Is Technology-Based Fall Risk Assessment Associated with Technology Acceptance Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults? A Cross-Sectional Study

Eunice Oladepe  Ojo; Boon Peng  Ng; Dahee Kim; Ladda Thiamwong

doi:10.60099/prijnr.2025.273063

Authors

Eunice Oladepe Ojo College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, USA.
Boon Peng Ng College of Nursing and Disability, Aging and Technology Cluster, University of Central Florida , USA.
Dahee Kim College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, USA.
Ladda Thiamwong College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, USA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2025.273063

Keywords:

Community-dwelling older adults, Fall risk, Fall risk assessment, Senior technology acceptance, Technology

Abstract

Compared to the general population, older adults experience more falls, negatively impacting their health and independence in the activities of daily living. They have many risks for falls, and there is a need to assess their risks using technology to determine appropriate interventions for them. The use of technology may lead to better outcomes in risk assessment and fall prevention. This study aimed to describe technology acceptance in community-dwelling older adults and examine the relationship between technology-based fall risk appraisal and senior technology acceptance. The study was conducted among community-dwelling older individuals in low-income settings in Central Florida. The Senior Technology Acceptance survey (n = 79) was used to obtain information about older adults’ technology acceptance. The Short Fall Efficacy Scale International which measures fear of falling, and the BTrackS Balance System, which assesses balance, were used for the fall risk appraisal. Participants were categorized into four fall risk appraisal groups based on their fear of falling and balance scores, including rational, irrational, congruent, and incongruent fall risk appraisal groups. A multiple linear regression adjusted for covariates was performed.

Results found that the average senior technology acceptance score was at moderate acceptance; 41.8% of participants had excellent, 49.4% moderate, and 8.9% low senior technology acceptance. A total of 44.3% had rational, and 17.7% had congruent fall risk appraisal. We found no significant association between technology-based fall risk appraisal and senior technology acceptance. This study shows that many community-dwelling older adults accept the use of technology, and senior technology acceptance was not significantly associated with fall risk appraisal, which indicates the need to support their use of technology, including making it accessible and using it in fall risk assessment. Additionally, senior technology acceptance was not significantly associated with fall risk appraisal. This necessitates using technology to improve fall risk awareness and considering other factors affecting senior technology acceptance besides fall risk appraisal.

References

World Health Organization. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. Updated March 17, 2008. Accessed February 5, 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563536

Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2022;17(1):1-13. doi:10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Older adult fall prevention. Updated May 12, 2024. Accessed December 1, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/falls/data-research/facts-stats/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/falls/facts.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Older adults fall data. Updated October 28, 2024. Accessed December 2, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/falls/data/index.html#cost-falls

World Health Organization. Falls. Updated April 26, 2024. Accessed February 5, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Risk factors for falls. Updated 2017. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/media/pdfs/STEADI-FactSheet-RiskFactors-508.pdf

Asai T, Oshima K, Fukumoto Y, Yonezawa Y, Matsuo A, Misu S. The association between fear of falling and occurrence of falls: a one-year cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):393. doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03018-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03018-2

Liu M, Hou T, Li Y, et al. Fear of falling is as important as multiple previous falls in terms of limiting daily activities: a longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1-9. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02305-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02305-8

Birhanie G, Melese H, Solomon G, Fissha B, Teferi M. Fear of falling and associated factors among older people living in Bahir Dar City, Amhara, Ethiopia- a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02534-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02534-x

National Institute on Aging. Older adults and balance problems. Updated September 12, 2022. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/older-adults-and-balance-problems

Cuevas-Trisan R. Balance problems and fall risks in the elderly. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2019;35(2):173-183. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.008

Kempen GIJM, Yardley L, van Haastregt JCM, et al. The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age and Ageing. 2008;37(1):45-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afm157

Carrick Institute. BTrackS balance tracking systems. Updated 2025. Accessed February 12, 2025. https://carrickinstitute.com/store/btracks-balance-tracking-systems/?

Sun R, Sosnoff JJ. Novel sensing technology in fall risk assessment in older adults: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:1-N.PAG. doi:10.1186/s12877-018-0706-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0706-6

Thiamwong L, Sole ML, Ng BP, Welch GF, Huang HJ, Stout JR. Assessing fall risk appraisal through combined physiological and perceived fall risk measures using innovative technology. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2020;46(4):41-47. doi:10.3928/00989134-20200302-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20200302-01

Thiamwong L, Huang HJ, Ng BP, et al. Shifting maladaptive fall Risk appraisal in older adults through an in-Home Physio-fEedback and Exercise pRogram (PEER): a pilot study. Clin. Gerontol. 2020;43(4):378-390. doi:10.1080/07317115.2019.1692120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2019.1692120

Chen K, Lou VWQ. Measuring senior technology acceptance: development of a Brief, 14-Item Scale. Innov. Aging. 2020;4(3):igaa016. doi:10.1093/geroni/igaa016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa016

Chen K, Chan AHS. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):635-652. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.895855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855

Feldwieser F, Marchollek M, Meis M, Gietzelt M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E. Acceptance of seniors towards automatic in home fall detection devices. J. Assist. Technol. 2016;10(4):178-186. doi:10.1108/JAT-07-2015-0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-07-2015-0021

Ha J, Park HK. Factors affecting the acceptability of technology in health care among older Korean adults with multiple chronic conditions: a cross-sectional study adopting the senior technology acceptance model. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:1873-1881. doi:10.2147/CIA.S268606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S268606

DeLange Martinez P, Tancredi D, Pavel M, Garcia L, Young HM. Technology acceptance among low-income Asian American older adults: cross-sectional survey analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e52498. Published 2024 Nov 22. doi:10.2196/52498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/52498

Schroeder T, Dodds L, Georgiou A, Gewald H, Siette J. Older adults and new technology: mapping review of the factors associated with older adults' intention to adopt digital technologies. JMIR Aging. 2023;6:e44564. doi:10.2196/44564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/44564

Gell NM, Rosenberg DE, Demiris G, LaCroix AZ, Patel KV. Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. The Gerontologist. 2015;55(3):412-421. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt166

Mace RA, Mattos MK, Vranceanu A-M. Older adults can use technology: why healthcare professionals must overcome ageism in digital health. Transl. Behav. Med. 2022;doi:10.1093/tbm/ibac070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac070

Ojo EO, Thiamwong L, Loerzel V. Experience using multi-technology for fall risk assessments among low-income community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2024:1-7. doi:10.3928/00989134-20241009-03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20241009-03

Balance Tracking System. BTrackS™ Assess Balance. Updated 2025. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://balancetrackingsystems.com/assess-balance/

Thiamwong L, Stout JR, Park J-H, Yan X. Technology-based fall risk assessment for older adults in low-income settings: Protocol for a cross-sectional study. JMIR Research Protocols. 2021;10(4):e27381. doi:10.2196/27381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/27381

Ojo EO, Thiamwong L. Recruitment strategies for a technology-based fall risk assessment research study among community-dwelling older adults during a global pandemic. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2024;50(9):18-23. doi:10.3928/00989134-20240809-05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20240809-05

Marques-Vieira CMA, Sousa LMM, Severino S, Sousa L, Caldeira S. Cross-cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international in elderly: systematic literature review. J. Clin. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2016;7(3):72-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcgg.2015.12.002

Balance Tracking Systems. BTrack software. Updated 2025. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://balancetrackingsystems.com/software

Levy SS, Thralls KJ, Kviatkovsky SA. Validity and reliability of a portable balance tracking system, BTrackS, in older adults. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther(2001). 2018;41(2):102-107. doi:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000111

Goble DJ, Hearn MC, Baweja HS. Combination of BTrackS and Geri-Fit as a targeted approach for assessing and reducing the postural sway of older adults with high fall risk. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:351-357. doi:10.2147/CIA.S131047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S131047

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Social distancing: keep a safe distance to slow the spread. Updated October 8, 2024. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/90522

Ng BP, Park C. Accessibility of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of Medicare beneficiaries. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E65. Published 2021 Jul 1. doi:10.5888/pcd18.210056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd18.210056

Thiamwong L, Xie R, Park JH, Lighthall N, Loerzel V, Stout J. Optimizing a technology-based body and mind intervention to prevent falls and reduce health disparities in low-income populations: Protocol for a clustered randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023;12:e51899. Published 2023 Oct 3. doi:10.2196/51899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/51899

Thiamwong L, Xie R, Park JH, et al. Levels of accelerometer-based physical activity in older adults with a mismatch between physiological fall risk and fear of falling. J Gerontol Nurs. 2023;49(6):41-49. doi:10.3928/00989134-20230512-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20230512-06

Thiamwong L, Xie R, Conner NE, Renziehausen JM, Ojo EO, Stout JR. Body composition, fear of falling and balance performance in community-dwelling older adults. Transl Med Aging. 2023;7:80-86. doi:10.1016/j.tma.2023.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tma.2023.06.002

Ng BP, Hawkins GT, Massey M, LaManna JB, Park C. Digital divide among medicare beneficiaries and the diabetes prevention program. Am J Prev Med. 2024;67(5):746-752. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.019

Chan DYL, Lee SWH, Teh P-L. Factors influencing technology use among low-income older adults: a systematic review. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e20111. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20111

Lee, C., & Coughlin, JF. PERSPECTIVE: Older adults' adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. JPIM. (2015);32(5), 747-759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12176

Bertolazzi, A., Quaglia, V. & Bongelli, R. Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review. BMC Public Health 24, 506 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5

Full GSA 2023 Abstract Book PDF, Innovation in Aging. 2023;7(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104