15 73(90.1) 8(9.9) 44% 86.9% 90.1% 36.3% 55.5%
≥15 93(63.7) 53(36.3) (36.3-51.9) (75.8-94.2) (81.5-95.6) (28.5-44.7) (49-62)
Ricerca[11] <4.4 35(81.4) 8(18.6) 21.1% 86.9% 81.4% 28.8% 38.8%
≥4.4 131(71.2) 53(28.8) (15.1-28.1) (75.8-94.2) (66.6-91.6) (22.4-35.9) (32.4-45.1)
England[12] <0 24(96) 1(4) 14.5% 98.4% 96% 29.7% 37%
andFraser ≥0 142(70.3) 60(29.7) (9.5-20.7) (91.2-100) (79.6-99.9) (23.5-36.5) (30.7-43.3)
Sirdah[13] <27 63(94) 4(6) 38% 93.4% 94% 35.6% 52.9%
≥27 103(64.4) 57(35.6) (30.5-45.8) (84.1-98.2) (85.4-98.3) (28.2-43.6) (46.4-59.4)
ShineandLal[14] <1530 162(73.3) 59(26.7) 97.6% 3.3% 73.3% 33.3% 72.3%
≥1530 4(66.7) 2(33.3) (93.9-99.3) (0.4-11.3) (67-79) (4.3-77.7) (66.4-78.1)
11Tscore[16] ≥7 40(97.6) 1(2.4) 24.1% 98.4% 97.6% 32.3% 44.1%
<7 126(67.7) 60(32.3) (17.8-31.3) (91.2-100) (87.1-99.9) (25.6-39.5) (37.6-50.5)
11Tscore(cutoff5) ≥5 64(88.9) 8(11.1) 38.6 86.9 88.9 34.2 51.5
<5 102(65.8) 53(34.2) (31.1-46.4) (75.8-94.2) (79.3-95.1) (26.8-42.2) (45.0-58.0)
11Tscore(cutoff6) ≥6 58(95.1) 3(4.9) 34.9 95.1 95.1 34.9 51.1
<6 108(65.1) 58(34.9) (27.7-42.7) (86.3-99.0) (86.3-99.0) (27.7-42.7) (44.6-57.6)
11Tscore(cutoff8) ≥8 30(96.8) 1(3.2) 18.1 98.4 96.8 30.6 36.7
<8 136(69.4) 60(30.6) (12.5-24.8) (91.2-100.0) (83.3-99.9) (24.2-37.6) (33.3-46.0)
11Tscore(cutoff9) ≥9 20(95.2) 1(4.8) 12.0 98.4 95.2 29.1 35.2
<9 146(70.9) 60(29.1) (7.5-18.0) (91.2-100.0) (76.2-99.9) (23.0-35.8) (29.0-41.5)
Abbreviations: PPV = Positive predictive value, NPV = Negative predictive value, RBC = Red blood cell count interval, RDW = Red blood
cell distribution width, RDWI = Red blood cell distribution width index.
Khorwanichakij et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
262
disease, and β-thalassemia combined with α-thalassemia
disease. In the subgroup of the β-thalassemia group, the
results were not signicantly dierent from in the full
analysis. Similarly, the results remained similar to the full
analysis in the α-thalassemia disease group. However,
when we validated the formulas in the β-thalassemia
combined with α-thalassemia disease patients, the NPV
and the accuracy of almost all the formulas were better
than in the full analysis, with gures ranging between
79.0%-93.0%, while the sensitivity and specicity were
not dierent from in the full analysis.
Proposed novel thalassemia–iron deciency discrimination
(TID) predictive score
Because the validation of each previous formula
was imperfect, we attempted to determine the signicant
factors to dierentiate between thalassemic and IDA
patients. We found that MCH, % RDW, RBC, and PLT
were signicant factors related to thalassemia. erefore,
the predictive score is calculated by using these factors
as the following:
y = (-4.643) + (2.273 if MCH 17 to 20) + (3.888 if
MCH > 20) + (2.025 if RDW 21 to 25) + (4.986 if RDW
> 25) + (0.485 if RBC 3.5 to 4.5) + (4.787 if RBC > 4.5) +
(0.785 if PLT < 265,000) + (1 if PLT 265,000 to 400,000)
Subsequently the TID predictive score was simplied
by multiplying with 2 as the following:
y = (-9) + (5 if MCH 17 to 20) + (8 if MCH > 20)
+ (4 if RDW 21 to 25) + (10 if RDW > 25) + (1 if RBC
3.5 to 4.5) + (10 if RBC > 4.5) + (2 if PLT < 265,000) +
(2 if PLT 265,000 to 400,000) (Fig 1)
We used the ROC analysis for the TID predictive
score. e most appropriate cuto level for predicting
thalassemia was ≥2, in which the AUC was 0.93 (95%
CI: 0.890 - 0.969; Fig 2). e sensitivity and specicity
of the score were 90.4% and 78.7%, respectively (Table 3).
Internal validation of the TID predictive score
e split 150 sample proles were utilized for the
internal validation study of the TID predictive score. e
AUC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.815 - 0.947). e sensitivity
to predict thalassemia from the internal validation was
96.4%, with the specicity and the accuracy of 50.0%
and 84.0%, respectively. ere was a non-statistically
signicant dierence in AUCs between the predictive
TID predictive score creation and the internal validation
(P-value = 0.805).
DISCUSSION
e most common cause of microcytic anemia
in developed countries is IDA. However, thalassemia
should not be overlooked in patients with microcytic
anemia, especially in Asian populations.
20-21
In Southeast
Asian subjects, the prevalence of α-thalassemia among
anemic patients is 20%–30%, and β-thalassemia is about
3%–9%.
20-21
A CBC is a worthwhile initial investigation
that can be performed in every hospital. Although CBC
is a simple test, it gives an instant result, but it cannot
totally dierentiate the cause of microcytic anemia.
Hence, conrmation tests, such as iron study, Hb typing,
and PCR for α-thalassemia, are still mandatory for a
denitive diagnosis. However, such conrmation tests
are invariably more sophisticated, quite expensive, and
can take several days to several weeks to get the results
back. So these are not always practical in developing
countries with limited resources.
Several formulas have been developed to predict
thalassemia and used as a screening tool for thalassemia
diagnosis. For example, predictive formulas, such as
Green and King, Srivastava, and Mentzer have shown a
sensitivity of 87.7%–93.8% and specicity of 82.5%–95%
according to the previous results.
7-9,15
e 11Tscore was
developed to improve the sensitivity and specicity for
improving thalassemia diagnosis.
15
It is composed of 11
predictive formulas.
15-18
A previous study from France
found it had a sensitivity of 85.7% and specicity of 97.5%,
15
while the study from ailand reported a sensitivity of
82.1% and specicity of 91.7%.
18
However, the 11Tscore
has been applied for predicting only the β-thalassemia
subtype.
15-18
Another study reported that the Jayabose
RDW index, the Green and King formula, and the Janel
11T score are good formulas to dierentiate thalassemia
trait from IDA among their population.
22
Moreover,
the serum ferritin cuto value from previous studies
for IDA diagnosis varied between <10 ng/ml and <16
ng/ml.
16-18
Currently, the denition for IDA diagnosis is
serum ferritin < 30 ng/ml and TSAT < 16 %.
4
therefore,
we dened IDA according to this recent suggestion in
this study.
In our study, we validated all the previous formulas
with all subtypes of thalassemia, including α-thalassemia
disease, β-thalassemia disease, α-thalassemia combined
with β-thalassemia disease, and IDA patients. In contrast
to the previous results, the sensitivity and specicity
to predict thalassemia disease among these included
patients were not high. Therefore, we proposed a
novel TID predictive score composed of 4 red blood
cell indices, namely % RDW, RBC, and PLT count.
e TID predictive score had a sensitivity of 90.4%
and specicity of 78.7% to dierentiate all thalassemia
subtypes from IDA. Although, the specicity from the
internal validation was insignicantly lower compared
Khorwanichakij et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
263
Original Article
SMJ
Fig 1. e thalassemia–iron deciency discrimination (TID) predictive score and their values.
Fig 2. Receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve for obtaining the cut o value for thalassemia prediction using
the TID predictive score (A) all thalassemia subtypes (B) β-thalassemia disease (C) α-thalassemia disease (D) α-thalassemia combined with
β-thalassemia
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
264
to the gure from the predictive score generation, the
sensitivity remained satisfying. e TID predictive score
applies % RDW for calculation because in ailand CBC
report is practically presented with % RDW. However, a
recent study showed that absolute RDW is more specic
to dierentiate thalassemia from IDA in microcytic
anemia comparing with relative RDW.
23
This score might be beneficial for thalassemia
screening, whereby patients who have a score ≥2 can be
selected for further investigation to conrm thalassemia
disease. is could reduce unnecessary expenses from
over investigation, which would be especially important
in resource-limited countries. In other words, patients
who have a lower likelihood of having thalassemia as
assessed from the predictive score could be treated as
IDA while waiting for their iron study.
ere are some limitations of this study to note.
First, because this was a retrospective study, some
information may have been missing. Second, the TID
predictive score demonstrated a specicity of 50.0% from
the internal validation, some IDA patients who have high
TID predictive scores might experience a treatment delay
while awaiting for Hb typing result. ird, IDA patients
from this cohort had signicantly more severe anemia
than the thalassemia subjects. is factor might inuence
the sensitivity/specicity of discriminant formulas. Lastly,
in the subgroup analysis, the size of some subgroups is
quite small which leads to imprecise formula validation.
CONCLUSION
alassemia and IDA are the most common causes
of microcytic anemia. Here, a TID predictive score
was proposed that demonstrated higher sensitivity for
thalassemia prediction while remaining uncomplicated
to be applied due to its few involved parameters.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the Department of
Medicine, Chaophraya Yommarat Hospital, Suphanburi,
ailand and the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital,
Mahidol University, ailand for grant support. We
also thank Assoc.Prof. Preechaya Wongkrajang and Dr.
Ratikorn Anusorntanawat for their valuable consultation
and advice and thank Ms. Pattaraporn Tunsing and
Ms. Kemajira Karaketklang for the data collection and
statistical analyses.
Conicts of interest: e authors conrm that there
are no known conicts of interest associated with this
publication.
Funding: is study was funded by grants from the
Department of Medicine, Chaophraya Yommarat Hospital,
Suphanburi, ailand and the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj
Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ailand.
REFERENCES
1. WHO. Trends in anemia in women and children: 1995 to
2016; WHO 2017; Available from http://www.WHO.int/data/
gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/prevalence-of-
anemia-in-women-of-reprodutive-age.
2. Brimson S, Suwanwong Y, Brimson JM. Nutritional anemia
predominant form of anemia in educated young ai women.Ethn
Health. 2019;24(4):405-14. doi:10.1080/13557858.2017.1346
188
3. Taher AT, Saliba AN. Iron overload in thalassemia: dierent
organs at dierent rates.Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ
Program. 2017;2017(1):265-71. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.265
4. Camaschella C. Iron-deficiency anemia.N Engl J Med.
2015;372(19):1832-43. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1401038
5. Brancaleoni V, Di Pierro E, Motta I, Cappellini MD. Laboratory
diagnosis of thalassemia.Int J Lab Hematol. 2016;38 Suppl
1:32-40. doi:10.1111/ijlh.12527
Khorwanichakij et al.
TABLE 3. Sensitivity, specicity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the TID predictive
score.
Logisticmodel Cutoff Thalassemia Iron Sensitivity Specicity PPV NPV Accuracy
n(%) deciency (95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI)
anemia
n (%)
Logisticmodelscore ≥2 150(92) 13(8) 90.4% 78.7% 92.0% 75.0% 87.2%
<2 16(25) 48(75) (84.8-88.1) (66.3-88.1) (86.7-95.7) (62.6-85.0) (82.9-91.6)
Abbreviations: PPV = Positive predictive value, NPV = Negative predictive value.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
265
Original Article
SMJ
6. JayaboseS,GiavanelliJ,Levendoglu O, Sandoval C, Ozkayak F,
Visintainer P. Dierentiating iron deciency anemia from
thalassemia minor by using an RDW-based index.J Pediatr
Hematol Oncol. 1999;21:314.
7. Green R, King R. A new red cell discriminant incorporating
volume dispersion for dierentiating iron deciency anemia
from thalassemia minor.Blood Cells. 1989;15(3):481-95.
8. Srivastava PC, Bevington JM. Iron deciency and-or thalassaemia
trait.Lancet. 1973;1(7807):832. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(73)
90637-5
9. Mentzer WC Jr. Dierentiation of iron deciency from thalassaemia
trait.Lancet. 1973;1(7808):882. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(73)
91446-3
10. Ehsani M, Darvish A, Eslani A, Seighali F. A new formula for
dierentiation of iron deciency anemia (IDA) and thalassemia
trait (TT). Turk J Hematol 2005;22(Suppl): 268.
11. Ricerca BM, Storti S, d’Onofrio G, Mancini S, Vittori M,
Campisi S, et al. Dierentiation of iron deciency from thalassaemia
trait: a new approach.Haematologica. 1987;72(5):409-13.
12. EnglandJM,BainBJ,FraserPM.Dierentiation of iron deciency
from thalassemia trait by routine blood‐count.Lancet.1973;1:449-
52.
13. SirdahM,TaraziI,Al NajjarE,Al HaddadR.Evaluation of
the diagnostic reliability of dierent RBC indices and formulas
in the dierentiation of theβ‐thalassemia minor from iron
deciency in Palestinian population.Int J Lab Hematol2007;30:
324-30.
14. Shine I, Lal S. A strategy to detect beta‐thalassemia
minor.Lancet1977;1:692-4.
15. Janel A, Roszyk L, Rapatel C, Mareynat G, Berger MG, Francois
A, et al. Proposal of a score combining red blood cell indices for
early dierentiation of beta-thalassemia minor from iron
deciency anemia.Hematology. 2011;16(2):123-7. doi:10.11
79/102453311X12940641877849.
16. Chandra H, Shrivastava V, Chandra S, Rawat A, Nautiyal R.
Evaluation of Platelet and Red Blood Cell Parameters with
Proposal of Modied Score as Discriminating Guide for Iron
Deciency Anemia and β-alassemia Minor.J Clin Diagn
Res. 2016;10(5):EC31-EC34. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/17672.
7843
17. Plengsuree S, Punyamung M, Yanola J, Nanta S, Paiping K,
Maneewong K, et al. Red Cell Indices and Formulas Used in
Dierentiation of β-alassemia Trait from Iron Deciency
in ai Adults.Hemoglobin. 2015;39(4):235-9. doi:10.3109/
03630269.2015.1048352
18. Pornprasert S, ongsat C, Panyachadporn U. Evaluation
of Applying a Combination of Red Cell Indexes and Formulas
to Dierentiate β-alassemia Trait from Iron Deciency
Anemia in the ai Population.Hemoglobin. 2017;41(2):116-9.
doi:10.1080/03630269.2017.1323763
19. WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of
anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and Mineral
Nutrition Information System. Geneva, World Health Organization,
2011 (WHO/NMH/NHD/MNM/11.1). Available from: http://
www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin. pdf, accessed
[date].
20. Goh LPW, Chong ETJ, Lee PC. Prevalence of Alpha (α)-
alassemia in Southeast Asia (2010-2020): A Meta-Analysis
Involving 83,674 Subjects.Int J Environ Res Public Health.
2020;17(20):7354. doi:10.3390/ijerph17207354
21. Kattamis A, Forni GL, Aydinok Y, Viprakasit V. Changing
patterns in the epidemiology of β-thalassemia.Eur J Haematol.
2020;105(6):692-703. doi:10.1111/ejh.13512
22. Urrechaga E, Homann JJML. Critical appraisal of discriminant
formulas for distinguishing thalassemia from iron deciency in
patients with microcytic anemia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;
55(10):1582-91. doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0856
23. Homann JJML, Urrechaga E. Role of RDW in mathematical
formulas aiding the differential diagnosis of microcytic
anemia.Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020;80(6):464-9. doi:10.10
80/00365513.2020.1774800
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
266
Voramon Teranasthiarphan, M.D., Thakerng Pitakteerabundit, M.D., Nan-ak Wiboonkhwan, M.D.,
Tortrakoon ongkan,
M.D.
Department of Surgery, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, ailand.
The Evolution of Associating Liver Partition with
Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy
ABSTRACT
Associating Liver Partition with Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy is a cutting-edge surgical technique
for resection of hepatic malignancies that has piqued the interest of the international hepatobiliary community.
Patients with insucient future liver remnants, many of whom are considered unresectable via other methods,
have the possibility of being cured with this treatment. e main issues; howbeit include, increased perioperative
morbidity and mortality as well as both early and rapid disease recurrence. However, with continuous improving
of patient selection, optimizing stage 2 operation times and rened operative techniques this has led to reduced
morbidity and mortality rates. As for its usage, the most frequent indication is colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM);
in which, the results in CRLM have shown higher resectability; however, it has a comparable complication rate
to two-stage hepatectomy. Conversely, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma have terrible
outcomes; although, with technical renement and better patient selection good outcomes are achievable.
Herein, we summarized the current evidence based of the application of ALPPS in real-life practice, including
the potential complications related to this procedure.
Keywords: ALPPS; Future liver remnant; hepatectomy (Siriraj Med J 2022; 74: 266-273)
Corresponding author: Tortrakoon ongkan
E-mail: Ttortrak@medicine.psu.ac.th
Received 2 December 2021 Revised 20 February 2022 Accepted 7 March 2022
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8210-1459
http://dx.doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.33
INTRODUCTION
An insucient future liver remnant is a factor
excluding patients from curative intent liver resection,
as the low hepatic functional reserve of the small, future
liver remnant (FLR) can lead to post-hepatectomy liver
failure (PHLF). Portal vein embolization (PVE) results in
compensatory hypertrophy of FLR; however, the biggest
drawback of PVE is insucient FLR hypertrophy, or
subsequent disease progression; which aects roughly
20% of patients.
1
Recently, Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) has been
introduced for patients with bilateral multinodular colorectal
liver metastases.
2
is can be used in conjunction with
Portal vein occlusion (PVO); either portal vein ligation
(PVL) or percutaneous PVE. e main idea being that the
liver grows in the interval between sequential resection,
and the risk of PHLF is presumably reduced due to
this staged approach.
3,4
However, although TSH is well
established, failure to proceed to stage 2 is reported as
being a problem in up to one-third of patients.
Dr. Hans Schlitt discovered the Associating
Liver Partition with Portal Vein Ligation for Staged
Hepatectomy (ALPPS) by chance. He noticed a small
liver remnant during an extended right hepatectomy for
hilar cholangiocarcinoma. So, he decided to perform a
hepaticojejunostomy and right PVL aer parenchymal
Teranasthiarphan et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
267
Review Article
SMJ
transection for enhancing exposure. Fortunately, computed
tomography (CT) scanning revealed extensive hypertrophy
of the remnant segments one week later. Hence, the right
liver was subsequently removed.
5
ALPPS is based on the
fast hypertrophy of remnant segments. It can enhance the
remaining liver by up to 80% over an average duration
of 1-2 weeks compared to 20-45% in 2-8 weeks in PVE
patients.
6,7
e possible mechanism of rapid hypertrophy
in ALPPS is based on the increase of portal ow in the
disconnection of the interlobar perfusion, accompanied
by the increased level of inammatory cytokines that
induce liver regeneration. e disadvantage is a high
procedure-related morbidity and mortality rate of roughly
40% and 15%, respectively, mainly from liver failure
and bile leakage.
8
As a result, the safety of ALPPS in
comparison to standard techniques is still debatable.
Pathophysiology of liver regeneration in ALPPS
There are two proposed mechanisms for rapid
hypertrophy aer the rst stage of ALPPS. Firstly, the
parenchymal transection will not allow communication
of interlobar collateral circulation. e portal ow can
maximize the shearing force to the hepatocyte that causes
the liver to regenerate. e later mechanism is based on
the increased level of inammatory mediators that drive
liver regeneration.
9
e disparity between the size and function of a remnant
could explain the high risk of ALPPS complications. e
regenerate hepatocyte shows edema and expansion, but is
still partly immature within the rst two weeks aer the
procedure, albeit from unknown causes.
10
Histologically,
the hepatocyte has greater cell density, is smaller in
size, brighter and has narrower sinusoidal compared to
PVE.
11
In electron microscopy, the FLR area is frequently
shown as being vacant in appearance. is is caused
by hepatocytic cytoplasm lled with glycogen granules
and fewer cytoplasmic organelles, lipofuscin granules.
To date, all of these properties can be interpreted as
immature cells.
Technical considerations (right trisectionectomy ALPPS)
The liver was examined with intraoperative
ultrasonography to conrm the number and location
of the tumor. e liver was fully mobilized, and the
hepatoduodenal ligament was skeletonized. e right portal
vein was ligated with non-absorbable suture material.
e parenchymal transection was carried down along the
falciform ligament (Fig 1). Most of the authors advocated
for using a plastic bag for covering the deportalized liver,
so as to control bile leakage. CT scanning was performed
at 9 days on average, postoperatively. e right hepatic
artery, right hepatic duct, right, and middle hepatic vein
were then divided in the second stage operation.
5,12
Modications to the initial techniques
Bile duct ligation
Recent studies have suggested against routine bile
duct ligation.
13,14
Many published reports have reported
complications; such as, a higher rate of bile leakage,
biloma formation and severe, dense adhesion at the porta
hepatis during second stage operations. e previous
hypothesis was that by increasing the biliary obstruction
response in obstructed livers, right bile duct ligation
could promote additional FLR hypertrophy.
Fig 1. Schematic overview of Associating Liver Partition with Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (right trisectionectomy). (A)
e liver was occupied with multiple tumors on both sides. e potential procedure is right trisectionectomy with the lateral section as the
future remnant liver. (B) In the rst stage, complete parenchymal transection was carried out along the falciform ligament, the tumors in
the remnant liver were removed, and the right portal vein was ligated. (C) e future liver remnant shows signicant hypertrophy, and then
the deportalized lobe was removed.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
268
Preservation of the middle hepatic vein
e rst ALPPS series mentions ligation of the
middle hepatic vein during the rst stage of the procedure
5
however, a recent study
13
discovered its relation with
congestion of liver segments IV, V, VIII. is may result
in decreased outow, followed by a higher risk of ischemia
and hepatic necrosis as well as subsequent bile leakage.
e middle hepatic vein is now preserved as the venous
outow of segment IV, rather than being removed as
previously reported, without compromising parenchymal
hypertrophy. Most hepatobiliary surgeons currently use
this method.
6
Hybrid ALPPS (Non touch technique)
is modication aims to avoid manipulating the
right lobe of the liver in order to improve tumor tissue
handling and prevent hematologic malignancy spread.
13,15,16
e parenchymal transection is performed using an anterior
approach, without mobilization, and the hepatoduodenal
ligament is le intact. In the days following the operation,
interventional radiology performs right PVE. At the
second stage, there is less inammation around the liver;
according to reports. Nevertheless, some of the authors
are against this idea, due to the inability to achieve
optimal vascular control during a technically complex
procedure; especially via an anterior approach.
14,15
Partial ALPPS
is modied technique solely diers in the degree of
liver partition. In contrast to conventional ALPPS, where
parenchymal transection was complete, partial ALPPS
transected only 50% to 80% of the parenchyma in stage
I.
14
Anatomic outow structures (hepatic veins), and/
or tumor(s) lying inside or near the future transection
line, determine the degree of partial transection. e
main advantage of this modication in technique is
that it limits the deleterious congestion of the excluded
segments and segment IV necrosis, by preserving their
outow via the middle hepatic vein.
17,18
Partial ALPPS
generates equivalent FLR hypertrophy to complete ALPPS,
but with decreased morbidity and near-zero mortality.
16
However, Chan et al. demonstrated that complete ALPPS
can cause rapid FLR hypertrophy more so than partial
ALPPS, while having no impact on perioperative risks in
chronic liver disease.
19
In the meta-analysis by Wu et al,
they compared partial and complete ALPPS and showed
that FLR hypertrophy and time intervals between stages
were not substantially dierent for both techniques.
20
Although, the post-operative complication rate was
signicantly lower in partial ALPPS.
Mini-ALPPS
Mini-ALPPS simplies rst stage hepatectomy, by
using a partial parenchymal transection technique and
intraoperative portal vein embolization, without hilar
dissection or liver mobilization. is approach allows
for an accelerated FLR hypertrophy to be obtained at
a mean of 63% within 11 days.
19
is is similar to that
reported for classic ALPPS; but without the high rate of
mortality and morbidity.
5,6
Associating Liver Tourniquet and Portal Ligation for
Staged Hepatectomy
With this method, a tourniquet is used to replace the
completion of the parenchymal transection, this reduces
the complexity and time required in the rst stage of the
operation.
21
A thick suture material is applied around the
liver in the deep sulcus of the parenchymal transection
(an extra-glissonian approach). en the tourniquet
is subsequently tightened to completely obstruct all
interlobar collateral circulation.
Radiofrequency assisted liver partition
is is an application of radiofrequency ablation to
the parenchyma, aer right PVL at the site of demarcation.
e hypertrophic rate is increased by up to 62% over a
mean interval of 22 days, according to the study, and
that it also avoids the complications of liver partition.
22
ALPPS outcome
Primary outcomes
e studies that investigated the ecacy of ALPPS
have consistently revealed that ALPPS causes hypertrophy
of 60-90%, with the average duration of the stage being
9-14 days (Table 1). Most of the cases (95-100%) that
complete the rst stage could be undergoing a later
stage.
5,6,15,23,24
e international ALPPS registry consists
of 141 (70%) colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients
among 202 patients.
25
Within 7 days, the median initial
standardized future liver remnant of 21% grew by 80%,
and ninety-day mortality was 9%. Severe complications
occurred in 27% of patients. Red blood cell transfusion,
an operative time of more than 300 minutes, patient ages
being greater than 60 years, and non-CRLM were all
independent risks for severe complications. Additionally,
the registry shows that many factors directly aect the
rate of liver hypertrophy; such as, age, intermittent
Pringle maneuver, and abnormal parenchyma.
25
According to meta-analysis,
26
ALPPS seems to be
more eective than the two-stage approach in causing
remnant hypertrophy, with signicantly higher resection
Teranasthiarphan et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
269
Review Article
SMJ
TABLE 1. Success rate and outcome of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy
compare with two-staged hepatectomy.
Author Year Primary tumor FLR volume Drop-out rate Morbidity*/
(reference) (N) increment(%)afterrststage(%) mortality
CRLM HCC CCA ALPPS TSH ALPPS TSH (%)
Schnitzbauer
5
 2012 14 3 4 74 n/a n/a n/a 64/12
ShindohJ
8
2013 14 3 4 70 62 n/a 28 40/12
SchaddeE
25
2014 141 17 19 80 n/a 2 n/a 27/9
SchaddeE
6
2015 228 32 27 90 n/a 2 n/a 14/9
Sandstrom
31
2018 97 - - 68 36 8 43 43/8
WangZ
36
2020 - 45 - 57 n/a 9 n/a 12/11
ChanA
37
2021 - 46 - 49 38 2 32 21/6.5
Abbreviations: CRLM; Colorectal Liver Metastasis, HCC; Hepatocellular carcinoma, CCA; Cholangiocarcinoma, FLR; Future liver remnant,
ALPPS; Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy, TSH; two-stage hepatectomy
* Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIB
n/a: non-available
rates of approximately 92-100%.
25–28
Additionally, there
is a shorter time interval of 1-2 weeks vs. 20-45% in
2-8 weeks following PVE. Furthermore, prolonged
periods between stages in TSH has caused up to 30%
of patients to be ineligible for a nal hepatectomy, due
to disease progression.
10,29,30
At the same time, ALPPS
faces the problem of most candidates having a higher
risk for micrometastasis in FLR aer a second stage
operation. Additionally, there is an argument concerning
the hypertrophic liver, in regards to cellular swelling
or complete functioning regeneration, and that liver
hypertrophy in such a short period of time may not
ensure its functional capacity.
9
In conclusion, despite
ALPPS having a greater resectability rate, there is no
signicant dierence in disease free survival between
ALPPS and TSH.
Morbidity and mortality
e major obstacle of the procedure is the signicant
rate of morbidity and mortality. e largest study, 202
patients, cited major morbidity of 28% and mortality of
9%.
6,15,25
Although, the reported mortality rate is variable,
the high complication rate is may have occurred from
the small sample size of the study. A German study
revealed a 12 percent 90-day death rate, triggering a
erce debate among international experts;
5
surgical
exploration, right portal vein ligation (PVL additionally,
other small studies found signicantly higher rates;
ranging from 22-29%. Conversely, there have been no
90-day mortalities recorded across multiple centers.
13,15,25
Comparison between ALPPS and Two-stage hepatectomy.
e retrospective comparative analysis of 140 patients
undergoing PVE to the 25 patients undergoing ALPPS
showed that the rates of hypertrophy were similar in both
groups: 70% in the ALPPS group and 60% in the PVE
group.
8
Overall, there was no signicant dierence in
major morbidity between the two groups (40% ALPPS
versus 30% PVE). However, for other complications
ALPPS had signicantly higher rates than PVE in all
causes; bile leak (24% versus 6%), re-laparotomy (30%
versus 3%) and sepsis (20% versus 0%); but was no
signicantly higher in liver-related mortality (12% versus
6%).
Data from the retrospective multicenter study
showed a trend towards higher morbidity and mortality
associated with ALPPS compared with PVE. e 90-day
mortality was 15% versus 6%, and post-hepatectomy
liver failure was 13% versus 9% for the ALPPS versus
the PVE group, respectively. Moreover, patients in the
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
270
ALPPS group achieved more completion of resection
(83% versus 66%); however, the recurrence at one year
was comparable (54% versus 52%).
25
In contrast to Aloia et al, the PVE group had just a
34% increase in FLR compared to a 77% gain in the ALPPS
group.
28
e LIGRO was a landmark randomized controlled
trial that compared the resection rate between ALPPS and
TSH in CRLM patients. is study demonstrated that
ALPPS could oer a higher resection rate compared to
TSH, 92% to 57%, respectively, with comparable surgical
margins, complications, and short-term mortality.
31
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of
ALPPS versus traditional staged hepatectomy, in 2019,
7
found that ALPPS increased FLR more than PVE and
TSH. However, the results of the study are limited due
to the high heterogeneity among the studies. As for
overall mortality and morbidity, the higher trend is
on the side of ALPPS over PVE/TSH; morbidity 30%
and 26%, respectively, without heterogeneity; mortality
10% and 4% consequently, without heterogeneity. e
feasible rate of stage 2 aer ALPPS and PVE were 94%
versus 63%, respectively, which is the same as between
ALPPS and TSH, 95% versus 72%, respectively.
ALPPS in CRLM
In the first international registry,
6
the 90-day
postoperative mortality among all patients who underwent
ALPPS was 9%. For patients with CRLM, the 2-year
overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)
were 62% and 41%, respectively. Patients with CRLM
who were younger than 60 years of age had a better
chance of survival than patients with other malignancies.
A separate analysis of the international ALPPS registry
included 228 patients with CRLM, which comprised of
72% of the study population. In this report, the 90-day
mortality was 5%. e leading cause of mortality was liver-
related, for which it was recommended by the authors
to evaluate the patients underlying condition, using the
model of end-stage liver disease, and the international
study group for liver surgery criteria, so as to discriminate
against higher or lower risk.
27
Some of the suggested approaches to improve ALPPS
outcome include stratication of patients for developed
liver failure following rst stage hepatectomy, achieving
expertise in the learning curve, renement in patient
selection, modications to the original ALPPS procedure
to reduce liver traumatization, interval chemotherapy,
a shorter time o chemotherapy, and preservation of
segment IV.
9
e objective of oncologic liver surgery is
to achieve a tumor-free margin. In there meta-analysis,
Margonis et al,
29
found that a margin of >1 mm was
related with better overall survival, and a margin of >1
cm was even associated with better DFS. As a result, a
better oncologic outcome may even justify the removal
of signicant volumes of parenchyma. Furthermore,
regarding the numbers and sizes of metastases remaining
in the FLR, full tumor clearance of the FLR during the
rst stage is crucial for any two-stage strategy. ese
traditional markers; numbers and sizes of metastases
as well as intensity of oncologic pretreatment area are
important prognostic factors. KRAS mutation, which has
been linked to poor survival, and TP53 mutation have
both been linked to a higher chance of tumor relapse in
recent studies.
30
Hence, analysis by Schnitzbauer et al,
32
assumed
that there is a tendency for potential overuse of ALPPS.
Additionally, the role of major hepatectomy in CRLM has
become less, due to eective down-sizing of chemotherapy
being available. In this case, ALPPS must be viewed as
a last resort at the very end of the therapeutic spectrum
for CRLM.
ALPPS in Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
e ALPPS registry’s initial report, which included
17 patients with HCC, and the second, which included
32 patients with HCC, reported 90-day mortality rates of
12% and 13%, respectively.
6,25
ese results appeared to
be the consequence of both an early learning curve and a
typically increased mortality of liver resection in altered
liver parenchyma. More devastating was when the rst
major analysis from the ALPPS registry, with 35 ALPPS
for intermediate-stage tumor, revealed a 90-day mortality
of 30%.
33
However, a thorough examination revealed
that ALPPS had been employed with broad inclusion
criteria and in an undierentiated manner. Fortunately,
aer careful selection, using the ALPPS technique in a
good patient candidate with HCC (Child A cirrhosis,
FLR volume > 30%, an indocyanine green clearance rate
at 15 minutes <20%, platelet count > 100,000/µL and no
complete right portal vein thrombosis), led to a decrease
in mortality of 7% and 0%.
23,34,35
A recent study, from
Wang et al, investigated their outcomes of conventional
ALPPS in 45 HCC patients.
36
e results showed that
the patients who received ALPPS had similar eects to
those who underwent one-stage hepatectomy,; with 1-
and 3-year OS rates of 64% and 60% and 1- and 3-year
DFS rates of 48% and 44%. Furthermore, the results
were far superior to those who received transarterial
chemoembolization. Recently, Chan et al. investigated
the role of ALPPS for hepatitis-related HCC. e study
shows ALPPS induced FLR volume increment by 48.8%,
without dierence in morbidity and mortality compared
Teranasthiarphan et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
271
Review Article
SMJ
to PVE. Although, over 56.5% of patients that complete
stage 2 had cirrhosis.
37
ALPPS in cholangiocarcinoma
From the beginning, ALPPS was rstly used in a
case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, even so, the latest
data reveals the highest perioperative complication risks
among all indicated diseases. e 90-day-mortality for
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from the ALPPS registry
is about 13%.
6
e risk of perioperative complications
is higher in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), most
likely from post rst stage parenchymal necrosis, possibly
infected bile, and biliary leakage. A matched case study
that compared data from the ALPPS registry to data
on PVE and right trisectionectomy for PHC found that
perioperative mortality was as high as 48% in the ALPPS
group versus 24% in the matched group.
38
ese results led
to unacceptable arguments over whether it is a homicidal
choice of treatment or not. However, from a closer
viewpoint, ALPPS in the research was performed with the
intention to improve resectability, by rapidly increasing
FLR; but at the same time some principles of surgery for
PHC were neglected. For example; performing the 1
st
stage
operation in the presence of infection and inammation
by conventional ALPPS; thereby causing a higher risk
of biliary leakage. Conversely, new techniques; such as:
“Mini-ALPPS” and “Hybrid ALPPS”, were introduced.
Both strategies aim to achieve appropriate FLR growth
in the shortest period possible, and both prevent hilar
dissection during the rst stage. As a result, in PHC
patients, ALPPS should not be deemed a categorical
contraindication.
Authors opinions
Aer the initial outcome of ALPPS demonstrated
the dramatic increment of FLR, this procedure became
famous among the hepatobiliary surgery community.
However, many patients have been through this procedure
without proper indication, which has lead to avoidable
complications. Even with the international ALPPS registry
results, the 90-day mortality was much higher than
conventional hepatectomy.
6
e authors suggest that the following issue should
be considered before selecting a patient for ALPPS.
1. For CRLM: the patient should receive episodes
of systemic chemotherapy, with or without
targeted therapy. Good response liver metastasis
could omit the need for this risky procedure.ALPPS
should only be used as a last measure in the
treatment of CRLM.
32
2. The CRLM patients who progress while on
systemic therapy are poor candidates for ALPPS.
3. Aer stage 1, preoperative liver evaluation is
crucial. Both quantitative and qualitative assessments
are essential. e second stage should be terminated,
or postponed for any patient that has good
FLR increase but impaired function. ere are
some discrepancies between the increased
volume and the remnant›s function because most
of the regenerated hepatocyte is still partly
immature.
10
4. In chronic viral hepatitis or cirrhosis there is
scant evidence of ALPPS; therefore, the surgeon
should select the most suitable patients for ALPPS.
5. Patients with cholangiocarcinoma should avoid
ALPPS. ALPPS in cholangiocarcinoma had the
highest risk of perioperative complication among
all indicated diseases. e 90-day-mortality for
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is high as 13%,
and might be higher for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
6
CONCLUSION
ALPPS is one of the strategies to overcome inadequate
future liver remnants. Perioperative complications are
the main concern for ALPPS, because the tremendous
volume increment within 1-2 weeks is not well correlated
with the function of the remnant liver. As early results
from the ALPPS registry have shown, inappropriate
patient selection resulted in a high risk of PHLF and
postoperative mortality. Proper patient selection coupled
with a satisfactory pre-and interstage liver assessment
could improve outcomes; especially for CRLM, which
has comparable results to TSH.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
e authors would like to thank Woralux Phusoongnern,
M.D., FRCNST, for the illustrations.
REFERENCES
1. May BJ, Mado DC. Portal Vein Embolization: Rationale,
Technique, and Current Application. Semin Interv Radiol
2012;29:81–9.
2. Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Two-
Stage Hepatectomy: A Planned Strategy to Treat Irresectable
Liver Tumors. Ann Surg 2000;232:777–85.
3. Lam VWT, Laurence JM, Johnston E, Hollands MJ, Pleass
HCC, Richardson AJ. A systematic review of two-stage
hepatectomy in patients with initially unresectable colorectal
sliver metastases. HPB 2013;15:483–91.
4. Giuliante F, Ardito F, Ferrero A, Aldrighetti L, Ercolani G,
Grande G, et al. Tumor progression during preoperative
chemotherapy predicts failure to complete 2-stage hepatectomy
for colorectal liver metastases: Results of an Italian multicenter
analysis of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219:285–94.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
272
5. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, Baumgart
J, Farkas SA, et al. Right portal vein ligation combined with in
situ splitting induces rapid le lateral liver lobe hypertrophy
enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-
for-size settings. Ann Surg 2012;255:405–14.
6. Schadde E, Raptis DA, Schnitzbauer AA, Ardiles V, Tschuor C,
Lesurtel M, et al. Prediction of Mortality Aer ALPPS Stage-1:
An Analysis of 320 Patients From the International ALPPS
Registry. Ann Surg 2015;262:780–5.
7. Liu Y, Yang Y, Gu S, Tang K. A systematic review and meta-
analysis of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for
staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) versus traditional staged hepatectomy.
Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e15229.
8. Shindoh J, Vauthey J-N, Zimmitti G, Curley SA, Huang SY,
Mahvash A, et al. Analysis of the ecacy of portal vein embolization
for patients with extensive liver malignancy and very low future
liver remnant volume, including a comparison with the associating
liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
approach. J Am Coll Surg 2013;217:126–33; discussion 133-
134.
9. Abbasi A, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Merath K, Weber SM, Abbott
DE, Dillho M, et al. Role of associating liver partition and
portal vein ligation in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)—strategy
for colorectal liver metastases. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol
2018;3:66.
10. Lang H, Baumgart J, Mittler J. Associated Liver Partition and
Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Registry:
What Have We Learned? Gut Liver 2020;14:699–706.
11. Matsuo K, Murakami T, Kawaguchi D, Hiroshima Y, Koda K,
Yamazaki K, et al. Histologic features aer surgery associating l
iver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
versus those aer hepatectomy with portal vein embolization.
Surgery 2016;159:1289–98.
12. Bertens KA, Hawel J, Lung K, Buac S, Pineda-Solis K, Hernandez-
Alejandro R. ALPPS: Challenging the concept of unresectability
– A systematic review. Int J Surg;13:280–7.
13. Hernandez-Alejandro R, Bertens KA, Pineda-Solis K, Croome
KP. Can we improve the morbidity and mortality associated
with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation
for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure in the management
of colorectal liver metastases? Surgery 2015;157:194–201.
14. Petrowsky H, Györi G, de Oliveira M, Lesurtel M, Clavien P-A.
Is partial-ALPPS safer than ALPPS? A single-center experience.
Ann Surg 2015;261:e90-92.
15. Ardiles V, Schadde E, Santibanes E, Clavien PA. Commentary
on “Happy marriage or ‘dangerous liaison’: ALPPS and the
anterior approach.” Ann Surg 2014;260:e4.
16. Dokmak S, Belghiti J. Which limits to the “ALPPS” approach?
Ann Surg 2012;256:e6.
17. Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibañes M, Pekolj J, de Santibañes
E. Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged
Hepatectomy Oers High Oncological Feasibility With Adequate
Patient Safety: A Prospective Study at a Single Center. Ann
Surg 2015;261:723–32.
18. Truant S. Laparoscopic Partial ALPPS: Much Better an
ALPPS! Ann Hepatol 2019;18:269-273.
19. Chan ACY, Chok K, Dai JWC, Lo CM. Impact of split
completeness on future liver remnant hypertrophy in associating
liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
(ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma: Complete-ALPPS versus
partial-ALPPS. Surgery 2017;161:357–64.
20. Wu X, Rao J, Zhou X, Deng R, Ma Y. Partial ALPPS versus
complete ALPPS for staged hepatectomy. BMC Gastroenterol
2019;19:170.
21. Robles R, Parrilla P, López-Conesa A, Brusadin R, de la Peña J,
Fuster M, et al. Tourniquet modication of the associating liver
partition and portal ligation for staged hepatectomy procedure.
Br J Surg 2014;101:1129–34.
22. López-López V, Robles-Campos R, Brusadin R, López-Conesa
A, Navarro Á, Arevalo-Perez J, et al. Tourniquet-ALPPS is a
promising treatment for very large hepatocellular carcinoma
and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2018;9:28267–
80.
23. Chan ACY, Poon RTP, Lo CM. Modied Anterior Approach for
the ALPPS Procedure: How We Do It. World J Surg 2015;39:2831–5.
24. Li J, Moustafa M, Linecker M, Lurje G, Capobianco I, Baumgart
J, et al. ALPPS for Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma:
Did Aggressive Surgery Lead to the Oncological Benet? An
International Multi-center Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:1372–84.
25. Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R, Malago M, Machado M,
Hernandez-Alejandro R, et al. Early survival and safety of
ALPPS: rst report of the International ALPPS Registry. Ann
Surg 2014;260:829–36.
26. Moris D. Operative Results and Oncologic Outcomes of
Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged
Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Versus Two-Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) in
Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Surg 2018;42:
806-815.
27. Røsok BI, Høst-Brunsell T, Brudvik KW, Carling U, Dorenberg
E, Björnsson B, et al. Characterization of early recurrences
following liver resection by ALPPS and two stage hepatectomy in
patients with colorectal liver-metastases and small future
liver remnants; a translational substudy of the LIGRO-RCT.
HPB 2019;21:1017–23.
28. Aloia TA, Vauthey J-N. Associating liver partition and portal
vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): what is gained
and what is lost? Ann Surg 2012;256:e9.
29. Margonis GA, Sergentanis TN, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Andreatos
N, Tzanninis I-G, Sasaki K, et al. Impact of Surgical Margin
Width on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following R0
Hepatic Resection of Colorectal Metastases: A Systematic
Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2018;267:1047–55.
30. Serenari M, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibañes M, Pekolj J, de
Santibañes E. The ALPPS Approach for Colorectal Liver
Metastases: Impact of KRAS Mutation Status in Survival. Dig
Surg 2018;35:303–10.
31. Sandström P, Røsok BI, Sparrelid E, Larsen PN, Larsson AL,
Lindell G, et al. ALPPS Improves Resectability Compared With
Conventional Two-stage Hepatectomy in Patients With
Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Results From a Scandinavian
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (LIGRO Trial).
Ann Surg 2018;267:833–40.
32. Schnitzbauer AA, Schadde E, Linecker M, Machado MA, Adam
R, Malago M, et al. Indicating ALPPS for Colorectal Liver
Metastases: A Critical Analysis of Patients in the International
ALPPS Registry. Surgery 2018;164:387–94.
33. D’Haese JG, Neumann J, Weniger M, Pratschke S, Björnsson B,
Ardiles V, et al. Should ALPPS be Used for Liver Resection in
Intermediate-Stage HCC? Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:1335–43.
Teranasthiarphan et al.
Volume 74, No.4: 2022 Siriraj Medical Journal
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/index
273
Review Article
SMJ
34. Vennarecci G, Laurenzi A, Levi Sandri GB, Busi Rizzi E, Cristofaro
M, Montalbano M, et al. e ALPPS procedure for hepatocellular
carcinoma. EJSO 2014;40:982–8.
35. Chan ACY, Poon RTP, Chan C, Lo CM. Safety of ALPPS
Procedure by the Anterior Approach for Hepatocellular
Carcinoma. Ann Surg 2016;263:e14–6.
36. Wang Z, Peng Y, Hu J, Wang X, Sun H, Sun J, et al. Associating
Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy
for Unresectable Hepatitis B Virus-related Hepatocellular
Carcinoma: A Single Center Study of 45 Patients. Ann Surg 2020;
271:534–41.
37. Chan A, Zhang WY, Chok K, Dai J, Ji R, Kwan C, et al. ALPPS
Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hepatitis-related Hepatocellular
Carcinoma: A Changing Paradigm in Modulation of Future Liver
Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy. Ann Surg 2021;273:957–65.
38. Olthof PB, Coelen RJS, Wiggers JK, Groot Koerkamp B, Malago
M, Hernandez-Alejandro R, et al. High mortality aer ALPPS
for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: case-control analysis
including the rst series from the international ALPPS registry.
HPB 2017;19:381–7.