Development and Psychometric Testing of the Self-Management Difficulty Scale for Pregnant Nurses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2025.274914Keywords:
midwife, nurse, nursing management, occupational health, perinatal abnormalities, pregnant midwives, pregnant nurses, self-management, self-management difficulties scaleAbstract
Pregnant nurses are at high risk of perinatal abnormalities due to occupational hazards and face difficulties in performing appropriate self-management. To facilitate self-management among pregnant nurses, it is necessary to assess their difficulties. This study aimed to develop a Self-Management Difficulty Scale to measure self-management difficulties of pregnant nurses and evaluate its psychometric properties. The scale was developed in three phases: Phase I involved drafting the scale through literature reviews, panel discussions with experts, and pre-testing with pregnant nurses, resulting in 41 draft items that constituted self-management difficulties. In Phase II, a preliminary survey was conducted with 232 nurses from four hospitals in two Japanese cities to validate these items. Item and exploratory factor analysis were performed, and 28 items remained. In Phase III, a psychometric test was conducted with 172 pregnant nurses from 20 hospitals in 10 Japanese cities.
Results of confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the 28-item Self-Management Difficulty Scale consisted of 4 subscales: ‘duelling roles of a nurse and a pregnant woman’, ‘prioritising the foetus’, ‘unsure about management’, and ‘perceiving one’s limits’, and good construct validity. Additionally, concurrent and convergent validity, as well as the adequate reliability of the total and subscales, were confirmed. In conclusion, the Self-Management Difficulty Scale has both accepted validity and reliability. It can be used for screening perinatal abnormality risk, early intervention, and promoting self-management behaviours. Further study is required to validate the construct validity by various types, known-group technique, and predictive validity of this scale in other populations of pregnant women.
References
Women in work 2025 [Internet]. PwC. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.pwc.co.uk/services/economics/insights/women-in-work-index.html
Maternal employment rates [Internet]. OECD Family Database. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 14] Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/oecd-family-database.html
Women and men in Japan 2020 [Internet]. Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 14] Available from: https://www.gender.go.jp/english_contents/pr_act/pub/pamphlet/women-and-men20/index.html
Jiang Z, Chen J, Feng L, Jin M, Liu S, Wang L et al. Associations between maternal occupational exposures and pregnancy outcomes among Chinese nurses: A nationwide study. Reprod Health. 2023, 20(1):161. doi:10.1186/s12978-023-01704-x.
Corchero-Falcón MDR, Gómez-Salgado J, García-Iglesias JJ, Camacho-Vega JC, Fagundo-Rivera J, Carrasco-González AM. Risk factors for working pregnant women and potential adverse consequences of exposure: A systematic review. Int J Public Health. 2023;68:1605655. doi:10.3389/ijph.2023.1605655.
Japan Federation of Medical Worker’s Unions [Internet]. Working conditions of nursing staff report on survey results (2017). 2017 [cited 2025 Jun 14]. Available from: http://irouren.or.jp/research/eab06579253f4616e4732d51ff657db736ac4978.pdf
Hino M, Yano R. Self-management behaviours among nurses and midwives during pregnancy and associated factors: A cross-sectional study. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2024, 28(4):795-811.
Kim JH, Kim O, Cho M, Jeong H, Dan H. Associations of anxiety and fatigue with hazardous occupational conditions of Korean nurses in early pregnancy: A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2024, 30(4):e13232. doi:10.1111/ijn.13232
WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2016 [cited 2025 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912
Hino M, Takashima R, Yano R. Health management of working pregnant nurses: A grounded theory study. Nurs Open. 2024, 11(4):e2158. doi:10.1002/nop2.2158
Quinn P. A grounded theory study of how nurses integrate pregnancy and full-time employment: Becoming someone different. Nurs Res. 2016, 65(3):170–178. doi:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000157.
Lee H, Chang HE, Ha J. Nurses’ clinical work experience during pregnancy. Healthcare (Basel). 2020, 9(1):16. doi:10.3390/healthcare9010016
Hino M, Ebina Y, Yano R. Pregnant nurses’ occupational stress and associated factors: A comparative cross-sectional study with other healthcare workers, physical workers, and desk workers. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2025, 22(2):e70000. doi:10.1111/jjns.70000.
Rainbow JG, Dolan HR, Farland L. Nurses’ experiences of working while pregnant: A qualitative descriptive study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021, 124:104092. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104092
Ryan P, Sawin KJ. The individual and family self-management theory: Background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2009, 57(4):217-225.e6. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004.
Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Front Public Health. 2018, 6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007, 147(8):573. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010.
WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects (75th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, October 2024) [Internet]. World Medical Association. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/
Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology. 2018, 9(8):2207–2230. doi:10.4236/psych.2018.98126.
Cristobal E, Flavián C, Guinalíu M. Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ): Measurement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty. Manag Serv Qual Int J. 2007, 17(3):317–340. doi:10.1108/09604520710744326.
Stefana A, Damiani S, Granziol U, Provenzani U, Solmi M, Youngstrom EA, Fusar-Poli P. Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: Best practice guidelines for their development and validation. Front Psychol. 2025, 15:1494261. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494261.
Japan Academy of Midwifery. 2020 evidence-based guidelines for midwifery care guidelines committee of the Japan Academy of Midwifery. Jpn J Acad Midwifery. 2019, 33(Suppl):1–183. doi:10.3418/jjam.33s.
Inoue A, Kawakami N, Shimomitsu T, Tsutsumi A, Haratani T, Yoshikawa T, Shimazu A, Odagiri Y. Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire. Ind Health. 2014, 52(6):535–540. doi:10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114.
Yamazaki Y. Salutogenetic theory (a new theory of health) and the concept SOC (sense of coherence). Qual Nurs. 1999, 5:81–88.
Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
Eriksson M, Lindström B. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006, 60(5):376–381. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041616.
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments Version July 2019. COSMIN[Internet]. 2019. [cited 2025 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf#
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008, 6(1):53–60. doi:10.21427/D7CF7R.
Kayan Fadlelmula F. Assessing power of structural equation modeling studies: A meta-analysis. Math Educ Res J. 2011, 1:14–23.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001.
He J, Wang H, Chen X. Experiences and self-care of pregnant nurses with gestational diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2024, 23(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01679-x
Pedersen P, Momsen AH, Andersen DR, Nielsen CV, Nohr EA, Maimburg RD. Associations between work environment, health status and sick leave among pregnant employees. Scand J Public Health. 2021, 49(2):149-158. doi:10.1177/1403494820919564
Kader M, Bigert C, Andersson T, Selander J, Bodin T, Skröder H et al. Shift and night work during pregnancy and preterm birth-a cohort study of Swedish health care employees. Int J Epidemiol. 2022, 50(6):1864-1874. doi:10.1093/ije/dyab135
Francis F, Johnsunderraj SE, Divya KY, Raghavan D, Al-Furgani A, Bera LP et al. Ergonomic stressors among pregnant healthcare workers: Impact on pregnancy outcomes and recommended safety practices. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021, 21(2):e172-e181. doi:10.18295/squmj.2021.21.02.004
Brunner L, Chagnon Krief P, Probst I, Abderhalden-Zellweger A, Renteria SC, Vonlanthen J et al. A narrative review on factors associated with job interruption during pregnancy. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023, 36(3):303-323. doi:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02132
Shayestefar M, Asgari MR, Jahanfar S, Babamohamadi H. Adjustment strategies among Iranian pregnant nurses in continuing nursing care: a qualitative content analysis. BMC Nurs. 2025, 24(1):876. Published 2025 Jul 7. doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03538-3
Moschetti K, Brunner L, Abderhalden-Zellweger A, Probst I, Renteria SC, Vonlanthen J et al. Predictors of the return to work for pregnant employees on preventive leave: Patients from an occupational medicine consultation in Switzerland. PLoS One. 2024, 19(3):e0300686. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300686
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: The Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, Thailand Nursing & Midwifery Council has exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.





.png)

