Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Practical Overview for Clinicians
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has become an integral component of contemporary cardiovascular care, offering effective surgical treatment while reducing the physical and physiological burden associated with conventional median sternotomy. Through the use of smaller incisions, endoscopic visualization, and refined perioperative management, a broad spectrum of cardiac procedures can now be performed with safety and durability comparable to conventional approaches. These include coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral and aortic valve surgery, selected congenital heart defect repairs, and other intracardiac interventions.
This review provides a practical overview of minimally invasive cardiac surgery for clinicians involved in the diagnosis, referral, and longitudinal management of patients with heart disease. Key topics include the range of procedures amenable to minimally invasive approaches, fundamental principles underlying their performance, and critical considerations for patient selection. The clinical benefits of MICS—such as reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, and improved quality of life—are discussed alongside important risks and limitations that may influence procedural choice.
By emphasizing clinically relevant concepts rather than technical operative detail, this article aims to facilitate informed referral, shared decision-making, and effective multidisciplinary collaboration, supporting the appropriate integration of minimally invasive strategies into modern cardiac care.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Goodman LR, Kay HR, Teplick SK, et al. Complications of median sternotomy: computed tomographic evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141(2):225-30. doi:10.2214/ajr.141.2.225.
Shirke MM, Dominic C, Debnath P, et al. Computed tomography scanning for sternal wound infections: a systematic review. Ulster Med J. 2024;92(3):139-47.
Ailawadi G, Agnihotri AK, Mehall JR, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery I: patient selection, evaluation, and planning. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(4):243-50. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000301.
Wolfe JA, Malaisrie SC, Farivar RS, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery II: surgical technique and postoperative management. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(4):251-9. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000300.
Shimokawa T, Kumamaru H, Motomura N, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac surgeries in 2022: annual report by Japanese Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025. doi:10.1007/s11748-025-02225-z.
Aboul-Hassan SS, Luszczyn M, Stanislawski R, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Clin Med. 2025;14(21):7590. doi:10.3390/jcm14217590.
Sural S, Aslan V, Mutlu D, et al. Comparison of postoperative atrial fibrillation after total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy and conventional median sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025;12:1697113. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1697113.
Langer NB, Argenziano M. Minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery: incisions and approaches. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016;12(1):4-9. doi:10.14797/mdcj-12-1-4.
Buffolo E, Andrade JC, Succi J, et al. Direct myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;33(1):26-9. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1014076.
Magee MJ, Jablonski KA, Stamou SC, et al. Elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass improves early survival for multivessel coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(4):1196-202; discussion 202-3. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03587-1.
Ascione R, Angelini GD. OPCAB surgery: a voyage of discovery back to the future. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(2):121-4. doi:10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00698-x.
Day JR, Taylor KM. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome and cardiopulmonary bypass. Int J Surg. 2005;3(2):129-40. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.04.002.
Puskas JD, Martin J, Cheng DC, et al. ISMICS consensus conference and statements of randomized controlled trials of off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2015;10(4):219-29. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000184.
Reichenspurner H. The evolution of modern cardiac surgery and the necessity to change. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(2):79-83. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000253.
Arom KV, Emery RW, Flavin TF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(4):1562-6. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00962-5.
Arom KV, Emery RW, Nicoloff DM. Mini-sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(4):1271-2. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(96)81291-4.
Arom KV, Emery RW, Nicoloff DM, et al. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: experimental and clinical experiences. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(6 Suppl):S48-52. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00136-7.
Arom KV, Jotisakulratana V, Pitiguagool V, et al. Can surgeons do complete revascularization in diabetic patients using the off-pump technique? Innovations (Phila). 2007;2(1):1-6. doi:10.1097/IMI.0b013e3180313a05.
Ruengsakulrach P, Thupvong K, Pitiguagool V, et al. Mid and long term outcome and factors influencing survival after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14:154.
Ruengsakulrach P, Pitiguagool V, Pamornsing P, et al. Factors affecting graft patency and long-term survival outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;38(5):46.
Buxton BF, Raman JS, Ruengsakulrach P, et al. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125(6):1363-71. doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(02)73241-8.
Buxton BF, Ruengsakulrach P, Fuller J, et al. The right internal thoracic artery graft—benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;18(3):255-61. doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00527-3.
Ruengsakulrach P, Brooks M, Hare DL, et al. Preoperative assessment of hand circulation by means of doppler ultrasonography and the modified Allen test. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121(3):526-31. doi:10.1067/mtc.2001.112468.
Ruengsakulrach P, Brooks M, Sinclair R, et al. Prevalence and prediction of calcification and plaques in radial artery grafts by ultrasound. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(2):398-9. doi:10.1067/mtc.2001.114096.
Ruengsakulrach P, Buxton BF, Eizenberg N, et al. Anatomic assessment of hand circulation in harvesting the radial artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(1):178-80. doi:10.1067/mtc.2001.112821.
Ruengsakulrach P, Eizenberg N, Fahrer C, et al. Surgical implications of variations in hand collateral circulation: anatomy revisited. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(4):682-6. doi:10.1067/mtc.2001.116951.
Ruengsakulrach P, Sinclair R, Komeda M, et al. Comparative histopathology of radial artery versus internal thoracic artery and risk factors for development of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1999;100(19 Suppl):II139-44. doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.suppl_2.ii-139.
Comanici M, Bithi N, Raja SG. Comparison of outcomes between total arterial off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Am J Cardiol. 2025;249:43-50. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.04.007.
Ahmed M, Majeed K, Ali H, et al. Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025;57(2):463-77. doi:10.1007/s11255-024-04198-z.
Cappellaro AP, de Almeida LFC, Pinto ML, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;73(4):201-8. doi:10.1007/s11748-025-02116-3.
Ren Q, Li G, Chu T, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies with a propensity-score analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025;39(6):1365-74. doi:10.1007/s10557-024-07603-y.
Comanici M, Bulut HI, Raja SG. 10-year mortality of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Cardiol. 2024;219:77-84. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.03.019.
Banyatpiyaphod S, Arom K, Jotisakulratana V, et al. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft (TECAB) and multi-vessels small thoracotomy (MVST) CABG using Da Vinci robotic surgical system: an early experience at Bangkok Heart Hospital. Heart Lung Circ. 2007;16:S28-S9.
Ushioda R, Hirofuji A, Yoongtong D, et al. Multi-vessel coronary artery grafting: analyzing the minimally invasive approach and its safety. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1391881. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1391881.
Ushioda R, Hirofuji A, Yoongtong D, et al. The left axillary artery is a reasonable option as the inflow site for saphenous vein graft in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1397396. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1397396.
Watanabe S, Arayawudhikul N. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass to the left anterior descending artery using right gastroepiploic artery graft for a redo case with poor conduits. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;38(2):204-6. doi:10.1007/s12055-021-01285-z.
Van Praet KM, Stamm C, Sündermann SH, et al. Minimally invasive surgical mitral valve repair: state of the art review. Interv Cardiol. 2018;13(1):14-9. doi:10.15420/icr.2017:30:1.
Amin A, Kumar R, Mokhtassi SS, et al. Minimally invasive vs. conventional mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1437524. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1437524.
Holubec T, Kaiser P, Rashid H, et al. The 10 commandments for moving from direct vision to endoscopic mitral and tricuspid surgery safely. Innovations (Phila). 2025;20(6):517-22. doi:10.1177/15569845251386448.
Poffo R, Montanhesi PK, Toschi AP, et al. Periareolar access for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: the Brazilian technique. Innovations (Phila). 2018;13(1):65-9. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000454.
Durdu MS, Baran Ç, Gümüş F, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive cardiac surgery incisions: periareolar approach in female patients. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018;20(5):283-8. doi:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.37200.
Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Akansel S, et al. Periareolar endoscopic minimally invasive cardiac surgery: postoperative scar assessment analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(2):ivac200. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivac200.
Messika-Zeitoun D, Chu MWA, Bouchard D, et al. Clinical presentation and outcomes after surgery for mitral regurgitation: real-world insights from the MITRACURE international registry. Circulation. 2025;152(13):927-38. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.073674.
Shibata M, Kim K, Ono Y, et al. Risk of reoperation following rheumatic mitral repair: long-term longitudinal analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025:S0022-5223(25)00862-1. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.049.
Liu Z, Zhang H, Wang M, et al. Predictors and prognosis of mild regurgitation after rheumatic mitral valve repair: A dual-center cohort analysis on the basis of cardiac computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2026;171(2):385-397.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.07.043.
Dillon J, Yakub MA, Kong PK, et al. Comparative long-term results of mitral valve repair in adults with chronic rheumatic disease and degenerative disease: Is repair for “burnt-out” rheumatic disease still inferior to repair for degenerative disease in the current era? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(3):771-777; discussion 777-779. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.066.
Schaff HV. Mitral valve repair in patients with rheumatic heart disease: What are the limits? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(3):779-780. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.009.
Yasmin F, Jawed S, Najeeb H, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement in rheumatic heart disease: A high-value care systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024;49(6):102530. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102530.
Santos K, Campoverde Fárez C, Zecchin Ferrara V, et al. Comparative outcomes of right anterior minithoracotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2025;20(6):534-546. doi:10.1177/15569845251396471.
Glauber M, Ferrarini M, Miceli A. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: State of the art and future directions. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(1):26-32. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.01.01.
Di Bacco L, Miceli A, Glauber M. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(3):1945-1959. doi:10.21037/jtd-20-1968.
Reser D, Walser R, van Hemelrijk M, et al. Long-term outcomes after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery through right anterior minithoracotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65(3):191-197. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1587591.
Bonacchi M, Dokollari A, Parise O, et al. Ministernotomy compared with right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;165(3):1022-1032.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.125.
Gu W, Zhou K, Wang Z, et al. Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement: Techniques and early results. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1106845. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1106845.
Husen TF, Vidya AP, Heuts S, et al. Comparative study of different minimally invasive aortic valve replacement techniques: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025;40(11):ivaf244. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivaf244.
Kelpis TG, Pitsis AA. Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement with aortic annulus and root enlargement. Innovations (Phila). 2025;20(6):597-598. doi:10.1177/15569845251392478.
Yilmaz A, Claessens J, Packlé L, et al. Aortic valve replacement: Totally endoscopic versus mini-sternotomy. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7300. doi:10.3390/jcm12237300.
Ahmed M, Ahsan A, Shafiq A, et al. Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk. Int J Surg. 2024;110(12):8097-8106. doi:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
Böning A, Balaban U, Herrmann E, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic lung disease: An analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025;40(8):ivaf189. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivaf189.
Erdem S, Goel SS, Reardon MJ. Five-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgery in low-risk aortic stenosis: Insights from the Evolut Low Risk Trial. Heart Int. 2025;19(2):3-4. doi:10.17925/HI.2025.19.2.5.
Leon MB, Mack MJ, Pibarot P, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at 7 years. N Engl J Med. 2025. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2509766.
Wyss CA, Corti R, Nestelberger T, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with SAPIEN 3 versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk of surgical mortality: A cost-utility analysis for Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2024;154:3558. doi:10.57187/s.3558.
Hashiguchi H, Yasuda N, Ohkawa A. The TATEGIRI technique: Adaptation of a longitudinal aortotomy for totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025;20(1):363. doi:10.1186/s13019-025-03613-5.
Alsarraj MK, Nellis JR, Vekstein AM, et al. Borrowing from adult cardiac surgeons—bringing congenital heart surgery up to speed in the minimally invasive era. Innovations (Phila). 2020;15(2):101-105. doi:10.1177/1556984520911020.
Gupta S, McEwen C, Eqbal A, Haller C. Minimally invasive surgery for congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024;118(4):953-962. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.11.032.
Lo Rito M, Brindicci YCM, Moscatiello M, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for simple congenital heart defects: Preserving aesthetics without jeopardizing patient safety. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023;10(11):452. doi:10.3390/jcdd10110452.
Kiraly L, Aye WMM, Subbian SK, et al. Minimal incision and less invasive techniques in congenital cardiac surgery: A narrative review. Pediatr Med. 2024;7:14. doi:10.21037/pm-23-15.
Lamelas J, Aberle C, Macias AE, et al. Cannulation strategies for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2020;15(3):261-269. doi:10.1177/1556984520911917.
Lei YQ, Liu JF, Xie WP, et al. Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for the surgical treatment of atrial septal defects: A meta-analysis and systematic review. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):266. doi:10.1186/s13019-021-01648-y.
Dodge-Khatami J, Dodge-Khatami A, Nguyen TD, et al. Minimal invasive approaches for pediatric and congenital heart surgery: Safe, reproducible, more cosmetic than through sternotomy, and here to stay. Transl Pediatr. 2023;12(9):1744-1752. doi:10.21037/tp-23-282.
Youssef SJ, Millan JA, Youssef GM, et al. The role of computed tomography angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: An early program experience. Innovations (Phila). 2015;10(1):33-38. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000126.
Falk V, Cheng DC, Martin J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: A consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6(2):66-76. doi:10.1097/IMI.0b013e318216be5c.
Salamate S, Bakhtiary F, Bayram A, et al. Endoscopic minimally invasive approach versus median sternotomy for multiple-valve surgery: A propensity-matched analysis. Adv Ther. 2025;42(1):261-279. doi:10.1007/s12325-024-03008-3.
Naito N, Takagi H. Comparison of endoaortic balloon occlusion and transthoracic aortic clamp for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Angiol. 2025;34(3):176-190. doi:10.1055/a-2572-1060.
Chan EY, Lumbao DM, Iribarne A, et al. Evolution of cannulation techniques for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: A 10-year journey. Innovations (Phila). 2012;7(1):9-14. doi:10.1097/IMI.0b013e318253369a.
Ceresa F, Mammana LF, Leonardi A, et al. Virtually wall-less versus standard thin-wall venous cannula in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: Single-center experience. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(7):1221. doi:10.3390/medicina59071221.
Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Meyer A, et al. Single-center experience with a self-expandable venous cannula during minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2022;17(6):491-498. doi:10.1177/15569845221131534.
Kirov H, Caldonazo T, Runkel A, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical femoral cannulation in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2024;19(3):247-253. doi:10.1177/15569845241241534.
Nishijima T, Ushijima T, Fuke Y, et al. Cannula to femoral artery diameter ratio predicts potential lower-limb ischemia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery with femoral cannulation. Innovations (Phila). 2024;19(2):161-168. doi:10.1177/15569845241237212.
Wisneski AD, Nguyen TC. Myocardial protection in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: Evolved techniques for the new era of cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2022;17(2):88-91. doi:10.1177/15569845221082546.
Salenger R, Ad N, Grant MC, et al. Maximizing minimally invasive cardiac surgery with enhanced recovery (ERAS). Innovations (Phila). 2024;19(4):371-379. doi:10.1177/15569845241264565.
Goecke S, Pitts L, Dini M, et al. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery for minimally invasive valve surgery: A systematic review of key elements and advancements. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(3):495. doi:10.3390/medicina61030495.
Kruse J, Krasny I, Hamiko M, et al. Enhanced recovery after minimally invasive valve surgery: Ultra-fast extubation versus standard weaning strategy. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):35048. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21830-9.
Verevkin A, Dashkevich A, Gadelkarim I, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior minithoracotomy: Setup, results, and evolution of a new surgical procedure. JTCVS Tech. 2025;29:28-39. doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.10.022.
Diegeler A, Matin M, Falk V, et al. Indication and patient selection in minimally invasive and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16 Suppl 1:S79-S82. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00194-3.
Burns DJP, Wierup P, Gillinov M. Minimally invasive mitral surgery: Patient selection and technique. Cardiol Clin. 2021;39(2):211-220. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2021.01.003.
Malik MI, Loshusan B, Chu MWA. Learning curve analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair. Innovations (Phila). 2025;20(3):297-303. doi:10.1177/15569845251337406.
Holmes SD, Fornaresio LM, Shuman DJ, et al. Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(2):128-133. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000255.
Shamaz H, Ali J. Shaping the future of cardiac surgery: The rise of minimal-access techniques. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025;12(10):402. doi:10.3390/jcdd12100402.
Ceresa F, Sansone F, Patanè F. Role of preoperative femoral artery color Doppler echocardiography in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2012;7(6):441-444. doi:10.1177/155698451200700612.
Castillo-Sang M, Bartone C, Palmer C, et al. Fifty percent reduction in narcotic use after minimally invasive cardiac surgery using liposomal bupivacaine. Innovations (Phila). 2019;14(6):512-518. doi:10.1177/1556984519874030.
Gregory AJ, Noss CD, Kent WDT, et al. The 7 pillars of pain management for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2025;20(4):331-335. doi:10.1177/15569845251358225.
Wilbring M. Advancing minimally invasive cardiac surgery—let’s take a look into the future. J Clin Med. 2025;14(3):904. doi:10.3390/jcm14030904.
Celmeta B, Viva T, Bisogno A, et al. Detachable aortic clamp for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2023;42:196-202. doi:10.52198/23.STI.42.CV1675.
Kishimoto N, Takahashi Y, Kawase T, et al. A novel ring knot pusher with closed triangle tip for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2022;17(4):339-342. doi:10.1177/15569845221109859.
Issa HMN, Parisi A, Goubran D, et al. The 10 commandments of robotic bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting. Innovations (Phila). 2025;20(6):511-516. doi:10.1177/15569845251350280.
Miller CL, Zwischenberger BA. Minimally invasive surgical coronary artery bypass in women. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;12(6):596-605. doi:10.21037/acs-2023-adw-15.
Yasumoto Y, Nakamura Y, Tamagawa K, et al. CT-based evaluation of thoracic anatomy in AS versus AR patients undergoing MIAVR. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025. doi:10.1007/s11748-025-02223-1.
Raja SG. New clinical advances in minimally invasive coronary surgery. J Clin Med. 2025;14(9):3142. doi:10.3390/jcm14093142.
