Effects of Light- and Sound-Reduction Incubator Cover on Duration of Sleep in Premature Infants A Randomized Controlled Trial

Main Article Content

Piyanuch Hirunpoem
Nisakorn Waidab
Siriporn Wetprasit

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the average sleep duration (total sleep, deep sleep, and active sleep) in premature infants, the light and noise in incubators between the groups using light- and sound-reduction incubator cover and conventional incubator cover.              


Design: Randomized controlled trial study, a two-group posttest-only design.


Methods: Convenience sampling was used to select 36 preterm infants who were 32-37 weeks post menstrual age, weighed between 1,400-2,500 grams, and were cared for in incubators. The samples were randomly assigned to the experimental and the control groups using the blocked randomization technique with block sizes of 4. The instruments used in the research consisted of two parts: the experimental instruments including a light- and sound-reduction incubator cover and a conventional incubator cover, and the data collection instruments including 1) demographic infant data record form, 2) sleep-wake behaviors of premature infant record form, 3) light brightness record form, and 4) sound loudness record form. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, independent t-test, and Mann Whitney U test were used for data analysis.


Main findings: The study showed that the duration of total sleep and deep sleep of premature infants using the light- and sound-reduction incubator cover were significantly longer than those using the conventional incubator cover (p < .05); and the active sleep of premature infants in both types of incubator covers were not significantly different (p > .05). The level of light and noise in incubators while using the light- and sound-reduction incubator cover was significantly lower than that while using the conventional incubator cover (p < .05).


Conclusion and recommendations: According to the study findings, the light- and sound-reduction incubator cover could increase the duration of total and deep sleep for premature infants. It can also help reduce light and sound levels in the incubator. Therefore, the use of light- and sound-reduction incubator cover should be promoted for sleep quality in premature infants.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hirunpoem, P., Waidab, N. ., & Wetprasit, S. . (2023). Effects of Light- and Sound-Reduction Incubator Cover on Duration of Sleep in Premature Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nursing Science Journal of Thailand, 41(3), 64–78. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ns/article/view/261699
Section
Research Papers

References

March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. 112 p.

The Medical Record and Statistics of Labor Room. Annual report. Bangkok: Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital; 2020. 12 p. (in Thai).

Almadhoob A, Ohlsson A. Sound reduction management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1):CD010333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010333.pub3.

Mindell JA, Lee C. Sleep, mood, and development in infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2015;41:102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.08.004.

Gardner SL, Goldson E, Hernandez JA. The neonate and the environment: impact on development. In Gardner SL, Carter BS, Enzman-Hines M, Hermandez JA, editors. Merenstein & Gardner’s: handbook of neonatal intensive care. 8th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2016. p.262-314.

Cirelli C, Tononi G. The sleeping brain. Cerebrum. 2017;2017:cer-07-17.

Hack M. The sensorimotor development of the preterm infant. In: Fanaroff A, Martin RJ, editors. Neonatal-perinatal medicine: disease of the fetus and infant. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. p.759-81.

Santos J, Carvalhais C, Xavier A, Silva MV. Assessment and characterization of sound pressure levels in Portuguese neonatal intensive care units. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2018;73(2):121-7. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2017.1304883.

Edward AD, Austin T. Noise in the NICU: how prevalent is it and is it a problem? Infant [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 24];12(5):161-5. Available from: https://www.infantjournal.co.uk/pdf/inf_071_rev.pdf.

Cardoso SM, Kozlowski Lde C, Lacerda AB, Marques JM, Ribas A. Newborn physiological responses to noise in the neonatal unit. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;81(6):583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.11.008.

Duran R, Ciftdemir NA, Ozbek UV, Berberoğlu U, Durankuş F, Süt N, et al. The effects of noise reduction by earmuffs on the physiologic and behavioral responses in very low birth weight preterm infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(10):1490-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.001.

McMahon E, Wintermark P, Lahav A. Auditory brain development in premature infants: the importance of early experience. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1252:17-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06445.x.

Rea MS, Figueiro MG. The NICU Lighted Environment. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2016;16(4):195-202. doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2016.09.009.

Ludington-Hoe SM, Abouelfettoh A. Light reduction capabilities of homemade and commercial incubator covers in NICU. ISRN Nurs. 2013;2013:502393. doi: 10.1155/2013/502393.

Valizadeh S, Hosseini M, Jafarabadi M, Mirnia K, Saeidi F, Jabraeeli M. Comparison of 2 methods of light reduction on preterm infants’ sleep pattern in NICU: a randomized controlled trial. Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 10];4(4):211-6. Available from: https://www.cjmb.org/uploads/pdf/pdf_CJMB_57.pdf.

Sancak E. An investigations of sound absorbance properties of weft knitted spacer fabrics. Int J Acoust Vib [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Jul 10];20(1):36-40. Available from: https://iiav.org/ijav/content/volumes/20_2015_1570691426853784/vol_1/819_firstpage_1712101426853925.pdf.

Bai P, Yang X, Shen X, Zhang X, Zhu J, Yin Q, et al. Investigation on sound absorbing performance of the polyester fiber for noise reduction in large-scale equipment. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Apr 6];398(1):012004. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/398/1/012004/pdf. doi: 10.1088/ 1757-899X/398/1/012004.

Bernard R. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 5th ed. Duxbery: Thomson Learning; 2000. 792 p.

Thanacharoenpipat P. Effects of positioning on duration of sleep among premature infants [master’s thesis]. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2001. 62 p.

Topf M. Three estimates of interrater reliability for nominal data. Nurs Res. 1986;35(4):253-5. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198607000-00020.

Firmino C, Rodrigues M, Franco S, Ferreira J, Simões AR, Castro C, et al. Nursing interventions that promote sleep in preterm newborns in the neonatal intensive care units: an integrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710953.

Cailleau L, Weber R, Cabon S, Cailleau L, Weber R, Cabon S, et al. Quiet sleep organization of very preterm infants is correlated with postnatal maturation. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:559658. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.559658.

Georgoulas A, Jones L, Laudiano-Dray MP, Meek J, Fabrizi L, Whitehead K. Sleep-wake regulation in preterm and term infants. Sleep. 2021;44(1):zsaa148. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa148.

Puyana-Romero V, Núñez-Solano D, Fernández-Zacarías F, Jara-Muñoz E, Hernández-Molina R. The importance of reverberation for the design of neonatal incubators. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:584736. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.584736.

Kuhn P, Zores C, Langlet C, Escande B, Astruc D, Dufour A. Moderate acoustic changes can disrupt the sleep of very preterm infants in their incubators. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(10):949-54. doi: 10.1111/apa.12330.