10-year Surgical Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, A Single-Center Retrospective Study from Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective procedure for treating renal stones, particularly when the stone size is a staghorn stone or larger than 20 millimeters, or when it is between 10 and 20 millimeters in size and located in the lower calyx. Previous studies of PCNL have shown high stone-free rates (SFR) with minimal complications. Although previous studies have examined SFRs following PCNL in Thailand, the objective of this research is to expand the national database on PCNL outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes, including the efficacy and safety, of PCNL performed at Vajira Hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective descriptive study that enrolled patients who underwent PCNL at Vajira Hospital, Thailand, between January 2012 and December 2022. SFR was defined as a residual stone size of less than 4 millimeters on imaging. Perioperative bleeding and postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 203 patients underwent PCNL. Among these, the types of stones were staghorn (n = 96, 47.3%), small non-staghorn stones sized between 10-20 millimeters (n = 23, 11.3%), and large non-staghorn stones larger than 20 millimeters (n = 84, 41.4%). The median preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 84 mL/min/1.73 m² (range: 5-132). Preoperative UTI was present in 38.4% (n=78) of patients. SFR was 43.3%. Patients with non-staghorn stones had a significantly higher SFR compared to those with staghorn stones (56.1% vs. 29.2%, respectively, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in SFR between the small and large non-staghorn stone groups (p = 0.601). Postoperative GFR were comparable between the stone-free group and the residual stone group. Postoperative UTI and bleeding were recorded at rates of 13.8% and 8.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, SFR following PCNL was 43.3%. Patients with non-staghorn stones exhibited a higher SFR compared to those with staghorn stones. Additionally, the postoperative complication rates were considered acceptable.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Teichman JM, Long RD, Hulbert JC. Long-term renal fate and prognosis after staghorn calculus management. J Urol. 1995;153(5):1403-7.
Blandy JP, Singh M. The case for a more aggressive approach to staghorn stones. J Urol. 1976;115(5):505-6. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59258-7.
Koga S, Arakaki Y, Matsuoka M, et al. Staghorn calculi—long-term results of management. Br J Urol. 1991;68(2):122-4. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15278.x.
Vargas AD, Bragin SD, Mendez R. Staghorn calculi: its clinical presentation, complications and management. J Urol. 1982;127(5):860-2. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54109-9.
Constantinople NL, Waters WB, Yalla SV. Operative versus non-operative management of patients with staghorn calculi and neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 1979;121(6):716-8. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56965-7.
Wishahi M, El Feel A, Elkhouly A, et al. Concerns about stone-free rate and procedure events of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) for 2–4 cm kidney stones by standard-PCNL vs mini-PCNL: comparative randomised study. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):96. doi:10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1.
Xiao Y, Li Q, Huang C, Wang P, et al. Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2019;37(7):1441-7. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x.
El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating staghorn stones: 10 years of experience of a tertiary-care centre. Arab J Urol. 2012;10(3):324-9. doi:10.1016/j.aju.2012.03.002.
Ketsuwan C, Kongchareonsombat W, Sangkum P, et al. Perioperative renal calculus factors affecting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Thai J Urol. 2019;40(2):1-8.
Piamanant P. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the triangular technique, accessing the upper pole of the kidney through a subcostal incision for urinary tract stone removal. J Nakornping Hosp. 2025;16(1):93-107.
Ahmadmusa N. Treatment of renal stones by standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus modified mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Yala Hospital: a comparative study. Insight Urol. 2020;41(2):57-62.
Weerasawin T. Efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected Thai patients. Lampang Med J. 2022;30(3):115-21.
de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):11-7. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0424.
Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):146-58. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.016.
Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, et al. The Guy’s stone score—grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011;78(2):277-81. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026.
Omer Rashid A, Khalid H, Friad G, et al. Guy’s stone score as a predictor for stone-free rate and complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center report from a stone belt country. Urol Int. 2020;104(9-10):746-51. doi:10.1159/000506211.
Tefekli A, Esen T, Olbert PJ, et al. Isolated upper pole access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a large-scale analysis from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Urol. 2013;189(2):568-73. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.035.
Binbay M, Akman T, Ozgor F, et al. Does pelvicaliceal system anatomy affect success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urology. 2011;78(4):733-7. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.058.
Gücük A, Kemahlı E, Üyetürk U, et al. Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol. 2013;190(1):144-8. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.009.
Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1263-8. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0055.
Mariappan P, Smith G, Moussa SA, et al. One week of ciprofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study. BJU Int. 2006;98(5):1075-9. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06450.x.
Bag S, Kumar S, Taneja N, et al. One week of nitrofurantoin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study. Urology. 2011;77(1):45-9. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.025.