Path Analysis of Transformational Leadership Behavior of Head Nurses, Team Climate for Innovation, Market Orientation Behavior and Service Innovation of Nursing Units in Private Hospitals, Thailand

Authors

  • napaporn saichu Ph.D student of Nursing Management Program and Multidisciplinary college, Christian University of Thailand
  • Patcharaporn Aree Nursing Management Program and Multidisciplinary college, Christian University of Thailand
  • Netchanok Sritoomma Nursing Management Program and Multidisciplinary college, Christian University of Thailand
  • Phechnoy Singchungchai Nursing Management Program and Multidisciplinary college, Christian University of Thailand

Keywords:

Service innovation, Transformational leadership behavior, Team climate for innovation, Market orientation behavior, Head nurses of private hospitals

Abstract

Relationship model, sequence and relationship direction of variables related to service innovation are necessary knowledge for the development of service innovation. This quantitative research aimed to study the levels and examine the direct and indirect effects of transformational leadership behavior of head nurses, the team climate for innovation, market orientation behavior, and service innovation of nursing units in private hospitals. The research samples were 384 head nurses with at least 6 months of experience at a nursing unit. Nursing unit was defined as a ward, intensive care unit, labor room, neonatal unit, or an outpatient department in a private hospital. The samples were recruited by simple random sampling. Research instruments consisted of a set of questionnaires with a five-point scale. The questionnaires were assessed by five experts. The content validity index of the transformational leadership behavior of head nurses, team climate for innovation, market orientation behaviors, and service innovation were 0.95, 1.00, 1.00, and 1.00. The reliability of questionnaires in the form of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.97, 0.94, 0.91, and 0.84. Three hundred and eighteen questionnaires were returned, representing 82.8% of the total number of questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistical analysis such as frequency, mean, standard deviation, and path analysis.

            The results showed that the average scores of transformational leadership behaviors of head nurses, team climate for innovation, and market orientation behavior were at a high level and service innovation was at a medium level. Results from path analyses revealed that transformational leadership behavior, team climate for innovation, market orientation behavior, and service innovation were congruent with the empirical data (c2 = 0.974, p = 0.324, CMIN/DF = 0.974, CFI = 1.000, GFI = 0.998, AGFI = 0 .985, RMSEA = 0.000). For path analysis, the results of the study found transformational leadership behavior had a positive direct effect on service innovation (β = 0.12, p <0.05), transformational leadership behavior had a positive indirect effect on service innovation through market orientation behavior (β = 0.24, p <0.05), and transformational leadership behavior had a positive indirect effect on service innovation through a team climate for innovation and market orientation behavior (β = 0 .15, p <0.05). Also, transformational leadership behavior had a totally positive effect on service innovation (β = 0.51, p <0.05), team climate for innovation had a totally positive effect on service innovation (β = 0.19, p <0.05), and market orientation behaviors had a totally positive effect on service innovation (β = 0.61, p <0.05).

            The results of this research serve as a guideline for head nurses in developing service innovation within nursing units in private hospitals. Thus, it is vitally important to have self-development opportunities for transformational leadership behavior, team climate for innovation, and market orientation behavior, in order to create more innovative services. Nurse administrators should emphasize policy formulation, training programs for service innovation development, provide opportunities for the application of service innovation and support the presentation of service innovation in order to develop nursing work performance and quality of nursing service.

References

References

1. Schumpeter J. The Theory of Economic Development, (reproduced, New York (1961).
2. Cheng CC, Krumwiede D. The role of service innovation in the market orientation—new service performance linkage. Technovation. 2012 Jul 1;32(7-8):487-97
3. Berry LL. Service innovation is urgent in healthcare. AMS Review. 2019 Jun 15;9(1-2):78-92.
4. Kaya N, Turan N, Aydın GÖ. Innovation in nursing: A concept analysis. J Comm Pub Health Nursing. 2016;2(108):2-4.
5. Bass BM, Riggio RE. Transformational leadership. Psychology press; 2006 Aug 15.
6. Ross EJ, Fitzpatrick JJ, Click ER, Krouse HJ, Clavelle JT. Transformational leadership practices of nurse leaders in professional nursing associations. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2014 Apr 1
7. Samad S. The influence of innovation and transformational leadership on organizational performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012 Oct 9; 57:486-93.
8. Tidd, J. & Bessent, J. Management innovation. (5thed). West Sussex: Wiley; 2014
9. Anderson NR, West MA. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior. 1998 May;19(3):235-58.
10. Pirola-Merlo A, Härtel C, Mann L, Hirst G. How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The leadership quarterly. 2002 Oct 1;13(5):561-81.
11. Narver JC, Slater SF. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of marketing. 1990 Oct;54(4):20-35.
12. Menguc B, Auh S, Shih E. Transformational leadership and market orientation: Implications for the implementation of competitive strategies and business unit performance. Journal of business research. 2007 Apr 1;60(4):314-21.
13. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement. 1970; 30(3): 607-610
14. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
15. Chatchawan R, Trichandhara K, Rinthaisong I. Factors Affecting Innovative Work Behavior of Employees in Local Administrative Organizations in the South of Thailand. Journal of southern technology.2018 May 31;11(1):113-24
16. Kasorn, K. and Khanchanapong, T.The effect of market and learning orientations on competitive capabilities of the Thai Automobile industry. Research Degree of Doctoral of Business Administration Program) Dhurakij Pundit University; 2014
17. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Ham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice; 2010
18. Alloubani, A., Abdelhafiz, I. M., Abughalyun, Y., Edris, E. E. M., & Almukhtar. Impact of leadership styles on leadership outcome (effectiveness, satisfaction and extra effort) in the private healthcare sector in Jordan. European Scientific Journal:2015
19. Krairiksh M. Nursing leadership for the service plan. Thai Journal of Nursing, 64(2)55-61 2015
20. Sharma M, Ghosh A. Perception of organizational climate and job satisfaction in nursing staff personnel. Indian Journal of Social Work. 2006;67(3):263-74
21. Songsraboon R. Factor influencing performance of private hospitals in Thailand. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Thonburi University;2015
22. Ravand H, Darvish H, Nasrabadi AN. Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Process and Service Innovation in a Teaching Hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2017 Aug 10;12(3):58-66.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-28

Issue

Section

Original Articles