Recurrent Intussusception in Children

Authors

  • Rangsan Niramis Department of Surgery, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health (Children's Hospital), Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Sukawat Watanatittan Department of Surgery, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health (Children's Hospital), Bangkok, Thailand
  • Maitree Anuntkosol Department of Surgery, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health (Children's Hospital), Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Tongkao Rattanasuwan Department of Surgery, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health (Children's Hospital), Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Veera Buranakitjaroen Department of Surgery, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health (Children's Hospital), Bangkok, Thailand.

Abstract

Background / Purpose : The etiology of intussusception in most cases of children is unknown. This makes the problem of recurrent intussusception even more puzzling. The purpose of this study was to present our experience of recurrent intussusception in our institute and to analyse the correlation of modes of treatment and the recurrence rate.

Methods: Medical records of patients treated for intussusception at the Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health from January 1988 to December 1998 were reviewed. The information about clinical manifestation, radiological findings and results of treatment were obtained. Clinical data of the patients with recurrent intussusception were assessed. The statistical differences were analysed by the Z test.

Results: Five hundred and seven patients were treated for 549 episodes of intussusception. Recurrent attacks of 42 episodes in 32 patients were noted. The total recurrence rate was about 8.2 per cent. Of the 32 patients, 17 were male and 15 were female. Their ages at the first episode was noted from 3 months to 11 years (average 14 months). Time interval before recurrence ranged from I day to 2 years (average 5 months). Numbers of the recurrence were recorded in 1-4 attacks. Seven cases recurred in the same admission, 2 cases after barium enema (BE), 3 cases after pneumatic and 2 cases after manual reduction. Non-operative management was successful in 313 episodes of intussusception. Recurrent attacks occurred in 35 of the 313 episodes of successfully non-operatively treated intussusception (11.2%), 18 of 135 episodes (13.3%) after BE reduction and 17 of 178 episodes (9.5%) after pneumatic or air reduction. There was no statistical difference between the recurrence rates after the two non-operative procedures (p = 0.123). Operative management was needed in 226 occurrences, successful manual reduction in 158 and intestinal resection was required in 68 cases. Recurrent attacks developed in 7 of the 226 surgically treated episodes (3.1%). All of them occurred after manual reduction only. The difference of the recurrence rates after the operative and non-operative managements of intussusception was statistically significant (p<.001). Of the 42 episodes of recurrence, 34 (80.1%) were successfully treated by BE and pneumatic reduction, although 4 of these 34 recurrences developed after previously successful manual reduction. The remaining 8 episodes of recurrence underwent manual reduction with or without ileocolopexy. Three of the 32 recurrent patients had leading points: Meckel's diverticulum, ileal and colonic polyp in one case each. There was no mortality among these 32 patients.

Conclusions: There was no statistical difference between the incidences of recurrent intussusception after successful management by BE and pneumatic reduction (p>.05), but the operative treatment had a lower incidence of recurrences than the non-operative procedures (p<.05). No recurrence was noted in any of the cases treated by manual reduction with ileocolopexy. It is concluded that the principle of management of recurrent intussusception should be similar to that of the primary intussusception in general.

References

1. Dennision WM, Shaker M. Intussusception in infancy and childhood. Br J Surg 1970; 37:679-84.

2. Ein SH, Stephens CA. Intussusception: 354 cases in 10 years. J Pediatr Surg 1971; 6: 16-27.

3. Ein SH. Recurrent intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 1975; 10:751-5.

4. Niramis R, Watanatittan S, Havanonda S. Intussusception in infancy and childhood. Bull Depart Med Serv Thai 1984;9:275-86.

5. Hamby LS, Fowler CL, Pokorny WJ. Intussusception. In: Donnellan WL, Burrington JD, Kimura K, et al, eds. Abdominal Surgery of Infancy and Childhood, vol. 2. Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1996: 42/13-19.

6. Pollet JE. Intussusception: a study of its surgical management. Br J Surg 1980;67:213-5.

7. Winstanley JHR, Doig CM, Brydon H. Intussusception: the case for barium reduction. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1987:32:285-7.

8. Todani T, Sato Y, Watanabe Y, Toki A, Uemura S, Urushihara N. Airreduction for intussusception in infancy and childhood: ultrasonographic diagnosis and management without x-ray exposure. Z Kinderclir 1990; 45: 222-6.

9. Sparnon AL, Little KET LL. Intussusception in a childhood: a review of 139 cases. Aust NZJ Surg 1984; 54: 353-6.

10. Liu KW, MacCarthy J, Guiney EJ, Fitzgerald RJ, Intussusception - current trends in management. Arch Dis Child 1986; 61:5-7.

11. West KW, Stephens B, Vane DW. Intussusception: current management in infants and children. Surgery 1987;120:704-10.

12. Mackay AJ, MacKellar A, Sprague P. Intussusception in children: a review of 91 cases. Aust NZJ Surg 1987:57: 15-7.

13. Wilson-Storey D, MacKinlay GA, Prescott S, et al. Intussusception: a surgical condition. J R Coll Edinb 1988; 33:270-3

14. Skipper RP, Boeckman CR, Klein RL. Childhood intussusception. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 151-3.

15. Palder SB, Ein SH, Stringer DA, Elton D. Intussusception: barium or air? J. Pediatr Surg 1991; 271-5.

16. Beasley SW, Auldist AW, Stokes KB. Recurrent intussusception: barium or surgery? Aust NZJ Surg 1987:57: 11-4.

17. Stringer DA, Ein SH. Pneumatic reduction : advantages, risks and indications. Pediatr Radiol 1990; 20: 475-7.

18. Renwick AA, Beasley SW, Phelan E. Intussusception: recurrence following gas (oxygen) enema reduction. Pediatr Surg Int 1992; 7: 361-3.

19. Daneman A, Alton DJ, Lobo E, Gravett J, Kim P, Ein SH. Pattern of recurrence of intussusception in children: a 17 year review. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28: 913-9.

20. Guo J, Ma X, Zhou Q, Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception : 6396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:1201-3.

21. Glover JM, Beasley SW, Phelan E. Intussusception: effectiveness of gas enema. Pediatr Surg Int 1991; 6: 195-7.

22. Phelan E, deCampo JF, Malecky G. Comparison of oxygen and barium reduction of ileocolic intussusception. AJR 1988; 150:1349-52.

23. Herman BE, Becker J. Recurrent acute intussusception-a survey. Surg Clin N Am 1960; 40: 1009-18.

24. Soper RT, Brown MJ. Recurrent acute intussusception in children. Arch Surg 1964; 89: 188-98.

25. Ravitch MM. The non-operative treatment of intussusception-hydrostatic pressure reduction by barium enema. Surg Clin N Am 1956: 36: 1945-50.

26. Ein SH. Leading points in childhood intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 1976: 11: 209-11.

27. Burrington JD. Surgical technique for the prevention of recurrent intussusception in childhood. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980;150:572-3.

Downloads

Published

2000-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Niramis R, Watanatittan S, Anuntkosol M, Rattanasuwan T, Buranakitjaroen V. Recurrent Intussusception in Children. Thai J Surg [Internet]. 2000 Mar. 31 [cited 2024 Apr. 29];21(1):17-22. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThaiJSurg/article/view/243360

Issue

Section

Original Articles