Comparison of Epidural Steroid Injection between L5-S1 Retrodiscal Technique and S1 Transforaminal Technique in L5-S1 Spinal Stenosis with S1 Radicular Pain

Main Article Content

Sithapan Munjupong, MD
Wanwipha Malaithong, MD
Nattaya Udomsakdi, MD
Nuj Tontisirin, MD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of L5-S1 retrodiscal technique compared to S1transforaminal technique in L5-S1 spinal stenosis with S1 radicular pain management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blinded controlled trial wasconducted in 40 patients undergoing single-level lumbar epidural steroid injection underC-Arm fluoroscope. The tip of needle in retrodiscal group (R-group) was posterior toL5-S1 disc and the tip of needle in S1 transforaminal group (S-group) was in S1 foramen.All participants were followed up in 2 week, 2 and 3 months.

RESULTS: Twenty adults were enrolled and assigned in two groups equally. There wasno difference in demographic data. S-group had lower average VAS than R-group in 2and 3-month follow-up. Also, number of patients, who had at least 50% VAS reduction,was higher in S group in every follow-up. A comparison of the efficacy was defined byreducing 50 points of VAS (visual analog scale). p < 0.05 was considered as statisticallysignificant.

CONCLUSION: S1 transforaminal technique provided an advantage over L5-S1retrodiscal technique in reducing S1 radicular pain. (Clinicaltrials.in.th. number, TCTR20150127001 )

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Munjupong S, Malaithong W, Udomsakdi N, Tontisirin N. Comparison of Epidural Steroid Injection between L5-S1 Retrodiscal Technique and S1 Transforaminal Technique in L5-S1 Spinal Stenosis with S1 Radicular Pain. BKK Med J [Internet]. 2017Feb.20 [cited 2020Jul.15];13(1):31. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bkkmedj/article/view/221778
Section
Original Article

References

1. Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Singh V, et al. Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2009;12: 699-802.
2. Slipman CW, Chow DW. Therapeutic spinal cortico-steroid injections for the management of radiculopathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2002;13:697-711.
3. Lew HL, Coelho P, Chou LH. Preganglionic approach to transformational epidural steroid injections. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:378. 4. Bogduk N, Aprill C, Derby R. Selective Nerve Root Blocks. In: Wilson DJ (ed).Interventional Radiology of the Musculoskeletal System.Edward Arnold, Lon- don, 1995;10:121-32.
4. Bogduk N, Aprill C, Derby R. Epidural Steroid Injections. In: White AH (ed). Spine Care, Volume One: Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment. Mosby, St. Louis, 1995;22:322-43.
5. Botwin KP, Gruber RD, Bouchlas CG, et al. Fluoroscopically guided lumbar transformational epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar stenosis: An outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:898-905.
6. Kim C, Choi HE, Kang S. Contrast spreadin patterns in retrodiscal transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36: 474-9.
7. Furman MB, Butler SP, Kim RE, et al. Injectate volumes needed to reach specific landmarks in S1 transforaminal epidural injections. Pain Medicine 2012;13(10):1265-74.
8. Furman MB, Mehta AR, Kim RE, et al. Injectate volumes needed to reach specific landmarks in lumbar transforaminal epidural injections. PM&R 2010;2(7):625-35. 10. Furman MB, Lee TS, Mehta A, et al. Contrast flow selectivity during transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injections.Pain Physician 2008;11(6):855-61.
9. Lee IS, Kim SH, Lee JW, et al. Comparison of the temporary diagnostic relief of transforaminal epidural steroid injection approaches: conventional versus posterolateral technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:204-8.