Lived Experiences of Adolescents Undergoing Legal Abortion in a Province of Thailand

Main Article Content

Lakkhana Chainok
Puangpaka Kongvattananon
Shirley C. Gordon

Abstract

            Becoming pregnant as an adolescent is a complex and worrying time for many. They are faced with a choice as to whether to continue the pregnancy and raise the child, to continue the pregnancy, and give the child up for adoption later, or terminate the pregnancy. Abortion is the ultimate choice for adolescents to handle their pregnancies. Legal abortion service for adolescent females with an unwanted pregnancy is an approach to improved quality of life in Thai society and avoids the many dangers of illegal abortions. This hermeneutic phenomenology study aimed to explore the lived experiences of legal abortion among adolescent females. Thirty adolescent females aged 15-19 years who underwent legal abortion were recruited using purposive sampling and snowball techniques. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and field notes. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Triangulation, member checking, and peer debriefing were employed to enhance the trustworthiness of the data.
             Four themes emerged from their experiences, including 1) The meaning of legal abortion: feeling safe but sinful, 2) Health after medical abortion: success or complications, 3) Life learning: the lessons in life, and 4) The need for good care and confidentiality. The findings of this study help the health care providers at legal abortion clinics to better understand the experiences of adolescent females undergoing an abortion. The findings will also inform health interventions that aim to reduce unwanted pregnancies and improve legal abortion services to meet the needs of adolescent females.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Lakkhana Chainok, Puangpaka Kongvattananon, Shirley C. Gordon. Lived Experiences of Adolescents Undergoing Legal Abortion in a Province of Thailand. PRIJNR [Internet]. 2022 May 27 [cited 2022 Nov. 27];26(3):376-89. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/258058
Section
Original paper

References

Zenebe M, Haukanes H. When abortion is not within reach: Ethiopian university students struggling with unintended pregnancies. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):1-13. doi:10.1186/s12939-019-0925-2.

Hornberger LL, Breuner CC, Alderman EM, Garofalo R, Grubb LK, Powers ME, Upadhya KK, Wallace SB. Options counseling for the pregnant adolescent patient. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):1-5. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-2274.

Prohm S, Sripichyakan K, Chareonsanti J, Klunklin P. Decision-making on continuing pregnancy Among Thai adolescents: a phenomenological study. Pacific Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2020;24(3):376-88.

Engelbert Bain L, Zweekhorst MBM, Amoakoh-Coleman M, Muftugil-Yalcin S, Omolade AI-O, Becquet R, et al. To keep or not to keep? Decision making in adolescent pregnancies in Jamestown, Ghana. PloS One. 2019; 14(9):1-18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221789.

Atuhaire S. Abortion among adolescents in Africa: a review of practices, consequences, and control strategies. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2019;34(4):e1378-86. doi:10.1002/hpm.2842.

Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Bureau of Reproductive Health. Abortion Surveillance Report, Thailand 2019. [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2019 Apr 5]. Available from: https://rh.anamai.moph.go.th/webupload/migrated/files/rh/n330_d1a80b22d8a4daa876f459095915af6d_Ebook_Abortion_62.pdf (in Thai)

Håkansson M, Oguttu M, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Makenzius M. Human rights versus societal norms: a mixed-methods study among healthcare providers on social stigma related to adolescent abortion and contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(2):1-13.

doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000608.

Powwattana A, Thammaraksa P, Manora S. Culturallygrounded mother-daughter communication‐focused intervention for Thai female adolescents. Nurs Health Sci.2018;20(2):214-23. doi:10.1111/nhs.12404.

Laeheem K, Suwansuntorn P. (2015). The social effects on pregnant teenagers in Na Mom district, Songkhla Province. NIDA Devel J. 2015;55(1):130-52. doi:10.14456/ndj.2015.11 (in Thai).

Jantacumma N, Powwattana A, Lagampan S, Chansatitporn N. Predictive model of quality of life among Thai pregnant teenagers. Pacific Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2018;22(1):30-42.

Arnott G, Sheehy G, Chinthakanan O, Foster AM. Exploring legal restrictions, regulatory reform, and geographic disparities in abortion access in Thailand. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):187-96.

Chamkajang K. Prevention and Solution of Adolescent Pregnancy Problem Act, BE 2559 (2016), Aspects on awareness and implementation. J Health Sci. 2019; 28(2):189-201(in Thai).

Referral System for Safe Abortion. Get to know RSATHAI. [Internet] 2020. [cited 2020 May 8]. Available from: https://www.rsathai.org/ (in Thai)

Nowak M, Klok J, Schwarz I, Arbour L, Johnsson AB. Human rights: handbook for parliamentarians No. 26. Switzerland: Inter-Parliamentary Union; 2016.

Hemrangsee J. Abortion law and ethics in Thai society. J Soc Sci and Buddhistic Anthro. 2021;6(11):483-98 (in Thai).

Kruachottikul S. Quality of unintended teenage pregnant women: midwifery role. Kuakarun J Nurs. 2014;21(2):18-27 (in Thai).

Rongluen S, Talengjit P, Siriborirak S. Unwanted pregnancies in teenagers: a survey of problems and needs for health care support. Siriraj Nurs J. 2012;3(2):14-28 (in Thai).

Tousaw E, Moo SN, Arnott G, Foster AM. “It is just like having a period with back pain”: exploring women’s experiences with community-based distribution of misoprostol for early abortion on the Thailand–Burma border. Contraception. 2018;97(2):122-9. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017. 06.015.

Chinthakanan O, Rochat RW, Morakote N, Chaovisitseree S. The hidden problems of illegal abortions in Thailand. Chiang Mai Med J. 2014;53(4):187-91.

Ramsook L. A methodological approach to hermeneutic phenomenology. Int J Humanit Soc Sci. 2018;10(1):14-24.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

Diekelmann NL, Allen D, Tanner CA. The NLN criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: a critical hermeneutic analysis. New York: National League for Nursing Press; 1989.

Lincon YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Los Angeles:Sage; 1985.

Kongvattananon P. Using mixed method for creditability in health science research. J Sci Tech. 2013;21(7):648-57.

Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802-11. doi:10.1177/1049732316654870.

Stephens M, Jordens CFC, Kerridge IH, Ankeny RA. Religious perspectives on abortion and a secular response. J Relig Health. 2010;49(4):513-35. doi:10.1007/s10943-009-9273-7.

Chaturachinda K, Boonthai N. Unsafe abortion: an inequity in health care, Thailand perspective. J Popul Soc Stud. 2017;25(3):287-97. doi:10.25133/JPSSv25n3.007.

Middleton C. National human rights institutions, extraterritorial obligations and hydropower in Southeast Asia: implications of the region’s authoritarian turn. Austrian J South-East Asian Stud. 2018;11(1):81-97. doi:10.14764/10. ASEAS- 2018.1-5.