Validation of Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Thai Version in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis

Main Article Content

Phichpraorn Youngcharoen
Suparb Aree-Ue
Yuwadee Saraboon


                 Pain catastrophizing is an important psychological factor influencing pain severity and disability in knee osteoarthritis, one of the most common musculoskeletal problems in older adults. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was developed in English to measure how catastrophizing impacts on pain experience but to date, no Thai version has been validated. The purpose of this study was to translate and examine psychometric properties of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Thai Version in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. This study included two phases. Phase 1 consisted of translating the instruments into Thai using the committee approach; conducting interviews to confirm their accuracy; and assessing content validity by expert committee. Phase 2 consisted of testing construct validity using convergent and divergent validities, and exploratory factor analysis; and examining internal consistency reliability. A convenience sample of 150 older adults with knee osteoarthritis was asked to complete the Numeric Rating Scale, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2-Short Form, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Thai Version.
                 The content validity index for item and scale level index confirmed its validity. Factor analysis indicated three factors, rumination, magnification, and helplessness, accounted for 65.97% of variance and were positively associated with pain intensity level and negatively associated with health status. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the total score and subscales were at an acceptable level. We conclude that the Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Thai version is a valid and reliable instrument able to be use for clinical or research purposes but encourage further testing with different samples by nurse researchers and others in different communities. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Youngcharoen P, Aree-Ue S, Saraboon Y. Validation of Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Thai Version in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis. PRIJNR [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 7 [cited 2022 Aug. 17];22(3):237-48. Available from:
Original paper
Author Biography

Phichpraorn Youngcharoen, PhD, RN, Lecturer, Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand



1. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2011 19(11):1270-1985.

2. Koolvisoot A. Arthritis: What should be done after the year of bone and joint decade? 2010. Siriraj Med J 2010 62:226-227

3. Koedwan C, Bun-in J, Terasombat C, Kuptniratsaikul V. The prevalence of knee OA in community-based elderly. Thai Journal of Physical Therapy. 2016 38(2):59-70.

4. Pitantananukune P, Surit P. Chronic pain management of older persons living in a community. Journal of Nurses’ Association of Thailand, North-Eastern Division. 2012 29(4):58-68.

5. Bansal D, Gudala K, Lavudiya S, Ghai B, Arora P. Translation, adaptation, and validation of Hindi version of the pain catastrophizing scale in patients with chronic low back pain for use in India. Pain Med. 2016 17(10):1848- 1858.

6. Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995 7(4):524.

7. Sinikallio SH, Helminen EE, Valjakka AL, Vaisanen- Rouvali RH, Arokoski JP. Multiple psychological factors are associated with poorer functioning in a sample of community-dwelling knee osteoarthritis patients. J Clin Rheumatol. 2014 20(5):261-267.

8. Helminen EE, Sinikallio SH, Valjakka AL, Väisänen- Rouvali RH, Arokoski JP. Determinants of pain and functioning in knee osteoarthritis: a one-year prospective study. Clinical rehabilitation. 2016 30(9):890-900.

9. Ikemoto T, Miyagawa H, Shiro Y, Young-Chang PA, Machiko A, Kenta M, Takahiro U, Masataka D. Relationship between biological factors and catastrophizing and clinical outcomes for female patients with knee osteoarthritis. World J Orthop. 2017 8(3):278-285.

10. Rayahin JE, Chmiel JS, Hayes KW, Almagor O, Belisle L, Chang AH, et al. Factors associated with pain experience outcome in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2014 66(12):1828-1835.

11. Somers TJ, Blumenthal JA, Guilak F, Kraus VB, Schmitt DO, Babyak MA, et al. Pain coping skills training and lifestyle behavioral weight management in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. Pain. 2012 153(6):1199-1209.

12. Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 468(3):798-806.

13. Hayashi K, Kako M, Suzuki K, Hattori K, Fukuyasu S, Sato K, Kadano K, Sakai T, Hasegawa Y, Nishida Y. Associations among pain catastrophizing, muscle strength, and physical performance after total knee and hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2017 8(4), 336–341.

14. Burns L, Ritvo S, Ferguson M, Clarke H, Seltzer Z, Katz J. Pain catastrophizing as a risk factor for chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Pain Res. 2015 8:21-32.

15. Sullivan M, Tanzer M, Stanish W, Fallaha M, Keefe FJ, Simmonds M, et al. Psychological determinants of problematic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Pain. 2009 143(1):123-129.

16. Meyer K, Sprott H, Mannion AF. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Psychosom Res. 2008 64(5):469-478.

17. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain. 1983 17(1):33-44.

18. Quartana PJ, Campbell CM, Edwards RR. Pain catastrophizing: a critical review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 9(5):745-758.

19. Sullivan MJ, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA, Keefe F, Martin M, Bradley LA, et al. Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain. 2001 17(1):52-64.

20. Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA, Hauptmann W, Jones J, O’neill E. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med. 1997 20(6):589-605.

21. Osman A, Barrios FX, Gutierrez PM, Kopper BA, Merrifield T, Grittmann L. The pain catastrophizing scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples. J Behav Med. 2000 23(4):351-365.

22. Van Damme S, Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Goubert L, Van Houdenhove B. A confirmatory factor analysis of the pain catastrophizing scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain. 2002 96(3): 319-324.

23. Yap JC, Lau J, Chen PP, Gin T, Wong T, Chan I, et al. Validation of the Chinese pain catastrophizing scale (HK-PCS) in patients with chronic pain. Pain Med. 2008 9(2):186-195.

24. Fernandes L, Storheim K, Lochting I, Grotle M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian pain catastrophizing scale in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 13:111.

25. Monticone M, Baiardi P, Ferrari S, Foti C, Mugnai R, Pillastrini P, et al. Development of the Italian version of the pain catastrophising scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Qual Life Res. 2012 21(6):1045-1050.

26. Cho S, Kim HY, Lee JH. Validation of the Korean version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Qual Life Res. 2013 22(7):1767-1772.

27. Youngcharoen P, Vincent C. Committee Translation Approach Combined with Cognitive Interviews: A Valuable Translation Method. Pacific Rim Int J of Nurs Res. 2016 20(2):91-94.

28. Furukawa R, Driessnack M, Colclough Y. A committee approach maintaining cultural originality in translation. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 27(2):144-146.

29. Nápoles-Springer A, Santoyo-Olsson J, O’Brien H, Stewart AL. Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations. Medical Care.2006 44(11):S21-30.

30. Lee J. Conducting cognitive interviews in cross-national settings. Assessment. 2014 21(2):227-240.

31. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Babin BJ, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2010.

32. Guillemin F, Coste J, Pouchot J, Ghézail M, Bregeon C, Sany J. The AIMS2‐SF. A short form of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 40(7):1267- 1274.

33. Aree-Ue S, Roopsawang I, Belza B. Self-regulation in older Thai women with self-reported knee osteoarthritis: A path analysis. J Women Aging. 2016 28(3):247-258.

34. Ren XS, Kazis L, Meenan RF. Short‐form Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2: tests of reliability and validity among patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 12(3):163-171.

35. McCaffery M, Pasero C. Teaching patients to use a numerical pain-rating scale. Am J Nurs. 1999 99(12):22.

36. Herr KA, Spratt K, Mobily PR, Richardson G. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain. 2004 20(4):207-219.

37. Pokpalagon P, Hanucharurnkul S. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the missoula-vitas quality-of-life lndex. Pacific Rim Int J of Nurs Res 2015 19(1):58-68.

38. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE;2012.

39. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997 314(7080):572.

40. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York NY: McGraw-Hill; 1967

Most read articles by the same author(s)