Situations and Factors Related to Home Birth among Women from a Subgroup of the Karen Ethnic Group in Remote Thai-Myanmar Border Areas

-

Authors

  • Primprapha Konkaew College of Nursing, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Phitsanulok Province, THAILAND
  • Papangkon Homchan Maeramad District Health Office, Tak Province, THAILAND
  • Jarinya Nansai Maeramad District Health Office, Tak Province, THAILAND
  • Nittaya Thamchamnong Maeramad District Health Office, Tak Province, THAILAND
  • Kukiet Konkaew Faculty of Science and Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Phitsanulok Province, THAILAND

Keywords:

factors, home birth, Pakakayyaw, Thai-Myanmar Border, remote area, Home birth, Karen ethnic groups, Remote area, Thai-Myanmar border

Abstract

Globally, maternal and infant mortality rates are problems that are influenced by access to services and the quality of the maternal and newborn service system. In Thailand, some pregnant women in border areas and other rural areas still labor at home. They often have no choice of where to give birth because of several factors. Maternal and child deaths can be a consequence of unsafe delivery services, such as the use of traditional birth attendants and insufficient availability of maternity supplies.                The aim of this cross-sectional study was to: 1) explore the situation of birth at home and 2) examine the factors associated with home delivery among pregnant women from a subgroup of the Karen ethnic group. The sample was selected by multistage randomization with 110 pregnant women who had experienced a home birth and hospital birth. Data were collected with a questionnaire from 4 January to 20 February 2021 along the Thai-Myanmar border districts of Tak Province, Thailand. Demographic data for maternal delivery were analyzed by descriptive statistics and a relationship factor analysis by Chi-square test.                The results revealed that 55 pregnant women (11%) gave birth at home. They were aged between 14 and 45 years (  = 26.2 ± 6.2). For 74.5% of the women, it was their second or more pregnancy, however, it was a first pregnancy for 25.5% of the women. 60% of the women had received no formal education or only compulsory level (elementary) education, and 56.4% had a low economic status. For 69.1% of the women, antenatal care did not meet the quality criteria and 61.8 % had experience birthing at home.  Also, exploration of the reasons why women gave birth at home revealed that 52.7% had intended to give birth at home due to several reasons. 40% of the women were unable to go to the hospital. 7.3% delivered their infant on the way to the hospital. 92.7% of the deliveries were carried out by traditional birth attendants. 50.9% of the infants had a birth weight between 2,500-3,000g. The lowest and highest birth weights were 1,200g and 3,980g, respectively. The factors related to home birth were education level, economic status, birth history, antenatal care, knowledge, family support, values, ​​ traditions, and environment (p<0.05). A first pregnancy and a newborn weight of 3,980g can prolong labor, increasing the risk for the mother. In contrast, low birth weight may put the infant at risk of respiratory distress syndrome and even death. Most families had a low economic status. Their rural residences were located far from a hospital and transportation was inconvenient. These results suggest that primary health care should train traditional birth attendants and health agencies, in addition to providing proactive antenatal care services, birth planning, and having a referral system to support these communities. Finally, systems should be developed in conjunction with the government sector, to ensure safe motherhood and baby-friendly hospitals, in order to reduce disparities in access to services.

References

World Health Organization. Safe motherhood and newborn health. Available from

https://www.unicef.org/ffl/02/, accessed 1 November, 2020

James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonik B. High risk pregnancy e-book: Management

options-expert consult. 4thed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.

Health Center for Marginalized Ethnic Groups and Migrants. Survey of child health and

impairment in disability office of the women's development center. Available from

http://doc.anamai.moph.go.th/index.php?r=str-project/view&id=3487, accessed 1 November, 2020.

(In Thai)

Ministry of Public Health, Department of Health, Thailand. Information system to support the

promotion of health and environmental health. Available from

https://dashboard.anamai.moph.go.th/, accessed 1 November, 2020. (In Thai)

Raksamat W, Pute S. Factors related to selection of midwifery delivery Boran Toh Bee

Dae, Yaha District, Yala Province. Thai Journal of Public Health and Health Sciences 2018;

(2): 11-9. (In Thai)

Sarker BK, Rahman M, Rahman T, Hossain J, Reichenbach L, Mitra DK. Reasons for

preference of home delivery with traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in rural Bangladesh: A

qualitative exploration. PloS One 2016; 11(1): e0146161.

Wongpikul O, Rojananukulpong S, Khamranrit A. Good quality antenatal care should be

given before 12 weeks of gestation. Available from https://hpc9.anamai.moph.go.th/web- upload/migrated/files/hpc9/n938_df1afe68b9df03814be919b973140495_article_20170110121603.pdf, accessed 1 November, 2020. (In Thai)

Ministry of Public Health. Neonatal mortality rate. Available from http://healthkpi. moph.go.th/

kpi2/kpi-list/view/?id=1439, accessed 1 November, 2020. (In Thai)

Maeramat Hospital, Tak Province ( BE 2560-2562). Available from Program HOS.XP,

accessed 1 November, 2020. (In Thai)

Wayne WD. Biostatistics: A foundation of analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed.

New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1995.

Kongsomboon K. An epidemiological research textbook for medical students. Bangkok:

Chulalongkorn University Printing Press; 2014. (In Thai)

Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization.

th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001.

Faye A, Niane M, Ba I. Home birth in women who have given birth at least once

in a health facility: Contributory factors in a developing country. Acta Obstet

Gynecol Scand 2011; 90(11): 1239-43.

Martinez-Molla T, Ruiz CS, Gonzalez JS, Sanchez-Peralvo M, Mendez-Perez G.

The father's decision-making in-home birth. Invest Educ Enferm 2015; 33(3): 573-83.

Turner K, Elter PT. Looking backward for research in midwifery. The Journal of

Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Nakhon Ratchasima 2012; 18 (2): 62-75. (In Thai)

Srisawat K, Sikaow O. Management for gestational diabetes mellitus. Journal of The Royal

Thai Army Nurses 2014; 15 (2): 50-9. (In Thai)

Moshi FV, Mbotwa CH. Determinants for choice of home birth over health facility birth

among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: An analysis of data from the 2015-16 Tanzania

demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

; 20: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03266-3

Budu E. Predictors of home births among rural women in Ghana: Analysis of data from the

Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2020; 20:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03211-4.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

Issue

Section

Original Articles