Efficacy of Dust Collector for Electric Cast Saw in Reduction of Dust and Noise during Cast Removal Procedure
Keywords:
Cast removal, Electric cast saw, Dust collector, Plaster of Paris, Oscillating sawAbstract
Background: Heavy noise and air pollution, both of which are classified as occupational health hazards, were produced during the cast removal procedure.
Objective:The purpose of this article was to design and build a dust collector that could operate with an oscillating saw, to reduce plaster dust and noise during cast removal, protecting healthcare workers and patients from occupational hazards.
Methods: A dust collector was designed and fabricated. The experiment was divided into two groups: five trials for cast saw testing with a vacuum cleaner and five trials for cast saw testing with a vacuum cleaner and a dust collector. Acoustic levels as well as aerosol detection were tested. A dual coil spring could work as a force moderator in this application. When a user applies forces to the cast surface, this spring set returned the cast saw and saw blade to a neutral position, promoting safety.
Results: The traditional cast removal group had higher average acoustic levels in a closed room during every experiment (LAeq), measuring 79.3 dBA, compared with the dust collector group, measuring 77.9 dBA, while the dust collector group had slightly higher 8-hour TWA and LCpeak. Total particle concentration was lower in the dust collector group (-0.0235 mg/m3) than in the traditional cast removal group (0.005 mg/m3).
Conclusion: This apparatus may protect patients from overpressure applied to the cast surface. During acoustic tests, the average noise levels differed only slightly between the two groups. In terms of dust containment, a dust collector linked to a vacuum cleaner performed better during the cast removal procedure. In the future, robotic technology and sensor applications may be adapted for this machine.
References
Flores A, Marques A, Machado J, Marta M, Vaz M. Bone Immobilization devices and consolidation mechanisms: Impact on healing time. Procedia Struct Integr. 2017; 5: 34–9.
Szostakowski B, Smitham P, Khan WS. Plaster of Paris–Short History of Casting and Injured Limb Immobilzation. Open Orthop J. 2017;11 (1): 291–6.
Johnston I, Garcia-Rodriguez JA, Longino PD. Removing a cast: Casting Immobilization Series for Primary Care. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can. 2018; 64 (11): 829–31.
Halanski MA. How to Avoid Cast Saw Complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36 (Supplement 1): S1–5.
Stork NC, Lenhart RL, Nemeth BA, Noonan KJ, Halanski MA. To Cast, to Saw, and Not to Injure: Can Safety Strips Decrease Cast Saw Injuries? Clin Orthop. 2016; 474 (7):1543–52.
Marsh JP, Jellicoe P, Black B, Monson RC, Clark TA. Noise levels in adult and pediatric orthopedic cast clinics. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ. 2011; 40 (7): E122-124.
Antabak A. Analysis of Airborne Dust as a Result of Plaster Cast Sawing. Acta Clin Croat [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 4]; Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=287537
Keet CA, Keller JP, Peng RD. LongTerm Coarse Particulate Matter Exposure Is Associated with Asthma among Children in Medicaid. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 197 (6): 737–46.
Chen C-H, Wu C-D, Chiang H-C, Chu D, Lee K-Y, Lin W-Y, et al. The effects of fine and coarse particulate matter on lung function among the elderly. Sci Rep. 2019; 9 (1):14790.
OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE: criteria for a recommended standard. Place of publication not identified: CREATESPACE; 2014.
Mamtaz H, Fouladi MH, Al-Atabi M, Narayana Namasivayam S. Acoustic Absorption of Natural Fiber Composites. J Eng. 2016; 2016:1–11.
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. Quality Assurance Guidance Document 2.12 [Internet]. North Carolina; 2016 [cited 2022 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/qa/m212.pdf
Jumlongkul A. Cadaveric skull and tissue cutting manipulator: autopsy equipment that provides safety against airborne infection and COVID-19. Res Biomed Eng [Internet]. 2020 Oct 17 [cited 2020 Oct 18]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42600-020-00104-5
Adarsh S, Kaleemuddin SM, Bose D, Ramachandran KI. Performance comparison of Infrared and Ultrasonic sensors for obstacles of different materials in vehicle/ robot navigation applications. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2016; 149: 012141.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.