Quality of life and Illness of Silicosis Patients

Main Article Content

Krittin Silanun, MD, PhD
Wisree Wayurakul, MD, MHSc
Werawut Pattanaworapong, MD
Kriengsak Mungtoklang, BPH


OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) and illness among silicosis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted among 125 silicosis patients aged between 29-79 years old. Four different tools were used in the study these included WHOQOL-BREF-THAI, Suanprung Stress Test-20 (SPST-20), peak flow metre and depth interview with the method of Feeling, Idea, Function, and Expectation (FIFE).

RESULTS: Approximately 80% of the silicosis patients can live life at a moderate to poor quality of life, and 83.2% of the silicosis patients had abnormal PEFR. In-depth interviews implemented with FIFE methods revealed that most of the silicosis patients are aware that silicosis is incurable but preventable. Additionally, it was known among workers that changing occupation might be necessary when diagnosed with the disease. Annual chest x-rays and medical checkup by physicians are considered to be the most practiced for silicosis patients. The relation between %PEFR and QOL showed low correlation (r = 0.05). In addition, the relation between %PEFR and stress level also showed low correlation (r = 0.07).

CONCLUSION: Four different tools may be considered to monitor silicosis amongst workers through home visits carried out by the residents’ local health assistants or nurses.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Silanun, MD, PhD K, Wayurakul, MD, MHSc W, Pattanaworapong, MD W, Mungtoklang, BPH K. Quality of life and Illness of Silicosis Patients. BKK Med J [Internet]. 2020Sep.25 [cited 2021Mar.2];16(2):158. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bkkmedj/article/view/242383
Original Article


1. National programme for the elimination of Silicosis [online] 2009. (Accessed at June 24, 2016 at https://www.ilo.org/ wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---safework/ documents/policy/wcms_118112.pdf ).
2. WHO. Silicosis available [online] 2010. (Accessed at January 10, 2010, at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/ fs238/en/
3. Chomsuan R, Tangkijthavorn O. Evaluation of national silicosis elimination program. Dis Control J 2008;34:271-9.
4. Annual report Diseases and health hazards of Occupational and Environmental 2014. Bureau of Occupational and Environmental [Internet]. 2014. (Accessed at August 12, 2016, at http://envocc.ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/situation/01_envocc_ situation _57.pdf.)
5. Surveillance system of Occupational and Environmental Disease 2015. Bureau of Occupational and Environmental [Internet]. 2014. (Accessed at August 12, 2016, at http://envocc. ddc.moph.go.th/contents/view/348.).
6. NIOSH hazard review: health effects of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Ohio, NIOSH; 2002. P.1-127.
7. Balmes JR. Occupational lung diseases. In: Ladou J, Harrison RJ, editors. Current occupational and environmental medicine. 5th ed. United State: Mc Graw Hill Education; p.362-8.
8. Churchyard G, Ehrlich R, teWaterNaude J, et al. Silicosis prevalence and exposure-response relations in South African goldminers. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:811-6.
9. Akgun M, Mirici A, Ucar EY, et al. Silicosis in Turkish denim sandblasters. Occup Med 2006;56:554-8.
10. Adverse effects of crystalline silica exposure. American Thoracic Society Committee of the Scientific Assembly on Environmental and Occupational Health. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:761-8.
11. Sakthong P, Schommer JC, Gross CR, et al. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF-THAI in patients with HIV/ AIDS. J Med Assoc Thai 2007;90(11):2449‐60.
12. Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health. (2559). Suanprung Stress test- 20.[Internet].2016. (Accessed at February 2, 2016, at http://www.dmh.go.th/test/stress/
13. American Lung Association [internet]. 2016. (Accessed at March 13, 2016, at http://www.lung.org/assets/documents/ asthma/peak-flow-meter.pdf).
14. Bruce Ambuel. Patient-Centered Interviewing, 2nd ed. [Internet].2013. (Accessed at August 12, 2016, at www.mcw. edu/FileLibrary/User/jre hm/fastfactpdfs/Concept0 17.pdf).
15. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
16. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, et al. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006;60(6):631-7.
17. Liu HB, Yan B, Han B, et al. Determination of ameliorable health impairment influencing health-related quality of life among patients with silicosis in China: a cross-sectional study. J Int Med Res 2011;39:1448-55.
18. Prathapan S, Hettiarachchi P, Wimalasekara SW. Respiratory illnesses and ventilator function among gem cutters in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Med J 2013;58:29-31.
19. Tiwari RR, Sharma YK, Saiyed HN. Peak expiratory flow: a study among silica exposed workers, India. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2004;8:7-10.
20. Han B, Yan B, Zhao N, et al. The influence of the functional capacity on subjective well-being and quality of life of patients with silicosis. Aging & Mental Health 2013;17(6):707-713.
21. Dumavibhat N, Matsui T, Hoshino E, et al. Radiographic Progression of Silicosis among Japanese Tunnel Workers in Kochi. J Occup Health 2013;55:142-148.