Effectiveness of 3-1-5 Model in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in Bangkok Heart Hospital

Main Article Content

Siwimon Koteruecha
Sroy Fourtunia
Kunyada Paochitkul
Patcharee Chantaruthai
Chamaiphan Wananusorn
Damras Tresukosol

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess treatment timeliness using the 3-1-5 model in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to identify factors associated with delayed reperfusion and adverse clinical outcomes.


MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adults (≥18 years) with STEMI undergoing primary PCI between June 2020 and December 2023. Patients who declined reperfusion, required interhospital transfer, or died before PCI were excluded. After Institutional Review Board approval, data were collected using a standardized case record form. Timeliness was assessed using the 3-1-5 model (≤ 90 minutes from first medical contact (FMC) to PCI). Outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day mortality and hospital readmission. RESULTS: Among 52 patients (mean age 59.83 ± 10.97 years; 88.46% male), FMC-to-device time ≤ 90 minutes was achieved in 69.23%. In-hospital mortality was 3.85%, with no mortality at 30 days or 6 months. Complications included cardiogenic shock (7.69%), arrhythmia, and intra-aortic balloon pump use (3.85%). Hospital readmission within 6 months occurred in 7.50%. The median door-in–door-out time was 35 minutes, exceeding the recommended 30 minutes. Delays were mainly attributed to system- and patient-related factors, including atypical or absent chest pain, delayed diagnosis, poor communication, and hemodynamic instability.


CONCLUSION: Although the key performance indicator (KPI) for achieving coronary reperfusion time within 90 minutes was not met, this study identified key contributors to treatment delays, particularly during the door-in door-out (DIDO) time. These delays were related to both system delay and patient delay. The door in door out interval is a critical early phase that directly affects timely diagnosis and subsequent reperfusion. System delay improvements in triage, diagnostic workflows and continuous training of healthcare personnel may help optimize this process and facilitate timely care across subsequent stages. In addition, enhancing public awareness of STEMI symptoms and the importance of early hospital presentation may reduce patient delay.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Koteruecha S, Fourtunia S, Paochitkul K, Chantaruthai P, Wananusorn C, Tresukosol D. Effectiveness of 3-1-5 Model in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in Bangkok Heart Hospital. BKK Med J [internet]. 2026 Feb. 27 [cited 2026 Mar. 2];22(1):23. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bkkmedj/article/view/276303
Section
Original Article

References

World Health Organization. Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD). 2021. (Accessed September 8, 2023, at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) .).

Kampa W, Puntuwet N. Ischemic heart disease [Internet]. Bangkok: Thai Noncommunicable Disease Network; n.d. (Accessed September 8, 2023, at http://www.thaincd.com/document/file/download/leaflet/%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%88%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%94%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%94.pdf ).

Sansanayudh N, Chandavimol M, Srimahachota S, et al. Patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world practice: insights from nationwide Thai PCI registry. J Interv Cardiol. 2022;2022:5839834. doi:10.1155/2022/5839834.

Kiblboeck D, Steinrueck K, Nitsche C, et al. Evaluation of the Manchester triage system for patients with acute coronary syndrome. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020;132(11-12):277-82. doi:10.1007/s00508-020-01632-x.

The Heart Association of Thailand under the Royal Patronage of H.M. the King. Thai Acute Coronary Syndromes Guidelines 2020. Bangkok: Nextstep D-Sign Limited Partnership; 2020. (Accessed September 8, 2023, at http://www.thaiheart.org/Thai-ACS-Guidelines-2020).

Leite L, Baptista R, Leitao J, et al. Chest pain in the emergency department: risk stratification with Manchester triage system and HEART score. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:48. doi:10.1186/s12872-015-0049-6.

Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e18-e114. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038.

Jneid H, Addison D, Bhatt DL, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC clinical performance and quality measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(10):e000032. doi:10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000032.

National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). CathPCI Registry Executive Summary Metrics eReports Dashboard[Internet]. 2020. (Accessed January 15, 2024, at https://cvquality.acc.org/NCDR-Home/Registries/CathPCI-Registry).

Swaminathan RV, Wang TY, Kaltenbach LA, et al. Nonsystem reasons for delay in door-to-balloon time and associated in-hospital mortality: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(16):1688-95. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.073.

Champasri K, Srimahachota S, Chandavimol M, et al. Door-to-device time and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insight from real world data of Thai PCI Registry. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023;13(5):843-54. doi:10.21037/cdt-22-611.

Jain A. TCTAP A-017 door to balloon time and causes of delay of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: a single center prospective study. JACC. 2019;73(15_Supplement):S9. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.043.

Sim WJ, Ang AS, Tan MC, et al. Causes of delay in door-to-balloon time in south-east Asian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0185186. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185186.

Inoue A, Mizobe M, Takahashi J, et al. Factors for delays in door-to-balloon time ≤ 90 min in an electrocardiogram triage system among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective study. Int J Emerg Med.2023;16(1):77. doi:10.1186/s12245-023-00562-5.

Tungsubutra W, Ngoenjan D. Door-to-balloon time and factors associated with delayed door-to-balloon time in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at Thailand’s largest tertiary referral centre. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(3):434-40. doi:10.1111/jep.13061.

Hsiao YT, Hung JF, Zhang SQ, et al. The impact of emergency department arrival time on door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Clin Med.2023;12(6):2392. doi:10.3390/jcm12062392.

Emami M, Mirzamohamadi S, Heidari A, et al. Evaluation of the causes of door-to-balloon time delays in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction at Tehran Heart Center. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2023;18(1):68-71. doi:10.18502/jthc.v18i1.12584.