Retrospective Study on the Effect of Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Carcinoma

Authors

  • Siripong Sirikurnpiboon Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Supakade Surabenjawong Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Viroj Laosunthornsiri Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Burin Awapittaya Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

Background: In the present, there are two types of giving radiotherapy together with chemotherapy for
treatment of rectal carcinoma: neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and adjuvant CRT. A study conducted
overseas has found that patients given neoadjuvant CRT had better disease-free survival rate than patients given
adjuvant CRT, with no difference in overall survival rate and distant metastasis rate. However, there is no study
comparing the efficacy of neoadjuvant CRT and to adjuvant CRT in Thai patients.
Materials & Methods: In this retrospective study, patients were divided into two groups: the group which
received neoadjuvant CRT (54 patients) and the group receiving adjuvant CRT (71 patients). The objective of
this study was to determine disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate of the treatment comparing
neoadjuvant and adjuvant CRT. Lastly, the correlation between the status of K-ras gene and outcome of the
treatment was analyzed.
Results: The group with neoadjuvant CRT had disease-free survival rate as follows: 1 year at 94.2%; 2
years at 81.8%; 3 years at 70.4%; and 5 years at 70.4% compared with the group with adjuvant CRT who had
disease-free survival rate as follows: 1 year at 82.4%; 2 years at 73.5%; 3 years at 57.1%; and 5 years at 46.1%.
The group which received neoadjuvant CRT had statistically significant better disease-free survival rate than the
group receiving adjuvant CRT (P=0.034). The group which received neoadjuvant CRT had overall survival
rate: 1 year at 96.2%; 2 years at 90.1%; 3 years at 82.1%; and 5 years at 64.5% compared with the adjuvant
chemoradiation group which had overall survival rate: 1 year at 89.7%; 2 years at 85.3%; 3 years at 69.9%; and
5 years at 55.4%. It was found that the group receiving neoadjuvant CRT did not have statistically significant
better overall survival rate than the adjuvant CRT group (P=0.147).
Conclusions: Patients who received neoadjuvant CRT had better outcome in term of disease-free survival
than those with adjuvant CRT.

References

1. Stryker SJ, Kiel KD, Rodemaker A, et al. Preoperative çchemo
radiationé for stage II and III rectal carcinoma. Arch Surg
1996; 131:514-9.

2. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative VS
postoperative chemo radiotherapy for rectal cancer. N
Engl J Med 2004; 351:1731-40.

3. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ et al. Rates of circumferential
resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and
predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002;
235:449-57.

4. Wu ZY, Wan J, Li JH et al. Study of circumferential resection
margin involvement and lower rectal carcinoma. World J
Gastroenterol 2007; 13:3380-3.

5. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens R, Steele R, et al. Preoperative
radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy
in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and
NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet
2009; 373:811-20

Downloads

Published

2012-06-29

How to Cite

1.
Sirikurnpiboon S, Surabenjawong S, Laosunthornsiri V, Awapittaya B. Retrospective Study on the Effect of Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Carcinoma. Thai J Surg [Internet]. 2012 Jun. 29 [cited 2024 Apr. 24];33(2). Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThaiJSurg/article/view/226873

Issue

Section

Original Articles