Optimizing Quality Nursing Research: A Call for Action

Main Article Content

Wongchan Petpichetchian
Somchit Hanucharuenkul
Sue Turale

Abstract

           One of the key success indicators of peer-reviewed nursing journals is to publish high-quality research manuscripts. In reality, only small numbers of published research are of high quality resulting in limited utility either for guiding evidence-based practice or for subsequent research projects. Quality nursing research does not occur by chance but it requires competencies and genuine efforts of all people involved in the research process. In this article, an emphasis is on three essential groups of people including research educators, nurse researchers, and peer reviewers. Each group contributes to the quality of research at different stages of research endeavors. Recommendations and a call for action to these identified groups are highlighted.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Petpichetchian W, Hanucharuenkul S, Turale S. Optimizing Quality Nursing Research: A Call for Action. PRIJNR [Internet]. 2022 Sep. 12 [cited 2022 Nov. 27];26(4):549-54. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/259256
Section
Editorial

References

Yanbing S, Hua L, Chao L, Fenglan W, Zhiguang D. The state of nursing research from 2000 to 2019: a global analysis. JAN. 2021;77(1):162-75. doi:https://doi.org/10. 1111/jan.14564

Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA:Wolters Kluwer; 2021.

Wannasuntad S, Petpichetchian W, Vachprasit R, Shatpattananunt B, Siripituphum D, Sawasdinaruenart S. A scoping review of Thai nursing research over the past 3 years. Thai Journal of Nursing Council. [Internet]. 2022[cited 2022 Aug 3];37(2):143-66. Available from:

https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJONC/article/view/256539 (In Thai).

Thai-Journal Citation Index (TCI) Centre. History of the Thai-Journal Citation Index (TCI) Centre. [cited 2022 Aug 5]; Available from: https://tci-thailand.org/eng/ ?page_id=21.

Oermann MH, Nicoll LH, Chinn PL, Ashton KS, Conklin JL, Edie AH, et al. Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals. Nurs Outlook. 2018;66(1):4-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.005

Henly SJ, Dougherty MC. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research. Nurs Outlook. 2009;57(1):18-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.05.006

Barajas-Ochoa A, Cisneros-Barrios A, Ramos-Remus C. Evaluation of the quality and subsequent performance of manuscripts rejected by Clinical Rheumatology: a research report. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41(8):2541-51. doi:10.1007/s10067-022-06238-4

Ordak M. Statistical recommendations for the authors of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022;148(5):1011-3. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03956-9

Dawson C. 100 activities for teaching research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2016.

Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med.2013;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Sys Rev. 2015;4(1):1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

Lambert VA, Lambert CE. Getting started with your writing for publication project. Pacific Rim Inter J Nurs Res [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2022 Aug 8];16(2):83-4.Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/5917

Lambert VA, Lambert CE. Why manuscripts are not acceptable for publication. Pacific Rim Inter J Nurs Res [Internet]. 2011[cited 2022 Aug 8];15(1):1-2. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/6544

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-18.

Recio-Saucedo A, Crane K, Meadmore K, Fackrell K, Church H, Fraser S, et al. What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00120-2

Tennant JP. The state of the art in peer review. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2018;365(19):fny204. doi:10.1093/femsle/fny204