Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy: 6-Year Experience in Thai Patients

Authors

  • Chakrapan Euanorasetr Division of General Surgery, Unit B, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Weerapat Suwanthanma Division of General Surgery, Unit B, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common anorectal disorders worldwide. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SHD) is a relatively new technique introduced in 1998. Nowadays, there are sufficient evidences of its benefits. There are 25 randomized clinical trials comparing SHD with open hemorrhoidectomy and 6 randomized clinical trials comparing SHD with closed hemorrhoidectomy (CHD). There are also 5 systematic reviews of randomized trials comparing SHD and conventional hemorrhoidectomy. We have previously studied and retrospectively compared hemorrhoidectomy by stapled technique (n = 88) and closed hemorrhoidectomy (n =88).

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the results of our 6-year experience of SHD in Thai patients and to compare with our previous study.

Patients and Methods: From January 2004 to December 2006, 116 patients underwent SHD using PPH.03. We compared these data including 88 SHD using PPH-01 performed between October 2000 and December 2003 with 88 CHD from our previous study. All procedures were performed under spinal anesthesia and in jackknife position.

Results: In SHD group (N= 204), 96 were male (47%) and 108 were female (53%) with median age of 51 years (20-80 years). In CHD group (N= 88), 36 were male (41%) and 52 were female (59%) with median age of 47 years (22-79 years). SHD group required less analgesic consumption than CHD group (58.3% vs 100%; p<0.05). Mean operative time was shorter in SHD than CHD group (17 vs 35 minutes; p <0.05). Postoperative hospitalization for one day was more common in SHD than CHD group (81.9% vs 20.4%;p <0.05). Postoperative complication rates especially urinary retention were lower in SHD than CHD group (36.8% vs. 62.5% and 32.8% vs. 55.7%; p <0.05; respectively). Overall recurrent hemorrhoidal symptoms were similar between the two groups after median follow-up period of 34 months (3-77 months). SHD group developed less recurrent bleeding than CHD group (1.5% vs 9.1%; p <0.05). No serious complications after SHD were found.

Conclusions: Our results confirm that SHD is simple (shorter operative time), safe (less postoperative pain and less complications) and effective (low recurrent symptoms). Stapling technique also reduces the length of hospital stay. There are no serious complications. This study demonstrates that the previously published favorable results of SHD can be reproduced in Thai patients. The keys of success are proper patient selection and good surgical technique. Because of the rather high urinary retention rate, SHD should not be performed under spinal anesthesia as a day-case surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA, Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: 18; CD005393.

2. Cataldo P, Elis CN, Gregorcyk S, et al. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised), Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48: 189-94.

3. Chung CC, Cheung HY, Chan ES, et al. Stapled hemorrhoid-opexy vs Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial., Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1213-9,

4. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, et al, A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1824-36.

5. Longo A, Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with circular stapling device; a new procedure, Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Monduzzi, Rome; 1998. p.777-84.

6. Milito G, Cortese F, Casciani CU. Surgical treatment of mucosal prolapse and hemorrhoids by stapler, Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy, June 3-6, 1998.

7. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nustorm PO, et al. Persistent pain and fecal urgency after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356: 730-3.

8. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE, Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial, Lancet 2000; 355: 782-5.

9. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy; randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355: 779-81.

10. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 64-8.

11. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 669-74.

12. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A, et al. Modern stapled Longo procedure vs conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial, Int J Colorectal Dis 2002; 17:50-3.

13. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89: 1376-81.

14. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, et al, Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1437-44.

15. Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2003:46: 491-7.

16. Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, et al. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy; randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 2003: 27: 203-7.

17. Krska Z, Kvasnieka J, Faltyn J, et al. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids according to Longo and Milligan Morgan: an evaluation of postoperative tissue response. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5:573-6.

18. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 93-9.

19. Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM. Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy; a three and a half year follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 37-8.

20. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, et al. Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19:239-44.

21. Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with LigaSure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 2005;19:235-9.

22. Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, et al. Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1517-22.

23. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 809-15.

24. Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2 year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 29-35.

25. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, et al. Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial, Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 668-9.

26. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, et al. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361: 1437-8.

27. Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, et al. Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorect Dis 2001; 3: 175-78.

28. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1666-75.

29. Ooi BS, Ho YH, Tang CL, et al. Results of stapling and conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6:59-60.

30. Bikhchandani J, Agarwal PN, Kant R, et al. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 2005;189:56-60.

31. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88:1049-53.

32. Khalil KH, O'Bichere A, Sellu D. Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87:1352-5.

33. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, et al. Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 337-40.

34. Ho KS, Ho YH. Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol 2006; 10: 193-7.

35. Huang WS, Chin CC, Yeh CH, et al. Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade Ill hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007: Mar 2; (Epub ahead of print)

36. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, et al. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1367-74.

37. Peng BC, Jayne DG, Ho YH. Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:291-7

38. Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:1395-406

39. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1837-45.

40, Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, et al. The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:172-8.

41. Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (Stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50: 1-15.

42. Corman ML, Gravie JF, Hager T, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party-indications, contra-indications and technique, Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 304-10.

43. Euanorasetr C, Sriyodwieng W. Stapled and closed hemorrhoidectomy: A comparative retrospective study with long-term follow-up. Thai J Surg 2005; 26: 9-16.

44. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, et al. Experience of 3,711 stapled hemorrhoidectomy operations, Br J Surg 2006;93: 226-30.

45. Wexner SD. The quest for painless surgical treatment of hemorrhoids continues. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193: 174-8.

46. Zaheer S, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, et al. Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41: 696-704.

47. Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Sogawa N, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after surgery for benign anorectal disease: potential risk factors and strategy for prevention. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 676-82.

48. Euanorasetr C. Complications of surgical hemorrhoidectomy. In: Parinya Thavichaigarn, et al, editor. Advances in Surgery/RCST 21. Bangkok Medical Publisher; 2002. p.394-456.

49. Euanorasetr C. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy. In: Chakrapan Euanorasetr, et al, editor. Advances in Surgery/RCST 26, Bangkok Medical Publisher; 2004. p. 68-87.

50. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 810.

51. Roos P. Haemorrhoid surgery revised. Lancet 2000; 355:1648.

52. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:826-8.

53 Pessaux P, Lermite E, Tuech JJ, et al. Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 824-5.

54. Herold A, Kirsch JJ. Complications after circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy: results of an inquiry in Germany. Coloproctology 2001; 23: 8-16.

55. Bonner C, Prohm P, Storkel S. Fournier gangrene as a rare complication after stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Case report and review of the literature. Chirurg 2001; 72: 1464-6.

56, McDonald PJ, Bona R, Cohen CR. Rectovaginal fistula after stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 64-5.

57. Wong LY, Jiang JK, Chang SC, et al. Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 116-7.

58. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:268-70.

59. Cipriani S, Pescatori M. Acute rectal obstruction after PPH stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4: 367-70.

60. Aumann G, Petersen S, Pollack T, et al. Severe intra-abdominal bleeding following stapled mucosectomy due to enterocele: report of a case. Tech Coloproctol 2004; 8:41-3.

61. Blouhos K, Vasiliadis K, Tsalis K, et al. Uncontrollable intra- abdominal bleeding necessitating low anterior resection of the rectum after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: report of a case, Surg Today 2007; 37:254-7.

62. Seow-Choen F, Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg 2001; 88:1-3.

63. Touzin E, Hegge S, McKinley C. Early experience of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in a community hospital setting. Can J Surg 2006; 49: 316-20.

Downloads

Published

2007-06-29

How to Cite

1.
Euanorasetr C, Suwanthanma W. Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy: 6-Year Experience in Thai Patients. Thai J Surg [Internet]. 2007 Jun. 29 [cited 2022 Aug. 15];28(2):39-47. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThaiJSurg/article/view/241141

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>