Health Risks from Indoor PM10 and Effects of Sick Building Syndrome in Office Workers
Keywords:
Health Risk Assessment, Hazard Quotient, Indoor PM10, Sick Building Syndrome, Office workersAbstract
This study aimed to determine the index of health risk from indoor PM10 exposure so as to characterize the association between indoor PM10 and the prevalence effects of Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) and significant confounding factors among office workers in an academic institute in Thailand. This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2020 and involved 96 workers in 33 offices. Particle air sampling equipment, and a self-administered questionnaire which was developed by the researchers, were used as the tools to acquire the concentration level of building PM10 and assess SBS symptoms, respectively. Results showed that 12 rooms in total had concentrations of PM10 that exceeded the average analysis value of 38.1±14.0 μg/m3. The prevalence of SBS effects with regards to general symptoms, mucosal symptoms, skin symptoms, and eye-related symptoms were 75.0%, 57.4%, 45.5%, and 54.9%, respectively. For health risk assessments, the Hazard Quotient (HQ) regarding exposure to PM10 was found to be at moderate health hazard levels. Chi-square test results of two case studies, under and over average analysis value, examined for dry eye symptoms (DES) revealed significant associations with PM10 concentration (p<0.05). Moreover, using binary logistic regression analysis, working period (more than 8 hours daily) significantly increased the risk (adjusted odds ratio, AOR) of DES to 3.86 (95% CI: 1.01–14.72). These findings could assist administrators in controlling work duration (limit to fewer than 8 hours daily) to decrease the occurrence of DES symptoms in officers and to reinforce the occupational health and safety regulations.
References
Jung SJ, Mehta JS, Tong L. Effects of environment pollution on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf 2018; 16(2): 198-205.
World Health Organization. Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: Global update 2005. Copenhagen Ø, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2005.
Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsand AM, Switzer P, et al. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2011; 11(3): 231-52.
Tham KW. Indoor air quality and its effects on humans: a review of challenges and developments in the last 30 years. Energy Build 2016; 130: 637-50.
Chaloulakou A, Mavroidis I. Comparison of indoor and outdoor concentrations of CO at a public school. Evaluation of an indoor air quality model. Atmos Environ 2002; 36(11): 1769-81.
Estokova A, Stevulova N. Particulate matter investigation in indoor environment. Glob Nest J 2014; 12(1): 20-6.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Indoor particulate matter. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/indoor-particulate-matter, accessed 15 Jan, 2020.
Saramak A. Comparative analysis of indoor and outdoor concentration of PM10 particulate matter on example of Cracow City Center. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2019; 16(11): 6609-16.
California Environmental Protection Agency. Inhalable particulate matter and health (PM2.5 and PM10). Available from: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/inhalable-particulate-matter-and-health, accessed 18 Apr, 2021.
Seppänen OA, Fisk WJ, Mendell MJ. Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. Indoor Air 1999; 9(4): 226-52.
Huo X, Sun Y, Hou J, Wang P, Kong X, Zhang Q, et al. Sick building syndrome symptoms among young parents in Chinese homes. Build Environ 2020; 169: 106283.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Indoor air facts no. 4 sick building syndrome. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/sick_building_factsheet.pdf, accessed 15 Jan, 2020.
Chen A and Chang VWC. Human health and thermal comfort of office workers in Singapore. Build Environ 2012; 58: 172-8.
Sun Y, Zhang Y, Bao L, Fan Z, Wang D, Sundell J. Effects of gender and dormitory environment on sick building syndrome symptoms among college students in Tianjin, China. Build Environ 2013; 68: 134-9.
Shan X, Zhou J, Chang VWC, Yang EH. Comparing mixing and displacement ventilation in tutorial rooms: students’ thermal comfort, sick building syndromes, and short-term performance. Build Environ 2016; 102: 128-37.
Thach T, Mahirah D, Dunleavy G, Nazeha N, Zhang Y, Tan C, et al. Prevalence of sick building syndrome and its association with perceived indoor environmental quality in an Asian multi-ethnic working population. Build Environ 2019; 166: 106420.
Hamid A, Hakim S, Elokda E, Mostafa N. Prevalence and risk factors of sick building syndrome among office workers. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2013; 88: 109-14.
Ritwichai A, Buathong N. Sick building syndrome and stress among office workers. Chula Med J 2017; 61(4): 525-38.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Introduction to indoor air quality. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/introduction-indoor-air-quality, accessed 15 Jan, 2020.
Atarodi Z, Karimyan K, Gupta VK, Abbasi M, Moradi M. Evaluation of indoor air quality and its symptoms in office building: a case study of Mashhad, Iran. Data in Brief 2018; 20: 74-9.
Sun Y, Hou J, Cheng R, Sheng Y, Zhang X, Sundell J. Indoor air quality, ventilation and their associations with sick building syndrome in Chinese homes. Energy Build 2019; 197: 112-9.
Azuma K, Ikeda K, Kagi N, Yanagi U, Osawa H. Physicochemical risk factors for building-related symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: Ambient particles and combined exposure to indoor air pollutants. Sci Total Environ 2018; 616-7: 1649-55.
Zhang X, Li F, Zhang L, Zhao Z, Norback D. A longitudinal study of sick building syndrome (SBS) among pupils in relation to SO2 , NO2 , O3 and PM10 in schools in China. PLoS One 2014; 9(2): 112933.
New South Wales Government of Health. Particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5. Available from: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/air/Pages/particulate-matter.aspx, accessed 18 Apr, 2021.
Nezis I, Biskos G, Eleftheriadis K, Kalantzi OI. Particulate matter and health effects in offices - A review. Build Environ 2019; 156: 62-73.
Ścibor M, Balcerzak B, Galbarczyk A, Targosz N, Jasienska G. Are we safe inside? Indoor air quality in relation to outdoor concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 and to characteristics of homes. Sustain Cities Soc 2019; 48: 101537.
Tran VV, Park D, Lee YC. Indoor air pollution, related human diseases, and recent trends in the control and improvement of indoor air quality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(8): 2927.
Sun C, Zhang J, Guo Y, Fu Q, Liu W, Pan J, et al. Outdoor air pollution in relation to sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms among residents in Shanghai, China. Energy Build 2018; 174: 68-76.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. A standardized Epa protocol for characterizing indoor air quality in large office buildings. Washington, D.C.; 2003.
The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Indoor Air Quality Management Group. A guide on indoor air quality certification scheme for offices and public places. Hong Kong; 2003.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Human health risk assessment. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/risk/human-health-risk-assessment, accessed: 16 Apr, 2021.
Yunesian M, Rostami R, Zarei A, Fazlzadeh M, Janjani H. Exposure to high levels of PM2.5 and PM10 in the metropolis of Tehran and the associated health risks during 2016-2017. Microchem J 2019; 150: 104174.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Inhalation rates in exposure factors handbook, final report no. September, Washington, DC; 2011.
Lemly AD. Evaluation of the hazard quotient method for risk assessment of selenium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1996; 35(2): 156-62.
WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004; 363(9403): 157-63.
Ministry of Public Health, Department of Health, Thailand. Guidelines for surveillance of risk areas from air pollution, Bangkok, Thailand, 2011.
Samara C, Kouimtzis TH, Tsitouridou R, Kanias G, Simeonov V. Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM10 in an industrialized urban area of Northern Greece. Atmos Environ 2003; 37(1): 41-54.
Leung Dennis YC. Outdoor-indoor air pollution in urban environment: challenges and opportunity. Front Environ Sci 2015; 2: 1-7.
Tunsaringkarn T, Prueksasit T. Indoor air assessment, health risks, and their relationship among elderly residents in urban warrens of Bangkok, Thailand. Air Qual Atmos Health 2015; 8: 603-15.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. What are the air quality standards for PM? Available from: https://www3.epa.gov/region1/airquality/pm-aq-standards.html, accessed 4 Feb, 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Improving indoor air quality. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/improving-indoor-air-quality, accessed 4 Feb, 2020.
Lim FL, Hashim Z, Md Said S, Than LT, Hashim JH, Norbäck D. Sick building syndrome (SBS) among office workers in a Malaysian university: associations with atopy, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and the office environment. Sci Total Environ 2015; 536: 353-61.
Lu CY, Tsai MC, Muo CH, Kuo YH, Sung FC, Wu CC. Personal, psychosocial and environmental factors related to sick building syndrome in official employees of Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 15(1): 1-9.
Norbäck D, Edling C. Environmental, occupational, and personal factors related to the prevalence of sick building syndrome in the general population. Br J Ind Med 1991; 48(7): 451-62.
Brasche S, Bullinger M, Morfeld M, Gebhardt HJ, Bischof W. Why do women suffer from sick building syndrome more often than men? Subjective higher sensitivity versus objective causes. Indoor Air 2001; 11(4): 217-22.
Hine CH, Hogan MJ, McEwen WK, Meyers FH, Mettier SR, Boyer HK. Eye irritation from air pollution. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 1960; 10(1): 17-20.
Łatka P, Nowakowska D, Nowomiejska K, Rejdak R. How air pollution affects the eyes: a review. Ophthalmol J 2018; 3(2): 58–62.
Wolkoff P. Dry eye symptoms in offices and deteriorated work performance: a perspective. Build Environ 2020; 172: 106704.
Camara JG, Lagunzad JK. Ocular findings in volcanic fog induced conjunctivitis. Hawaii Med J 2011; 70(12): 262-5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons License CC-BY-ND
