Articles The dental caries status according to diagnostic criteria of precavitated carious lesions compared to WHO recommended criteria.

Main Article Content

เรวดี ต่อประดิษฐ์
จันทนา อึ้งชูศักดิ์
มุกดา รุ่งรัตน์ธวัชชัย
คมสรรพ์ บุณยสิงห์

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the dental caries prevalence of samples who had been examined by WHO recommended criteria and precavitated carious lesion criteria. There were 1,553 samples at the age of 0-74 years old. Each sample was examined twice by the same examiner. Dental caries were recorded according to both criteria. When precavitated criteria were used, the prevalence of dental caries were 7.5% and 12.0% higher than measured by WHO criteria in primary and permanent teeth respectively. The precavitated teeth among age groups were 0.5-2.8 teeth per person. Although the WHO criteria provided a high reliability, the caries detection was under estimated, and provided a very limited prediction for prevention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
ต่อประดิษฐ์ เ, อึ้งชูศักดิ์ จ, รุ่งรัตน์ธวัชชัย ม, บุณยสิงห์ ค. Articles The dental caries status according to diagnostic criteria of precavitated carious lesions compared to WHO recommended criteria. Th Dent PH J [Internet]. 1999 Jun. 28 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];4(1):27-35. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThDPHJo/article/view/213949
Section
Original Article

References

1. Pitts NB. Diagnostic tools and measurements-impact on appropriate care, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 24-35
2. Nyvad B, Fejerskov O. Assessing the stage of caries lesion activity on the basis of clinical and microbiological examination. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 69-75
3. WHO Oral Health Surveys Basic Methods Third Edition, WHO, Geneva 1987
4. WHO Oral Health Surveys Basic Methods Fourth Edition, WHO, Geneva 1997
5. กองทันตสาธารณสุข กรมอนามัย. คู่มือการสํารวจสุขภาพช่องปากระดับจังหวัด ปรับปรุงครั้งที่ 1 พ.ศ. 2539
6. Fejerskov O, Manji F. Risk assessment in dental caries. In : Bader JD. ed. Risk assessment in dentistry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Dental Ecology; 1990. 215-217
7. Kingman A.,Selwitz RH. Proposed methods for improving the efficiency of the DMFS index in assessing initiation and progression of dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 60-8
8. Machiulskiene V., Nyvad B., Baelum V. Prevalence and severity of dental caries in 12-year-old children in Kaunas, Lithuania 1995. Caries Res 1998; 32: 175-180
9. Ismail Al. Clinical diagnosis of precavitated carious lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1997: 25(1):13-23
10. World Health Organization. Preventive Programme Planning Oral Health Services. WHO Geneva 1980
11. Ismail AI, Brodeur JM, Gagnon P. et al. Prevalence of non-cavitated and cavitated caries lesions in a random sample of 7-9 year old schoolchildren in Montreal, Quebec. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1992; 20: 250-255