https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjrt/issue/feed The Thai Journal of Radiological Technology 2024-05-22T16:19:28+07:00 ผู้ช่วยศาสตราจารย์ ดร.นภาพงษ์ พงษ์นภางค์ napapong.pon@mahidol.ac.th Open Journal Systems <p>The Thai Journal of Radiological Technology (TJRT) is an official journal of the Thai Society of Radiological Technologists (TSRT). The journal disseminates and promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in radiological technology, medical physics, latest technology, techniques, innovation and related subjects in radiology. It presents original articles, technical reports, short communications, reviews articles and letters to the editor.</p> https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjrt/article/view/266575 Development of a web application for stroke diagnosis assistance using deep learning artificial intelligence on computed tomography image 2024-01-26T15:08:45+07:00 Titipong Kaewlek titipongk@nu.ac.th Ketmanee Sitinwan ketmanees63@nu.ac.th Kunaporn Lueangaroon kunapornl63@nu.ac.th Wasita Sansuriyawong wasitas63@nu.ac.th Rawiwan Pattaweerakul rawiwankai@gmail.com Thatchai Hantrakul thatchai_han@hotmail.com Bhuwid Chinwatanawongwan bhuwid@gmail.com <p>Stroke presents a significant health risk for the elderly, demanding precise diagnosis through computed tomography (CT) imaging. Expert interpretation is crucial, and present artificial intelligence (AI) proves invaluable for radiologists, ensuring accuracy. Various accessible programs, but requiring payment, can be installed on devices. This study aims to develop a web application for stroke detection in brain CT images. The web application, compatible with computers, phones, and tablets, employs deep learning AI for stroke classification. Using a dataset of 1,636 images (1,111 normal, 525 stroke), about 70% (1,175 images) were used to train, 20% (329 images) for validation, and 10% (132 images) for test the AI model (Deep learning: VGG-16). Evaluation metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and are under curve (AUC), gauged the web app's performance. Design and functionality were assessed through a 5-point Likert scale by three radiologists. Results show impressive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC (0.969, 0.952, 0.978, 0.952, 0.965). Design and performance scores were 4.13 ± 0.38 and 4.37 ± 0.33. In conclusion, the web application effectively diagnoses strokes in brain CT images, offering a user-friendly experience on the internet.</p> 2024-05-26T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 The Thai Society of Radiological Technologists https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjrt/article/view/267822 Optimizing the minimum detectable difference of chest protocol digital radiography system by V-shaped line gauge phantom and Taguchi analysis 2024-04-02T14:24:47+07:00 Samrit Kittipayak samrit.kit@cra.ac.th Puksupa Lodea puksupa.lode@gmail.com Salinpatr Panjaudomrat salinpatr.pan@gmail.com <p><strong>Background:</strong> The Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) of Digital Radiography (DR) image systems was quantified and optimized using a self-developed V-shaped line gauge phantom and Taguchi optimization analysis. The increased clinical applications of the DR system are mainly due to its ability to provide instant and precise imaging for radiologists to diagnose. <strong>Objective:</strong> The purpose of this study was to optimize parameters for MDD values based on Taguchi's analysis and to verify a self-developed V-shaped line gauge phantom for the chest protocol of the DR system. <strong>Materials and methods:</strong> The chest protocol was exposed using the V-shaped line gauge and solid acrylic water phantom in various sizes with the DR system. Five factors were assigned in this study: (A) focal spot, (B) kVp, (C) mAs, (D) filter, and (E) phantom thickness. Since each factor could have two or three levels, eighteen groups of factor combinations were organized according to Taguchi’s algorithm. The V-shaped line gauge images were estimated. ANOVA was adopted to determine the significant factors and MDD values to evaluate the spatial resolution. <strong>Results:</strong> The optimal parameters for the highest Signal-to-Noise (S/N) ratio were as follows: (A) large focal spot, (B) 140 kVp, (C) 6.25 mAs, (D) 0.1 mmCu filter, and (E) phantom thickness of 16 cm. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The optimal parameters in this study provided an MDD value of 0.87 mm compared to 1.66 mm for conventional parameters. The self-developed V-shaped line gauge phantom also proved to be suitable for the DR system. Furthermore, all factors affected the image quality with statistical significance following the ANOVA analysis.</p> 2024-05-22T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 The Thai Society of Radiological Technologists https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjrt/article/view/265632 Setup errors and CTV to PTV margin for upper abdominal cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy technique using electronic portal imaging device in Sakon Nakhon Hospital 2023-12-07T15:25:16+07:00 Wimonmart Tongngarm wimonmart.to@gmail.com Sarayut Kornsopa lamood58@gmail.com Phattanapong Saenchon ph26at@gmail.com Nawaporn Pongsak wimonmart.to@gmail.com Netchanok Yingsom netchanoky62@nu.ac.th Ketmanee Lalomchai ketmaneel162@nu.ac.th Yanika Waisarikam yanikaw62@nu.ac.th Sumalee Yabsantia sumaleey@nu.ac.th <p><strong>Introduction:</strong> The systematic and random setup errors for patients with upper abdominal cancer are specific to each hospital. <strong>Objective:</strong> This study aimed to determine the systematic error, random error, and CTV to PTV margin for patient positioning in upper abdominal cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID). <strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> Patient information and setup errors of 32 patients undergoing radiotherapy were collected. The data on setup errors in three directions (longitudinal, lateral, and vertical) were retrospectively collected from the Mosiaq Platform. Subsequently, individual and population systematic and random errors were calculated. The CTV to PTV margins were then determined using the Van Herk equation. Finally, correlations between setup error and BMI, age, and PTV volume were analyzed. <strong>Results:</strong> The results showed that the setup errors in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions were 2.59±1.44, 2.17±0.95, and 1.66±0.59 mm, respectively. The population systematic errors in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions were 1.44, 0.95, and 0.59 mm, respectively. The population random errors in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions were 2.59, 2.17, and 1.66 mm, respectively. The determined CTV to PTV margins in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions were 5.42, 3.89, and 2.62 mm, respectively. There was no correlation between setup error and BMI, age, or PTV volume, with p-values &gt; 0.05. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The CTV to PTV margins were less than 5 mm in all directions except the longitudinal direction. This finding may be useful for reviewing the PTV margin for Sakon Nakhon hospital.</p> 2024-05-22T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 The Thai Society of Radiological Technologists https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjrt/article/view/266430 Repeat film analysis and its implications for quality assurance in diagnostic radiology: An institutional case study 2023-12-07T15:34:36+07:00 Bunchai Nittayasupaporn Bunchai_crt9@hotmail.com Jatupong Proukkerd yiwjatupong.p@gmail.com Manassawee Permwong manassaweepemwong@gmail.com Thititip Tippayamontri Thititip.T@chula.ac.th <p><span class="s16">The primary objective of this research was to analyze the rate of repeated chest examinations using the Reject and Usage Analysis tool program of the Samsung XGEO</span><span class="s16">-</span><span class="s16">GC</span><span class="s16">80</span><span class="s16"> X</span><span class="s16">-</span><span class="s16">ray machine</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">A retrospective study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital</span><span class="s16"> (</span><span class="s16">KCMH</span><span class="s16">)</span><span class="s16"> in the Department of Radiological Diagnostic</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">The study involved collecting statistics and closely examining the causes behind rejected images within the machine system</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">Among the key findings were Chest examinations accounted for the highest number of images, comprising </span><span class="s16">39</span><span class="s16">.</span><span class="s16">32</span><span class="s16">%</span><span class="s16"> of the total </span><span class="s16">40,400</span><span class="s16"> images</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">Repeated images were most prevalent in chest examinations, making up </span><span class="s16">32</span><span class="s16">.</span><span class="s16">21</span><span class="s16">%</span><span class="s16">of the </span><span class="s16">7,550</span><span class="s16"> rejected images and </span><span class="s16">6</span><span class="s16">.</span><span class="s16">02</span><span class="s16">%</span><span class="s16"> of all images</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">The primary reason for rejecting images was improper positioning, constituting </span><span class="s16">75</span><span class="s16">.</span><span class="s16">47</span><span class="s16">%</span><span class="s16"> of all rejected images</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">In chest examinations, the most common reason for image rejection was improper breathing, contributing to </span><span class="s16">54</span><span class="s16">.</span><span class="s16">3</span><span class="s16">%</span><span class="s16"> of all </span><span class="s16">1,321</span><span class="s16">rejected images and </span><span class="s16">14</span><span class="s16">.</span><span class="s16">0</span><span class="s16">%</span><span class="s16"> of all rejected images in the study</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">Furthermore, the study highlighted that a significant portion of X</span><span class="s16">-</span><span class="s16">ray image rejections resulted from human errors, primarily from radiological technologists</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">To reduce the rate of repeated imaging, the following recommendations were proposed for i</span><span class="s16">) </span><span class="s16">comprehensive evaluation of the patient's condition before the X</span><span class="s16">-</span><span class="s16">ray examination, ii</span><span class="s16">) </span><span class="s16">Ensuring proper patient positioning, iii</span><span class="s16">) </span><span class="s16">Implementation of various initiatives within the healthcare unit, including regular training for radiologists, and iv</span><span class="s16">) </span><span class="s16">Establishment of criteria for accepting radiographic images across all radiol</span><span class="s16">ogical technologists within the diagnostic department</span><span class="s16">. </span><span class="s16">In conclusion, these analyses are essential to enhance the quality of radiological services</span><span class="s16"> at KCMH</span><span class="s16">, minimize image rejections, and ultimately improve patient care and </span><span class="s16">radiation </span><span class="s16">safety</span><span class="s16">.</span></p> 2024-05-25T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2024 The Thai Society of Radiological Technologists