A comparison of prednisolone plus oral azathioprine or oral cyclophosphamide versus prednisolone alone for the treatment of mild pemphigus

Authors

  • Proadpran NaSongkhla IMMUNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY, BANGKOK, THAILAND
  • Oraya Kwangsukstid IMMUNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY, BANGKOK, THAILAND

Keywords:

Pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, prednisolone ABIS skin score

Abstract

Background: Pemphigus is a rare bullous autoimmune disorder. Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy and are usually given in combination with adjuvant immunosuppressive agents to reduce the cumulative corticosteroids dose and adverse effects, however there is no controlled studies on individual therapeutic regimens in mild pemphigus.

Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy, safety and corticosteroids-sparing effect of oral cyclophosphamide or azathioprine for the treatment of mild pemphigus.

Material and Methods: A prospective randomized non-blinded experimental study 22 patients with mild pemphigus. They were randomized in to 2 groups, 11 for each by simple randomization method. The first group were received daily oral prednisolone alone. The second group were received daily oral prednisolone plus oral cyclophosphamide or azathioprine. At each follow up visit, the prednisolone dosage was subsequently reduced until discontinue followed by 6 and  12 weeks  follow up to measure number of patients who achieve complete remission, time to achieve  remission, recurrent and relapsing rate, cumulative prednisolone dose and side effects of the treatments. The number of new blister formation and level of anti-Dsg3 and/or anti-Dsg1auto-antibodies by ELISA method are used for evaluation.

Results: There were 22 patients included in this study, but 3 patients from the combined group were excluded due to their poor compliance. The remaining 19, 13 were female, 6 were male in 18-78 years of age (average 47.7 years). There were 7 cases with pemphigus foliaceus, 12 with pemphigus vulgaris and 2 of them have been treated with prednisolone. At the end of the study, the number of patients who achieved complete remission was 63.6% (7/11) in the prednisolone group and 75% (6/8) in the combined group (P = 1) correlate with the reduction of anti-Dsg 3 and/or anti-Dsg 1 auto-antibodies titers. The average time to complete remission in the prednisolone group were 255.14 (215 – 267 days) and in the combined group were 266.66 (266 – 267 days) (P = 0.125). One patient from the combined group had disease relapse between treatment. Three patients from the prednisolone group had disease recurred after stop treatment with average time 8.3 weeks. The average cumulative prednisolone dose were 2648.5 (1750 – 3600 mg) in the first group and 2300 (2100 – 2625 mg) in the combined group (P = 0.191). Acne, weight gain and cushigoid appearance were the adverse effects noted in both group. Hypertension, hyperglycemia and oral candidiasis were found only in prednisolone group. Nausea and vomiting were found only in combined group

Conclusions: The combination of daily oral prednisolone plus oral cyclophosphamide or azathioprine seems to have higher rate of complete remission, lower recurrent rate, longer disease free interval  and also demonstrate steroid sparing effect without serious adverse effects from immunosuppressive agents.

References

Stanley JR. Pemphigus.in:Wolff K, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, editors. Fitzpatricks dermatology in general medicine, vol.1.7th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill 2008. 459-68.

Bystryn JC, Steinman NM. The adjuvant therapy of pemphigus: an update. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:203-212.

Stanley JR. Therapy of pemphigus vulgaris. Arch Dermatol 1999;135:76-78.

Martin Pfutze et al. Introducing a novel Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Scores (ABSIS) in pemphigus. Eur J Dermatol 2007;17:4-11.

Vincent C. Ho, David M Zloty. Immunosuppressive agents in dermatology. Derm Therapy 1993;11:73-85.

Diya F Mutasim. Management of autoimmune bullous diseases : pharmacology and therapeutics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:859-77

Murrell DF, Dick S, Ahmed AR, et al. Consensus statement on definitions of disease end points and therapeutic response for pemphigus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58:1043-6.

Shin Wei Yeh , Sami N, Razzaque A. Ahmed. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris :current and emerging opinion. Am J Clin Dermatol 2005; 6: 327-42.

Malgorzata O, Zofia K-Strasz, Jadwiga S, et al. Efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and cyclosporine (Ciclosporin) as adjuvant drugs in pemphigus vulgaris. Am J Clin Dermatol 2007;8:85-92.

Beissert S, Werfel T, Frieling U, et al. A comparison of oral methylprednisolone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of pemphigus. Arch Dermatol 2006 ;142:1447-54.

Cummins DL, Mimouni D, Anhalt GJ, et al. Oral cyclophosphamide for treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 35.

Chams-Davatchi C, Esmaili N, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Randomized controlled open-label trial of four treatment regimens for pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;57:622-8.

Martin LK, Werth VP, Villaneuva EV, Murrell DF. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64: 903-8.

Frew JW, Martin LK, Murrell DF. Evidence-based treatments in pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Dermatol Clin 2011;29:599–606.

Amagai M. Pemphigus family of disease: Gaspari AA, Tyring SK, editor. Clinical and basic immunodermatology 1st ed. Springer;2008. 739-49.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

NaSongkhla, P., & Kwangsukstid, O. (2026). A comparison of prednisolone plus oral azathioprine or oral cyclophosphamide versus prednisolone alone for the treatment of mild pemphigus. Thai Journal of Dermatology, 27(4), 273–283. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJD/article/view/282924

Issue

Section

Original articles