Surveillance Evaluation of Hand Foot Mouth and Enterovirus Infection Diseases, Surin Province, 2016

Authors

  • ลักขณา สีนวลแล Off i ce of Disease Prevention and Control 9th Nakhon Ratchsima
  • สุทธิลักษณ์ หนูรอด Off i ce of Disease Prevention and Control 9th Nakhon Ratchsima
  • กัญญรัตน์ สระแก้ว Office of Disease Prevention and Control 9th Nakhon Ratchsima

Keywords:

Hand Foot and Mouth Disease, Enterovirus Infectious Diseases, Positive predictive value, sensitivity

Abstract

Hand-foot-and-mouth disease(HFMD) and disease from enterovirus Infection have been
classi ed as noti able diseases under the national surveillance in Thailand since 2001. Each year,
Thailand has a large number of patients and there are patients with severe illness and death. In Surin
province, the incidence rate of HFMD tended to increase. Surin Health Provincial Office and
The Of f ice of Disease Prevention and Control 9, Nakhon Ratchasima collaborated to Surveillance
Evaluation of HFMD and Enterovirus infection in Surin Province, 2016. The objective was to study
the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the surveillance system, the reporting process and provide
suggestions on improving the surveillance system. A cross-sectional study was conducted. We studied
in Surin hospital, Prasat hospital, Kapchoeng hospital, Thatoom hospital and Sangkha hospital.
The study population consisted of patients who were hospitalized in Surin province, aged less than
15 years from 1 January to 31 December 2016. The sample consisted of patients who were admitted
to hospital aged less than 15 years from 1 January to 31 December 2016. Searched for HFMD
and enterovirus Infection from patient records and reports from the National Noti cation Disease
Surveillance (R506). From the ve hospitals, we reviewed 1,058 medical records, and interviewed
33 health personnel. The system had positive predictive value of 50.4%, sensitivity of 61.4% for
these two diseases. The accuracy of the information was 99.6% for gender, 99.8% for age, and
48.2% for onset date. The timeliness of the reporting within 3 days was 92.9%. Information in the
medical records and in the R506 reports was in the same direction. Most patients were 0-3 years old,
high number of cases in June-August. In addition, administrators and practitioners have a positive
attitude toward the surveillance system. In conclusion, the positive predictive value and sensitivity were
at moderate level. Timeliness in reporting is good. Data from the surveillance system could represent
the medical records. The program was simple and allowed easy operation of the system. Information
from the surveillance system was used to alert the network, monitor the situation and plan
for disease control. So that the surveillance system more effective, the ow chart of the province should
be updated for the new staff can understand the work process. Samples should be sent to isolate
the causative organism. In the border hospital, there is also a problem of informing foreign patients
about the situation in the neighboring countries. It is necessary to have process for the prevention
and control of the disease not to spread to Thailand.

References

1. สำนักระบาดวิทยา.ระบบเฝ้าระวังโรค (รายงาน 506). [serial online] 2559. [ค้นข้อมูลเมื่อ 3 กุมภาพันธ์
2559]; ค้นข้อมูลจาก:http://www.boe.moph.go.th/boedb/surdata/disease.php?dcontent=
old&ds=71
2. กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. นิยามโรคติดเชื้อประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์องค์การรับส่งสินค้าและพัสดุภัณฑ์,
2546.
3. สำนักระบาดวิทยาและกรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์. แนวทางเฝ้าระวัง สอบสวน และรายงานโรค กรณีสงสัย
ติดเชื้อเอนเทอโรไวรัส(12 กรกฎาคม 2555). [serial online] 2559. [ค้นข้อมูลเมื่อ 25 พฤศจิกายน
2559]; ค้นข้อมูลจาก: URL:http://thaigcd.ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/pdf/baby/13.7.58/
Measure_HFM.pdf
4. U.S.Department of Health and Human Service, Centre of Disease Control and Prevention. Update
Guideline for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems, MMWR 2001; 50: 1-25.
5. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classi cation of Diseases and Related Health
Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10)-WHO Version for ;2016.[serial online] 2016. [cited 2016
Feb 3]; Available from: URL:http://apps.who.int/classi cations/icd10/browse/2016/en#/I
6. สำนักระบาดวิทยา.รายงานการประเมินระบบเฝ้าระวังโรคมือ เท้า ปาก และโรคติดเชื้อไวรัสเอนเทอโร
ประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2555. [Internet]. 2556 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ13 พฤศจิกายน 2559]. เข้าถึงได้จาก
http://www.boe.moph.go.th/ les/report/20140320_87651203.pdf
7. ขนาดของกลุ่มตัวอย่าง. [Internet]. 2559 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ13 พฤศจิกายน 2559]. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://sites.
google.com/site/bbnmonsl/khnad-khxng-klum-tawxyang

Published

2019-01-31

How to Cite

สีนวลแล ล., หนูรอด ส., & สระแก้ว ก. (2019). Surveillance Evaluation of Hand Foot Mouth and Enterovirus Infection Diseases, Surin Province, 2016. The Office of Disease Prevention and Control 9th Nakhon Ratchasima Journal, 25(1), 16–26. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ODPC9/article/view/187097