The Effect of a Web-Based Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Prevention Program on Hearing Protection Device Behavior Among Thai Navy Officers: A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2023.262221Keywords:
Hearing devices behavior, Hearing protection, Motivation theory, Navy personnel, Web-based programAbstract
Navy officers working on the coastal guard vessels risk hearing loss due to repeated exposure to high noise levels from ship engines. Therefore, proper use of hearing protection devices is important. In this study, a web-based hearing loss prevention program was developed to promote the behavior of the use of hearing protection devices among Thai navy officers working on coastal guard vessels. In total, 152 navy personnel were recruited based on selection criteria and randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 76) and control groups (n = 76). The participants in the experimental group received the hearing loss prevention program via a website over four weeks. After completing the program, hearing protection device behavior was evaluated by a self-report questionnaire immediately after and at eight weeks follow-up.
The results showed significantly increasing scores of the use of hearing protection devices behavior within the experimental group, both immediately and eight weeks after the program completion. However, there were no significant differences in the scores when comparing between groups, even though the scores of the experimental group were better than those in the control group. The restrictions could be explained by some emerging events during the implementation period, including the COVID-19 pandemic followed by a massive oil spill incident at sea. These put an extra workload on the study participants. Most importantly, there was a problem with the network connection that might have affected the continuation of participant attention to the program. Although this study found no effective results of the developed program due to some limitations, nurses can adopt this protective intervention to reduce the risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among Navy officers. Therefore, a recommendation for further study is to develop an intervention program that considers both the working context of the coastal vessels and appropriate participation methods that require more challenging efforts.
References
Orru H, Luha A, Pindus M, Jõgeva R, Vahisalu M, Lekk U, et al. Hearing loss among military personnel in relation to occupational and leisure noise exposure and usage of personal protective equipment. Noise Health.2020; 22(107):90-8. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_12_19.
Irgens-Hansen K, Baste V, Bråtveit M, Lind O, Koefoed VF, Moen BE. Hearing loss in the Royal Norwegian Navy: a longitudinal study. Noise Health. 2016;18(82):157-65.doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.
Chanchang C, Sithisarankul P, Sangsuwan S. Comparison of prevalence and associated factors of hypertension between ship officers and In-land officers of the Royal Thai Navy. RTNMD journal. 2018;45(1): 154-69 (in Thai).
Abhakornkiartiwong Hospital. Report of the working environmental assessment of Luang Samae San ship. Occupational Health Department Abhakornkiartiwong Hospital; 2019 (in Thai).
Neitzel RL, Swinburn TK, Hammer MS, Eisenberg D. Economic impact of hearing loss and reduction of noise-induced hearing loss in the United States. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(1):182-9. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHRH-15-0365.
Health Promotion and Productivity in the Workplace: The Occupational and Environmental Health Nurse Role in Supporting the Workforce Using NIOSH’s Total Worker Health® Approach. Workplace Health Saf. 2021;69(2):93-5. doi: 10.1177/2165079920967811.
Navy and Marine CORPS Public Health Center. Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center Technical Manual: Navy Medicine Hearing Conservation Program Technical Manu. Portsmouth: Navy and Marine CORPS Public Health Center;2020. Contract No.: MCPHC TM-6260.51.99-3.
Roger B. Occupational and environmental health nursing: concept and practice. 2 ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003.
Klaiklueng C. Development of a hearing screening system for navy personnel. Naval War College, Thai Royal Naval Education Department; 2015 (in Thai).
Federman J, Karch SJ, Duhon C. How hearing conservation training format impacts personal attenuation ratings in U.S. Marine Corps Training Recruits. Int J Audiol. 2021;60(2):151-9. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1811407.
Beamer S, Gagne C, Chada N, Mehta H, Piper S, Wong G, et al. Effectiveness of hearing loss prevention education for active-duty military personnel: a preliminary study. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2020;5(3):684-98. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_PERSP-19-00076.
Weathersby P, McCluskey J, Huebner H, Marshall L. Success of custom hearing protection devices within an enhanced hearing-conservation program aboard a US navy warship. Naval Submarine Medical Research Lab Groton CT. Groton United States;2018. Technical Report No.: AD1065317. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1065317
Hong O, Chin DL, Fiola LA, Kazanis AS. The effect of a booster intervention to promote hearing protection behavior in operating engineers. Am J Ind Med. 2013;56(2): 258-66.doi: 10.1002/ajim.22091.
Im EO, Chang SJ. Web-based interventions in nursing. Comput Inform Nurs. CIN. 2013;31(2):94-102. doi: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182771868.
Gupta S, Xu X, Liu W, Zhang J, Kelly S. Integrating user voice in hearing care with focus on off-duty warfighter. Mil Med. 2021 Jan 25;186(Suppl 1): 709-15. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa307.
McCullagh MC, Ronis DL. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of hearing protection interventions for farm operators. BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 18;15:399. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1743-0.
McCullagh MC, Banerjee T, Cohen MA, Yang JJ. Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Audiol.2016;55 Suppl 1(0):S3-12. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1122239.
Kothe E, Ling M, North M, Klas A, Mullan BA, Novoradovskaya L. Protection motivation theory and pro‐environmental behaviour: a systematic mapping review. Aust J Psychol. 2019 Nov; 71(4):411-32. doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12271.
El Dib RP, Mathew JL, Martins RH. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD005234. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub5.
Reddy R, Welch D, Ameratunga S, Thorne P. An ecological approach to hearing-health promotion in workplaces. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(5):316-27. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1271467.
Natarajan N, Batts S, Stankovic KM. Noise-induced hearing loss. J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 17;12(6):2347.doi: 10.3390/jcm12062347.
Sliwinska-Kowalska M. New trends in the prevention of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Oct 20;33(6):841-8. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01600.
Tikka C, Verbeek JH, Kateman E, Morata TC, Dreschler WA, Ferrite S. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced
hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):Cd006396. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment questionnaire for screening ability in using technology for learning. Thailand: Office of the Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education; 2013 (in Thai).
Tantranont K. Hearing loss of workers and the use of hearing protective devices: case study in large food canning industry [master’s thesis]. [Chiang Mai, Thailand]: Chiang Mai University 2004. (In Thai).
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337: a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
Chee W, Lee Y, Chee E, Im EO. Practical guidelines for development of web-based interventions. Comput Inform Nurs. 2014 Oct;32(10):504-11. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000088.
Conner M, Norman P. Predicting and changing health behavior: research and practice with social cognition models. 3 ed. UK: Open University Press; 2015.
Chen M-F. Impact of fear appeals on pro-environmental behavior and crucial determinants. Int J Advert. 2016;35(1):74-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1101908.
Perawongmetha A. Oil spill reaches shoreline in eastern Thailand. 2022 Jan 29 [updated UpToDate; 2023 [cited 2023 July 8]. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/oil-workers-race-protect-beachesspill-off-thai-coast-2022-01-28/
Bonadonna R. On obedience: contrasting philosophies for the military, citizenry, and community [book review]. Ethics Int Aff. 2021;35(2):313–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679421000319 Review of:Kaurin PS, editor. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press; 2020.
Capa-Aydin Y, Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci E, Ceylandag R. The relationship between vicarious experience, social persuasion, physiological state, and chemistry self-efficacy: the role of mastery experience as a mediator. Psychol Sch. 2018;55(10):1224-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22201
Fauzan NS, Sukadarin EH, Widia M, Irianto I, Ghazali I. A systematic literature review of the factors influencing hearing protection device usage among industrial workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042934.
Anderson S. How fast should a website load in 2023? 2023 July 31 [cited 2023 July 26]. Available from: https://www.hobo-web.co.uk
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: The Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, Thailand Nursing & Midwifery Council has exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.
.png)
