The correlations of tinea corporis or tinea cruris with symptomatic and asymptomatic tinea pedis and onychomycosis
Keywords:
Prevalence, Tinea corporis, Tinea cruris, symptomatic and asymptomatic tinea pedis, symptomatic and asymptomatic onychomycosisAbstract
Background: Dermatophytosis is a superficial dermatophyte infection . Studies have demonstrated correlations between tinea corporis or tinea cruris and concomitant fungal infections on other sites, but there are few reports about correlations with asymptomatic tinea infection.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of tinea corporis or tinea cruris in correlations with symptomatic or asymptomatic tinea pedis and/or onychomycosis.
Materials and methods: 150 patients from the Institute of Dermatology with fungal infections on the trunk or groins who were clinically diagnosed and mycologically confirmed. Symptomatic and asymptomatic tinea pedis, and onychomycosis were confirmed by KOH preparation and nail clipping.
Results: One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled in the study. There were 81 patients (54%) who had tinea corporis, 27 (18%) patients with tinea cruris, while 42 patients (28%) had both tinea corporis and tinea cruris. Among these subjects, there were 20 cases of symptomatic tinea pedis, 14 asymptomatic tinea pedis, 11 symptomatic onychomycosis and 7 cases with normal target toenail but showed positive culture for fungus. Concomitant tinea corporis and tinea cruris were found in 28% of the study group (p<0.001). Concomitant tinea pedis and onychomycosis were identified in 3.33% (p = 0.008). Asymptomatic tinea pedis were also identified in 4.7 % of patients with tinea corporis and tinea cruris (p = 0.003). The presence of asymptomatic nail infection was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: It is advisable, therefore, to examine the feet and toenails of all proven cases of tinea on the body and groins for possible concomitant foot infection. However, whether it is necessary to treat all asymptomatic cases need to be further debated.
References
Rebell G, Zaias N. Introducing the syndromes of human dermatophytosis. Cutis 2001; 67: 6-17.
Shannon V, Michel H. Superficial fungal infection: dermatophytosis, onychomycosis, tinea nigra, piedra. In Wolff K, Goldsmith LA, Datz SI, Glichrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine. 7th ed. McGrawHill; 2008. p. 1807-21.
Walling HW. Subclinical onychomycosis is associated with tinea pedis. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161: 746-9.
Hull PR, Gupta AK, Summerball RC. Onychomycosis: an evaluation of three sampling methods. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 1015-7.
English MP. Nail and fungi. Br J Dermatol 1976; 94: 697-701.
Aly R. Ecology and epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31: S21-5.
Daniel CR 3rd, Jellinek NJ. The pedal fungus reservoir. Arch Dermatol. 2006; 142: 1344-6.
Lim JW, Suh MK, Ha GY. The frequency of tinea pedis in patient with tinea cruris. Korean J Med Mycol 2007; 12: 1-8.
Tosti A, Piraccini M, Lorenzi S. Onychomycosis caused by nondermatophytic molds: clinical features and response to treatment of 59 cases. J Am AcadDermatol 2000; 42: 217–24.
Xavier AP, Oliveira JC, Ribeiro VL, Souza MA. Epidemiological aspects of patients with ungual and cutaneous lesions caused by Scytalidium spp. An Bras Dermatol 2010; 85:805-10.
Ungpakorn R. Mycoses in Thailand: current concerns. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 2005; 46: 81-6.
Gupta AK, Ryder JE, Baran B, Summerbell RC. Non-dermatophyte onychomycosis. Dermatol Clin 2003; 21: 257–68.
Weinberg JM, Koestenblatt EK, Tutrone WD, Tishler HR, Najarian L. Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 193–7.
Baudraz-Rosselet F, Ruffieux C, Lurati M, Bontems O, Monod M. Onychomycosis insensitive to systemic terbinafine and azole treatments reveals non-dermatophyte moulds as infectious agents. Dermatology 2010; 220:164–8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Thai Journal of Dermatology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารโรคผิวหนัง ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย หรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใดๆ
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารโรคผิวหนัง ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารฯ หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใดๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักอักษรจากบรรณาธิการวารสารโรคผิวหนังก่อนเท่านั้น