Surgery of Intracranial Aneurysms: Experience of 100 Cases

Authors

  • Sukit Tassanasunthornwong Department of Medical Services, Lerdsin Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok 10500, Thailand

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment in 100 cases of intracranial aneurysms performed by the author.

Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective study involving 100 patients (57 females and 43 males) who underwent surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysm between 1991-2002. Patients' age, gender, location of aneurysm, and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) clinical grading (Hunt and Hess grading) were studied and correlated with the outcome following surgery.

Results: Thirty six patients (36%) had aneurysm of the posterior communicating artery (PcoA), 33 patients (33%) had aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery (AcoA) and 17 patients (17%) had aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The outcome as evaluated by the Glasgow outcome scale was good recovery in 60 patients (60%), moderate disability in 11 patients (11%), severe disability in 7 patients (7%) and death in 22 patients (22%), Good recovery and moderate disability patients (71 patients or 71%) were classified under the favorable outcome group whereas patients with severe disability and death (29 patients or 29%) were classified under the unfavorable outcome group. According to Hunt and Hess SAH grading, the patients with SAH grade I-II had favorable outcome in 60 patients (92%) and un favorable outcome in 5 patients (8%) whereas the patients with SAH grade IV.V had favorable outcome in 1l patients (31%) and unfavorable outcome in 24 patients (69%).

Conclusion: This study of 100 cases revealed 71 cases with favorable outcome, 7 cases with severe disability and 22 death cases. Patients with SAH grade I-III had favorable outcome in 60 cases (92%) and death in 5 cases (8%). Factors that affected the outcome were SAH clinical grading and the age of patients.

References

1. Dott NM. Intracranial aneurysms: cerebral arterio-radiography: surgical treatment. Edinburgh Med J 1933; 40:219-34.

2. KrayenbuhI HA, Yasargil MG, Flamm ES, Tew JM. Microsurgical treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1972; 37: 678-86.

3. Yasargil MG, Fox JL. The microsurgical approach to intracranial aneurysm. Surg Neurol 1973; 3ะ 7-14.

4. Fox JL. Intracranial aneurysm (Vol ll). New York: Springer-Verlag; 1983. p. 613-4, 877-909.

5. Naso WB, Rhea AH, Poole A. Management and outcomes in a low- volume cerebral aneurysm practice. Neurosurgery 2001;48: 91-100.

6. Kassel NF, Torner JC, Jane JA, Haley EC Jr, Haley EC Jr, Adams HP. The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery: part 2-Surgical results. J Neurosurg 1990;73:37-47.

7. LeRoux PD, Elliott JP, Downey LD, et al, Improved outcomes after rupture of anterior circulation aneurysm: A retrospective 10-year review of 224 good grade patients. J Neurosurg 1995:83:394-402.

8. Yasargil MG. Microneurosurgery, Vol 2, New York: Thieme Stratton; 1984. p. 169-223.

9. Ljunggren B, Saveland, Brandt L. Causes of unfavorable outcome after early aneurysm operation. Neurosurgery 1983;13:629-33.

10. Krayenbuhi N, Hegner T, Yoniekawa Y, Keller E. Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: hypertensive hypervolemic hemodilution (Triple-H) therapy according to new systemic hemodynamic parameter, Acta Neurochir Suppl 2001; 77:247-50.

11. Romner B, Reinstrup P. Triple H therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A review. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2001; 77:237-41.

12. Kassell NF, Drake CG. Timing of aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery 1982; 10: 514-9.

13. Ljunggren B, Brandt L. Timing of aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurosurg 1986; 33: 159-75.

14. Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Kagstrom E, et al. Results of early operations for ruptured aneurysm. J Neurosurg 1981; 54:473-9.

15. Ohman J, Heiskanen O. Timing of operation for ruptures supratentorial aneurysms; a prospective randomized stud, J Neurosurg 1989; 70: 55-60.

16. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg 1968; 28: 14-20.

17. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcomes after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1975; 1:480-4

18. Yasargil MG, Vise WM, Bader DCH. Technical adjuncts in neurosurgery. Surg Neurol 1977; 8: 311-6.

19. AI-Mefty O. Supraorbital-pterional approach to skull base lesions. Neurosurgery 1987; 21: 474-7.

20. Origitano TC, Anderson DE, Tarassoli Y, et al. Skull base approaches to complex cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol 1993;40:339-46.

21. Batjer H, Samson D. Intraoperative aneurysm rupture: Incidence, outcome, and suggestions for surgical management. Neurosurgery 1986; 18: 701-7.

22. Giannotta SL, Oppenheimer JH, Levy ML, et al, Management of intraoperative rupture of aneurysm without hypotension. Neurosurgery 1991; 28: 531-6.

23. Batjer HH, Samson DS. Intraoperative aneurysm rupture. In: Neurosurgery. 2nd ed., Volume Il. McGraw-Hill Com, Inc; 1996. p. 2277-82.

24. Yasargil MG. Microneurosurgery (Vol. 1). New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1984. p. 208-71, 279-49.

25. Locksley HB. Natural history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations, In: Sahs AL, Perret GE, Locksley HB, Nishioka H, editors. Intracranial aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1969,

26. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC Jr, et al. The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part: overall management results. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 18-36.

Downloads

Published

2004-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Tassanasunthornwong S. Surgery of Intracranial Aneurysms: Experience of 100 Cases. Thai J Surg [Internet]. 2004 Mar. 31 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];25(1):1-6. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThaiJSurg/article/view/242843

Issue

Section

Original Articles