Factors Influencing Injury Severity Scores Among War Casualties along the Thai–Myanmar Border: Experience from Maesot Hospital (2020–2024)
Keywords:
Injury Severity Score, War Trauma, Emergency Surgery, Maesot HospitalAbstract
Background: In the context of ongoing armed conflicts and political instability in Southeast Asia, particularly along the Thai–Myanmar border, war-related injuries pose a significant public health challenge. These injuries are complex and have a profound impact on emergency medical care. Assessing the severity of war-related trauma is crucial for prioritizing treatment and guiding decision-making in trauma and emergency surgery. Therefore, this study aims to identify factors influencing injury severity scores (ISS) in war casualties admitted to Maesot Hospital, a major referral center along the Thai–Myanmar border.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using medical records of war-injured patients treated at Maesot Hospital between 2020 and 2024. A total of 212 patients were included and categorized into two groups based on their ISS scores: ISS <16 (n=53) and ISS ≥16 (n=169). Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with higher ISS.
Results: There was no significant association between sex and ISS severity (p=0.79). However, age was a significant factor, with patients aged 35–44 years being more likely to sustain severe injuries (p=0.04). Additionally, inpatient status was strongly associated with higher ISS (p<0.01), indicating that patients requiring hospitalization had more severe injuries.
Regarding injury location, multiple trauma involving multiple body regions was the strongest predictor of higher ISS (Adjusted OR = 9.69, 95% CI: 1.05–88.65, p=0.04). Conversely, head and neck injuries, abdominal and pelvic injuries, and upper limb injuries did not show significant associations with ISS severity.
Conclusions: and Recommendations: Key determinants of severe injury in war casualties include patient age, inpatient status, and multiple trauma affecting multiple body regions. These findings highlight the importance of these variables in predicting trauma severity and clinical outcomes. The study underscores the need for strategic resource allocation, optimized trauma triage, and improved surgical management protocols in conflict-affected border regions. Implementing ISS-based triage in battlefield trauma care settings could enhance patient survival and improve healthcare efficiency in resource-limited environments.
References
Ferreira C, Correia M. Surgical frontiers in war zones: perspectives and challenges of a humanitarian surgeon in conflict environments. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 May 23;9(1):e001234.
MacGregor AJ, Dougherty AL, McCabe CT, Watrous JR. Trajectory of self-rated health after combat-related injury. Injury. 2021 Jul 1;52(7):1721–6.
Stewart IJ, Sosnov JA, Howard JT, Orman JA, Fang R, Morrow BD, et al. Retrospective Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes After Combat Injury: A Hidden Cost of War. Circulation. 2015 Dec 1;132(22):2126–33.
Eidenbenz D, Gauss T, Zingg T, Darioli V, Vallot C, Carron PN, et al. Identification of major trauma using the simplified abbreviated injury scale to estimate the injury severity score: a diagnostic accuracy and validation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 29;33(1):13.
Factors influencing injury severity score regarding Thai military personnel injured in mass casualty incident April 10, 2010: lessons learned from armed conflict casualties: a retrospective study - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 25]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22214518/
Channel 3. Anti-junta forces and Myanmar soldiers flee to Thailand for treatment [Internet]. Bangkok: Channel 3 News; 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 26]. Available from: https://ch3plus.com/news/social/morning/396708
War Surgery: Working with Limited Resources in Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence, Volume 2 | International Committee of the Red Cross [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 25]. Available from: https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/4105-war-surgery-working-limited-resources-armed-conflict-and-other-situations-violence
Boonthep N, Intharachat S, Iemsomboon T. Factors influencing injury severity score regarding Thai military personnel injured in mass casualty incident April 10, 2010: lessons learned from armed conflict casualties: a retrospective study. BMC Emerg Med. 2012 Jan 3;12:1.
Van Ditshuizen JC, Sewalt CA, Palmer CS, Van Lieshout EMM, Verhofstad MHJ, Den Hartog D, et al. The definition of major trauma using different revisions of the abbreviated injury scale. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 May 27;29(1):71.
Anderson MK, Grier T, Dada EO, Canham-Chervak M, Jones BH. The Role of Gender and Physical Performance on Injuries: An Army Study. Am J Prev Med. 2017 May 1;52(5):e131–8.
Kim JG, Choi HY, Kang GH, Jang YS, Kim W, Lee Y, et al. Prognostic Association between Injury Severity Score and the Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Trauma in South Korea. J Pers Med. 2024 Jul;14(7):674.
Machaku D, Chambo M, Nkoronko M, Shadrack M, Sadiq A, Msuya D. Ocular, scrotal and abdominal trauma in a secondary blast injury. J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Mar 18;2023(3):rjad126.
Lueckel SN, Stephen AH, Monaghan SF, Binder W, Adams CA. Predicting Outcomes in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). R I Med J 2013. 2019 Oct 1;102(8):34–6.
Lamb CM, MacGoey P, Navarro AP, Brooks AJ. Damage control surgery in the era of damage control resuscitation. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Aug 1;113(2):242–9.
