Accuracy of Per-rectal Examination for Diagnosis and Predicting Type of Appendix in Patients with Acute Appendicitis

Authors

  • Weerapat Suwanthanma Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Ronnarat Suvikapakornkul Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Panuwat Lertsithichai Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Siroj Kanjanapanjapol Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Chakrapan Euanorasetr Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Acute appendicitis, Per-rectal examination, Appendix type

Abstract

Introduction: Type of appendix is a well-recognized factor responsible for difficulty in appendectomy. Traditionally per-rectal examination should be performed in all patients with acute abdomen. Our goal of this study was to demonstrate the accuracy of per-rectal examination for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to predict type of appendix by the result of per-rectal examination.

Material and Methods: We reviewed the relationship between positive per-rectal examination and all types of appendix in patients with acute appendicitis from January 2006 to October 2006 at our institution.

Results: There were 142 patients in the study including 68 males. The mean age at diagnosis was 32.8 years in male and 40.7 years in female. Per-rectal examination was performed in 113/142 (80%) patients. At operation, pelvic type was the most common type. Accuracy of per-rectal examination for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and predicting pelvic-type appendicitis are 52.3% and 48% respectively.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the accuracy of per-rectal examination as one of clinical diagnostic tools had low sensitivity and specificity and could not be used routinely as a predictor of type and diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

References

1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;1 35:910-25.

2. Beasly SW. Can we improve diagnosis of acute appendicitis? BMJ 2000;321:907-10,

3. Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bodian C, How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:401-6.

4. Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP. Appendicitis. Curr Probl Surg 2005;42:688-742.

5. Humes DJ, Simpson J, Clinical review: acute appendicitis. BMJ 2006:333:530-4.

6. Bonello JC, Abrams JS. The significance of a çposittiveé rectal examination in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:97-101.

7. Dixon JM, Elton RA, Rainey JB, Macleod DA. Rectal examination in patient with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. BMJ 1991;302:386-8.

8. Manimaran N, Galland RB. Significance of routine digital rectal examination in adults presenting with abdominal pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004; 86:292-5.

9. Wakeley CP. The position of the vermiform appendix as ascertained by an analysis of 10,000 cases. J Anat 1933;67:277-83.

10. Dunning PG, Goldman MD. The incidence and value of rectal examination in children with ruptured appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1991;73:233-4.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-29

How to Cite

1.
Suwanthanma W, Suvikapakornkul R, Lertsithichai P, Kanjanapanjapol S, Euanorasetr C. Accuracy of Per-rectal Examination for Diagnosis and Predicting Type of Appendix in Patients with Acute Appendicitis. Thai J Surg [Internet]. 2008 Dec. 29 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];29(4):133-6. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThaiJSurg/article/view/241039

Issue

Section

Original Articles