Development and Psychometric Testing of Quality Relationship Scale for Family Caregivers of People with Cancers

Main Article Content

Siranee Kejkornkaew
Supreeda Monkong
Natthacha Chiannilkulchai
Yupapin Sirapo-ngam

Abstract

          A quality relationship between caregiver and care-receiver is an essential issue since it not only motivates the family to take on a caregiving role but also impacts all caregiving processes. Before this study there was no Thai instrument that measured this concept. This study aimed to develop the Thai Quality Relationship Scale for Family Caregivers of People with Cancer and test its psychometric properties. This paper focuses on the testing of the scale. The conceptual model and content domains were derived from a comprehensive literature review and semi-structured interviews. The instrument was verified for content validity by three experts and examined for clarity by 15 family caregivers. The construct validity of the revised scale was tested by exploratory factor analysis with 220 family caregivers of persons with cancer from the central part of Thailand.
          Results revealed that the scale was composed of four factors and accounted for 54% of variances, including feeling of love, concern about disease and treatment, sympathy for suffering, and concern with daily activities. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the total items was 0.87, and each factor was in an acceptable range. This instrument has good construct validity and reliability and would help measure quality relationships for family caregivers of people with cancer in Thailand. Future research is needed to confirm its adequate validity and reliability in other groups of family caregivers. Nurses can use this tool and the newly proposed conceptual structure of quality relationships to assess, design, and test nursing intervention to support family caregivers to continue providing good care for their care-receivers.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Kejkornkaew S, Monkong S, Chiannilkulchai N, Sirapo-ngam Y. Development and Psychometric Testing of Quality Relationship Scale for Family Caregivers of People with Cancers. PRIJNR [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 5 [cited 2022 Aug. 19];26(2):282-95. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/256518
Section
Original paper

References

Nemati S, Rassouli M, Ilkhani M, Baghestani AR. Perceptions of family caregivers of cancer patients about the challenges of caregiving: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018;32(1):309-16. doi:10.1111/scs.12463.

Kim Y, Carver CS. Unmet needs of family cancer caregivers predict quality of life in long-term cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(5):749-58. doi:10.1007/s11764-019-00794-6.

Kim Y, Carver CS, Ting A. Family caregivers’ unmet needs in long-term cancer survivorship. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019;35(4):380-3. doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2019. 06.012.

Mahumud RA, Alam K, Dunn J, Gow J. The burden of chronic diseases among Australian cancer patients: evidence from a longitudinal exploration, 2007-2017. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228744.

Lee GL, Ramaswamy A. Physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects of end-of-life trajectory among patients with advanced cancer: a phenomenological inquiry. Death Stud. 2020;44(5):292-302. doi:10.1080/07481187.2018.1541944.

Ullgren H, Tsitsi T, Papastavrou E, Charalambous A. How family caregivers of cancer patients manage symptoms at home: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;85:68-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.004.

Greenwood N, Smith R. Motivations for being informal carers of people living with dementia: a systematic review of qualitative literature. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):169. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1185-0.

Towle RM, Low LL, Tan SB, Hendrix C. Quality improvement study on early recognition and intervention of caregiver burden in a tertiary hospital. BMJ Open Quality. 2020;9(3): e000873. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000873.

Bassola B, Cilluffo S, Lusignani M. Going inside the relationship between caregiver and care‐receiver with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Italy, a grounded theory study. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29(4):1083-90. doi:10.1111/hsc.13142.

Morris LW, Morris RG, Britton PG. The relationship between marital intimacy, perceived strain and depression in spouse caregivers of dementia sufferers. Br J Med Psychol. 1988;61 (Pt 3):231-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3179245

Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, Harvath T. Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(6):375-84. doi:10. 1002/nur.4770130605.

Kelly EP, Agne JL, Meara A, Pawlik TM. Reciprocity within patient-physician and patient-spouse/caregiver dyads: insights into patient-centered care. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(4):1237-44.

Kelmer G, Rhoades GK, Stanley S, Markman HJ. Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long‐distance relationships. Fam Process. 2013;52(2): 257-70.

Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(4):644. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/58/4/644/

Streck BP, Wardell DW, Wood GL. Family caregiver-receivermutuality: a concept analysis. Adv Nur Sci. 2020;43(2): E71-E9. doi:10.1097/ans.0000000000000302.

Hooker SA, Schmiege SJ, Trivedi RB, Amoyal NR, Bekelman DB. Mutuality and heart failure self-care in patients and their informal caregivers. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018;17(2):102-13. doi:10.1177/1474515117730184.

Enright J, O’Connell ME, Branger C, Kirk A, Morgan D. Identity, relationship quality, and subjective burden in caregivers of persons with dementia. Dementia (London). 2020;19(6):1855-71. doi:10.1177/1471301218808607.

Bouchard K, Greenman PS, Pipe A, Johnson SM, Tulloch H. Reducing caregiver distress and cardiovascular risk: a focus on caregiver-patient relationship quality. Can J Cardiol. 2019;35(10):1409-11. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.007.

Edwards HB, Ijaz S, Whiting PF, Leach V, Richards A, Cullum SJ, et al. quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1): e015538. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015538.

Samartkit N, Kasemkitvattana S, Thosingha O, Vorapongsathorn T. Caregiver role strain and rewards: caring for Thais with a traumatic brain injury. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2010; 14(4):297-314.

Wirojratana V. Development of the Thai family care inventory [dissertation]. [Portland]: Oregon Health & Science University; 2002.

Kejkornkaew S, Sirapo-ngam Y, Monkong S, Junda T, Wallhagen MI. A grounded theory study of the quality relationships between family caregivers and persons with head and neck cancer. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2016;20(2): 161-73.

Johanson GA, Brooks GP. Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(3):394-400.

Castleberry A, Nolen A. Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning. 2018;10(6):807-15.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell, LS. Principal components and factor analysis. In: Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, editors.Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2007. pp. 607-75.

Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology. 2018;9(08):2207-30.

Hair J, Black B, Anderson R. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River,NJ; 2010.

Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a Primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. doi:10.3389/fpubh. 2018.00149.

Kitrungrote L, Wonghongkul T, Chanprasit C, Suttharangsee W, Cohen MZ. Experiences of caregivers of spouses with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Pacific Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2008;12(3):207-19.

Kelly EP, Agne JL, Meara A, Pawlik TM. Reciprocity within patient-physician and patient-spouse/caregiver dyads:insights into patient-centered care. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(4):1237-44. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4482-9.

Qiu X, Sit JWH, Koo FK. The influence of Chinese culture on family caregivers of stroke survivors: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(1-2):e309-19. doi:10.1111/jocn.13947.

Raffagnino R, Puddu L. Love styles in couple relationships: a literature review. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2018; 6(12):307-30. doi:10.4236/jss.2018.612027.

Cornelius-White JHD, Kanamori Y, Murphy D, Tickle E. Mutuality in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis and metasynthesis. J Psychother Integr. 2018;28(4):489-504. doi:10.1037/int0000134.

Stead A, White J. Loss of Intimacy: a cost of caregiving in aphasia. Top Lang Disord. 2019;39(1):55-70. doi:10.1097/tld.0000000000000175.

Thampanichawat W. Maintaining love and hope: caregiving for Thai children with HIV infection. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care.2008;19(3):200-10. doi:10.1016/j.jana.2007.12.001.

Cartwright JC, Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Limandri B. Enrichment processes in family caregiving to frail elders. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1994;17(1):31-43. doi:10.1097/00012272-199409000-00006.

Colasante T, Gao X, Malti T. Aware and tuned to care: children with better distress recognition and higher sympathy anticipate more guilt after harming others. Br J Dev Psychol. 2019;37(4):600-10. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12305.

Sinclair S, Beamer K, Hack TF, McClement S, Raffin Bouchal S, Chochinov HM, et al. sympathy, empathy, and compassion: a grounded theory study of palliative care patients’understandings, experiences, and preferences. Palliat Med. 2017;31(5):437-47. doi:10.1177/0269216316663499.

Thompson NM, Uusberg A, Gross JJ, Chakrabarti B. Empathy and emotion regulation: an integrative account. Prog Brain Res. 2019;247:273-304. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.024.

Sethabouppha H, Kane C. Caring for the seriously mentally ill in Thailand: Buddhist family caregiving. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2005;19(2):44-57.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>