Employee Motivation and Retention in the Emergency Medical Service System

Main Article Content

Kan Turapan, RN
Phonthip Geerapong, MSc
Panee Sitakalin, DrPH

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with employee motivation and retention in the emergency medical service (EMS) system.


MATERIALS AND METHODS: All of the participants were enrolled from 6 EMS centers. Participants were healthcare providers aged 20-59 years old working in an emergency department. The reliability of employee motivation and retention in the EMS system questionnaire had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93.


RESULTS: A total of 141 participants were recruited to participate in this study. The average age was 34.75 ± 7.67 years old. 69.5% were male, and 30.5% were female, respectively. 80.1% of participants worked at the emergency department for less than 10 years, and 22.7% had health problems. Age, marital status, educations, occupation, working hours per week, health problems, and medical scheme were associated with employee motivation and retention in the EMS system.


CONCLUSION: Age, marital status, educations, occupations, working hours per week, health problems, and medical schemes were related to employee motivation and retention in the EMS system.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Turapan, RN K, Geerapong, MSc P, Sitakalin, DrPH P. Employee Motivation and Retention in the Emergency Medical Service System. BKK Med J [Internet]. 2022 Feb. 26 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];18(1):12. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bkkmedj/article/view/254551
Section
Original Article

References

1. Lowery DS, Quest TE. Emergency medicine and palliative care. Clin Geriatr Med 2015;31(2):295-303.

2. Suriyawongpaisal P, Atiksawedparit P, Srithamrongsawad S, Thongtan T. Assessment of nationwide emergency systems in Thailand, a middle-income country setting with UHC. Int J Health Plann Manage 2019;34(2):e1346-e55.

3. National Institute for Emergency Medicine. According to the 2016 Emergency Medical Service Performance Statistics Report. 2016.

4. Phuekphan P, Aungsuroch Y, Yunibhand J. A Model of Factors Influencing Intention to Leave Nursing in Thailand. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research 2021;25(3):407-20.

5. Nantsupawat A, Kunaviktikul W, Nantsupawat R, Wichaikhum OA, et al. Effects of nurse work environment on job dissatisfaction, burnout, intention to leave. International Nursing Review 2017;64(1):91-8.

6. Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers RM. Employee organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover: Academic press; 2013.

7. Phaengkrathok W, Klunduang S. The work retention of back office personal in Khonkaen hospital. Journal of Khon Kaen Provincial Health 2020;2(2):231-46.

8. Giroux CR. The Motivation to work, by F. Herzberg, B. Mausner and B.C. Snyderman, John Wiley & Sons, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1959. Relations Industrielles-industrial Relations. 1960;15:275-6.

9. Wongrsksat S, Sutherasan S. Factors Associated with Prevalence of Needle Stick or Sharp Injuries among Nursing Personnel at Thammasat University Hospital. TUH Journal online 2016;1(1):26-41.

10. Chupan S, Khumyu A, Vatanasin S, Vatanasin D. Factors Influencing Intention to Stay in Career among Professional Nurses. The Journal of Faculty of Nursing Burapha University 2017;25(4):1-10.