Evaluation of the Antioxidant Activity, Collagen Synthesis and Stability of Bright and Firm hybrid emulsion I

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Sep 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31524/bkkmedj.2019.09.008
Keywords:
bright and firm hybrid emulsion I, antioxidant activity, collagen synthesis, 168 The Bangkok Medical Journal Vol. 15, No. 2; September 2019 ISSN 2287-0237 (online)/ 2228-9674 (print) stability

Main Article Content

Sitthiphon Bunman, MSc
Pannee Chinjarernpan, PhD
Sirawit Stitsmith, MD
Apicha Jabsuwan, MSc
Sanghyun Kim, MSc

Abstract













OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate antioxidant activity, collagen synthesis, and stability of bright and firm hybrid emulsion I.


MATERIAL AND METHODS: The stability was evaluated by pH test, heating and cooling test, and microbial growth test. The antioxidant activity was evaluated by 2,2′-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method, 2,2-Azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline- 6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) method, and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) method. Histological analysis was stained with Masson’s trichrome and evaluated for collagen synthesis on days 28.


RESULT: Bright and firm hybrid emulsion I had antioxidant activity and was stable under room temperature. Histological analysis was performed on day 28. Bright and firm hybrid emulsion I increased collagen synthesis when compared with the control group.


CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that bright and firm hybrid emulsion I has antioxidant effect, increases collagen synthesis and stabilizes under room temperature.













Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Bunman S, Chinjarernpan P, Stitsmith S, Jabsuwan A, Kim S. Evaluation of the Antioxidant Activity, Collagen Synthesis and Stability of Bright and Firm hybrid emulsion I. BKK Med J [Internet]. 2019 Sep. 20 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];15(2):168. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bkkmedj/article/view/222824
Issue
Vol. 15 No. 2 (2019): September
Section
Original Article

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

1. Wilkinson JM, Stanley D. Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: a comparative anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10(4):380-2.
2. Dakouré PW, Ndiaye A, Ndoye JM, et al. Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: a simple method of comparison of the articular exposure. Surg Radiol Anat2007;29(8):671-4.
3. Pollock JW, Athwal GS, Steinmann SP. Surgical exposures for distal humerus fractures: a review. Clin Anat 2008;21(8):757-68.
4. Ring D, Gulotta L, Chin K, et al. Olecranon osteotomy for exposure of fractures and nonunions of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18(7):446-9.
5. O’Driscoll SW. The triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle (TRAP) approach for distal humeral fractures and nonunions. Orthop Clin North Am 2000;31(1):91-101.
6. Özer H, Solak S, Turanli S, et al. Intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus treated with the triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125(7):469-74.
7. Sachdev S, Shah K, Mehta M, et al. The comparison of triceps reflecting anconeus pedicle and olecranon osteotomy approaches in the treatment of intercondylar fractures of the humerus. Indian J Orthop Surg 2017;3(3):294-300.
8. Bryan RS, Morrey BF. Extensive posterior exposure of the elbow. A triceps-sparing approach. Clin Orthop 1982;166:188-92.
9. Van Gorder GW. Surgical approach in supracondylar “T” fractures of the humerus requiring open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1940;22:278-92.