Comparative Oncologic Outcomes between Emergency and Elective Surgery in Colon Cancer Patients in Suratthani Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64387/tjs.2026.276777Keywords:
Selected:Colon cancer, Emergency surgery, Obstruction, Perforation, Survival, Elective surgeryAbstract
Background: Colon cancer remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Emergency surgical presentations, such as obstruction or perforation, are associated with poorer outcomes compared to elective surgery. This study aimed to compare the clinical and oncologic outcomes between elective and emergency surgeries in colon cancer patients.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Suratthani Hospital, Thailand, including patients who underwent colon cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into elective and emergency surgery groups (obstruction or perforation). Exclusion criteria included rectal cancer, stage IV disease, iatrogenic perforation, and incomplete follow-up. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariable Cox regression to adjust for unbalanced baseline characteristics.
Results: Of the 191 included patients, 104 (54.5%) underwent elective surgery, and 87 (45.5%) underwent emergency surgery (75 obstruction, 12 perforation). The emergency group had significantly higher comorbidity rates (p = 0.032), colostomy rates (p < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (p = 0.006). Five-year overall survival was significantly lower in the emergency group (HR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.09–2.29) compared to the elective group (reference), particularly in perforation cases (HR 2.85, 95% CI: 1.62–5.02; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified perforation, obstruction, comorbidity, stage III disease, poor/mucinous histology, and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy as independent predictors of worse survival.
Conclusion: Emergency surgery for colon cancer, especially for perforation, is associated with worse oncologic outcomes compared to elective procedures. Early detection, timely elective intervention, and adjuvant chemotherapy are crucial for improving survival in colon cancer patients.
References
Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024. [cited 2024 May 10] Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheet.pdf
National Cancer Institute of Thailand. Cancer in Thailand, Vol. X, 2016–2018. Bangkok: Ministry of Public Health; 2021.
Biondo S, Parés D, Martí Ragué J, et al. Emergency operations for nondiverticular perforation of the left colon. Am J Surg. 2002;183(3):256-60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00780-8.
Yang KM, Jeong MJ, Yoon KH, et al. Oncologic outcome of colon cancer with perforation and obstruction. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02319-5.
Ho YH, Siu SK, Buttner P, et al. The effect of obstruction and perforation on colorectal cancer disease-free survival. World J Surg. 2010;34(5):1091-101. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0443-2.
Gök MA, Kafadar MT, Yeğen SF. Perforated colorectal cancers: clinical outcomes of 18 patients who underwent emergency surgery. Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(2):161-5. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.106667.
Chen TM, Huang YT, Wang GC. Outcome of colon cancer initially presenting as colon perforation and obstruction. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1228-y.
Biondo S, Gálvez A, Ramírez E, et al. Emergency surgery for obstructing and perforated colon cancer: patterns of recurrence and prognostic factors. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(12):1141-61. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02110-x.
Biondo S, Kreisler E, Millan M, et al. Differences in patient postoperative and long-term outcomes between obstructive and perforated colonic cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195(4):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.027.
Biondo S, Martí-Ragué J, Kreisler E, et al. A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;189(4):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.009.
Zhou H, Jin Y, Wang J, et al. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and long-term survival between emergency and elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04334-8.
Lavanchy JL, Vaisnora L, Haltmeier T, et al. Oncologic long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(12):2091-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03426-8.
Sucullu I, Ozdemir Y, Cuhadar M, et al. Comparison of emergency surgeries for obstructed colonic cancer with elective surgeries: A retrospective study. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(6):1322-7. doi: 10.12669/pjms.316.8277.
Asano H, Kojima K, Ogino N, et al. Postoperative recurrence and risk factors of colorectal cancer perforation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(3):419-24. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2694-3.
van der Sijp MP, Bastiaannet E, Mesker WE, et al. Differences between colon and rectal cancer in complications, short-term survival and recurrences. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(10):1683-91. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2633-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles must be contributed solely to The Thai Journal of Surgery and when published become the property of the Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand. The Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand reserves copyright on all published materials and such materials may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission.