Comparing the Efficacy in Reducing Pelvic Pain Score at 3 Months after Treatment in Clinically Diagnosed Endometriotic Patients between Leuprolide Acetate and Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate: A randomized controlled trial
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 11.25 mg-leuprolide acetate (Enantone L.P.) and 150 mg-intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) (Depo-Progesta) in the reduction of pelvic pain score, satisfaction of the patients after 3 months of treatment and associated side effects.
Materials and Methods: The study design was based on a randomized controlled trial, which was conducted in thirty-six patients who attended gynecologic outpatient department at Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Centre (MSMC). These patients were randomized into two groups, either the 11.25 mg-leuprolide acetate or the DMPA-IM group at their first visit. The pelvic pain scores were gathered by using the numerical rating scale at their first visit and 3 months after treatment. The satisfaction score was gathered by using rating scale 1-10. Side effects were collected data as yes or no. Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate both the efficacy through the improvements in pelvic pain score and patient’s satisfaction score. Finally, Chi-square test was used to evaluate side effects of both medications.
Results: The efficacy to reduce the pelvic pain score was similar between the 11.25 mg- leuprolide acetate and DMPA-IM group after 3 months of treatment. After the treatment, pain score was reduced from 7.00 (6.00, 8.00) [median (interquartile range)] to 2.00 (0.00, 2.00) in leuprolide acetate group and from 8.50 (6.00, 10.00) to 2.00 (2.00, 3.00) in the DMPA-IM group. The median (interquartile range) reduction in pain score was 73.21% (55.56, 100.00) in leuprolide acetate group and 71.43% (60.00, 80.00) in DMPA-IM group. However, this reduction did not show statistical significance between groups. Concerning the secondary objectives of this study, the median (interquartile range) of satisfaction score was 9.00 (7.00, 10.00) in leuprolide acetate group and 8.00 (8.00, 9.00) in DMPA-IM group at 3 months after treatment which were considered high but were not statistically significant between groups. In this study hot flashes were more commonly experienced by the patients in the leuprolide acetate group with statistical significance. In contrast, vaginal spotting was more common in patients of the DMPA-IM group. Other side effects such as night sweat, mood swing and vaginal dryness experienced by these patients were not statistically different between groups.
Conclusion: This double-blinded randomized controlled trial demonstrated that 11.25 mg-Leuprolide acetate was as effective as 150 mg-DMPA-IM in terms of reduction in endometriosis-related pain and patient satisfaction at 3 months after the initial treatment without significant differences.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Fritz MA, Speroff L. Endometriosis. In: Fritz MA, Speroff L, editors. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2011:1211-48.
Vanhie A, D’Hooghe TM. Endometriosis. In Berek JS, Berek DL, editors. Berek & Novak’s gynecology. 15th ed. United States of America: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2012;279-312.
Tanmahasamut P, Noothong S, Sanga-Areekul N, Silprasit K, Dangrat C. Prevalence of endometriosis in women undergoing surgery for benign gynecologic diseases. J Med Assoc Thai 2014;97:147-52.
Winkel CA. Evaluation and management of women with endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:397-408
Cheewadhanaraks S, Peeyananjarassri K, Dhanaworavibul K, Liabsuetrakul T. Positive predicetive value of clinical diagnosis of endometriosis. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:740-4.
Taylor HS, Adamson GD, Diamond MP, Goldstein SB, Horne AW, Missmer SA, et al. An evidence-based approach to assessing surgical versus clinical diagnosis of symptomatic endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;142:131-42.
Dunselman GA, Vermuelen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge CT, D’Hooghe B. De Bie O, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014;29:400-12.
Mahutte NG, Arici A. Medical management of endometriosis-associated pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2003;30:133-50.
Zhou J, Lei ZW, Lü JQ, Sun J, Xu XW. Conservative surgery combined with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in treatment of moderate or severe endometriosis. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2005;40:5-8.
Suen SH, Chan SCS. A Prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of leuprorelin 3 month depot for the treatment of pelvic endometriosis. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery 2005;5:2-9
Baxter N, Black J, Duffy S. The effect of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue as first-line management in cyclical pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:64-6.
Sharpe-Timms KL, Zimmer RL, Jolliff WJ, Wright JA, Nothnick WB, Curry TE. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) therapy alters activity of plasminogen activators, matrix metalloproteinases, and their inhibitors in rat models for adhesion formation and endometriosis: potential GnRH-a–regulated mechanisms reducing adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 1998;69:916-23.
Winkel CA. A cost-effective approach to the management of endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000;12:317-20.
Crosignani PG, Luciano A, Ray A, Bergqvist A. Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Hum Reprod 2006;21:248-56.
Schlaff WD, Carson SA, Luciano A, Ross D, Bergqvist A. Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Fertil Steril 2006;85:314-25.
Mori T, Ito F, Koshiba A, Kataoka H, Takaoka O, Okimura H et al. Local estrogen formation and its regulation in endometriosis. Reprod Med Biol 2019;18:305-11.
Grandi G, Mueller M, Bersinger N, Papadia A, Nirgianakis K, Cagnacci A et al. Progestin suppressed inflammation and cell viability of tumor necrosis factor-α-stimulated endometriotic stromal cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 2016;76:292-8.