Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is gaining popularity as an alternative to conventional on-pump technique for myocardial revascularization. This includes minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MID CAB) and full sternotomy off pump (OPCAB)methods. These two approaches should be evaluated for financial and clinical appropriateness.
Materials and Methods: Records of patients who had single or double bypass (IMA and/or saphenous vein) grafts between January 1997 and June 1998 were reviewed. These included 44 MIDCAB, 92 OPCAB and 243 conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) patients. The pre-operative, intra and post-operative variables and clinical outcomes among these 3 groups were analyzed. With univariate analysis, the MIDCAB and OPCAB patients were compared to the CCAB group. The cost to perform each of these procedures was obtained from the participating institutions.
Results: MIDCAB patients compared to CCAB patients had a higher predicted risk (5.4±11 vs 2.3±2.8, p=0.012), an increased incidence of reoperative status and preoperative COPD. OPCAB patients had a higher predicted risk (5.3±7.8), with greater incidence of co-morbidities of renal failure and prior CVA. MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures required less OR time and utilized less blood products. The observed operative mortality rates were MIDCAB 4.5%, OPCAB 1.6% and CCAB 2.8% (NS). Mean hospital costs for each procedure were $21,000 CCAB, S19,000 for OPCAB and $17,000 for MIDCAB.
Conclusion: Both MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures can be performed in selected patient populations without any statistical increase in major morbidity or mortality rates. Off pump procedures are safe and currently reflect acute episode of care cost savings over CCAB. Longitudinal comparison of these off-pump to on-pump procedures should be a priority.
References
2. Bennetti FJ, Naselli G, Wood M, et al. Direct myocardioal revascularization without extra corporeal circulation. Chest 1991; 100:312-6.
3. Calcfiroe AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodora G, Mazzei V, Vitolla G. Recent advances in multivessel coronary grafting without cardiopuolmonary bypass. The Heart Surgery Forum 1998(1):20-5.
4. Arom KV, Emergy RW, Nicoloff DM, Flavin TF, Emery AM. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: experimental and clinical experiences, Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:S48-52.
5. Arom KV, Commentary on Calafiroe AM, Di Glammarco G, Toedore G. Mazzei V, Vitolla G. Recent advances in multivessel coronary grafting without cardiopulmonary by-pass. The Heart Surgery Forum 1998;1(1):25.
6. Magovern JA, Beneckart DH, Landreneau RJ, Sakert T, Magovern GJ Jr. Morbidity, cost, and six-month outcome of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(4):1224-9.
7. Zenati M, Domit TM, Sault M, et al. Resource utilization for minimally invasive direct and standard coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63(6 suppl):S84-7.
8. Del Rizzo DF, Boyd WD, Novick RJ, McKenzie FN, Desai ND, Menkis AH. Safety and cost-effectiveness of MIDCABG in high-risk CABG patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1998: 66:1002-7.
9. Ferraris VA, Ferrairs SP, Singh A. Operative outcome and hospital cost. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115(3):593-602.
10. Gundry SR, Romano MA, Shattuck OH, Razzouk AJ, Bailey LL. Seven-year follow-up of coronary artery bypasses performed with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115(6):1273-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles must be contributed solely to The Thai Journal of Surgery and when published become the property of the Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand. The Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand reserves copyright on all published materials and such materials may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission.