The The Effect of Gauze-Based, Negative-Pressure Wound Dressing on Skin Graft Survival: A Comparative Study

Article Sidebar

Sarut Chaisrisawadisuk MD, FRCST
PDF
Published: Sep 25, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31524/bkkmedj.2020.21.007
Keywords:
Gauze-based; Negative pressure wound therapy; Skin graft

Main Article Content

SARUT CHAISRISAWADISUK
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Warakarn Tangjatuporn
Department of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
Apirag Chuangsuwanich
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the success rates of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) survival for gauze-based and foam-based Negative-Pressure Wound Dressing (NPWDs).


MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, prospective, cohort study was conducted to compare the STSG survival rates of gauze-based and foam-based NPWDs at Days 7 and 30 post-surgery. Sixty-nine patients underwent STSG and NPWD procedures. In all, 79 wounds required dressing: 42 had a foam-based NPWD applied, while the remaining 37 wounds had a gauze-based NPWD. Wall-suctioned, continuously negative pressure was applied at -100 mmHg for 7 days.


RESULTS: At Day 7, the median graft survivals of the foam- and gauze-based NPWDs were 89.74% and 87.63%, respectively. At 30 days, the median graft survival for the foam- and gauze-based NPWDs were 95.2% and 92.01%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the graft survival of the 2 groups. The success rate of graft survival for the gauze-based NPWD proved to not be inferior to that of foam-based NPWD.


CONCLUSION: Gauzed-based NPWD is non-inferior to foam-based NPWD in terms of STSG survival. Gauze can be used as an alternative NPWD for STSG immobilization.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
CHAISRISAWADISUK S, Tangjatuporn W, Chuangsuwanich A. The The Effect of Gauze-Based, Negative-Pressure Wound Dressing on Skin Graft Survival: A Comparative Study. BKK Med J [Internet]. 2020 Sep. 25 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];16(2):153. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bkkmedj/article/view/242545
Issue
Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): September
Section
Original Article

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Vloemans AF, Kreis RW. Fixation of skin grafts with a new silicone rubber dressing (Mepitel). Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1994;28(1):75–6.

Grabski WJ, Giandoni MB, Anderson LL. Surgical pearl: hydrocolloid dressings for full-thickness skin grafts. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32(2 Pt 1):273–4.

Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, et al. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997;38(6):553–62. 4. Llanos S, Danilla S, Barraza C, et al. Effectiveness of negative pressure closure in the integration of split thickness skin grafts: a randomized, double-masked, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006;244(5):700–5.

Scherer LA, Shiver S, Chang M, et al. The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving graft survival. Arch Surg 2002;137(8):930–3; discussion 3–4.

Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, et al. Skin graft fixation with negative-pressure dressings. J Dermatol 2003;30(9):673–8.

Azzopardi EA, Boyce DE, Dickson WA, et al. Application of topical negative pressure (vacuum-assisted closure) to split-thickness skin grafts: a structured evidence-based review. Ann Plast Surg 2013;70(1):23–9.

Dunn RM, Ignotz R, Mole T, et al. Assessment of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in the split-thickness skin graft clinical pathway-an observational study. Eplasty 2011;11:e14.

Vidrine DM, Kaler S, Rosenthal EL. A comparison of negative-pressure dressings versus Bolster and splinting of the radial forearm donor site. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133(3):403–6.

Chang KP, Tsai CC, Lin TM, et al. An alternative dressing for skin graft immobilization: negative pressure dressing. Burns 2001;27(8):839–42.

Psoinos CM, Ignotz RA, Lalikos JF, et al. Use of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in a pediatric burn patient. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44(12):e23–6.

Borgquist O, Gustafson L, Ingemansson R, et al. Tissue ingrowth into foam but not into gauze during negative pressure wound therapy. Wounds 2009;21(11):302–9.

Malmsjo M, Ingemansson R. Green foam, black foam or gauze for NWPT: effects on granulation tissue formation. J Wound Care 2011;20(6):294–9.

Fraccalvieri M, Ruka E, Bocchiotti MA, et al. Patient’s pain feedback using negative pressure wound therapy with foam and gauze. Int Wound J 2011;8(5):492–9.

Fraccalvieri M, Zingarelli E, Ruka E, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam: histological, immunohistochemical and ultrasonography morphological analysis of the granulation tissue and scar tissue. Preliminary report of a clinical study. Int Wound J 2011;8(4):355–64.

Fraccalvieri M, Zingarelli E, Ruka E, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam: histological, immunohistochemical and ultrasonography morphological analysis of the granulation tissue and scar tissue. Preliminary report of a clinical study. Int Wound J 2011;8(4):355–64.