Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Tibial Alignment Guides in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Radiographic Analysis

Main Article Content

Nitiphol Nualsalee
Charlee Sumettavanich

Abstract

Purpose: to evaluate the postoperative radiographic position of the TKA components and compare the difference in the accuracy of positioning of tibial components between Intramedullary guides tibia and extramedullary guides tibia.


Methods: An intramedullary guide was used in 50 cases and extramedullary guide was used in another 50 cases. A radiographic study was performed after 3 month of follow up to evaluate postoperative component position and compare the difference in the tibiofemoral angle and the tibial component angle between 2 groups.


Results: Radiographic analysis showed that satisfactory position was achieved using both types of instrumentation. No statistically significant difference was observed in the tibiofemoral angle. However the coronal plane positioning of the tibial component revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01), with intramedullary guides being superior to extramedullary guides. Both groups were within the percentage of outlier (< 3 degree varus). The mean surgery time and the drainage blood loss in intramedullary guides was more than extramedullary guides with statistically significant difference (p < 0.01).


Conclusion: Both techniques allowed satisfactory alignment. It is important for the surgeon to appreciate the benefits and deficiencies of each guide and to use whichever is suited most properly in each particular case.

Article Details

Section
Original Articles

References

1. Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Cross MB, Haddad FS. Alignment and fixation in total knee arthroplasty: changing paradigms. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(10 Suppl A): 16-9.
2. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 560-9.
3. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(12): 2143-9.
4. Nam D, Cody EA, Nguyen JT, Figgie MP, Mayman DJ. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(2): 288-94.
5. Meding JB, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Galley MR, Malinzak RA. Intramedullary vs extramedullary femoral alignment guides: a 15-year follow-up of survivorship. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(4): 591-5.
6. Maestro A, Harwin SF, Sandoval MG, Vaquero DH, Murcia A. Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13(5): 552-8.
7. Dennis DA, Channer M, Susman MH, Stringer EA. Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993; 8(1): 43-7.
8. Brys DA, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. A comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (263): 175-9.
9. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (321): 106-10.
10. Ishii Y, Ohmori G, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB. Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (318): 167-75.
11. Tillett ED, Engh GA, Petersen T. A comparative study of extramedullary and intramedullary alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (230): 176-81.
12. Barrett WP, Mason JB, Moskal JT, Dalury DF, Oliashirazi A, Fisher DA. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(8): 1273-1284.
13. Patil S, D'Lima DD, Fait JM, Colwell CW Jr. Improving tibial component coronal alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of a tibial planing device. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 381-7.
14. Talmo CT, Cooper AJ, Wuerz T, Lang JE, Bono JV. Tibial component alignment after total knee arthroplasty with intramedullary instrumentation: a prospective analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(8): 1209-15.