Lower Pole Caliceal Stone Clearance After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: The Effect of Infundibulopelvic Angle

Authors

  • Bannakij Lojanapiwat Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University, Changmai, Thailand.
  • Surithorn Soonthornpun Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University, Changmai, Thailand.
  • Supot Wudhikarn Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University, Changmai, Thailand.

Abstract

               Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) represents the first choice therapy for renoureteral stone disease. Clinical controversy exists concerning the efficacy of ESWL for lower pole kidney stones. Nowadays, the factors that hindering the spontaneous passage of stone debris resulting from ESWL of lower caliceal stone are the gravity - dependent position of the lower pole calices and particular features of the inferior - pole collecting system anatomy.

                We studied the influence of the lower infundibulo-pelvic anatomy in the success of ESWL of lower caliceal stone size 10-20 millimeter in 50 patients with Storz Modulith SL -20 machine. At the mean follow-up of 6 months, 44 per cent of the Patients presenting an infundibulo-pelvic angle of lesser than 90˚ became stone free. On the other hand, 86% of the patients presenting an infundibuo-pelvic angle of greater than 90˚ became stone free. Our data suggested that acute infundibulo-pelvic angle of lower pole hindered the spontaneous passage of stone fragments after ESWL.

References

1. Sampaio FJB, Anunciacao ALD, Silva ECG. Comparative Follow - up of Patients with Acute and Obtuse Infundibulum-Pelvic Angle Submitted to Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Caliceal Stones : Preliminary Report and Proposed Study Design, J Endourol 1997;11:157-61.

2. Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. Urology 1994; 151:663-7.

3. Netto NR, Claro JFA, Lemos GC. Renal calculi in lower calices : What is the best method of treatment ? Urology 1991; 146:721-3.

4. May DJ, Chandhoke PS. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shcok wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi. Urology 1998;159:24-7.

5. Sampaio JJB, Mandarim CA. 3-Dimensional and radiological pelviocaliceal anatomy for endourology. Urology 1988;140:1352-5.

6. Keeley FX, Moussa SA, Tolley DA, Clearance of lower pole stones following SWL : The effect of infundibulopelvic angle, Abstract. J Endourol 1997: 11:sup:S96

7. Chen Rn, Streem SB. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi : long term radiographic and clinical outcome. Urology 1996; 156:1572-5.

Downloads

Published

1998-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornpun S, Wudhikarn S. Lower Pole Caliceal Stone Clearance After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: The Effect of Infundibulopelvic Angle. Thai J Surg [Internet]. 1998 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];19(4):117-20. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThaiJSurg/article/view/250038

Issue

Section

Original Articles