Sonography and MRI Appearance of Proximal Long Head Biceps Tendon

Main Article Content

Thanis Saksirinukul

Abstract

This article delves into the intricate anatomical structure and diagnostic imaging of the proximal long head biceps tendon, shedding light on its complexities and pathologies. Employing both ultrasound (us) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the study illustrates the normal appearance of the tendon and explores detailed imaging findings for identifying abnormalities. The discussion encompasses tendinopathy, tears, biceps reflection pulley lesions, and superior labrum anterior-to- posterior lesions. By elucidating these aspects, the article aims to enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform treatment planning for a spectrum of conditions involving the proximal long head biceps tendon.


The proximal long head biceps tendon is a complex anatomical structure in shoulder imaging. Pathologies of the biceps tendon and adjacent structures, such as rotator cuff tendons and labrum, can affect treatment options and strategies. Secondary biceps tendon injury is more common than primary biceps tendon injury -biceps tendon injury is coexisted with rotator cuff tendon tear in 90% approximately. Diagnostic imaging as MRI is the preferred modality for visualizing all parts of the biceps tendon and detecting abnormalities. Ultrasound is also easily accessible and can provide good visualization of some parts of the proximal biceps tendon. This article discusses how to identify abnormalities on both MRI and ultrasound findings, for diagnosis and treatment planning. 

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Saksirinukul T. Sonography and MRI Appearance of Proximal Long Head Biceps Tendon. BKK Med J [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];19(2):128. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bkkmedj/article/view/264761
Section
Reviews Article

References

Panico L, Roy T, Namdari S. Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Ruptures: Biomechanics, Clinical Ramifications, and Manage ment. JBJS Rev 2021;9(10). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00092.

Zappia M, Chianca V, Di Pietto F, et al. Imaging of long head biceps tendon. A multimodality pictorial essay. Acta Biomed 2019;90(5-S):84-94. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i5-S.8351.

Jacobson JA. Shoulder US: anatomy, technique, and scanning pitfalls. Radiology 2011;260(1):6-16. doi: 10.1148/radi ol.11101082.

Vinson EN, Wittstein J, Garrigues GE, et al. MRI of selected abnormalities at the anterior superior aspect of the shoulder: potential pitfalls and subtle diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(3):534-45. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8789.

Petchprapa CN, Beltran LS, Jazrawi LM, et al. The rotator interval: a review of anatomy, function, and normal and abnormal MRI appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(3):567-76. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4406..

Motamedi D, Everist BM, Mahanty SR, et al. Pitfalls in shoulder MRI: part 2--biceps tendon, bursae and cysts, incidental and postsurgical findings, and artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203(3):508-15. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12849.

Kim JY, Rhee SM, Rhee YG. Accuracy of MRI in diagnosing intra-articular pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon: results with a large cohort of patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2654-5.

Nakata W, Katou S, Fujita A, et al. Biceps pulley: normal anatomy and associated lesions at MR arthrography. Radio graphics. 2011;31(3):791-810. doi: 10.1148/rg.313105507.

Schaeffeler C, Waldt S, Holzapfel K, et al. Lesions of the biceps pulley: diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the shoulder and evaluation of previously described and new diagnostic signs. Radiology. 2012;264(2):504-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112007.

Mohana-Borges AV, Chung CB, Resnick D. Superior labral anteroposterior tear: classification and diagnosis on MRI and MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(6):1449-62. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811449.

De Coninck T, Ngai SS, Tafur M, et al. Imaging the glenoid labrum and labral tears. Radiographics 2016;36(6):1628-47. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016160020.