Influence of Body Mass Index on Acromial Distance Evaluated in Sitting and Supine Positions: A cross-sectional study

  • Waleerat Sansee Faculty of Physical Therapy, Saint Louis Collage, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
  • Chaowit Suttiwanit Faculty of Physical Therapy, Huachiew Chalermpraklet University, Samut Prakan 10540, Thailand
  • Varavee Temprom Faculty of Physical Therapy, Saint Louis Collage, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
  • Chamaiporn Sangnon Faculty of Physical Therapy, Saint Louis Collage, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
  • Wanvisa Panichaporn Faculty of Physical Therapy, Srinakharinwirot University, Ongkharak, Nakhon-nayok 26120, Thailand
  • Nitaya Viriyatharakij Faculty of Physical Therapy, Srinakharinwirot University, Ongkharak, Nakhon-nayok 26120, Thailand
Keywords: Acromial distance, Pectoralis minor length, Body mass index, Rounded shoulder posture

Abstract

Objective: 1) To analyse the effect of body mass index (BMI) on acromial distance (AD) evaluation in sitting and supine positions. 2) To clarify intra- and inter-rater reliability of AD evaluation.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by 4 well trained assessors in 2 Physical Therapy Faculties. A total of 114 healthy participants (aged 18–48 years old), comprising 20 males and 94 females. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling and separated into two groups according to BMI group 1 (BMI less than 23 kg/m2; n=69), and BMI group 2 (BMI greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2; n=44). Main outcome measures were the AD evaluations in both sitting and supine positions were evaluated, and compared between BMI groups using independent-sample T Test.

Results: For participants in BMI group 1 and group 2, the average AD in the sitting position was 69.1 mm and 81.3 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. In the supine position, the average AD for participants in BMI group 1 and group 2 was 39.4 mm and 56.1 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in AD values between the BMI groups (P < 0.001). The AD evaluations showed excellent both intra-rater reliability (ICC3,1 0.991 to 0.999) and inter-rater reliability (ICC2,1 0.954 to 0.999).

Conclusions: The AD values in both positions were significantly increased in the participants with a higher BMI. Therefore, BMI should be taken into account when using AD for clinical monitoring and interventions to correct pectoralis minor length or rounded shoulder posture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-09-30
Section
Original Articles