Development and Psychometric Testing of the Work Performance Scale of Nurse at Primary Care Units

Main Article Content

Karn Chaladthanyagid
Sunee Lagampan
Noppawan Piaseu
Chukait Viwatwongkasem
Naruemon Auemaneekul
Oi Saeng Hong

Abstract

                 Nurses are a cornerstone in providing care for people at primary care units, so the evaluation of the nurses’ work performance is important to improve service quality. Nurses’ performance has been assessed in many counties, including the United States of America, Canada, England, New Zealand, South Africa, and South Korea. Currently, there is a scarcity of tools for assessing all aspects of the work performance of nurses in Thai primary care units, so we undertook this study to develop and test the work performance scale of nurses. The study design was instrument development and psychometric testing. Qualitative methods using focus group discussions and expert reviews were applied for the items’ construction. Quantitatively we examined the psychometric properties of this scale with 662 nurses working at primary care units in Thailand. Only the quantitative data and results are presented here.


                Exploratory factor analysis revealed 71 items comprising ten factors: Basic treatment for common health problems and continuing care, School health care, Self-development, Research and innovation, Women and child care, Health resource management, Planning and budget management, Standard of care and assurance, Health data management, Disease prevention and environmental health care, and Disaster management. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the total 71 items and for each domain are in acceptable ranges. 


                The Work Performance Scale for Nurses at Primary Care Units achieved good validity and reliability scores and can be used to evaluate the work performance of nurse to improve their practices. However, it requires further confirmatory testing with nurses in Thailand at a range of primary care units. 

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Chaladthanyagid K, Lagampan S, Piaseu N, Viwatwongkasem C, Auemaneekul N, Hong OS. Development and Psychometric Testing of the Work Performance Scale of Nurse at Primary Care Units. PRIJNR [Internet]. 2020 Jan. 2 [cited 2022 Sep. 28];24(1):73-88. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/175604
Section
Original paper

References

1. World Health Organization. Global strategic directions for strengthening and midwifery 2016-2020. Geneva: Health Professions Networks; 2016.

2. Hughes D, Leethongdee S, Osiri S. Using economic levers to change behavior: The case of Thailand’ s universal coverage health care reforms. Soc Sci Med. 2010 70(3): 447- 454. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.031.

3. Hanucharurnkul S. Nurses in primary care and nurse practitioner in Thailand. Contemporary Nurse. 2007 26(1):83-89. doi: 10.5172/conu.2007.26.1.83.

4. Al-Makhaita HM, Sabra AA, Hafez AS. Job performance among nurses working in two different health care levels, Eastern Saudi Arabia: A comparative study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014 3(7):832-837. doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2014.240420142.

5. Germain BP, Cumming GG.The influence of nursing leadership on nurse performance: a systematic literature review. J Nurs Manag. 2010 18(4):425-439. doi:10.111/j.1365-2834.2010.01100.x.

6. Griffin MA, Neal SK, Parker SK. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad Manag J. 2007 50:327– 347. doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438.

7. Ruksaphram P, Isaramalai S, Bunyasopun U. Development and evaluation of a chronic care competency scale for primary care teams in Thailand. Pacific Rim Int Nurs Res. 2014 18(2):111-124.

8. Nontapet O, Isaramalai S, Petpichatchain W, Brooks WC. Conceptual Structure of Primary Care Competency for Thai Primary Care Unit (PCU) Nurses. Thai Journal of Nursing
Research. 2008 12(3):195-206.

9. Sarakeshtrin A, Samphawamana O, Suwannarat K. Role’s performance of register nurses at primary care unit in Thailand. Journal of Nursing Division. 2010 37(3):52-63 [in Thai].

10. Kitreerawutiwong N. Developing a tool to evaluate primary care performance in different types of facilities: a case study in Phitsanulok province, Thailand. College of Public Health Sciences. Chulalongkorn University; 2009.

11. Keller LO, Strohschein S., Schaffer M A. Cornerstones of public health nursing. Public Health Nurs. 2011;28 249-260.

12. Stanhope M, Lancaster J. Public health nursing population centered health care in community. 9th edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Inc.; 2016.

13. Schaffer MA, Kalfoss M, Glavin K. Public health nursing intervention to promote quality of life in the older adult population: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2017 7(11):92-106. doi:10.5430/jnep.v7n11p92.

14. Stanhope M, Lancaster J. Public health nursing population centered health care in community. 8th edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Inc.; 2014.

15. Cassells BH. in Nies AM, McEwen M. Community/ Public Health Nursing. 6th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Inc.; 2015.

16. Toso, BRGO, Filippon, J, & Giovanella, L. Nurse’ performance on primary care in the National Health Service in England. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016 69(1):169-77. doi:10.1590/0034-7167.2016690124i.

17. Nuntaboot, K. Nurses of the Community, by the Community, and for the Community in Thailand. Regional health forum. 2006 10(1):11-28.

18. Srisuphan W, Junthai K. Manual practice of registered nurse in health promoting hospital. Bangkok, Judd Thong Printing; 2013 [in Thai].

19. Piaseu N, Narasri P, Chaladthanyagid K. Nurses’ roles in primary care management of non-communicable diseases toward sustainable development goals. Ramathibodi Nursing Journal. 2017 23(1):27-43 [in Thai].

20. Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council. Competencies of Registered Nurses. Bangkok. Siriyod Printing; 2011 20-21 [in Thai].

21. Szara M, Ksykiewicz-Dorota A, Klukow J. Review of research tools for assessment of performance of nursing staff. Medical and Biological Science. 2016 30(4):77-85. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12775/MBS.2016.038.

22. Al-Homayan AM, Shamsudin FM, Subramaniam C, Islam R. Impacts of job performance level on nurses in public sector hospitals. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2013 10(9):1115-1123. doi: 10.3844/ajassp. 2013.1115.1123

23. Kahya E, Oral N. Measurement of clinical nurse performance: Developing a tool including contextual items. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2018 8(6):112-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v8n6p112.

24. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2017.

25. Kyriazos T. Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology. 2018 9:2207-2230. doi: 10.4236/psych.2018.98126.

26. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education International; 2010.

27. Roch SG, Stern AM, Caputo PM. Absolute vs relative performance rating formats: Implications for fairness and organization justice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2007 15(3):302-316. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x.

28. McCoach BD, Gable KR, Madura PJ. Instrument development in the affective domain: school and corporate applications. (3rded.). New York: Springer Science;2013.

29. Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organization. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science. 2012 29(3):280-293. doi: 10.1002/cjas.232.

30. Chiristiansen ND, Burns GN, Montgomery GE.Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment. Human Performance. 2005 18:267-307. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4.

31. Streiner DL, & Norman GR. Health measurement scale: a practical guide to their development and use. (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.

32. Creswell WJ. Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches.(3rd ed.). California: Sage;2013, pp. 145-177.

33. Waltz CF, Strickland OL, & Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research. (5th ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2016.

34. Thaopan W, and Sota C. Teenage pregnancy and social dilemma in a province of northeastern Thailand. J Pub Health Dev. 2017 15(2):43-54.

35. Lee JH, Choi YJ, Sung NJ, Kim SY, Chung SH, Kim J, et al. Development of the Korean primary care assessment tool measuring user experience: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 21(2):103-111. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp007.

36. Beaglehole R, Epping-Jordan J, Patel V, Chopra M, Ebrahim S, Kidd M, Hainess A. Improving the prevention and management of chronic disease in low-income and middle income countries: a priority of primary health care. Lancet. 2008 372(9642):940-949. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61404-X.

37. Phakdeechanuan K, Songwwathana P, Sae-Sia W. Thai nurses’ learning needs regarding disaster nursing: High needs?. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing. 2015 5(2):56-66. doi: 10.14710/nmjn.v5i2.10529.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>