A Rookie in Laparoscopic Liver Resections: Initial Performance of 22 Cases at Lampang Regional Hospital

Bun Wittayachumnangul

Authors

Bun Wittayachumnangul Department of Surgery, Lampang Regional Hospital

Keywords:

Laparoscopic, Liver resection, Minimally invasive surgery, Resources

Abstract

Objective: To review the initial 22 cases of laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) by a general surgeon to enhance the quality of patient care and implementation for the broader medical community in the northern region of Thailand.

Materials and Methods: This descriptive retrospective study analyzes the author’s liver surgery registry data from August 2018 to December 2023. Patients included underwent LLRs for various provisional diagnoses. All received computed tomography (CT) triple-phase liver protocol scans to assess provisional diagnosis and resectability. The IWATE score was used to evaluate procedural difficulty, and inflow control techniques were identified.

Results: A total of 22 patients underwent LLRs between August 2018 and December 2023, with a mean age of 63.8 ± 13.8 years; 68.2% were male. Most patients were classified as Child Turcotte Pugh (CTP) A. The most common preoperative and postoperative diagnosis was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The mean IWATE score was 5.6 ± 2.2, and 40.9% of the surgeries were classified as major procedures. The most common resection was left hepatectomy, while the procedure with the highest difficulty score was anterior sectionectomy for HCC. Estimated blood loss was 125 [100, 300] milliliters, and the mean operative time was 4.1 hours ± 105.9 minutes. One patient died postoperatively due to a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA).

Conclusion: LLRs are feasible for surgeons with a learning curve. IWATE difficulty scoring can assist surgeons in deciding on minimally invasive surgery, albeit with some limitations.

References

Litynski GS. Profiles in laparoscopy: Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987-1988). JSLS. 1999;3(2):163-7.

Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery. 1996;120(3):468-75. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80065-1.

Morise Z, Wakabayashi G. First quarter century of laparoscopic liver resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(20):3581-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3581.

Ban D, Kudo A, Ito H, et al. The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Updates Surg. 2015;67(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0302-7.

Xi C, Zhu M, Ji T, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system of laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumor. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:1019763. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1019763.

Lin H, Bai Y, Yin M, et al. External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(6):3732-49. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08687-5.

Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):761-77. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413.

Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, et al. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(5):1170-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3.

Lee JJ, Conneely JB, Smoot RL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma at a North-American Centre: a 2-to-1 matched pair analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(4):304-10. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12342.

Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, et al. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery. 2019;165(4):731-40. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.012.

Dua MM, Worhunsky DJ, Hwa K, et al. Extracorporeal Pringle for laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1348-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3801-6.

Huang JW, Su WL, Wang SN. Alternative Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Pringle Maneuver by Huang's Loop. World J Surg. 2018;42(10):3312-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4584-z.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Noba L, Rodgers S, Chandler C, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Reduces Hospital Costs and Improve Clinical Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(4):918-32. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04499-0.

Pędziwiatr M, Mavrikis J, Witowski J, et al. Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery. Med Oncol. 2018;35(6):95. doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1153-0.

Joliat GR, Kobayashi K, Hasegawa K, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations 2022. World J Surg. 2023;47(1):11-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06732-5.

Dogeas E, Tohme S, Geller DA. Laparoscopic liver resection: Global diffusion and learning curve. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2021;50(10):736-8. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021371.

Brown KM, Geller DA. What is the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(5):1065-71. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3100-8.