Development of a Perception Scale of Motorcycle Helmet Use for University Students Using the Health Belief Model
Keywords:
Health belief model, Perception scale, Motorcycle helmet, Confirmatory factor analysis, University studentsAbstract
Motorcycle accidents causing life-threatening violence and head injuries are the leading cause of death and disability among motorcyclists who do not wear helmets. Although Thailand has had established laws governing helmet wearing since 1979, most motorcyclists do not wear a helmet. A survey of wearing a helmet among motorcyclists in Thailand in 2018 found that among teenagers only 22% of them wear a helmet. In understanding the behavior of motorcyclists, a behavioral theory is needed to provide a better explanation and comprehensive insight into the phenomena. In particular, the Health Belief Model (HBM) is one of the most widely used behavior models that has been applied extensively to evaluate and explain individual differences in preventive health behavior. There are some research studies on the behavior of wearing a helmet among motorcyclists using the HBM, but not using the complete HBM structure in the research tool. Consequently, the results of the study are not clear due to a lack of psychological properties of measurement, especially in terms of content and construct validity. In Thailand, there are no research reports on the perception scale of motorcycle helmet use that was created with the complete constructs of the HBM. The aims of this research were: 1) to develop a perception scale of motorcycle helmet use (PSMHU) for university students based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) and 2) to examine the content and construct validity of the PSMHU.
A cross-sectional survey of 600 undergraduate students of Thailand National Sports University, Chon Buri campus, Thailand, was conducted in August 2020. The students were randomly selected from three faculties: Education, Arts, and Sport Science and Health. The instrument was designed to collect data regarding demographics, brief motorcycle riding information, and six HBM construct measures. The content validity of the HBM constructs was assessed by five experts. A pilot study was conducted among 50 students to ensure the validity and reliability of a preliminary total of 60 questions of HBM components. Some items were revised and refined based on the results of the pilot study. Also, all items were screened to pass an alpha reliability criterion of ≥0.70. Finally, the 24 questions that passed the reliability criterion represented the PSMHU and were used to collect the data. Statistical analyses were carried out using descriptive, alpha reliability, and Second Order of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (SOCFA).
The mean age of the students was 20.77 ± 8.01 years. Overall 67.3% (n = 404) of the students were male. Most of the students studied in the Faculty of Education (46.8%) followed by the Faculty of Arts (32.3%), and Sport Science and Health (20.8%). On average, students had driven motorcycles for 6.84 years. About 69.3% of the students did not wear a helmet. The PSMHU had a scale reliability of 0.87 and each item had reliability between 0.71- 0.82. The alpha reliabilities of six components were in the range of 0.81-0.85. The results of SOCFA indicated that the model fit to the empirical data. All six constructs of PSMHU were statistical significant at p <0.001. The perceived susceptibility (βPSUS = 0.95, = 0.90) and severity (βPSEV = 0.81, = 0.66) were the most influential components, followed by perceived benefit (βPBEN = 0.75, = 0.56), barrier perception (βPBAR = - 0.73, = 0.53) and self-efficacy (βPSEL = 0.70, = 0.49). Finally, cues to action (βCTAC = 0.63, = 0.40) played the least influence in the PSMHU.
The primary aims of the present study were met. A psychometrically-sound scale containing six components relevant to the HBM was developed and preliminary support regarding the reliability and construct validity of the PSMHU was established. This PSMHU can be used as a research tool for predicting helmet wearing behavior in motorcycling using the HBM. The results that were obtained from testing construct validity of the PSMHU provided important information, especially regarding susceptibility and severity perceptions of head injuries due to non-helmet use. These outcomes are useful for instructors who teach health education and safety, should they develop a preventive-health behavior program that encourages students to habitually wear a helmet when driving a motorcycle.
References
Ministerial Regulation No.14, Ministry of Transport. Road traffic act. A.D. 1979.
Available from: http://pknow.edupol.org/Course/C3/Karnpolice_group/subj_traffic/ tf1/
doc/020604-15.pdf. Accessed 12 January, 2019. (In Thai)
Thai Roads Foundation and Road Safety Watch. A report of safety helmet wearing of
motorcycle drivers in Thailand, 2018. Bangkok: Thai Roads Foundation; 2018. (In Thai)
Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model.
Health Educ Q 1988; 15(2): 175-83.
Van Wormer EA. Applying the health belief model to Michigan motorcyclist helmet use.
[M.S. Thesis in Health Education]. Michigan: Eastern Michigan University, USA; 2017.
Ambak K, Ismail R, Abdullah AR, Borhan NM. Prediction of helmet use among Malaysian motorcyclists using structural equation modeling. Aust J Basic & Appl Sci 2010; 4(10): 5263-70.
Brijs K, Brijs T, Sann S, Trinh TM. Psychological determinants of motorcycle helmet use among
young adults in Cambodia. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2014; 26, Part A: 273-90.
Kumpong J, Satiennam T, Satiennam W, Trinh AT. Psychological models for development
of motorcycle helmet use among students in Vietnam. IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environ Sci 2018; 143: 1-8.
Zammani AF, Bazargan M, Shafiei A, Barzargan HS. The frequency and predictors of helmet use among Iranian motorcyclists: A quantitative and qualitative study. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2011; 43(4): 1562-9.
Ratanavaraha V. Factors affecting motorcycle helmet use: Using structural equation modeling (SEM) for the theory of the health belief model in urban and rural areas. A Research Report, Institute of Engineering; Suranaree University of Technology. Nakhon Ratchasima; 2014. (In Thai)
Chonsalasin D, Siridhara S, Ratanavaraha V, Jomnonkwao S, Watthanaklang D. A study of factors affecting intention of helmet use: An application of the theory of health belief model. Technical Education Journal King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 2017; 8(1): 26-35. (In Thai)
Jomnonkwao S, Watthanaklang D, Sangphong O, Champahom T, Laddawan N, Uttra S. et al. A comparison of motorcycle helmet wearing intention and behavior between urban and rural areas. Sustainability 2020; 12: 8395-401.
Office of Register and Evaluation, Thailand National Sports University. Student data of
Thailand National Sports University, Chonburi Campus. Chonburi; 2020. (In Thai)
Jackson DL. Sample size and number of parameter estimate in maximum likelihood
confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Caro investigation. Struct Equ Modeling 2001; 8: 205-
Grant J, Davis L. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 1997; 20: 269-74.
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011; 2: 53-5.
Hair JF, Jr., Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson ER. Multivariate data analysis; A global perspective, (7th ed.), NJ.: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2010.
D’Onofrio CN. Theory and the empowerment of health education practitioners. Health Educ Q 1992; 19(3): 385-403.
Hochbaum GM, Sorenson JR, Lorig K. Theory in health education practices. Health Educ Q 1992; 19(3): 295-313
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons License CC-BY-ND