Comparison of Posterior and Combined Medial-lateral Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus among Children

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Oct 31, 2015
Keywords:
Supracondylar fractures posterior approach combined medial-lateral approach

Main Article Content

Somboon Wutthipiriyaangkul, MD
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sawang Daen Din Crown Prince Hospital, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand

Abstract

Purpose: The most effective surgical approach for the surgical treatment of supracondylar fractures has not yet been established. Two commonly used approaches are a posterior approach and a combined medial-lateral approach. We performed a retrospective study to compare these two treatment strategies.
Methods: A total of 66 patients were selected for review. Each patient was treated by one of the two approach methods. Data including operative time, blood loss, radiological results, the range of motion of the elbow, Flynn’s criteria, and operative complications were collected.
Results: Thirty-two patients were treated with a posterior approach, and the rest (34) were treated with a combined medial-lateral approach. A posterior approach was associated with a significantly shorter operative time. There were no significant differences in blood loss, radiological results, the range of motion of the elbow, Flynn’s criteria, and complications between the two groups.
Conclusion: The posterior approach technique was as effective as the combined medial-lateral approach in the treatment of supracondylar fractures, but provided shorter operative times.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 39 No. 3-4 (2015): May-October
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Kaewpornsawan K. Comparison between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and open reduction with pinning in children with closed totally displaced supracondylar humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10:131–137.
2. Aktekin CN, Toprak A, Ozturk AM, Altay M, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY. Open reduction via posterior triceps sparing approach in comparison with closed treatment of posteromedial displaced Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2008;17:171–178.
3. Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2008;90:1121–1132.
4. Farnsworth CL, Silva PD, Mubarak SJ. Etiology of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop.1998;18:38–42.
5. Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet.1959;109:145–154.
6. Oh CW, Park BC, Kim PT, Park IH, Kyung HS, Ihn JC. Completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children: results of open reduction versus closed reduction. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8:137–141.
7. Reitman RD, Waters P, Millis M. Open reduction and internal fixation for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:157–161.
8. Pirone AM, Graham HK, Krajbich JI. Management of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:641–650.
9. Ay S, Akinci M, Kamiloglu S, Ercetin O. Open reduction of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures through the anterior cubital approach. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:149–153.
10. Bamrungthin N Comparison of posterior and lateral surgical approach in management of type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus among the children. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 ;91:502-506.
11. Sangkomkamhang T, Singjam U, Leeprakobboon D. Risk factors for loss of fixation in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 ;97 Suppl 9:S23-S28.
12. Paradis G, Lavallee P, Gagnon N, Lemire L. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Technique and results of crossed percutaneous K-wire fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;297:231–237.
13. Mazda K, Boggione C, Fitoussi F, Penneçot GF. Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br.2001;83:888–893.
14. Archibeck MJ, Scott SM, Peters CL. Brachialis muscle entrapment in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures: a technique of closed reduction and report of initial results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:298–302.
15. Kekomäki M, Luoma R, Rikalainen H, Vilkki P. Operative reduction and fixation of a difficult supracondylar extension fracture of the humerus. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984;4:13–15.
16. Yildirim AO, Unal VS, Oken OF, Gulcek M, Ozsular M, Ucaner A. Timing of surgical treatment for type III supracondylar humerus fractures in pediatric patients. J Child Orthop. 2009;3:265–269.
17. Kazimoglu C, Cetin M, Sener M, Aguş H, Kalanderer O. Operative management of type III extension supracondylar fractures in children. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1089–1094.
18. Sibly TF, Briggs PJ, Gibson MJ. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood: range of movement following the posterior approach to open reduction. Injury. 1991;22:456–458.
19. Labelle H, Bunnell WP, Duhaime M, Poitras B. Cubitus varus deformity following supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2:539–546.
20. Skaggs DL, Cluck MW, Mostofi A, Flynn JM, Kay RM. Lateral-entry pin fixation in the management of supracondylar fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:702–707.