Factors Affecting Optimal Postural Reduction in Posterior Percutaneous Screw Fixation for Neurological Intact in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture

Main Article Content

Terdpong Tanaviriyachai, MD
Kongtush Choovongkomol, MD
Urawit Piyapromdee, MD
Weera Sudprasert, MD
Sarut Jongkittanakul, MD

Abstract

Background: Optimal reduction of kyphosis is a goal in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. Several factors are known to limit the amount of posterior surgical reduction. However, few comprehensive assessments of postural reduction in posterior percutaneous screw fixation have been reported.


Objectives: To determine the relevant factors affecting the optimal anterior vertebral restoration in the percutaneous posterior surgical treatment of neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fracture.


Materials and Methods: Seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent posterior percutaneous screw fixation for thoracolumbar fracture (T11–L3) burst fracture were included. The patients were divided into sufficient reduction group (postoperative anterior vertebral height correction; AVH ratio ≥ 80%) and insufficient reduction group (postoperative anterior vertebral height correction; AVH ratio < 80%). Clinical characteristics including sex, age, body mass index, time to operation, injury level, and intraoperative blood loss, as well as radiologic characteristics including fracture morphology, fracture deformity, canal stenosis, and fixation techniques were investigated to determine the relevant factors.


Results: The mean AVH of insufficient reduction group (n = 21) was 72.03±5.46%, and sufficient reduction group (n=56) was 90.45±6.48%. The relevant factors for insufficient reduction, as identified by univariate analysis, were time to operation > 7 days (OR, 12.19; 95% CI, 1.42-104.89), preoperative kyphosis ≥ 20o (OR, 6.25; 95% CI, 1.86-20.96), preoperative anterior vertebral compression ratio ≥ 0.5 (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 0.02-0.41), and preoperative canal stenosis ≥ 50% (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.63). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that time to operation > 7 days (OR, 9.28; 95% CI, 1.46-58.99), burst fracture type A4 (OR, 20.88; 95% CI, 1.08-402.02), comminution 30-60% (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0-0.44) and comminution > 60% (OR, 0.008; 95% CI, 0-0.37) were significant risk factors for insufficient postural reduction.


Conclusions: Insufficient postural reduction in posterior percutaneous screw fixation after thoracolumbar burst fracture affected by delayed operation time > 7 days, burst type A4 fracture and comminution more than 30%.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

1. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8(8): 817-31.
2. Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(20): 2325-33.
3. Zou D, Yoo JU, Edwards WT, Donovan DM, Chang KW, Bayley JC, et al. Mechanics of anatomic reduction of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Comparison of distraction versus distraction plus lordosis, in the anatomical reduction of thoracolumbar burst fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(2): 195-203.
4. Gertzbein SD, Crowe PJ, Fazl M, Schwartz M, Rowed D. Canal clearance in burst fractures using the AO internal fixator. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(5): 558-60.
5. Mueller LA, Mueller LP, Schmidt R, Forst R, Rudig L, et al. The phenomenon and efficiency of ligamentotaxis after dorsal stabilization of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006; 126(6): 364-8.
6. Kuner EH, Kuner A, Schlickewei W, Mullaji AB. Ligamentotaxis with an internal spinal fixator for thoracolumbar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76(1): 107-12.
7. Fredrickson BE, Mann KA, Yuan HA, Lubicky JP. Reduction of the intracanal fragment in experimental burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(3): 267-71.
8. Katonis PG, Kontakis GM, Loupasis GA, Aligizakis AC, Christoforakis JI, Velivassakis EG. Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar spine injuries using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(22): 2352-7.
9. Chang KW. A reduction-fixation system for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(8): 879-86.
10. Hiroyuki A, Tobimatsu H, Nagamoto Y, Horii C, Yamashita T, Furuya M, et al. Risk factors for a kyphosis recurrence after short-segment temporary posterior fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 66: 138-43.
11. Ni WF, Huang YX, Chi Yl, Xu HZ, Lin Y, Wang XY, Huang QS, et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for neurologic intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010; 23(8): 530-7.
12. Tinelli M, Toffer F, Kreinest M, Matschke S, Grützner PA, Suda AJ. Minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous posterior fixation of one-level traumatic thoraco-lumbar and lumbar spine fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28(8): 1581-7.
13. Kocis J, Kelbl M, Kocis T, Navrat T. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018.
14. Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Owens BD, Zeidman SM, Chang AS, Klemme WR. Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(1): 61-5.
15. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994; 3(4): 184-201.
16. Keynan O, Fisher CG, Vaccaro A, Fehlings MG, Oner FC, Dietz J, et al. Radiographic measurement parameters in thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review and consensus statement of the spine trauma study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(5): 156-65.
17. Vanek P, Bradac O, Konopkova R, Lacy P, Lacman J, Benes V. Treatment of thoracolumbar trauma by short-segment percutaneous transpedicular screw instrumentation: prospective comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 20(2): 150-6.
18. Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, Jiang LS. A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol. 2007; 67(3): 221-31.
19. Rodríguez VJ, Lobo EA, Joven AE. Herrera A, Vicente J, Suñén E, et al. Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(8): 1194-201.
20. Xu Y, Zhou X, Yu C, Maohua C, Qirong D, Zhongming Q, et al. Effectiveness of postural and instrumental reduction in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebra fracture. Int Orthop. 2008; 32(3): 361-5.
21. Sjostrom L, Karlstrom G, Pech P, Rauschning W. Indirect spinal canal decompression in burst fractures treated with pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(1): 113-23.
22. Chang HJ, Yu SL, Sang JY, Lee HD, Chung NS. Factors affecting postural reduction in posterior surgery for thoracolumbar burst fracture. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015; 2: 28(4): 225-30.
23. Charles M, James DH, Margaret MM, et al. Rockwood and Greens Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
24. Lieberman JR, Friedlaender GE. Bone Regeneration and Repair: Biology and Clinical application. New Jersey: ANSI; 2014.
25. Chung WH, Eu WC, Chiu CK, Chan CYW, Kwan MK. Minimally invasive reduction of thoracolumbar burst fracture using monoaxial percutaneous pedicle screws: Surgical technique and report of radiological outcome. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020; 28(1): 1-9.
26. Vaccaro AR, Zeiller SC, Hulbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, et al. The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18(3): 209-15.
27. Eysel P, Hopf C, Furderer S. Kyphotic deformation in fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Orthopade. 2001; 30(12): 955-64.
28. Malcolm BW, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Chou SN. Post-traumatic kyphosis. A review 8 of forty-eight surgically treated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63(6): 891-9.