Comparison of Single Incision and Separate Incision Techniques in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer

Wikran Sornthom

doi:10.64387/tjs.2025.271816

Authors

Wikran Sornthom Department of Surgery, Ubonratchathani Cancer Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64387/tjs.2025.271816

Keywords:

Breast cancer, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Single-incision technique, Node harvesting, Surgical outcomes

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among Thai women, with approximately 50 new cases per 100,000 population annually. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is crucial for staging early breast cancer, and the choice of surgical technique can significantly impact outcomes. Identification of SLN using blue dye alone simplifies the procedure while remaining effective for resource-limited hospitals lacking frozen section analysis. Prior studies of single-incision SLNB focused on breast-conserving surgery.

Objective: This pilot study aimed to compare the single-incision and separate-incision techniques for SLNB in breast cancer patients, focusing on node harvesting, operative time, and postoperative complications.

Materials and Methods: Data were collected from Ubonratchatani Cancer Hospital between 2020 and 2024. A total of 59 patients with early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer were included: 31 underwent SLNB via the single-incision technique, and 28 via the separate-incision technique. Patients with biopsy-proven axillary node metastasis or those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess key factors influencing node harvesting.

Results: The single-incision technique led to a 46% and 40% increase in lymph node yield compared to the separate-incision method in mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy alone, respectively. Operative times were shorter for the single-incision group, and postoperative complications, including seroma and wound infection, were less frequent. Tumor location, HER-2 status, and histologic grade significantly affected node harvesting. Both techniques showed comparable safety profiles, but the single-incision approach demonstrated improved surgical efficiency. Additionally, both techniques yielded similar survival outcomes, with no statistically significant differences in short-term overall survival and progression-free survival.

Conclusion: The single-incision technique for SLNB benefits node harvesting and operative efficiency while maintaining comparable postoperative complication rates. These findings suggest that the single-incision method may enhance patient outcomes, but further research is needed to validate these results and explore long-term oncological benefits.

References

Vittayapipat N, Sa-nguanraksa D, Bhothisuwan K, et al. Comparing arm morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection in thai patients with early breast cancer. J Med Assoc Thai. 2017;100(3):S61-S70.

Chitapanarux I, Sripan P, Somwangprasert A, et al. Stage-Specific Survival Rate of Breast Cancer Patients in Northern Thailand in Accordance with Two Different Staging Systems. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(9):2699-706. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.9.2699.

McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg. 2005;48(3):185-94.

Devarakonda S, Thomas SS, Sen S, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer Using Methylene Blue Dye Alone: a Safe, Simple, and Cost-Effective Procedure in Resource-Constrained Settings. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021;12(1):210-7. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01273-6.

Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252(3):426-32; discussion 432-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32.

Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318(10):918-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470.

Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7.

Alamoodi M, Patani N, Mokbel K, et al. Reevaluating Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Total Mastectomy for Low Axillary Burden Breast Cancer: Insights from a Meta-Analysis including the SINODAR-ONE Trial. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(4):742. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040742.

Petrelli F, Lonati V, Barni S. Axillary dissection compared to sentinel node biopsy for the treatment of pathologically node-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials with long-term follow up. Oncol Rev. 2012;6(2):e20. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2012.e20.

Zakaria S, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC. Safety and technical success of methylene blue dye for lymphatic mapping in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;196(2):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.060.

Giammarile F, Vidal-Sicart S, Paez D, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Methods in Breast Cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2022;52(5):551-60. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.01.006.

Lo C, Lee PC, Yen RF, et al. Most frequent location of the sentinel lymph nodes. Asian J Surg. 2014;37(3):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.01.006.

Lovasik BP, Seidel RL, Novello M, et al. Single incision for oncologic breast conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy in early stage breast cancer: A minimally invasive approach. Breast J. 2019;25(1):41-6. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13158.

Zhang X, Shen Q, Hu YJ. Comparison of two different surgical strategies for breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy plus sentinel lymph node biopsy. Updates Surg. 2021;73(6):2095-101. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01109-0.

Freitas-Junior R, Ferreira-Filho DL, Soares LR, et al. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Training Surgeons and Bridging the Gap. Curr. Breast Cancer Rep. 2019;11:136-42. doi: 10.1007/s12609-019-00317-3.

Masannat YA, Agrawal A, Maraqa L, et al. Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer, is it time to think again? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(1):62-6. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0109.

Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3248-58. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108.

Treeratanapun N, Lerttiendamrong B, Vacharathit V, et al. Is sentinel lymph node biopsy without frozen section in early stage breast cancer sufficient in accordance with ACOSOG-Z0011? A retrospective review from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01709-6.

Rocco N, Velotti N, Pontillo M, et al. New techniques versus standard mapping for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg. 2023;75(6):1699-1710. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01560-1.

Hua B, Li Y, Yang X, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02719-7.

Swenson KK, Nissen MJ, Ceronsky C, et al. Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(8):745-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02574496.

Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3657-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4062.

Blidaru A, Bordea CI, Radu M, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Techniques. In: Rezai M, Kocdor MA, Canturk NZ, eds. Breast Cancer Essentials. Cham: Springer. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-73147-2_43.

Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(6):546-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012782.

Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, et al. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y.

Derossis AM, Fey JV, Cody HS 3rd, et al. Obesity influences outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(6):896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.005.

Yi M, Meric-Bernstam F, Ross MI, et al. How many sentinel lymph nodes are enough during sentinel lymph node dissection for breast cancer? Cancer. 2008;113(1):30-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23514.

Haddock NT, Wen YE, Steppe C, et al. Operative Time Predicts Postoperative Outcomes in Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstruction: Multivariate 1000 Flap Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10(12):e4713. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004713.

Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, et al. Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-term Follow-up From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):413-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001863.

Carlo JT, Grant MD, Knox SM, et al. Survival analysis following sentinel lymph node biopsy: a validation trial demonstrating its accuracy in staging early breast cancer. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005;18(2):103-7. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928044.