Rapid and Reliable Detection of Malignant Cells in Serous Fluids Using Clinical Microscopy

Authors

  • Suwannee Jitueakul Surat Thani Hospital, Surat Thani, 84000, Thailand. Email: hung_2509@hotmail.com
  • Preeyaporn Thaikerd Surat Thani Hospital, Surat Thani, 84000, Thailand. Email: preeyaporn.pt77@gmail.com
  • Tirawat Wannatung Faculty of Medicine Western University, Hathairaj Road, Ladsawai, Lamlukka, Pathumtani 12150, Thailand. Email: thirawat.wan@gmail.com
  • Suphinya Thanapongphichat Faculty of Medical Technology Prince of Songkla University, 90110. Thailand. Email: supinya.th@psu.ac.th
  • Mayuna Srisuphanunt Faculty of Medicine Western University, Hathairaj Road, Ladsawai, Lamlukka, Pathumtani 12150, Thailand. Email: mayuna.sr@western.ac.th

Keywords:

Malignant cells, Serous fluid, Clinical microscopy laboratory, Cytology laboratory, Early cancer detection

Abstract

The incidence of cancer in Thailand is rising and is now the leading cause of death. Serous fluid, found in cavities between organs, can be analyzed for malignant cells in advanced cancer stages. While Clinical Microscopy Laboratories offer rapid initial screening for malignant cells within two hours, definitive diagnosis in cytology labs typically takes up to a week. This study aims to compare the detection of malignant cells in serous fluid by clinical microscopy and cytology laboratories. A retrospective analysis of 778 serous fluid samples from 2022-2023 was conducted. These included 517 pleural effusions (67%), 221 peritoneal effusions (28%), and 40 pericardial effusions (5%). Simultaneous examinations were performed in both laboratories, showing strong concordance (Kappa = 0.76), with 120 positive and 601 negative concordant results. Sensitivity was 77.9%, and specificity was 96.3%. The findings suggest that clinical microscopy provides an effective and timely screening method for malignant cells in serous fluids, facilitating early cancer detection, treatment planning, and monitoring of patient outcomes. This approach can significantly improve the management of suspected cancer cases.

References

Institute NC. Hospital-based cancer registry 2021. 2021.

Ridley JW. Fundamentals of the study of urine and body fluids. Springer; 2018.

Panuttha Kritpetcharat KS, Oranong Kritpetcharat. Body fluid analysis. Bangkok: Thai Digital Print; 2019.

Nguyen GK. Essentials of fluid cytology. Gia-Khanh Nguyen; 2010.

Pinto D, Chandra A, Schmitt F. The international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: How to incorporate molecular data in cytopathology reports. J Mol Pathol. 2021; 2(2): 66–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.05.015

Pinto D, Chandra A, Crothers BA, Kurtycz DF, Schmitt F. Diagnostic categories and clinical management in serous cytopathology. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020; 9(6): 469–77.

Light RW. Pleural diseases. 7th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020.

Porcel JM, Light RW. Diagnostic approach to pleural effusion in adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019; 200(5): 585–90.

Jerz JL, et al. Training impact on diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology. Acta Cytol. 2022; 66(4): 362–68. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(199906)20:6<350::aid-dc5>3.0.co;2-7

Zaman S, et al. Role of cytopathology in effusion analysis: A hospital-based study. J Cytol. 2021; 38(2): 83–88.

Tondare S, et al. Automated analyzers in cytopathology: A future trend. Diagn Pathol. 2023; 18(1): 49.

Johnston WW. The cytology of pleural effusions: A review. J Clin Pathol. 2020; 73(10): 583–91.

Wright JH. The Wright-Giemsa stain: A cornerstone of hematological analysis. J Hematol. 2018; 43(6): 456–63.

Buys EM, et al. Flow cytometry in cancer diagnostics: A paradigm shift. Clin Cancer Res. 2021; 27(18): 5132–40.

Wang Z, et al. Fluorescence microscopy in cytological diagnostics: Advances and applications. Microsc Today. 2023; 31(1): 20–27.

Kulkarni A, et al. Machine learning in cytopathology: Enhancing diagnostic precision. Comput Pathol. 2022; 50(4): 456–63.

Chandra S, et al. The role of rapid diagnostic techniques in resource-constrained settings. J Glob Health. 2021; 11(3): 04021.

Johnston WW. Reassessing serous fluid cytology. Rev Pathol Med. 2023; 18(1): 15–25.

Wright JH. Cytological evaluations: Time-to-diagnosis metrics. Cytopath Insights. 2021; 19(4): 5–12.

Chandra S. Training personnel for microscopy-based diagnostics. J Cytol Educ. 2023; 22(3): 45–53.

Kulkarni A. Digital pathology in low-resource settings. Tech Med Cytol. 2022; 10(3): 12–9.

Bshara W. Cytological techniques: Current perspectives. J Pathol Rev. 2022; 34(2): 112–8.

Nguyen Q. Enhancing workflows through rapid cytological testing. Med Technol Rev. 2023; 28(2): 120–8.

Chandra S. Training personnel for microscopy-based diagnostics. J Cytol Educ. 2023; 22(3): 45–53.

Nguyen Q. Enhancing workflows through rapid cytological testing. Med Technol Rev. 2023; 28(2): 120–8.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26